« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Since Romney is headed for a landslide victory, isn’t it time to seek a mandate?

As some conservatives contend, Mitt Romney may well be running a timid campaign, but for a decidedly different reason than did John McCain. Given the disaster that has been life under Obama for the last four years, the 2012 GOP presidential nominee could justifiably assume that the only way he could lose to the incumbent would be to commit a huge verbal gaffe. Sadly, too many of our most prominent conservatives in the media spend too much of their precious airtime talking about polls rather than talking about conservative policy prescriptions an attentive electorate could be persuaded to support.

The level of economic suffering that defines life in these United States today rules out the re-election of the man whose policies have obtained in conjunction therewith. I reject the notion that any construction of 47%-ers, much less an electoral majority of 50% plus one desires to maintain the status quo because it would maximize the odds of continuing a subsistence existence sponsored by Uncle Sam’s taxing of the rich. Too many Americans tasted the American Dream of entrepreneurship over the past 15 years for a majority to give up.

In short, the mainstream media polls are a lie, as verified by history; James Carville’s economy, stupid maxim; party registration trends; un-skewed group polls; and the gray-haired lady in the second row of Southern Baptist Church choirs. Are conservatives going to spend the whole election season gnashing their teeth over the latest reports of the death of the Romney/Ryan campaign?

Not this one.

We now have an attentive electorate that has just received 3 and 1/2 years of data once again proving the failure of liberal Democratic Party economic policies. Shouldn’t we seize the reins that Bohners and McConnells have refused to employ to further educate Americans hungry for an answer to their economic malaise? What else do we live for!

Now is the time for conservatives to sing the praises of Buckley, Reagan and Ryan.

The first stanza is about a bubbling crude, oil that is, Black Gold, Texas Tea. You know, the stuff that made a middle class possible. The stuff that empowers soccer moms, NASCAR dads and anyone desiring to travel from point A to point B. The incumbent is on tape declaring that:

We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,” Obama said.

Americans grounded in their homes by high gasoline prices don’t care if other counties say “OK”, kiss my butt, or alahu akbar. They want to go from point A to point B in their car and still have enough money left to buy Le Sueur peas when they get to the grocery store. Mitt Romney wants to unleash Americans to extract American resources and raise their standard of living and to hell with what other countries say.

The second stanza amends the Endangered Species Act to value the private sector human species over the government bureaucrats whose taxpayer-funded salaries depend upon killing jobs to protect rats and snail darters. Let’s let some lawyers be furloughed from their licensed monopoly to fend for themselves in the non-licensed level playing field where the quality of the product one sells determines their lot.

The third stanza eschews appealing to Americans based upon skin color, genitalia, and who one wishes to have sexual intercourse with. You think the replacement referees in the NFL are a travesty? Our government’s main duty, after defending us against enemies abroad, is to be a neutral umpire enforcing  due process and equal protection under the Rule of Law rather than granting favors to a new type of aristocracy replacing the one we fought a war of Independence to rid ourselves of.

Aren’t we tired of the tired and meaningless language of whose “winning” and “losing” today and everyday based upon land line telephone calls from someone named Quinnipiac? Does it ever occur to anyone that whoever wins was always in the process of winn-ing? Does it ever occur to anyone that actual votes and not what people say to Rasmussen in September actually determines to whom we entrust the nukes and the making and enforcing of laws?

It does to this rooster and after announcing dawn each day, we tire of vacuous babblings that elevate irrelevant people that build nothing. Aren’t we conservatives because we revere actual achievement and desire laws that foster it.

I thought so, so why not actually use the precious little time we have on this earth advancing that. Just saying and more later.

Mike DeVine

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Editor - Hillbilly Politics

Co-Founder and Editor - Political Daily

Atlanta Law & Politics columnist –  Examiner.com

COMMENTS

  • PatriotForLiberty

    ^^^ This is brilliant and exactly what we need to keep repeating until Election Day! We love Le Sueur peas and to hell with what other countries say… just got a few cans at the store in honor of this post! :)

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    ‘berty, you made my day. more later

  • mobjack

    Which stage of grief is this? Denial?

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    “We now have an attentive electorate that has just received 3 and half
    years of data proving the failure of liberal Democratic Party policies.
    Shouldn’t we seize the reins that Bohners and McConnells have refused
    to employ to further educate Americans hungry for an answer to their
    economic malaise? What else do we live for!”

