<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitt Romney ignores Rachel Maddow, RINO&#8217;s and Secular-Left to Follow Santorum, Bush and Reagan at Liberty Commencement Speech this past Saturday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/2012/05/14/mitt-romney-ignores-rachel-maddow-rinos-and-secular-left-to-follow-santorum-bush-and-reagan-at-liberty-commencement-speech-this-past-saturday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/2012/05/14/mitt-romney-ignores-rachel-maddow-rinos-and-secular-left-to-follow-santorum-bush-and-reagan-at-liberty-commencement-speech-this-past-saturday/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: radicalrighty</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/2012/05/14/mitt-romney-ignores-rachel-maddow-rinos-and-secular-left-to-follow-santorum-bush-and-reagan-at-liberty-commencement-speech-this-past-saturday/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>radicalrighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/?p=356#comment-648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me too - but I was biased by my desire for Rick Perry to win the nomination.  I still like Perry, but I now fully believe Romney is the one who can beat Obama.

It&#039;s my opinion that if Obama&#039;s camp tries to drag this campaign into the mud, Romney will happily wade right in.

If he makes the &quot;Right&quot; VP pick, like Dick Morris (like him or not, Morris first predicted the &#039;10 rout) says, &quot;it will be a landslide.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too &#8211; but I was biased by my desire for Rick Perry to win the nomination.  I still like Perry, but I now fully believe Romney is the one who can beat Obama.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my opinion that if Obama&#8217;s camp tries to drag this campaign into the mud, Romney will happily wade right in.</p>
<p>If he makes the &#8220;Right&#8221; VP pick, like Dick Morris (like him or not, Morris first predicted the &#8217;10 rout) says, &#8220;it will be a landslide.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave_A</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/2012/05/14/mitt-romney-ignores-rachel-maddow-rinos-and-secular-left-to-follow-santorum-bush-and-reagan-at-liberty-commencement-speech-this-past-saturday/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave_A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/?p=356#comment-646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like him alot more now that he&#039;s the nominee, than I did when he was a candidate...

He stays on message, sounds competent and authoritative, and delivers a professional &amp; precise critique of what Obama has done wrong...

And regardless of the positions taken in the primary, the one thing it DID show us, is that the man doesn&#039;t run from a campaign fight....

I&#039;m looking forward to watching him be sworn in in January... Once we win this election....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like him alot more now that he&#8217;s the nominee, than I did when he was a candidate&#8230;</p>
<p>He stays on message, sounds competent and authoritative, and delivers a professional &amp; precise critique of what Obama has done wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>And regardless of the positions taken in the primary, the one thing it DID show us, is that the man doesn&#8217;t run from a campaign fight&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to watching him be sworn in in January&#8230; Once we win this election&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salemst</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/2012/05/14/mitt-romney-ignores-rachel-maddow-rinos-and-secular-left-to-follow-santorum-bush-and-reagan-at-liberty-commencement-speech-this-past-saturday/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>salemst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/?p=356#comment-643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat,

Superb piece on Mitt Romney.  I&#039;ve felt since the end of his Massachusetts Governorship that he could/would be the next Ronald Reagan we&#039;re looking for.  I live in Massachusetts, Romney was superb in a forbidding political climate.  

I realize Erick, Levin, Rush, Morrissey, and many many others have been critical, some disparaging, of Romney during the campaign.  He&#039;s a solid conservative, and governed that way.  He just doesn&#039;t use incendiary speech always the gentleman, as Reagan was.

I just want to say that I truly believe a person is just as conservative slowing down/stopping liberalism in a liberal state such as Massachusetts as one who&#039;s advancing conservatism in a conservative state such as Texas.  Romney&#039;s job was tougher than Reagan&#039;s in California.  He&#039;s already more conservative than George W Bush, George HW Bush, McCain, and Dole by his campaign.  I was angered by the negativity against him this past campaign.

Last point.  Romney governed as, or more conservatively, than he campaigned--never more liberal.  It&#039;s why given a Republican Congress I sincerenly believe he&#039;ll go down in history as one of our top 3-4 presidents combining incredible intelligence, wisdom, life experience, leadership with conservatism.  I have high hopes for Mitt Romney.

Thanks for a truly complimentary piece.  He deserves it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat,</p>
<p>Superb piece on Mitt Romney.  I&#8217;ve felt since the end of his Massachusetts Governorship that he could/would be the next Ronald Reagan we&#8217;re looking for.  I live in Massachusetts, Romney was superb in a forbidding political climate.  </p>
<p>I realize Erick, Levin, Rush, Morrissey, and many many others have been critical, some disparaging, of Romney during the campaign.  He&#8217;s a solid conservative, and governed that way.  He just doesn&#8217;t use incendiary speech always the gentleman, as Reagan was.</p>
<p>I just want to say that I truly believe a person is just as conservative slowing down/stopping liberalism in a liberal state such as Massachusetts as one who&#8217;s advancing conservatism in a conservative state such as Texas.  Romney&#8217;s job was tougher than Reagan&#8217;s in California.  He&#8217;s already more conservative than George W Bush, George HW Bush, McCain, and Dole by his campaign.  I was angered by the negativity against him this past campaign.</p>
<p>Last point.  Romney governed as, or more conservatively, than he campaigned&#8211;never more liberal.  It&#8217;s why given a Republican Congress I sincerenly believe he&#8217;ll go down in history as one of our top 3-4 presidents combining incredible intelligence, wisdom, life experience, leadership with conservatism.  I have high hopes for Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>Thanks for a truly complimentary piece.  He deserves it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
