or someone else with no information would say. Hey, it’s the information superhighway, look it up. She did not say she was a witch, she did not say that rats with human brains were running around. You are cow-towing to the liberal media and their ability to affect influence on the populace. For shame. The fact is, I do not have to read past your number one to realize you are taking what they say and deciding what to do with it, instead of finding out for yourself. yikes! Research is good, try it.

Your number 2 is embarrassing because you are nitpicking since you have not done your homework on what she has said. She won the primary against a huge lib. remember? What has Mike Castle accomplished in his career? I’ll tell you. He accomplished the whitewash of the Republican Party and is now very interested in being a part of “no labels.” Great. Love me some lib Republicans.

Most conservative men i know are not sexist. But the ones I run into online sure are.

I have defended Bush in the past when compared to the liberals. Perhaps you did not check to see the context of the comment? Possible. You didn’t seem to want to check the internets on the first bulletpoint.

forgive me, but,
“I don’t want to send my money to a campaign to elect someone who’ll fit in…. I want to send my money and support to candidates who a) will win and b) are principled, ethical, and serious conservatives (intelligence is optional).”

You are right! Intelligence is optional!

and every. not true. It is not true that most deer rifles are 22′s and every deer hunter shoots at squirrels and rabbits and such.

I hunt with a 30/30, and I have hunted with a .22-250 and a 270 and my dad hunts with a 30.06. none of which I would waste a bullet on a rabbit or squirrel.

You are skewing off on different tangents now.

“Is it a news flash to anyone that there are more Democrats in Delaware than Republans?”
I just pointed out that most Democrats are not democratic.

Democrat = a person
democratic = a process
Maybe you should sloww down some more.

Maybe she should run for state senator first, so she doesn’t need to represent both North and South Delaware?

Jimmy Carter won Georgia in 1980. Mondale won Minnesota in 1984.

Neither Carter nor Mondale lost by 16% percent of the applicable electorate.

If 16% (the margin of O’Donnell’s defeat was 16.6%) is damn close, there was no Reagan landslide . . . and landslides occur very infrequently.

There is no way that 16.6% of DE cares what Karl Rove said on Fox News. Bush was crushed in Delaware. The idea that Delaware voters are influenced by Rove is silly. Rove is Darth Vader to those in NE.

P.S. Northern Delaware and southern Delaware are going to be different in 2012, 2014, and every election for the next decade.

What is COD’s plan for dealing with that basic fact?

from Republicans: there is no candidate, ever, who has won 100% of his party.

And so long as you have free speech and dumb statements on the part of candidates, you’re going to have the problem of e-campaigns. Perhaps candidates who don’t have so many personal issues would have an easier time of it?

With basic math, too.

If Republicans make up 30%(just a guess I don’t know the exact number) of the electorate and 18% vote for the Dem that isn’t 18% of voters, dummy. That is 18% times 30% = 5.4% of the electorate.

I would suggest you make sure that you don’t make a fool of yourself when you making a case.

Would that be the same loyalty that Christine showed to the Republican Party of Delaware in 2006 when she mounted a failed general election write-in campaign after finishing 3rd in the Primary?

Would that be the same loyalty she showed to her campaign workers and vendors when she didn’t pay them for their time and services during her failed 2008 run?

Would that be the same loyalty she showed to the many donors who contributed to her failed 2010 Senate campaign when she pocketed close to a million dollars in campaign contributions all the while complaining about not receiving enough financial backing from the national party?

very competent, professional and accomplished politician. He knew how to get people who didn’t agree with him to work with him. CO’D is an incompetent, three time loser who can’t open her mouth without sticking her foot in it all the way up to her knee.

Lesson to be learned? Absolutely. Recruit competent candidates. That didn’t happen in DE.

you are obviously ignorant as a post. Reagan had more problems with Republicans than with Democrats. The Democrats just tried to stonewall him, give him some of what he wanted and get what they could in return. Republicans tried to destroy him.

What you are ignoring is that CO’D could have had a national TV special at the Reagan funeral plot, RR could have risen from the dead and given a rousing endorsement speech for her and struck the DE GOP dead with a bolt of lightening and she’d have still lost by double digits. She was a lousy candidate, completely incompetent with reference to the process and now she’s proved it three times in a row. Get over it.

But decided against it. But clearly it is to big of a coincidence to have 2 idiots harping on the exact same subject in that exact same post, etc. Especially considering that when 1 decided to stop posting the other popped on and resume being a moron.

becker makes a good point here… http://www.redstate.com/grassroots1773/2010/12/28/democrats-were-under-represented-in-delaware-election-nov-2-odonnell-did-not-motivate-democrat-vote/#comment-481

let’s give it a rest