« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Note To Jason Allen: There’s No *I* in “Team”

Jason Allen and Dan Benishek faced off in what proved to be a very tight GOP primary on August 3 for Michigan’s 1st Congressional District seat once occupied by Bart Stupak. At the end of the night, Benishek was up by a single vote.

In the days since, as each precinct and each county has been working to review and verify and certify, Allen and Benishek have had to ready legal teams and file paperwork and assemble staff in order to prepare for a recount fight…should one come. That decision rests soley on Allen’s shoulders.

Over those 9 days Benishek’s margin has crept up, not down, and with every county that has certified their numbers in preparation for the official meeting with Michigan’s Board of Canvassers on August 23, the margin widens. Latest numbers [subscription required] indicate Benishek is now up by 17 with 3 counties to go:

With only three counties left to either announce or complete their Election Night canvass, 1st Congressional Republican candidate Jason ALLEN has not yet decided whether to pursue a recount if he’s still down after Friday’s official certification by the state Board of Canvassers.

Currently, Allen is down 17 votes, a number both Allen and leader Dan BENISHEK agreed on today. The big county observers will be looking at is Otsego, where Allen has the potential to squeeze out a couple extra votes.

The cited article from MIRS News goes on to suggest that a recount will cost between $75,000 and $100,000 of already cash-strapped Michiganders’ hard-earned dollars, and will likely drag on for quite some time.

Dear Mr. Allen: Is it in the best interests of the people of the Upper Peninsula…or is it in the best interests of you personally… to spend more time and more money on recounts at a time when conceding and working together WITH Benishek will almost guarantee a defeat of the Democrat in MI-1 in the General election in November?

A letter, re-printed with permission below the fold, suggests that you “do the right thing” by Michiganders and end this while there’s still time to keep your honor and dignity…and political future… intact.

The text of “Dick’s” letter to Jason Allen:

Dear Jason, August 9, 2010

You may already be well ahead of me on this and perhaps this note will serve to confirm your biblical- and Golden Rule-based sensibilities and your own personal sense of integrity. As fate would have it, the events of recent days have presented you with a reputation-saving opportunity and you would be wise not to waste it. It’s an unexpected chance for you to put the toothpaste back in the tube; the genie back in the bottle.

I refer to events surrounding the “23% tax hike,” negative campaign tactic you employed in making up the polling difference between you and Benishek. Not unexpectedly, your scheme worked, but it also led to the turmoil now needlessly threatening to give away the seat to McDowell, Pelosi and the Democrats. Of course negative campaigning is neither new nor necessarily unfair, but there is negative campaigning based on truth and those sordid alternate tactics based on half-truths and un-truths such as the one you used. You deliberately chose to risk putting your future political career in jeopardy among the Michigan Republican leadership as well as among the Republican electorate at large using that method. And yet the opportunity is still open for you to get past this political life threatening mistake.

I’m suggesting that taking the magnanimous path and conceding the election to Benishek in the next day or so will eventually come to outshine and maybe even cancel the memory of your shameful ploy. Such a goodwill gesture by you has the potential to make the damaging consequences of that “23% tax hike” tactic disappear into the dustbin of history. Optimally and instead, you will likely be praised and remembered for taking the high road by graciously conceding early this week. Choosing this path also prevents McDowell from benefiting from the expense, lost momentum and inevitable intra-party acrimony awaiting your choice of not acting as outlined above.

If you demand a recount, thus dragging the process along until August 23 or even beyond and lose, the three major memories of the 2010 race among conservatives will have been not just the Alanson ploy and your having kept the $2,000 SEIU money, but mostly the fact of your wholly dishonest mailing, robo-calls and TV advertising per the 23% trickery. Should any recount give you the victory, McDowell will relentlessly use what you did against you as an example of how treacherous “you are capable of being,” and how dirty tricks is what the electorate can expect from you forever down the line. Imagine the effect in November in the critical UP. Aside from the endlessly innovative use the McDowell team will make of them, the combination of the 23% scandal and the Alanson move will not fade away going forward in Republican electoral thinking, meaning that your longer-range political career plans could well be over.

It’s your call. Behave now with honor and very likely be remembered for it when you run again in other races in the future or be forever labeled as a low-life pragmatist and, God forbid, a professional hack politician. Not what the people want at this particular voter-disconnect moment in history thanks to Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Murtha et al as reinforced by the mere 22% favorability rating of a current U.S. Congress infested with career politicians and assorted incumbents.

