Sotomayor Sessions Un-Hatch Hatch [updated]
By: Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) | July 25th at 10:48 AM |
For the first time ever, GOP Judiciary Committee veteran will vote against a Supreme Court nominee South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham is now the leader of a, thankfully smaller, Republican group of Senators equating the consequences of presidential elections with repeal of advise and consent clause and fealty to Oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. When Justice David Souter announced his retirement in May, this column | Read More »
Graham must defer to Constitution, not Sotomayor’s causes
By: Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) | July 18th at 09:02 AM |
Yes Lindsey, elections have consequences, including those of U.S. Senators and not just Presidents. And shouldn’t the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, its amendments and the Oath to uphold it have consequences too? [This is part three of DeVine Law series during Sotomayor nomination hearings. Parts one, two and columns prior to the hearings are here.] I speak, of course, of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) | Read More »
Sotomayor Sessions on Race and Judicial Activism [updated]
By: Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) | July 12th at 04:13 PM |
Democrats should own race-based injustice label after Supreme Court nomination hearing [For Update/Second DeVine Law report on Sotomayor hearing, see Sotomayor as Toto-deny-or] The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution demands equal protection for all persons. The Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. dreamed of a society based on character content judgments and supported the 1964 Civil Rights Act which prohibits discrimination against individuals based | Read More »