Some of my friends on the left are arguing that Gosnell is guilty of only murdering already-born babies, not of anything relating to abortion. Putting aside the absurdity of this argument (Gosnell marketed himself as an abortions, sold abortions, proved to the state that he was performing abortions, and his customers came there for abortions), it begs a more important question for those offering this line of argument: are the mother’s of those children accessories to first-degree murder?
If Gosnell was not performing abortions and was simply murdering babies, then the mothers who brought themselves to Gosnell are accomplices.
Of course, this type of argument won’t fly with the left, but it should be easy to whack-a-mole this nonsensical argument that Gosnell was simply a doctor killing live babies.
The left has their tail between their legs on Gosnell. It would be nice for once for the right to find a way to blow the door open further and overturn Roe v Wade once and for all.