Thanks for your time and attention, Jason. This is a defining moment for you and is a matter between you and your conscience.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/blog/loren_heal Socrates

    When Bill Brady won the Illinois Republican gubernatorial primary by 200-odd votes, a ratio similar to that of Dr. Benishek’s win in MI-01, his opponent Kirk Dillard gained a lot of good will and prestige in the Illinois Republican Party by quickly conceding after an automatic recount/recanvass — exactly the stage right now in MI-01.

    Calculate the risk. There there is tremendous downside — even if you were to be successful — to continuing at this point. The downside is to have a weakened and bruised candidacy, and a weakened Republican Party in Michigan. This at a time when Republicans should be on the ascendancy.

    Pivot from this loss. Show yourself a statesman. Walk away, and fight another day.

    • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/blog/loren_heal Socrates

      The vote margin was 193 after the recount.

  • WoodstockRedCat

    Karen Handel.

    • ywhyvon1

      Hey WoodstockRedCat, I assume you are from Cherokee County?

  • spoutinghorn

    shouldn’t the respective political parties pay for them? Why should the Taxpayer be forced to pay for the way a political party chooses their candidates?

    • nessa

      Is a Republican going to go the route of Manbearpig and give Bart THE Stupak’s seat to the4 Dems? Why not man up, concede and set about getting the candidate who won into office? I, for one, don’t want my Party dragged into some Minnesota and Senator Smalley bullcrap.

    • bk

      paying loads of lawyers to monitor the process.

      • bk
        • nessa

          … or like they did in Minnesota, forging, I mean finding new ballots from dead people, uhmm, voters.

          • eburke

            surely you aren’t implying that our esteemed, ACORN-backed, Soros-funded, SOS Mark Ritchie would have done *anything* nefarious in taking a 700 vote Coleman lead and turning it into a 300 vote deficit, are you?

            /rolling eyes

    • rdelbov

      secret. Primaries are a private matter for the political parties but the states fund the primary system and as a quid pro quo most parties agree to the state’s election rules that cover recounts and stuff like that. Not always as in AL the recount was on the other fella’s dime.

      I think Allen is 100% within his rights to persue a recount–I would expect Dr. B. to do the same.

      That being said I would Allen does not do a recount if the margin is over 15 votes. Time to move on.

  • tngal

    but there is in ” I will move into another district so I can get elected to another political office because I termed out in my last position and I didn’t even want this seat before Stupak quit plus I have union people backing me and I plan on being a career politican.

    No, no I in team. Maybe because Vanna turned over all the I’s elsewhere.

    • http://www.twitter.com/RS_yoyo yoyo

      No “I” in Team, nor is there “team” in Politics… Especially where the RNC is concerned, lately.

      I swear, they act like they are spending THEY’RE OWN MONEY, or something.

  • janis

    defend him not giving in yet. Excellent write-up, Dave. Now, then, let’s see if Allen cares more about the country or more about himself. If it’s himself, then he needs to shuffle over to the other side of the aisle with the rest of the Me-Firsters.

  • tngal

    check out their website. Front page with the press realeses. It wasn’t there a couple hours ago.

    The agenda is much shorter than the one for the 23rd. Only four items and one of them is :

    “Canvass and certification of the votes cast at the August 3, 2010 primary for the office of U.S. Representative in Congress, District 1. ”

    So that leads me to believe its all over but the crying..

    http://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,1607,7-127–242034–,00.html

    • Scope

      once the votes are certified, the loser has 48 hours to request a recount. I may be wrong about that. One way or another we should know by the end of tomorrow if a recount will be on the way.

      Do you know of any newspapers in MI 1 where we could send comments asking Allen to concede?

      • Scope

        is where you can post a comment asking Allen to man up.

        http://www.ironmountaindailynews.com/page/content.detail/id/517949.html?nav=5004

        • tngal

          “Surgeon Dan Benishek again declared victory on Thursday after the 31 counties in Michigan’s 1st district finished certifying results from the Aug. 3 primary.”

          Full story

          http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2010/08/michigan-county-results-show-b.html

          • tngal

            From the Cq story…

            “Allen’s campaign is mulling over its options, according to campaign manager Jeremy Hendges. Even though they didn’t notice any major issues on Election Day, they are looking for votes optical scanners may not have picked up, he said.

            “We’ll see where we go from here,” he said.”

            ______

            O.K.. do we start the barage of blogging and letters to the editor and everything now or do we wait another two days?
            .

          • Scope

            and discourage Allen from even requesting the recount. I registered at the above linked newspaper site, and am awaiting my email for authorization. Any other suggestions?

            I especially like the part where they “are looking for votes that optical scanners didn’t pick up.” That should tell the tale. If the scanners didn’t pick up votes, were they only missing Allen votes? If he does ask for a recount, you know his friends in high places will “find Allen votes that the scanners missed, guaranteed.

