« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Days of Infamy from Pearl to Benghazi

FDR et al's total victories vs Obama et al's appeasement

 

Today, December 7, 1941, we remember the waking of a sleeping giant by megalomaniacs ruling the former Empire of Japan. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt  declared the sneak attack at Pearl Harbor that killed more Americans on their own soil than at any time since the War Between the States, until September 11, 2001. The pain of the infamous deaths of that day and the thousands that followed in WWII has eased with time, but also because the United States was led to total victory over the attackers of that day as well as Hitler’s NAZIs and Mussolini’s Fascists.

Sadly, soon after V-J (see above pic in Times Square) and V-E days, Uncle Joe Stalin was appeased and an Iron Curtain built enslaving Eastern Europe, the protestations of General Patton notwithstanding, thus ushering in an era of Republican ascendancy built on anti-Communism that disgraced Democratic Party eggheads and their Alger Hiss. But even the much-liked Republican Ike architect of total victory from D-Day to the Battle of the Bulge refused to affirm MacArthur’s returns in Korea.

JFK turned the tide against Soviet missiles in 13 days in Cuba but LBJ betrayed American troops in Vietnam before a Democratic Party Congress betrayed the Hmong while reversing Nixon’s gains there post-Watergate. It took a Republican Reagan to get USSR walls torn down after the next Democrat had publicly deemed fears of Communism inordinate before Afghanistan’s last invasion in the 20th Century.

Saddam is left in power lest a Republican H.W. be unable to boast of a coalition with Syria just before a peace dividend and Monica Lewinsky divert attention from al Qaeda and its progenitors in NYC, Somalia, Khobar Towers and African embassies.

Dubya avenges 9/11 and surges in Iraq, only to have victory in the latter  and progress in the former treated like Sandra’s Flukey used Obama rubber. Osama bin Laden is killed prompting angels to sing of al Qaeda’s demise. Nothing to see in Benghazi.

Persian Spring blooms but there are Mullahs that remain unbowed to. Nothing to see in the streets of Tehran. Hillary restores diplomacy with “moderate” Assads. Nothing to see in Damascus. Arab Springs with tweets in Cairo, as John McCain’s friend Hillary’s and Barack’s hooded “moderate” Muslim brothers and sisters go “democratic”, with Hamas ceasefires lest all their rockets get smashed, with a little moderate Sharia law on the side. But they were “elected”!

And Barack Obama killed Osama bin Laden? But Democrats, didn’t guns kill him, just as American gun culture killed a linebacker’s main squeeze last week?

Meanwhile a drastic sequester of the Arsenal of Democracy looms with former leaders of a less free world retired and their successor leading from behind while locking up movie producers and greeting caskets in Delaware.

Security requests of Hillary for weeks in Libya? More marines in Paris than Benghazi? Pleas for help for seven hours at the consulate? Nothing to see there post-Candy Crowley and America’s most infamous re-election and the only future total victory kisses in Times Square likely for the next four years would be those celebrating Chief Justice John Roberts’ next legacy ruling for haters of same-sex marriage in Georgetown.

Mike DeVine

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Editor – Hillbilly Politics

Co-Founder and Editor – Political Daily

Atlanta Law & Politics columnist – Examiner.com

COMMENTS

  • bgintn

    Mike DeVine Sir;

    A National Cemetery is close to me.
    Spent some time today to walk through the headstones reading names, under the half mast flag, thinking.

    Why do I seem to see that the mess right now in the Middle East is deliberate?

    As World War II was how the World got out of the Great Depression.
    Are they setting up for World War III to get out of this current World Great Depression?

    Things are awful close to being the same, history repeating itself?

  • Viet71

    A rhetorical question re December 7, 1941: Did Roosevelt know the attack was coming?

    In “Day of Deceit”, Robert Stinnett argues persuasively he must have known. The argument is based largely on what was known in 1999 (when “Day of Deceit” was published) of the U.S. intercepts and decryption of the Japanese naval and diplomatic codes in late November and early December 1941.

    A fair reading of the historical record shows Roosevelt sacrificed Admiral Kimmel and General Short to cover for his own malefactions.

    Stinnett has his detractors for sure. But they merely nip at his heel.

  • bgintn

    As those that are being sacrificed today as well?

  • Viet71

    Surely.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    I will eventually read that book, but I suspect that the most FDR “knew” was that Japan eventually intended to attack us somewhere and that he did not know of the plan to attack Pearl specifically. I can’t accept any intentional “sacrifice” absent DIRECT evidence. We didn’t have a Navy that didn’t have places vulnerable to attack. But I’ll read the book.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    ‘tn, I don’t accept a premise that assumes American leaders have ever manipulated us into war to stimulate the economy.

  • checkmate2012

    GC, I think Viet71 is correct & FDR not only knew in it advance, but provoked the Japanese in order to join WWII that he promised Americans he wouldn’t do unless we were attacked. It’s not all conspiracy theory. Read this from the U.S. Naval Instititute where it’s just one indication of pre-planning of the Red Cross in HI…fascinating:

    http://www.usni.org/magazines/navalhistory/1999-06/advance-warning-red-cross-connection

    Also, Churchill wrote that FDR knew in his book, The Grand Alliance.
    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/fdrknew.html

  • streiff

    well said, Mike. Completely agree.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    thx check’, and will study further.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Appreciate you brother

  • streiff

    The US started a peacetime draft in the summer of 1940. The remembered stories of minor players aside, no reputable scholar has ever found evidence that Roosevelt knew any more about Pearl Harbor than Bush knew about 9/11, which is to say nothing. This subject has been studied exhaustively and always with the same result. Yes, everyone knew that hostilities with Japan were possible. No, there was no evidence of a time/place for the attack.

  • bgintn

    Mike Sir, not so much the “American Leaders” they are just pawns in the game so to speak. That is why in stressed World in my post. I was looking at a bigger picture. Those names on the headstones covered the world and got me to thinking about WW II and now.

  • checkmate2012

    I wasn’t trying to spread conspiracy theories as that’s my nature thus provided what I consider reliable sources. The U.S. Naval Instititute is hardly a tin hat website or organization. I hope you have time to read the article (it’s long), while not absolute proof, provides some interesting perspective…same with Churchill’s book. I 100% agree with you on 9/11 and Bush.

  • streiff

    the first article admits it isn’t reliable for the simple reason there is no evidence it ever happened. I really don’t care what someone allegedly told his daughter. That doesn’t rise to the level of hearsay. The underlying thesis is just profoundly stupid. That FDR sent medical supplies to Hawaii to treat civilian casualties but didn’t warn the military command or send medical supplies there. I don’t even know how to explain how dumb that is. If FDR wanted casus belli then max civilian casualties would be what he desired.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Too much b-gin’, ‘tn?