« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why not Rick Santorum?

There are only forty-five days until the Iowa Caucuses.  Conservatives are going to need a champion to face off against Romney after he wins the New Hampshire primary.  That guy may be Rick Santorum. 

It won’t be Cain.                                                                                                                                                                                  Cain is fading and he won’t be back.  9-9-9 was a loser, these sexual harassment allegations have not been rebutted with tangible evidence and he himself (not the media) continues to write the narrative that he doesn’t have the slightest clue on anything concerning foreign policy.  Cain will not be our nominee.

It won’t be Gingrich.                                                                                                                                                                       Many columnists have been predicting a Gingrich rise for over a month now.  The polls reflect as much.  What many failed to realize was that as soon as he goes up, he is going to have to come down.  It is already happening; his messy personal history is being discussed, we are being reminded of his history on individual healthcare mandates and his work as a lobbyist is growing more detrimental by the day.  Before he even takes off, he will be grounded. 

It probably won’t be Perry.                                                                                                                                                      Perry is our last great hope of defeating Romney and Obama.  But he has proved over and over that he is unprepared.  This week, Perry released a stellar populist plan to shrink the size of the budget and the scope of government.  It is eye-brow-raisingingly far reaching, but exciting nonetheless.  His rehabilitation plan following his debate gaffe has been at a perfect pitch.  Perry may be up to the task.  But repeatedly he has proved that he is not.  We will find out next Tuesday.  Either Perry will shine and give a perfect performance and be taken as a serious candidate again before Thanksgiving or he will continue to be a debate dud and stay in fifth of sixth place.  Perry has until Tuesday night to get his campaign together.  If he can’t, he is done and can go ahead and donate his war chest to the Salvation Army for Christmas.

With an empty field and the threat of Romney killing conservatism for another decade, conservatives must ask themselves, why not Rick Santorum? 

There is a small window of opportunity for us to align behind Santorum.

Santorum has some negatives.  He has often lacked presidential poise during the debates.  He lost his last Senate election and he has no executive experience.  But Santorum seems to be one of the only candidates on the debate stage that can continually articulate the case for conservatism to the electorate.  Unlike other candidates he is afraid of no one.  He calls out Paul on a sometimes irresponsible foreign policy, he calls out Perry on vaccinations and Romney on healthcare.  He could call Obama on his record.

Santorum’s stances on social issues are well documented which will give him strength with evangelicals.  His stances on foreign policy should allow neo-cons, Bush Republicans and war hawks in the party to rest easy knowing that he’ll be strong on defense.  If we’re honest, he will govern as a fiscal conservative.  In fact, his statements on fiscal policy comfort me that he would not be a big spending executive in D.C.  Santorum hasn’t always taken the most conservative votes but his rhetoric leads suggests that he got the message. 

To a certain degree, Santorum followed the Republican Party off of a cliff during the last decade as Bush Republicans allowed spending to reach all time highs.  Cain, Gingrich and Perry can all suffered from the same party mentality at some point or another.  Santorum wants to simplify the tax code, continue the Bush tax cuts, cut wasteful spending and join every other republican candidate in holding the line on tax raises. 

Santorum does have negatives.   A bold social conservatism scares away “independents,” he doesn’t have executive experience and he handily lost his last Senate race.

But in the general election, none of these factors will matter.  As all general elections, Santorum will play up issues like jobs and economical growth rather than abortion and gay marriage as the reason to vote for him.  Being a loser in your last election doesn’t matter either.  Six years ago, Romney’s negatives in Massachusetts were so high that had he attempted to run for a second term as governor he would have been creamed.   As we’ve learned, executive experience is not a pre-requisite for winning the White House.  There likely won’t be sexual harassment allegations against Santorum and he has never been a lobbyist either.  Unlike Romney, Santorum isn’t part of the “1%” corporate elite either.  If he can focus on the economy, conservatives can trust him on social issues and independents won’t care as long as it is out of sight out of mind. 

Unemployment, stagflation and a slow-moving economy next year will allow anyone other than Obama to find a path to victory.  It should be a conservative rather than a moderate. 

Many conservatives may not have fallen in love with Rick Santorum, but if there is no alternative, Santorum is a winning choice.  Where does Romney attack him from?  He would have to attack Santorum from the left. 

If for no other reason than conservatives have no other choice, we need to take a second look at Santorum and give him a poll bump and cash infusion before Thanksgiving.  The ball is in Santorum’s court on Tuesday to make this case to the American people.  

If he isn’t getting the time he needs, he should be combative and presidential to take the time he needs, not whine to the moderators that he isn’t getting enough time.  It has worked for Newt it will work for Rick. 

A moderate Romney will be unable to beat an empowered Obama.  If we don’t find a conservative champion quickly, we can settle in for five more years of Obama.  The only logical conclusion is to take another look at Santorum.  He will have his flaws but we can trust him, and that is worth a lot.

COMMENTS

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Over Pat Toomey in the PA GOP Senate Primary.

    • griffinelection

      He should never have made that endorsement. As Jim DeMint detailed in his book, telling Spector that he would be endorsing Toomey wasn’t easy but it was right. I think Santorum was blinded by his friendship with Spector. He was wrong, but it isn’t the unpardonable sin.

