« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The REALLY BIG question about the 2012 nomination: If Palin does NOT run, who would she endorse, and when? Could it be game, set, match ( for Bachman) early on?

I have absolutely NO idea if Sarah Palin intends to run for the WH. Not a clue. But it’s really intriguing to consider what happens if she chooses NOT to run.

Palin will continue to maintain her high profile. She was very successful in backing candidates in 2010. No doubt she’ll continue to do so. She wants to be a major force in GOP politics, a king-maker.  She retains a solid, hard core constituency of support in the GOP base, easily 30%, possibly   as much as 40% of likely voters. They are passionate about her, her beliefs, and are willing to devote their time AND their $$$ to whoever she supports.  Again, this was demonstrated time and time again in 2008.

So it’s quite natual to wonder, if not herself, then who?

Of the GOP field to date, both announced, and those  not quite yet there, one could reasonably assume that there are  FIVE who she could feel truly reflect her conservative philosophy:

Bachman, Cain, Pawlenty, Santorum, and Perry.

Anybody see another possibility? She might be waiting to see what, if anything, Paul Ryan does.

Absent that theory, what then  might she do?

The Iowa straw poll is just around the corner. It often reflects ( 3 of the last 5 times) who will win the caucuses the following year. And this year, because of heightened interest, it’s expected that around 25%, if not more,  of next year’s caucus goers will vote in the straw poll next month. That’s BIG.

And Michelle Bachman will win the straw poll comfortably. That effectively takes Santorum and Pawlenty out of the running.

So suppose right after the Iowa straw poll, Palin endorses Michelle Bachman. The GOP CONSERVATIVE SISTERHOOD ROCKS!!! Announces she’ll be chairWOMAN  (g) of her campaign. Hits the road hard for her. Raises theBIG $$$.  Everything she did in 2008, just 100x more magnified, and MORE effective.

All the oxygen for the other candidates disappears from the room. And forget about any of them trying to get any media coverage.

Bachman would be the front runner by a wide margin in every poll thereafter. Most of the others in the field would soon drop out.

Let’s fast-forward to just after the 2011 third quarter fund raising results are released.  Bachman, I expect will have a huge lead, surpassing even Mitt, and Perry. She’d be well ahead in the polls in  Iowa, and possibly even, or close to it, in New Hampshire.

And then the other shoe drops.

Nikki Haley soon announces that she’s also endorsing Palin,and  well in advance of the South Carolina primary.

So there you have it. Bachman wins Iowa, finishes close to Mitt in NH ( Palin will help her there, big time) which really hurts Mitt, and she comfortably wins in South Carolina, and then immediately steamrolls right into my state, Florida, where she’ll easily win.

That’s it.  Game, set, and match…..er, nomination. Girl power, GOP style..version 2012.

Could easily happen..it’s a very viable path to the nomination for Michelle.

And what it really does is make us think hard about what Sarah will do if she doesn’t run herself.

COMMENTS

  • acat

    Fourth paragraph up from the end, you said “Nikki Haley soon announces that she

    • gawken

      you can edit my next piece..LOL

      Your scenario with Perry is as plausible. I was having some fun with the idea of a ladies’ movement of sorts..but the key point is that Palin can, if and when she chooses to act..really move this thing along..

      • acat

        Or, maybe a club is more accurate…. the media can and will try to split off more “moderate” (especially FiCon) GOPers by pointing out that “Candidate X pals around with Palin”. Guilt by association and, if it doesn’t work, they’ll start recycling the same lies and half-truths we’ve already seen on Red State.

        Oh, and my rate for copy-editing for a friend is $50/hour. Please remit. (cheshire grin)

        Mew

        (you do not want to know what I charge non-friends)

      • rightwingmom52

        Besides, cat himself confused 2 posters here at redstate tonight – rightwingnut2 and me, rightwingmom52. He’s hardly one to point a paw at you for doing the same thing.

        Also, my husband says I’m really good at pointing out others’ mistakes (I take that as a compliment).

    • BA Cyclone

      …they might know a little bit about the lay of the land I guess.

      Perry jumps in, he

  • nvrepub

    a Romney-Bachman ticket. Most likely outcome. They’d raise huge sums of money, and it would unite both wings of the party – the moderate/establishment wing, and the tea party.