    We need a Braveheart to stand up and speak that truth. The Tea Party did it for a while, and then the Republican beltway types said “Well, that was nice, now sit down and watch professionals do it.”

    Well, after a demolition derby of a presidential primary, we have a ham-strung campaign up against the most biased media ever.

    The Tea Party needs to rev up its engines and starts making some noise again. If not before, AT LEASE on election day!!!

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Ah yes – polls dictate elections. Right. This is for you:

    Starting in 1992, EVERY Pew poll appears to lean to one direction — always
    towards the Democrat, and by an average of more than 5 percentage
    points. Worse this is a reflection of the “final” poll which even the
    Democratic firm, Public Policy Polling, usually gets right.

    October 1988 — Bush 50 Dukakis 42; Actual Result Bush +7.6 (Call this one spot on.)

    Late October 1992 — Clinton 44 Bush 34; Actual Result :Clinton +5.5 (Skew against Republican candidate +5.5)

    November 1996 — Clinton +51 Dole 32; Actual Result Clinton +8.5 (Skew against Republican candidate +10.5)

    November 2000 — Gore 45; Bush 41 (Skew against Republican Candidate +3.5)

    November 2004 — Kerry 46; Bush 45 (Skew against Republican Candidate +3.4)

    November 2008 — Obama 50 McCain 39 (Skew against Republican + 3.8)

  • commonsenseobserver

    Carter was a highly successful two-term President?

  • kcdude

    Good job Gamecock! My hope is that Romney’s debate performance will help move this whole thing forward.

  • pliny

    I don’t know where those figures came from, but I don’t think they are right. Polls have been pretty accurate – you can see the record for 2004 and 2008.

    Pew was one of the accurate ones, with Bush 51:48 in 2004 (0.6% in favor of Bush) and Obama 52:46 in 2008, erring 1.3% on McCain’s side.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Denial is the stage Obama is in with respect to that country where the river by that name flows. My stage of grief is at the Le Sueur pea stage, which product I can’t afford thx to Democrats.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    thx kc’, the turning of the Earth moves this whole thing forward. The only way Obama doesn’t lose is if the Earth stops turning before Election Day!

  • http://www.justintribble.com Justin Tribble

    The issue is likability. Romney must shift the narrative himself. He must make this debate about *him*. About *Mitt Romney*.”

    Not about Obama, about him.

    This is so important I cannot say it enough or emphasize it enough.

    He *must* use this debate to defend himself, vigoriously. Hit back against the character assassination. Hit back against the media bias. Plead his case. Explain himself. Describe why he is a good man. Reassure the people he doesn’t just “care about the rich”. Admit to it, awknowledge that people think he’s out of touch, directly address it.

    He must explain that he’s a humble guy and doesn’t like to brag about his personal life — but that he’s given millions to charity and he’s sick of being described as a “scrooge” — he’s sick of it! “It’s not true, they just lie about me and I’m going to defend myself!”

    And get aggressive: “We better get serious or this country is finished. I’m not a great politician, I’m not even a great campaigner — but I’m great at working hard and streamlining big organizations, and that’s what I’ll do with our bloated, fat, joke of a Federal Government, and I’ll kick Congress’ ass and get them to work. I did it in Massechusetts, a super liberal state run by Democrats, and I’ll do it as president.”

    “I want to get in the White House and get to work right away, that’s what I do, I get behind the desk and work. This campaign stuff isn’t my forte. Pandering and telling people what they want to hear isn’t what I’m good at, in fact, I’m pretty lousy at it; I’m just good at getting things done.”

    Say those lines, he wins the debate!

    This is pivitol. Hit back hard and defend yourself. Worry about Obama in the next debates.

    If I were advising him, I would advise him to say “Obama” no more than once — and to say “this president” no more than once, if at all. If he must, say “administration” instead.

    To him, Obama’s just a “bump in the road.”

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Good ideas Justin.

  • Pingback: Renetta Servidio

  • Pingback: Theron Rosenthal

  • Pingback: Jenifer Baiotto

  • Pingback: Hien Jou

  • Pingback: edu links

  • Pingback: Paul Cozzy

  • Pingback: Lane Reindeau