« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Implications of Ending DADT

Judge Virginia Philips has issued an injunction blocking the military from enforcing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Now homosexuals serving can be open about their sexual orientation (but people are advising them not to because of an appending appeal). Gone is the perk for homosexuals serving secretly in the military: shared showers. Once their out in the open its going to be uncomfortable for their same-gender heterosexual peers. Sharing showers or close quarters is well known to military members but apparently forgotten by those that never served. Ah, but the Gay Activists say that homosexuals will be professional whether its other homosexuals or same-geneder heterosexuals that their are in close quarters with. Fine, so how come heterosexuals are deemed unprofessional between different genders?

Ultimately, there is a cost to lifting DADT that does impact heterosexuals. The Department of Defense doesn’t have the billions to spend to upgrade bases globally to allow separate facilities for the new class of groups to segrate to. You can’t same-gender homosexuals showering or living together any more than you can different-gender heterosexuals right? You can’t risk having a heterosexual female with a man that claims he’s gay as well – there are bisexuals too.

Where is this leading to? STARSHIP TROOPERS. Not the book, the movie with co-ed showers. America may be ready to have soldiers serve openly gay but is it ready to tear down all gender distinctions?

That could be one way to off-set the recruiting hit that our armed forces may take. Recruiters in San Francisco are not flush with volunteers, its the conservative Southern and Midwestern states that often fill the rolls. Will they still turn out? 

One has to ask if Judge Phillips really looked at the broader implications of her decision.

Tags:
Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://www.havearoach.com Lee Hempfling

    is a conversation i heard Mike Broomhead on KFYI get into with a gay caller… It was great radio Mike! Bravo! But the man said he looked forward to the day when gays were gays and didn’t flaunt it, when people just accepted gays and no one had to always make it the topic of conversation.

    That amazed me.

    The Pentagon was doing JUST THAT with Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Now, it will become what that man was hoping it would stop being…..

    Unbelievable stupidity … DADT was a specific behaviour curtailment. I feel quite confident that if the male soliders in the military should start demanding to be open about their desire for female soldiers and we’d have Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell enforced against them, only under a more sanitized brand name.

    The people who just want to live and feel comfortable living should not have to be the brunt of progressives hijacking a social issue to add to the roster of useful idiots.

    • SirGladiator

      If a judge, and not the President of the United States, can give orders to the military, then we’ve had a radical change of command in the United States. How long until the judges begin ordering women to serve in full combat roles exactly the same as the men? How long until the judges order us out of Iraq and Afghanistan? This is an unbelievable and completely unacceptable precedent this judge is trying to set, and I certainly hope for the good of the Country, not simply on this one issue but for all the ones that will surely come if this stands, I hope this gets overturned.

  • reddog53

    There will inevitably be discussions about cosmetics, jewelry, behavior, and the impact on military families that need to be handled with care.

    I think at a minimum, each and every judge that wants to rule on this issue should have to spend a week at sea on a crowded amphibious ship or destroyer before taking on this challenge.

    Life in the military, on or off duty, on or off base, is different. To make it work, the members of the unit have to be cohesive and uniform… there can be no perceptions of unequal treatment, special favors or selective assignment based on any criteria — sexual orientation, political beliefs, religious beliefs or alma mater, for example. Order, discipline and morale depend on consistency of treatment and behavior.

    Adding this to the mix will not make things easier.

  • GregInFla

    Did something change?