            As I said elsewhere, if Allen was dishonest and desperate enough to lie in ads against Dr. Dan, he is dishonest and desperate enough to “find” non-existent votes. He just has to come up with more cashola for his SEIU team.

          • tngal

            already. The tweets are already bouncing around all over the place and individual bloggers are picking up the stories. (tagging stories is nice ) 2 or 15 more stories certainly couldn’t hurt (hah!)

            That’s why I was wondering if there was one person or two out there who might hold sway over allen? Someone in the Michigan party or on a national level who he admires and who could talk a little sense into him.

            yeah, the votes that optical scanners didn’t pick up. I thought that’s what they were looking for since last Wednesday.

          • gekster
          • eburke
          • Scope

            I found a website that you can link to all of the MI newspapers from. I’m going back to get the county lists and then start hitting the websites with comments.

  • azaeroprof

    Full disclosure: I’m all in for Benishek here, and I agree with practically everything in your post.

    Imagine for a moment if the shoe were on the other foot. What if Benishek were down 17 votes. (We’re not talking about a Handel-esque margin of 0.4%, we’re talking about a margin of less than 0.02%!! This is well within the “slop” of any election process, no matter how well-controlled. In fact, I think many jurisdictions have laws that trigger an automatic recount for such a small margin.) As conservatives who have every good reason to not want Jason Allen to be the nominee. we would likely all be counseling Benishek to ask for a recount; to not do so with this margin would frankly be irresponsible and a disservice to his supporters. I know I would be very disappointed if Benishek did not request a recount in that circumstance.

    While it would certainly be big of Allen to concede and I would respect him for doing that, he obviously feels he is the better candidate and nearly half the voters agree with him. Does a candidate have any less right to ask for a recount just because they are not conservative?

    • IJB

      In principle, I think I agree with what you are saying. And if they can get a recount done before September, I probably wouldn’t begrudge Allen asking for one (though I think his odds of pulling this race out in a recount are low (barring shenanigans…)).

      But if there’s a good chance that a recount will drag on past Labor Day, then I think a good case could be made that the guy behind, in this case Allen, should “fall on his sword”. It would be the right thing to do for the party, and it would generate him good will for later races.

      I think as long as whoever the winner of this race is is known by Sept. 1, I don’t think any long-term damage will be done to GOP prospects in MI-01.

      But, the longer this drags out, the worse it gets…

      • azaeroprof

        We’re not talking a statewide election here, so I would think it could be done quickly. And even if the tables were turned, I would agree with your assessment.

        Now if this were a general election, it’d be a whole different story!

  • jomo2009

    that Jason Allen probably won’t have a future in Republican politics if he insists on becoming the GOP version of Al Franken.

  • tngal

    As posted upthread, all 31 counties are in and Benishek has the 15 vote lead. Bd of canvassers to certify this tomorrow. But cppolitics got ahold of allen’s camp who is looking over the options.

    So my question is, when races are this close, is there someone from say the RNC or the Michigan republican camp who would be leaning into a candidates ear asking them to bow out. Who would have sway either in Michigan or at the federal level to talk to Jason about this.

    • eburke

      over at the RCCC would have Allen’s # on his cell phone and would be advising him to do the graceful and right thing.

  • lawson

    We are talking about someone’s life here. If you put , this much into a venture and you had a legal right to make sure you really lost, I think you all might take advantage of that.
    I am all against frivilous stuff, but a 17 vote margin could EASILY be made up in a recount. Heck, Benishek gained 16 votes in this phase. I don’;t begrudge someone for making when its this close.

    • Scope

      and I really don’t care. One candidate won the election, albeit with 17-18 votes. Yeah, it’s dang close, and, I agreed that if it was Benishek that was 18 votes down, that he should concede to Allen. Are you really in favor of dragging out the results, even after a canvassing? That canvassing was the recount, and, if Allen doesn’t pull ahead, which looks doubtful, why prolong the misery, and, keep the R from doing the job of campaigning against the D?

  • lawson

    If Benishek can gain 14 votes in this recanvass ,Then it is not hard to imagine a mistake of accounting of some sort that could erase that lead.
    I live in Maryland, so I know very little about these two. I have no horse in the race, but elections like this are why we have a recount process.

    • SoFiMil

      Therefore, AP Bernishek picked up 3 votes (as opposed to 14). Both are relatively miniscule

      • SoFiMil

        Both are relatively miniscule numbers, but if under this metrics Allen is even less likely to prevail on a recount. A lot would depend on the number of absentee ballots, and less so on the number of optical scan, punch card, and touch-screen ballots.