« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Senate Dems throw a tantrum – upset about their upcoming loss of Senate control

At the same time that the Senate Dems were busy tabling the CCB legislation:

1. Harry Reid was loudly complaining to his caucus that he knew absolutely nothing about any so-called talks between Obama and Boehner. “And”, he said, “I’m the Majority leader, fer pete’s sake..”

2. The hard core liberal Senate Dems were all up in arms at reports that a posssible deal included BIG spending cuts NOW.

The Dem caucus..they’re looking around, realizing that their majority is going the way of the dodo next year, and for many of the old bull hard core core liberal Dems, this is their last swansong. And they’re especially riled up because they know that Obama will sell them out in a split second to get re-elected.

So, they’re determined to enact every part of their agenda they can, and block any and all GOP efforts to pass legislation that can also pass the House.

And unlike the House, where the Dem caucus kept on their defeated chief ideologue, Nancy Pelosi, as Minority leader, senate Dems will NOT retain Reid. There’s going to be a steel-cage match in the Dem caucus between Schumer and Durbin for the minority leader spot, and that’s partly why the Dem caucus is so intractible. After 2012, it will be far more liberal, far more dogmatic, far more hard left, and if you want to run that herd, you have to appeal to them.  A losing army first licks its wounds, then looks arouind for someone else to blame.

So, don’t look for, let alone expect, any reasonableness or a modicum of common sense from the Senate Dems.

COMMENTS

  • izoneguy

    They lost and will continue to lose because of their free-spending ways.

    ObamaCare will get cut.
    Frank-Dodd will be rolledbacked
    And Obama’s new Consumer Protection Agency will never
    see the light of day.

    The US has just wasted Trillions on a failed socialist experiment.

    Time to MOVE-ON

  • YnotNOW

    Will indeed be the minority, but very very liberal. And therefore very likely to be able to maintain a filibuster. Our path to conservative legislation and budgets will still not be smooth….

    • Spiral

      I have written many diaries on the need to eliminate the Senate filibuster rule in 2013.

      We can not allow 41 Maxist Democrat US Senators to block the conservative agenda.

      • Spiral

        Another option is to give all Democrat Senators a one-way ticket to Greece. That’s where they belong.

        Actually, Greece is probably too good for them.

      • gekster

        Didn’t go over last time, and it won’t this time.

        whup….whup….whup….whup
        c’mon silver, get up, dang it.
        whup….whup….whup….whup
        What’s wrong with this nag.
        whup….whup….whup….whup
        whup….whup….whup….whup

        • Spiral

          Mark your calendar.

          It’s January 2013. Rick Perry is President. The GOP has won control of the US Senate, with a 55 to 45 seat margin as a result of the 2012 elections. The GOP retained its majority in the US House.

          43 of the 45 Democrat US Senators announce their intentions to filibuster any legislation that attempts to reduce speding on Medicare, Social Security or Medicaid. Also, they announce their intention to filibuster any judicial nominee who do not support Roe versus Wade and affirmative action programs.

          Every conservative radio talk show host in the country will be doing as they did in 2005, demanding that the GOP Senate junk the filibuster to end Democrat obstructionism.

          Count on it.

          • gekster

            anyone with a brain won’t want either side, ours or thiers, to have that much power and control.
            If they junk it, then they will be fools.
            We will not control the Senate forever, as has been shown,
            and like I say, no one party should have that stick.

          • Spiral

            So, you think that if there is a President Perry in 2013 and a GOP controlled House and GOP controlled Senate (with 55 Republicans and 45 Democrats) that conservatives will accept a situation where 41 Democrats can defeat all of President Perry’s judicial nominees unless they are as liberal as Elena Kagan. And you think the GOP will allow 41 Democrat US Senators block all conservative legislation unless the GOP waters the conservative legislation down to the point that it satisfies the Democrats.

            You think that, in response, conservatives around the country would sit tight and accept the filibuster as more important than anything else?

            Ok. You are entitled to your opinion.

          • gekster

            You just don’t get it, and you never will.
            Keep going and you will earn the monicer homer.

          • cwilson

            “Every conservative radio talk show host in the country will be doing as they did in 2005, demanding that the GOP Senate junk the filibuster to end Democrat obstructionism.”

            No, Spiral, that’s NOT what the talk show hosts were advocating in 2005. They were saying the filibuster should not apply to JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS.

            No prominent talk show host was advocating the elimination of the filibuster in its entirety. In fact, that was one of their opponent’s talking points: “If you eliminate it for judicial nominations, then that’s a slippery slope to complete elimination, and you guys don’t want that.”

  • steve010

    sometimes, but the stupidest action the (D)s took was to ignore the statutory requirement to raise the debt ceiling. They could have repealed that requirement easily in 2009 without much political cost. The (D)s will never again have the opportunity to evade the debt ceiling with their out of control spending. The other stupid thing they did was not bringing up the Bush tax cuts when they had the majority in the house and 60 in the Senate. Instead, they were rabidly focused on Obamacare, dumb. Again they could have raised taxes without the GOP being able to stop it. I think they thought that if they did these things that they might lose a few seats in the house. What a bunch of jerks.