« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

GOP takes the Senate – highly likely; McConnell is the next majority leader – not if he doesn’t promote the conservative agenda

It is all but a given that the GOP will take control of the Senate this November. I’m in no way suggesting that we be complacent, rather we must redouble our efforts to elect true conservatives who will begin to restore sanity to our government.

But it is a worthwhile exercise to begin to contemplate the make-up of the next GOP Senate caucus, and what it portends for the furtherance of the conservative agenda.

The GOP now has 47 senators.  I believe that all GOP incumbents will win reelection. Also, the GOP will flip the following SEVEN seats:

Florida, Missouri, Montana, N. Dakota, Ohio, Virginia, Wisconsin.

In addition, I believe we can take one or two of the following states:

Michigan, Minnesota, W. Virginia, Hawaii, Connecticut, New Mexico

But we won’t assume any of these. Thus, the next GOP caucus will consist of  54 members. It will take 28 to elect the next majority leader.

So let’s divide the caucus into two camps, and let’s call them the “New Breed” and the “Old Guard”  based on their voting histories and establishment ties, and their perceived willingness in the past to “just go along..” ( including loyalty to McConnell)

Old Guard: McConnell, Blunt, Cornyn, Shelby, Murkowski, McCain, Chambliss, Isakson, Grassley, Roberts, Collins, Brown,  Cochran, Wicker, Graham, Alexander, Hatch

Total:  17

New Breed: Thune, Barasso, Sessions, Boozman, Rubio, Crapo, Risch, Kirk, Coats, Moran, Paul, Vitter, Johanns, Heller, Ayotte, Burr, Hoeven, Portman, Inhofe, Coburn, Toomey, DeMint, Corker, Lee, Johnson, Enzi

Total: 26

We can likely assume that the 7 Dem seats that will be turned over will also fall into the “New Breed.” And  the seats of the four retiring GOP senators, from  Texas, Indiana, Arizona, Nebraska, will all be filled by conservative “New Breed” Republicans.

That makes the “New Breed” total 26 + 7 + 4 = 37

Now, not all these races are going to go as I’ve predicted here ( though we could actually win MORE seats) and some I have classified as the “New Breed” may be loathe to go against McConnell, but hey, it doesn’t take the CBO to tell us that 37 is a LOT MORE than 17.

And I suspect that McConnell, and a few other senators, like DeMint, are also doing the math every day.

To be blunt, if McConnell doesn’t stand up to Reid at every opportunity, for the rest of this term, and in the all-important, and inevitable lame-duck, then McConnell will NOT be the next Majority Leader.

No “partial” repeal of Obamacare. No aquiescing on radical judical appointments. Absolutely NO increase in the debt ceiling unless we get everything we want as far as spending cuts and tax reform. Force votes on entitlement reform. THE WHOLE NINE YARDS.

If McConnell won’t. then we will find someone who will. In my list of 37 “New Breeders”, there is almost a simple majority ( 27) of the caucus by itself who can force the issue.

I can easily see someone like  Ron Johnson ( who famously told his fellow GOP senators that  “..he didn’t come to DC to ‘get along’ he came here to fix things..” getting exasperated enough to go to DeMint and say that he will run against McConnell unless DeMint will do so.

In short, my fellow conservatives and Tea Party members, there’s the potential for mutiny in the air, and the total shake-up, and possible eradication of the GOP Establishment that for so long has been part of the problem, and NOT the solution.

And one last happy thought  to ponder:

If you think that 2012 looks bad for the Senate Democrats, well, 2014 looks even worse.

There are 20 Dems up in 2014, and 13 Republicans.  Every GOP seat looks quite safe, even if a few senators choose to retire.

Not so for the Democrats:

I will flat out predict that at least SEVEN will announce their retirements:

 Landrieu, Baucus, Hagan, Johnson, Warner, Rockefeller.

Some are guaranteed losers. Other might win a difficult, but expensive race, but why, WHY go to all that trouble just to sit in the MINORITY Dem caucus. Far better to retire and earn the BIG lobbying $$$. And here are a few more Dems are are potentially vulnerable..Levin, Lautenberg.

Can you say 60 seat GOP supermajority in 2014?

( And you wonder why the Dems are all of a sudden willing to consider ending the filibuster…now you know)

Personally, I don’t know if Mitch McConnell has the cojones for the battles ahead these coming months.  We will find out, and more importantly, McConnell will find out if his troops will allow him to lead them.

Right now, I’d say it’s even money either way.

COMMENTS

  • trimulchio

    unimpressive Sen. Gillibrand is probably FAR more vulnerable than generally thought.

    She tried to prevent herself as a “Blue Dog,” while representing a Conservative House District and then sprung left when appointed to Sen. Clinton’s seat. That alone could damage her upstate and she is not well known enough to have much traction in the City. She seems to be trying to ensure she carries the Albany area, by moving there.

