No Palin, No base!


I've had it with the post-election Palin backbiting. What would you have done?

I was aghast last night, listening to Carl Cameron’s report about McCain’s aides bashing of Palin on The O’Reilly Factor. I was seething when more alleged details were leaked anonymously on Thursday.

Two points.

During his stump speeched, Senator John McCain spoke of his distaste for pork and in particular those who hid behind their earmarks. He said, “I will name names and make them famous.”

Now is that time. They should not be allowed to remain anonymous. Senator McCain should either find out who they are and out them or repudiate them. They are cowards trying to cover their behinds. In a word, dishonorable.

Until their anonymous veils are lifted, ALL of McCain’s aides will be tainted as untrustworthy *and should be viewed as *disloyal. Even Hillary Clinton’s aides aired their dirt with names attached. Good luck getting hired by a future candidate when “McCain campaign staffer” is listed on your resume.

FoxNews’ Carl Cameron’s reports should be taken with a huge grain of salt. He was profusely anti-Fred Thompson during the primaries. I lost count how many times he gleefuly displayed drive-by tendencies against the conservative candidates running. Bias-light.

Finally, I’d like to know what we at the base think? How would you have voted had McCain followed those same aides’ and elite-types who wanted Senator McCain to tack left in his VP selection? Would you have even voted?

What if Senator McCain chose a moderate to liberal running mate?
I still would have rallied to him
I would have begun looking elsewhere
I would have voted for someone else
I would not have voted for any presidential candidate

  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

Category: , , , , , , , ,

RSS feed

10 Comments Leave a comment

I would have thought long and hard.

Joel Farnham (Diary) Thursday, November 6th at 11:31PM EST (link)

If he had went totally to the left, I would have stayed out. If he had picked another conservative, I would have still voted.

Moderate? Hmmmm. Long and hard. I would like to think I would have voted for the party but……….. I don’t think so. I would have sat out probably.

Call me what you want, just don’t call me late for dinner.

 

No Way

jchild314 (Diary) Thursday, November 6th at 11:49PM EST (link)

This is my first post at RS. I am a “FredHead” from way back. I was completely energized by Sarah. I am livid at FOX’s lockstep with these slime reports that have come from the McCain crew. Sarah Palin is the FUTURE of the Republican Party….Period…She will be very WISE next time……Love ya Sarah…..We will be here….

 

That is a tough call

DONTREADONME (Diary) Thursday, November 6th at 11:51PM EST (link)

While the first obvious answer I would have gave in your poll was “I would not have voted for any Presidential Candidate”, I now have reconsidered.

When “Joe the Plumber” was “outed” by the press, I became so energized to vote for anyone that was not Obama. The drive-by media illustrated that they had become obvious cheerleaders for the Obama campaign.

The behavior of the media had become dangerous instead of just annoyingly amusing.

The drive-bys were now engaging in full-fledge propaganda peddling and acting as De Facto Politburo of the new Obama Regime. So voting against Obama was duty and necessary to stop the formation of, as a Major I work with called it, the U.S.S.A. While I am not a soldier nor do I ever suggest violence as a way to achieve political change in the U.S. I do believe in this phrase “I will protect the U.S.A. against all enemies foreign and domestic” not by force but by voting.

I guess I can call it the Obama Regime, since I do remember the left calling Bush’s Presidency as the Bush Regime.

 

McCain has been silent on this Palin-bashing

NoKoolAidForMe (Diary) Friday, November 7th at 12:22AM EST (link)

Here are the possible reasons:

1 – He’s tired of this, and doesn’t want to publicly criticize his campaign staff, hoping it will just go away.

2 – He’s behind it and is doing it in order to pin the blame on her for the loss in order to rehabilitate his image.

3 – He’s either behind it or allowing it to happen in order to destroy her reputation and save the party from her.

4 – He’s petty and wants to get even with her for “spoiling” his chances.

I think it’s either number 1 or 3. My first thought (and hope) would be for number 1, but part of me says he’s wanting her to drown.

I'm curious to see what Fred does now.

nogyro35 (Diary) Friday, November 7th at 4:35AM EST (link)

He is a very articulate conservative and I’d like to see him stick around and have a role in the rebuilding of this party.

Also good to see another FredHead and Palin supporter posting at RedState.

Thank you for your vote. Now is the time that the Joes and the GI Joes...

nogyro35 (Diary) Friday, November 7th at 4:52AM EST (link)

…need your support more than ever.

I just recently became a veteran of the Marine Corps, but I have a nephew who recently became a soldier and is going to Korea soon.

It is normal to worry for servicemen during a time of war, but it is another to worry because you know you have a government who wants to wave a white flag to the world.

The best you can do to help our troops and hopefully help Joe get his business, is to join in supporting the best conservative leaders for the party.

We have many upcoming leaders like Palin, Jindal, Coburn, Cantor, etc who have a track record of living and governing conservatively. Take a good look at them (avoid the MSM bias).

The left will try to prevent another Republican Revolution and we need to remain united in opposition.

 
 
 

Sniping and "shocking" accusations gets ratings

bcb1 (Diary) Friday, November 7th at 7:08AM EST (link)

This isn’t about Palin. It’s not. The media couldn’t care less whether she runs again or if she crawls into a hole in Alaska somewhere.

This is about TV ratings. The more gory the crash, the better. The more horrific the story, the better. The more backstabbing, sniping and outrage, the better. It’s what sells!

The hot story of the day is McCain’s staff versus Palin. In a week or two it’ll all die down and something else will be the new story of the day. But until then, there’s nothing to stop it, not while it’s on the hot list.

I'd go with 3

AceInTX (Diary) Friday, November 7th at 9:12AM EST (link)

nt

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

According to McCaslin...it's about Romney 2012

AceInTX (Diary) Friday, November 7th at 9:14AM EST (link)

nt

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in WashingtonFred Thompson

I'm worried it won't end in a couple of weeks

jazzycmk (Diary) Friday, November 7th at 1:01PM EST (link)

I could see a McCain staffer penning some sort of “tell all” about “what really happened behind the scenes at the McCain campaign.”

What’s so ridiculous about this is that I really don’t think the campaign has any reason to be ashamed. Sure, they probably made some tactical errors. But at the end of the day, they lost by less than 6pts nationally in a year where the environment was described as “toxic” for Republicans. An unpopular President, a faltering economy, and a vicious MSM all added up to defeat this year. They gave it their best shot. No shame in that.

The shame comes in what they are doing now.

jcmk

“90% of people don’t care about your problems…..and the other 10% are glad you have them” – former football coach Lou Holtz