« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Paycheck Fairness Act

Today, the United States legislature is focusing on the Paycheck Fairness Act.  Essentially it requires innocent employers to prove that they aren’t sexist by demonstrating that a man getting paid more is more qualified than his female employee of equal status.  It requires that a woman be shown to have inferior qualifications than men in the workforce.  This is a bad idea.

Some statistics show that women get paid only three quarters of the wages a male in a comparable position brings home.  So democrats have decided to take matters into their own hands. 

This bill isn’t a serious attempt to pass legislation yet remains a win-win for democrats.  If it passes, they please the trial lawyer lobby in making punitive claims easier to pursue.  If the republican filibuster defeats it, it is all part of the evil republicans war on women.  You know, because republicans hate women…  It is a strong political move by Harry Reid. 

Obama jumped into the fray saying that because “women are the breadwinners for a lot of families” blah blah blah “everybody suffers” from inequality, thus we should regulate businesses in a heavier way because that is what is going to get the economy going again.  Or something like that.

Where does Romney stand?  He is taking both positions.  He doesn’t oppose the bill but he doesn’t expressly support it. 

The facts are that, we as a society are becoming more aware of unequal pay.  We have been doing so for decades and the situation continues to improve.  More women are in law school than men now.  More women are in med school than men now.  Women are demanding equal pay and the numbers are moving in the right direction. 

Government already takes a quarter or more of what we make before we even see it.  It then takes even more every time we an item or service with it.  It then charges property taxes to retain the item that we have purchased.  Employers are already forced to pay at least $7.15 per hour to employees.  But the government shouldn’t be also telling employers who should get a raise and who shouldn’t.  This is another line crossed.   

Government involvement will help little and will hurt businesses by requiring more regulations.  Again, this type of regulation only hurts the law abiding citizens.  Discriminators will continue to discriminate while justifying it all the while.  It will only be decent employers that will be forced to give account for their actions.

It will take their focus off of an employer’s bottom dollar and focus it on defending against potential lawsuits.  Worst, it requires an employer who has no qualms with his or her female employees to cite specific reasons as to why she isn’t as good as her male counterparts.  Conservatives respect women more than that.  When I go into a new job, whether my boss is a man or woman, never even crosses my mind.  If someone were to ask me whether a co-worker is black or white, I would have to take a second to picture them because for most of us – these identifiers don’t define our co-workers to us.

But this is another case of divide and conquer by democrats by forcing Americans to take sides against one another on issues of disability, vocation, gender, race, religion, etc. 

The Republican message should be clear.  We don’t care what color, gender or religion you are.  We want you to be working a job that allows you to pay your bills and eventually, with hard work, to create a future for yourself.  Women will make more long term under a republican administration because more people will be hired and given raises.  This kind of regulation simply makes employers pause before hiring women.  I will be glad to see republicans block this terrible bill.

COMMENTS

  • Kyle-MI

    This is what Dems do best. They propose legislation that creates buzz and gets everyone talking about an issue even if the bill is garbage and has no chance of passing. This is what the GOP needs to do more. They need to propose bills that highlight their side of an issue. These are the type of things that drive the national conversation.

  • Kyle-MI

    The issue and the solution would be so complicated that the required federal legislation would be a behemoth (even more so than most regulation). To “solve” the problem you would almost need micromanagement of wages. Even people working in the same job for the same company with the same sex get payed different amounts.

  • commonsenseobserver

    But this bill is not the solution. Yes, I favour stronger protections for female employees who raise the issue, to prevent retaliation, but the potential cost to employers is too large, the definition has been significantly broadened, and the burden of proof has been shifted directly to the employer, which is unreasonable and opens the door to frivolous lawsuits. These parts are wrong. Congressional Republicans should move an alternative that facilitates negotiations between employees and employers and protects both.

  • central807

    Liberalism…creating another “unjust” America, one imaginary victim at a time.

  • central807

    Liberalism…creating another “unjust” America, one imaginary victim at a time.

  • checkmate2012

    This Act ($15M) is awful for business as you stated due to more burdens and lawsuits. Perhaps if Reps. just changed the training phrase to private businesses only, that would reveal the real purpose & get the Dems to pick a fight on that. The Dems also implicate that women are too stupid to negotiate without gov’t training.

    from Thomas(http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:1:./temp/~c1123TAYnq:e8686:)

    SEC. 5. NEGOTIATION SKILLS TRAINING FOR GIRLS AND WOMEN.
    (3) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES- To be eligible to receive a grant under this subsection, an entity shall be a public agency, such as a State, a local government in a metropolitan statistical area (as defined by the Office of Management and Budget), a State educational agency, or a local educational agency, a private nonprofit organization, or a community-based organization.
    (5) USE OF FUNDS- An entity that receives a grant under this subsection shall use the funds made available through the grant to carry out an effective negotiation skills training program that empowers girls and women. The training provided through the program shall help girls and women strengthen their negotiation skills to allow the girls and women to obtain higher salaries and rates of compensation that are equal to those paid to similarly situated male employees.

    And there are No punitive damages against the gov’t:
    (c) Enhanced Penalties- Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(b)) is amended–
    (1) by inserting after the first sentence the following: `Any employer who violates section 6(d) shall additionally be liable for such compensatory damages, or, where the employee demonstrates that the employer acted with malice or reckless indifference, punitive damages as may be appropriate, except that the United States shall not be liable for punitive damages.’;

  • checkmate2012

    60 votes were needed.

    Great news.

  • robertm75

    The State should not be in the business of determining wages in the private sector, especially when, as Checkmate2012 points out, they themselves are exempt from the same policy.