    More, she ran in ’10 against a fairly weak candidate and a vote should be known about how she polls and how to pull off weak supporters.

    • naraht

      Right now, the polling in the NY-Senate race shows Gillibrand up on each of the three possible Republican Candidates by more or less 60%-25% (Gillibrand-Long is 60-26, Gillibrand-Maragos is 60-25, Gillibrand-Turner is 59-25).

      • trimulchio

        recognition. On the other hand, she burned her bridges in her old District and that is teh kind of thing that flares. A smart race with a good candidiate (and a bit of $$ spent) would probably lose that seat for the Dems.

  • RealQuiet

    New Mexico is probably the best pick up possibility in that “least likely to flip” category. Heather Wilson is a solid candidate. Michigan is a different story. Stabenow is definitely beatable but I have my doubts of the field of GOP candidates.

    I don’t know if DeMint takes on the job because if memory serves he isn’t going to run for re-election when his time is up. I think the most likely challenger to McDonnell would be Thune from a tenure standpoint but I don’t think Thune would do that to Mitch. I think the candidate most likely to take on McDonnell would be Johnson. It would be fun to watch McCain and Graham furiously lobby the GOP caucus to not vote for him.

    • gawken

      DeMint has said hat he is “thinking about retiring” after this current term, not that it’s a definite. If asked to run for majority leader, he will, it will give him a chance to shape the party and the country.

      And if DeMint runs against McConnell, well, that puts Graham in a pickle…as well as Hatch…

      I believe more and more that 2012 will be another landscape changer…if EVERYTHING breaks right, the GOP could just hit 60 this November..

  • mikeymike143

    i saw jim demint and ron johnson named in the diary as the two possible conservative candidates who might run against mcconnell. both choices work for me. :)

  • davenj1

    I believe the GOP will win the Senate this year although I would warn that Brown could lose in MA (personally, I believe he will prevail) and we will likely lose the ME seat to an independent who will caucus with the Dems.
    Regardless, the GOP is still on track to take the Senate. With that being said, I for one sure hope that someone takes on McConnell’s in a leadership battle. DeMint may very well be a good choice. Some of the other names mentioned probably lack tenure to make a serious run. Maybe a Cornyn, Johanns or Inhofe make more sense if its not DeMint.

  • d_lamar

    has a majority in the Senate after the 2012 elections, if McConnell is the majority leader, and he leads as he has in the past, there will be no conservative agenda pursued.

    And therefore, there will be no reason for conservatives to get excited about the 2014 elections to elect conservatives in order to gain 60 votes. Conservatives will be disheartened and disillusioned when they witness the Senate act the same whether it be Reid or McConnell in charge.

  • http://ridersonthestorm101.blogspot.com/ SE-779

    The only one that I see as truly impossible is WV. Manchin polls very strongly against Raese(last poll I saw had Manchin up by 52 points), and remains very popular for a Democrat in WV. He’ll be there for another 6 years.

    The GOP has a decent shot at winning all the other races mentioned.

    • 6eorge Jetson

      from the coal industry base that the local Democrats are forced to take shots at Obama (figuratively) and their policies (literally).


      Joe Manchin holds his finger up to the wind

  • keepcoolwithcoolidge

    into your vulnerable list in 2014. Good analysis.

    • jomo2009

      Palin runs for the Alaska seat in ’14?

  • Kyle-MI

    That is another currently held Dem seat that will switch this Nov.

    And I agree with others that we will definitely loose Maine. Brown in MA is not looking good either.

    On the flip side, I would include NJ as another Dem seat in the second group of tossups/likely D.

    • acat

      I don’t think we lose Brown.

      I think the only reason we’ve lost Maine is that the Maine GOP doesn’t seem to have a bench.

      Mew

  • Mike Ferguson

    I have exchanged several e-mails and letters with Senator Boozeman and have actually spoken to him on one occasion he always seems very down to earth and just like one of the guys, which I guess is good for a politician, lol. Now we here in the Natural State have to just get our last congressional district red and boot Senator Pryor to the curb in 2014 and we will be doing good.

    As far as McConnell, he needs to go regardless, he has failed at leader and its time to hand the reigns to someone new.

  • Xasteius

    Everytime the NSRC or similar org asks me for a donation, I tell them ‘get rid of McConnell first!’

    • dudette

      of Rob Jesmer and the like on the behind the scenes end of stuff at NRSC or wherever it is that he works.

  • ohiohistorian

    As an Ohio resident, I know that Governor Kasich is not too popular, and I also know that Sherrod Brown is coated in Teflon(r). Based on these two facts, I don’t hold Ohio as that likely. I certainly hope that I am wrong, and am out there pushing Mandel. Just need to make sure that you understand this state.

