« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

“Six degrees of separation” 2012: Did Ozzie Guillen just wrap up the WH for Mitt?

As Ozzie Guillen’s public self-hoisting-on-his-own-petard continue too farfetched to surmise that the whole matter may have far reaching, and very unintended consquences: to wit, just about making sure that Mitt wins the White House this November.

After his election in 2008, Obama’s coronation in 2012 was being promoted in the MSM as inevitable..heck, we might as well cancel the election and use the money saved to reduce the deficit. Along with that, the GOP was being consigned to the dust bin  of political history, along with the Whigs.

Well, a funny thing happened on the way to that party. Actually, lots of things….Obamacare, TARP, the economy, jobs, gas prices, the Arab spring, Fast and Furious, Solyndra, the Tea Party, the 2010 election……well, you get the idea.

And soon after the 2010 vote, the shellshocked Dems began to float the idea that while Obama might not be the lock for the previously viewed as inevitable electoral landslide in 2012, they supposedly weren’t too worried because Obama had lots of “alternative pathways” to an Electoral College majority.

To that, I say pure, unadulterated, bulls**t…..

There is no really plausible pathway to an electoral win for Obama WITHOUT HIS WINNING FLORIDA.  Let me repeat that.

WITHOUT FLORIDA, OBAMA CAN’T BE RE-ELECTED. PERIOD.

To assume that Obama could, for instance, lose Florida, yet win North Carolina and/or Indiana is a 100:1 shot, at best.

And I am very positive about the GOP winning Florida. The state has trended RED since 2008. Gov Scott is doing a good job, the economy is beginning to turn around. We are going to retire Bill Nelson this November as well.

But we can’t take anything for granted, and must wage a vigorous campaign, from the top to the bottom of the ticket.

The Trayvon Martin incident is receiving a lot of attention nationally as race baiters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson attempt to once again inflame the passions of their base. And they will do so successfully, for they are very good at it, but it will blow up in their faces. Obama is going to get the votes of 95% of blacks regardless, but the Martin matter may enable Dems to increase turnout among blacks, which had dropped of in 2010, from the historic levels of the 2008 vote. This will help them.

However, the other major constituency which Dems rely on heavily is Latinos. Which brings us to Ozzie Guillen.

Latinos are a diverse group. There are Mexicans, Venezuelans, Dominicans, etc. And then there are the Cubans. People outside of Florida, especially outside of south Florida,  have no understanding of just how deep the loathing, the detestation, of Fidel Castro is in the Cuban community.

For Guillen, the manager of the Miami ( actually, little Havana, where the new stadium is ) Marlins, to publicly state his admiration for Castro ( and along the way, throw in a few nice words about Hugo Chavez) is about as damaging as if Arik  Shivek, the very popular manager of the Israeli national basketball team, said that he admired the way that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had managed to stay in power.

The Dems, the left, in this country have long had an infatuation with Fidel Castro. Going all the way back to Herbert L. Matthews, whose glowing portrayal of Castro as a mere “agrarian reformer” was ably satirized by National Review  (“How I got my job through the NY Times.”) the left has always adored Fidel.

Guillen’s stupid comments have brought the issue of Castro, and those in this country who support him, back to the forefront of the political discussion. And perhaps it is even more important today, as the future of a post-Castro Cuba, and the role of the US in restoring democracy to that islands, becomes  more and more likely with each passing month.

I watched all of Guillen’s press conference today, and the most tellig part was when he described the “women in white” those Cuban women here in the states who wear white to remember their sons, brothers, husbands who have suffered death, imprisonment, torture at the tender hands of Fidel. This story, and many more like it, will now become nationalized.

Here in Florida, the Cuban community has for the most part supported Republicans, but the Dems have been making inroads of late, because of various policies designed to appeal to Latinos.

No more. You will see an engaged, and enraged, Cuban community in south Florida, and they will take maximum advantage of the one way they can express their displeasure of Castro, and anyone and anything that supports him, or speak well of his regime….at the ballot box.

I make no pretense of expertise in analyzing demographics, but I expect that the Cuban American vote in Florida in 2012 will  be 100,000+ more than in 2008, and that the GOP will easily capture a significant percentage of that increase.

Coupled with increasing voter dissatisfaction with Obama, for the whole host of reasons, and the Dems have virtually no chance of taking Florida this November

And they can thus forget any chance of re-electing Obama.

Ozzie Guillen???..OZZIE GUILLEN???….Who’d have thunk it??

COMMENTS

  • Viet71

    n/t

  • mikeymike143

    trust me, castro is hated down here by anyone that lived under his tyranny. and i live in boca raton so i have seen plenty of local coverage about this incident. its not looking good for guillen.

  • GregInFla

    2008 North Carolina: Libertarian Party candidate Barr gets 25,419 votes, allowing Obama to get 49.9 percent of the vote and take North Carolina. If McCain gets 15,000 of those Barr votes, McCain takes North Carolina.