      I would be more concerned with a guy that passes a healthcare mandate as his signature policy achievement than Santorum blowing an endorsement.

      • wennejunk

        Endorsing Specter was pretty bad.

        Worse in my book (in your words):

        He has often lacked presidential poise during the debates. He lost his last Senate election and he has no executive experience.

        Quite frankly, that’s about enough for me at this point.

        We do not need – again – an inexperienced executive learning the job while the country crashes around him. That’s my main gripe with Cain as well.

      • conservativeparrothead

        Friendship sometimes gets in the way of politics. I remember Fred Thompson supporting McCain-Feingold, mostly out of his relationship with John McCain.

    • David123

      In 2004 Democrats were opposing Bush’s originalist judge nominations . It was important to have a Republican majority in the Senate.

      Specter had been key in getting Clarence Thomas confirmed. He then helped get Roberts and Alito confirmed. Based on progress with judges, Santorum’s support of Specter was a good move.

      Santorum can hardly be faulted for Specter’s actions after 2008.

      Santorum did win state-wide PA Senate races TWICE. He is more likely to carry Pennsylvania than most of the other Republican primary candidates. If the Republican does carry Pennsylvania, Obama has a big problem getting re-elected.

  • redmymind

    no one else’s social conservatism chimes in more closely to mine than that of Sen. Rick Santorum. I see him as a solid family man and a devout Catholic, and I would have no problem at all if he were to become president.

    Like some of those who have noted above, however, I too have taken some umbrage over his general “combative,” “in-your-face” debate style. That said, no one’s perfect. Maybe there are folks who are just fine with that.

    I enjoyed reading your analysis, griffinelection. Like you, I certainly view Rick Santorum as a solid candidate (and not just because we share the same religion), but I am completely sold on Governor Perry.

    To me, the good Governor has a commanding presence about him that inspires trust. His deep, deep executive experience and record of creating jobs is beyond dispute (despite the liberal hit pieces that turn up now and then); he has honorably worn the uniform of this country; and has a bold vision and outstanding plan radiating the color of pure red meat! No fillers!

    In Governor Perry, I see a steady, experienced set of hands that can “safely land the plane in a storm”. He has the cool but determined, down-to-earth temperament of a true leader, and a level of manliness and psychological maturity to match. I would trust him more than anyone else in the field to navagate this nation through the dangerous currents that lie ahead.

    • griffinelection

      If Perry can come back and make a race of this thing, he has my support. He just makes me really nervous…I hope he has no more fumbles.

  • Tbone

    I would swear he was a corpse.

  • tailfins1959

    If he can’t confront that, how will he handle a national cyber attack?

  • conservativeparrothead

    I think he can debate well too, unfortunately I think there is some frustration within the debate format for him and you can hear that in his answers, he said it about Iran the other night that everyone should have a chance to answer.

    I think in a general, his talk of manufacturing would play well in the rust belt a place that will be critical for the Republican nominee to pick off at least two of those states.

    Maybe he will be the Iowa surprise, but right now it doesnt look good.

  • tjms

    lived in PA when he lost reelection and believe he would have a very hard time carrying PA. There is a very large group that have commited to bringing him down if he gets up too high. They list multiple reasons but one of the main was that he lived in VA but had his kids in PA cyberschool with PA footing the bill. when he was approached and asked to pay it back he refused so an expensive court battle followed.

  • griffinelection

    but the tea party is stronger. Besides, many national politicians live in D.C. but try to keep their regular lives back home. That is actually the right thing to do.

    I would be more concerned with a guy that passes a healthcare mandate as his signature policy achievement than Santorum blowing an endorsement.

  • cheetah2

    The main problem is the debates, but he has shown improvement and given acceptable to good performances in the last 3 debates.

    Of course for the first of the 3 he doesn’t get credit because he made people mad by attacking Romney. In the second one his good performance was cancelled out by the one gaffe.

    However in the last one, he was seen by many as tied for the win with Gingrich. He showed the most passion which is pretty important, and he offered big ideas that no one else did. (he has a talent in that direction- I call it creative thinking.)

    Anyway my point is why write him off so quickly when he is working to fix the big problem we all saw in him. The gaffe he had is a problem that can be alleviated with good debating techniques, which we know he is learning.

    The big question is whether he can live down the one spectacular mistake. I see plenty of reason to hope that he can. And I am glad. I like Santorum a lot but Perry is far stronger in every area except the debating.

    I do agree that he must turn in acceptable performances in his future debates, but I see much reason to trust that he will.

  • griffinelection

    He has to stop wearing his frustration on his sleeve, its unpresidential.

  • wbf

    nt

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I mean, it’s really not fair how you ignore me all the time. I was an important Senator once, even though I eventually lost by 18 points. Then later I know I backed the wrong guy who ended up a turncoat and joining the Democrats, but c’mon, people, you need to let all that go and start being fair to me!

  • griffinelection

    and I haven’t “written him off so quickly.” I’ve given him like 7 debates, three months and tons of tv interviews and I will still give him more chances.