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_senate_elections/ohio/election_2012_ohio_senate; http://www.wtam.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=122520&article=10112419

  • jeffreywturner

    Unlike the Dems did with Obamacare, the GOP would be highly unlikely to get 100% of our caucus to vote for cloture on anything major or controversial. Mainly because our moderates actually are moderates (unlike theirs) and they don’t just obey like trained dogs when they are told by the establishment to vote a particular way. We would need at least about 64 or so in order to actually be able to get cloture on controversial votes.

  • mbauer

    But this is overly optimistic. If this were 2010, you’d be dead on. But this is not shaping up to be a wave year, and unless Romney can inspire a nation, I don’t see how it becomes that.

    There was no mention of Maine, which looks like it’ll go to the independent progressive King.

    I’ll put Nebraska and North Dakota as likely Republican, Indiana at lean Republican, and probably no other pick ups at better than toss up. I also worry about Massachusetts and Nevada. In spite of all of Warren’s bad publicity lately, polls still have that race at a dead heat.

    I live in Virginia, and our race is going to be down to the wire.

    In a right of center blog, if you write unfounded projections that people here want to hear, you will get a positive reaction, but that doesn’t make it correct.

    Look at the table under latest projections on wikipedia here~
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_Senate_election

    Is it a conspiracy or do you have information no one else has?

    • gawken

      and already Dems are starting to run away from him. That does not bode well for his, and the Dems, chances. Jobs are still non-existent, fuel prices to hig, and the economy generally sucks..and then there’s the housing market..

      Nope, I’m quite optimistic…

      • Viet71

        Obama needs at least 60 percent of the Hispanic vote, and a good turnout among Hispanic voters, according to an article I’ve read.

        His spouting off on the Trayvon Martin case and implicitly fueling anti-Zimmerman sentiment among Democratic voters cannot be helping him much with Hispanic voters, I imagine.

  • moonmad

    Guessing with data is educated guessing but it sounds at least plausible. I wish ” I have to do something” Chambliss would leave to be a Lobbyist. We’ll see about that in 2014. One dynamic that could come into play with a stronger group of conservatives would be the lessening of Moderates power. It’d be nice to see moderates have to Kiss up to the Conservative caucus because the votes needed to get anything done will been there. It’d be funny to see McCain go running off like Belushi in Animal House with no one following him. For the moment it’s still a dream. Expect the losers, be the squishy republicans or democrats to keep emplacing Legislative IEDS if they don’t get their way.

  • redneckkk

    My senator would make a great leader and help send the old goats out to pasture.

  • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

    Mitch McConnell should not even be in consideration for the job of majority leader.

    He has proven that he is not comfortable with the notion of a GOP majority, and he has repeatedly demonstrated that he is not a leader.

    He shouldn’t even be in the senate.

    • morstar150

      This article is well written. I am not sure it is accurate. One thing is for sure, however, that the Senate races are crucial to the survival of our nation. We must change course. That means the Republican leadership must change also. There is no way around it. We will support any Republican who gets through the primary, (except Snowe, I would rather a tea party Dem than her) because it makes the “New Breed” Republicans that much more effective.

      Red State .com was very influential in the last election. We must do it again. That means that you must send money to the candidates who you believe in. I have already started doing that and will continue to find candidates who are worthy of my donations. The party can back whomever they like. I will never go through the party committees. My money goes directly to the candidates. That is powerful, very powerful! Join me!

  • gravelyvoicejim

    …if the establishment career politician Todd Akin wins the Republican primary. Akin refused to stand on conservative principles and voted throughout 2011 with his establishment “leadership” for C.R.s that funded Obama Care and Planned Parenthood while raising our debt by $1T. He also voted for H.R. 525 in early, an expansion of Obama Care attempt by John Boehner when he brought it to a floor vote early last year. In his 12 years in congress Akin has also been known to take a large campaign donation or two from companies rewarding him for his earmarks.

    http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/earmark-recipients-filled-akin-campaign-coffers/541786

    Akin will talk a good conservative game when he’s in the state then run “home” to DC and vote however his establishment “leadership” directs him to vote. The latest polls from Missouri indicate it will be a close race, fortunately at this point Akin lags the two other major candidates – Brunner and Steelman – who would likely land in the “New Breed” camp, but it’s shaping up to be a real horse race and it’s still early since the MO primary is in August.

    http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/05/missouri-senate-still-a-toss-up.html

  • BA Cyclone

    I would never lay odds in this purple state, but we’ll have another shot at forcefully retiring Tom Harkin from Iowa in 2014. He was last up in the Democrat WAVE of 2008 and survived a competent challenger 63-37…but frankly the GOP primary was a very tight 3-way battle. We’ll need someone with firepower and money to take out Harkin.

    I can hope he’ll voluntarily retire, but then again I seriously doubt that. He is “only 72″ right now and frankly, it seems like an easy part-time job for him.

  • Pingback: Homepage

  • Pingback: Iis Web Hosting

  • Pingback: letmewatchthis