    2008 Indiana: Third party candidates get 29,186 votes, allowing Obama to get 49.9 percent of the vote and take North Carolina. If McCain gets 26,200 of those Barr votes, McCain takes Indiana.

    2008 Minnesota Senate Race: Franken loses but wins the recount. Constitution and Libertarian party candidates got 22,000 votes. Franken wins and is vote 60 for Obamacare.

    Numbers courtesy NY Times

    • acat

      the various campaigns plan to shiv Gary Johnson.

      So far, I haven’t heard a really solid reply, although Team Santorum seemed content to raise the middle finger toward libertarians…

      Mew

      • GregInFla

        a vote for the Libertarian is a vote for the most liberal candidate. Sorry, but the numbers don’t lie. The question needs to be how is Paul Johnson going to help get Obama out of office. Ron Paul has a big following down here in Florida. Since he ran as a GOP, he needs to support the GOP candidate. Johnson did the same, so I have some issues with him on this topic. This take-your-ball-and-go-home attitude is not healthy.

        • lapert

          I don’t think the numbers necessarily say what you say they do. You are assuming all libertarians would have voted for McCain if not for Barr (or not voted at all) – but that seems suspect at best. If even 20% of the libertarian voters aren’t doing it because they want smaller government but because they want legal drugs (which to me seems low for that population) than it doesn’t turn either Indiana or North Carolina.

          Rather than worry about a third party whose voters who are unpredictable by nature and quite marginal and shouldn’t get any attention at all you would be better served focusing on how the GOP candidate can run a half point better nationwide to turn those states.

          • texastaxpayer

            http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/03/obama-up-three-to-eight-nationally.html

            Numbers from March 22nd…

            Q8 If the candidates for President this year were Democrat Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney, who would you vote for?
            Barack Obama………………………………………… 48%
            Mitt Romney……………………………………………. 44%
            Undecided………………………………………………. 8%

            Q10 If the candidates for President this year were Democrat Barack Obama, Republican Mitt Romney, and Libertarian Gary Johnson, who would you vote for?
            Barack Obama………………………………………… 46%
            Mitt Romney……………………………………………. 39%
            Gary Johnson …………………………………………. 7%
            Undecided………………………………………………. 8%

            While the undecided number remains unaffected Obama loses 2% while Romney losses 5% with Gary Johnson included.

          • lapert

            Since it is highly unlikely Johnson will get 7% in any state, let alone nationally (it would be more than 6 times the best performance ever for the party and 14 times any result since 1980), we might want to dig a level to see what this poll is actually a reflection of.

            Interestingly enough, if you assume that the support distribution holds around 70% GOP for those that did/will actually vote Libertarian – you still don’t have enough votes to change the outcomes in NC or IN last time.

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            To properly argue that Gary Johnson will get 7% in 2012, you need to do two things.

            1) Go back a few elections. Calculate the Mean and SD of Libertarian Party performance in those elections. You will then note the obvious. Based on this distribution, Chebechev and several other famous statisticians would project Johnson’s likelyhood of getting 7% is equal to a decimal point, more than two or three zeroes, and then a significant digit.

            2) Once you’ve noted that Gary Johnson has effectively no chance of replicating the 7% performance predicted in the poll referenced above, you cant hen painstakingly explain why election 2012 is going to be several orders of magnitude better for Libertarian Party candidates than any of the past seven or eight contests.

          • Finrod

            Polling registered voters always leans towards the Democrats, because statistically Republicans are more likely to go vote. Also, Obama’s and Romney’s poll numbers are within the margin of error in the poll (which I’m rounding from 3.3 to 4, because their poll numbers don’t give decimal points).

        • acat

          Compare how George H.W. Bush reacted to Ross Perot with how Ronald Reagan reacted to Jon Anderson.

          How does Romney emulate Reagan here?

          Johnson has a much better case for being a candidate than Ron Paul ever did…. and Team Obama know darn well that any support Johnson picks up comes at Romney’s expense.

          Your assertion that “Johnson should support Romney” is meaningless… when has Ron Paul supported the GOP nominee? I also have some issues, although the inclusion of Huntsman and exclusion of Johnson in early debates seems .. hinky.

          The point, though, is that Johnson could be a credible fiscal conservative / libertarian threat on Romney’s right flank, and enough protest votes could cost Romney the race in a 1992-style (or 1968-style, if you like) plurality.

          How Romney addresses this matters, and to date nobody’s taking it seriously.

          Mew

          • GregInFla

            He cannot have Johnson as his VP (different party). My point was that NC and IN going Obama in 2008 was more due to third-party votes than Florida going Obama. And I am sorry, but I think Johnson has less a chance to nominate a SCOTUS (the true prize of POTUS) justice than Romney, and vote for third-party is a vote for the most radical alternative. A vote for Perot was a vote for Clinton. Those third-party voters in MN got what they deserved, and we ALL are paying for it with Obamacare. The facts canot be denied.