    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      won’t unite anybody. The VP doesn’t matter. Romney is a younger, squishier version of John McCain.

      • Wayne

        would be a big disappointment for me personally. 1) It would illuminate Bachmann as a “political animal” instead of a Constitutional conservative that I perceive her to be at this writing and; 2) I have no respect for Romney as a conservative in any category.

        Perry-Bachmann would be much more palatable.

        • acat

          Same exact problems, better geographic spread plus Hispanic outreach.

          Mew

      • izoneguy

        Romney is just a better looking McCain.

        Neither Bachmann or Rubio will taint their careers standing next to Romney.

  • rightwingnut2

    Don’t forget…Bachmann’s campaign manager, Ed Rollins spent his first two days on the job attacking Sarah Palin’s intelligence. I doubt that went unnoticed by Palin. Furthermore, members of the House of Representatives do not get nominated.

    I’m going to bite my tounge a little on this one, because I have no desire to bash Bachmann. However, I will say she’s not nearly as popular among the base here in MN as she is nationwide. i live in her district, and only know two people who support her for president. One of them is a friend of hers, the other would switch to Palin in a heartbeat if given the opportunity. She’s seen as a reliable conservative vote in the house, but the people who know her best are not taking her candidacy seriously.

    I don’t want to rain on the parade of Bachmann supporters, but I know a lot about her. The op-researchers are likely having a field day with what they’re finding.

    Don’t shoot the messenger.

  • rightwingnut2

    I meant to elaborate on my view of the current field.

    Cain and Pawlenty are struggling with fundraising,

    Paul will get his usual 5-7%, Johnson is a joke,

    Santorum is a good conservative, but has no shot,

    Newt blew his chances on Meet The Press weeks ago,

    McCotter only polls at 1%…..in Michigan.

    It’s a sad state of affairs if your not a fan of Mitt Romney.

    • acat

      Specifically, do the supporters of each of the candidates you named, Cain, Pawlenty, Paul, Johnson, Santorum, Newt, and McCotter, have the flexibility to throw their support over to another candidate early enough for it to matter….

      If not, all Romney has to do is to stay in the race, and let the conservatives defeat ourselves .. again.. and know the whole time that we’ll have to support him in the general.

      Mew

      • rightwingnut2

        …that isn’t in the race yet. I dont think any of those listed can pull it off. Do you?

        As it stands, Romney won’t even work up a sweat. Then we’ll be forced to listen to every elected GOP official defend RomneyCare for 9 months.

        • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

          You won’t find GOP officials – at least those running for office – defending RomneyCare. The best he’ll get is silence.

          And the illustrious Governor of Texas could be positioned to pull it off.

        • acat

          Perry has as good or better a record than Pawlenty.
          Perry is as good or better a public speaker than Bachmann or Cain.
          Perry is nowhere near as nuts as Ron Paul(!) or as libertarian as Johnson.
          Unlike McCotter and Santorum, Perry has already got enough stature that the media can’t ignore or pigeonhole him.

          Don’t know that he can win, but he’d be quite good.

          Mew

          • izoneguy

            You mean against Obama???

            Bahhhahhhhahhaahhhhahahha

      • rightwingmom52

        Not that I haven’t been called a right=wing nut or that I don’t claim to be one, but I didn’t make these comments.

        For the record, I like Bachmann. A lot. And I don’t like Romney. At all.

        • acat

          !

          • acat

            the names rightwingmom52 and rightwingnut2 follow the same rules as in this old bit…

            Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn

    • Wayne

      After the Meet the Press gaff I’ve had the opportunity to hear and see Newt elaborate on his positions. While I am not excited about him as a candidate I would choose him over Romney in a heartbeat. Though the question would be “what’s the difference”. My answer is simply that New’s knowledge and experience as a politician in Washington might be a better advantage than Romney as an alternative. Not a very good reason, but one just the same. If the party picks a RINO, it seems to me at this writing, Newt is the least of the evils.

      • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

        He has virtually no campaign staff and can’t raise money. And now the commentators are starting to make fun of him. Once they’re poking fun at a candidate, you’ve got a single serving of toast.

        And he’d be worse than Romney. He’s on a par with Ron Paul as far as being President is concerned.

        • Wayne

          !