« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The House MUST demand Regular Order: Understanding the Democrats use of the “deadline” strategy, and how the House must overcome it in the debt ceiling negotiations.

John Boehner has stated that he will no longer negotiate directly with Obama, and that the House must and will return to regular order in considering future legislation. We shall see. Remember, it was just after the GOP took control of the House in 2010, that they adopted the “three day rule,” which mandated that no legislation could be passed by the House until three days AFTER the bill had first been introduced on the House floor. This was to make sure that the public would have sufficient time to understand the legislation ( and, oh yeah, that our representatives would actually have time to read the “damn bill.”)

And then, as Congress attempted to find a fiscal cliff solution, House GOP leadership went back on their word. The Rules Committee voted to suspend the three day rule, and instead, went with the “Pelosi dictat”: They have to pass the bill before we can find out what’s in it.

And we are now just in fact finding out about the billions of pork that somehow managed to work its way into the bill.

This is the Democrats modus operandi. They have used it successfully time and time again. Remember the last debt ceiling debate, when some $600 billion in supposed spending reductions ended up being, at best, a few million?

They pretend to negotiate, but in reality, do not. They “negotiate” in the media, and as the deadline nears, complicit with the MSM, stir up fear in the public and the markets: The sky is falling, something, anything, must be done, a “bad” deal is better than no deal at all.

And they have already gone to the same playbook for the upcoming debt-ceiling debt. Obama fired the first shot when he stated that he would NOT negotiate with Congress; he demands unlimited debt increases; that Congress MUST pay for legislation that “it has already passed.” Thus, any give back from this idiotic position will let the MSM proclaim that Obama has offered a compromise, and it’s the stubborn GOP that is threatening the nation, not to mention widows and orphans, with financial ruin.

Mitch McConnell has stated that the deadline for reaching the debt ceiling is sometime in mid February. We know that is not true, in fact, it is probably months later. Because we can’t print any money money, it doesn’t mean that we won’t pay our bills. But it’s part of the Dem/MSM strategy, to start to spook the public, and Republicans, make them nervous, then stampede them into acting stupidly.

However, a deadline, even an artificial one, is needed to make the public focus on the issue. THE GOP MUST CONTROL THE TIMELINE, THE DEADLINE. This is crucial.

Boehner and McConnell should jointly announce immediately that any legislation MUST be passed by, say, February 10th. This gives Congress and the White House 30 days to come up with a solution. And Boehner should further announce that any bill passed by the Senate MUST be done by January 31st.

This is because Reid will most likely produce a bad bill at the last minute, and it will not match the House bill, and will require amendments and/or a conference committee, before final House passage. This is what regular order means.

The Senate is now blessed with several powerful conservative voices: among them Rubio, Cruz, Lee, Scott (Ron Johnson and Pat Toomey have some fences to mend). McConnell should turn them loose in the Senate. He is not the most effective voice for the conservative viewpoint. They will command the airwaves. They can take the fight to Reid, while Boehner and the House work their will.

Simply put, this is Boehner’s last chance. Failure here is not an option. Like the playoffs, it’s “win or go home time” for the Speaker.

COMMENTS

  • ntrepid

    Agreed…however, I have long assumed the House leadership (at minimum) was an integral part of this repeated charade by the beltway class.

    In other words, don’t count on it.

    Ntrepid
    RedState Member since 2006…?

  • dfcord

    Gawken,

    This is an interesting post and I understand why Republicans and their supporters would think along these lines.

    However, I am getting the impression the Democrats and their supporters are going to all but ignore any artificial deadlines.

    If I understand correctly the sequestration is automatic. Now that the taxes and unemployment insurance has been dealt with, what remains of the sequestration doesn’t look so bad.

    Section 4 of the 14th Amendment includes…
    “The validity of the public debt of the United States…shall not be questioned.”

    President Obama has made it clear he will not negotiate over the debt limit. I think you can count on him to reaffirm this during his inauguration where he swears to uphold the constitution.

    It appears the President has the ability to directly create money by minting coins of any denomination. The idea of getting around the artificial debt ceiling with coins in denominations of Billions or, even, Trillions is getting traction.

    Personally, I would rather see congress do their job and legislate a solution.

    As it stands, I doubt the Democrats will agree to something they see as worse than letting sequestration run its course.

    Politically and realistically, a Republican threat of defaulting on America’s debt is an empty one, IMHO.

    • rosenstern

      I had not heard of this idea to mint a $ Trillion coin before your post. I laughed when I read it, but then I suddenly got worried that in the world we live in, some politician might actually think this was a good solution!

      • dfcord

        Hopefully, no one thinks it is a “good solution”. I sure don’t.

        Do you think defaulting on America’s debt is a “good solution”?

        Do you think threatening to do it is a good negotiating tactic?

    • keepcoolwithcoolidge

      I think even some Democrats would be hesitant with the coin idea though. It could spook the markets, especially if someone calls it what it is (monetizing the debt.)

  • Jim_Riggs

    Personally, I don’t think there’s going to be a debt ceiling negotiation.