« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

It’s 1938 — all over again

Nothing should shock me anymore about the depth of humanity’s oldest hatred — nevertheless I am in shock. The next Holocaust is being prepared — as the world looks on. And does nothing.

On Wednesday, in Cairo, Fatah — the terrorist group founded by Yasser Arafat that now styles itself as “moderate” and runs the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank — signed a reconciliation agreement with Hamas, the terrorist group that runs the Gaza Strip. The signing was accompanied — as these things always are — by enough pomp and ceremony to disguise, for most onlookers, the monstrous evil taking place. It was attended by representatives not only of the Arab League, but of the E.U. and the U.N. That means us. Scandalously, the U.S. is not only a member of the U.N., but its chief financial contributor. So when “representatives of the U.N.” show up to cheer the consolidation of Palestinian power against Israel, they are doing that in our name.

From Big Peace:

The reconciliation agreement is an important step on the way to getting the United Nations General Assembly to unilaterally create a Palestinian state in September by international mandate. A reconciliation is an important prerequisite.

Abbas said that they had forever turned “the black page of divisions.” Meshall spelled out Hamas’s goal:

“Our aim is to establish a free and completely sovereign Palestinian state on the West Bank and Gaza Strip, whose capital is Jerusalem, without any settlers and without giving up a single inch of land and without giving up on the right of return [of Palestinian refugees].”

In fact, several years ago, the Middle East Quartet (United Nations, Russian Federation, United States, European Union) set three conditions for Hamas: recognize the state of Israel; renounce violence; and honor past Israeli-Palestinian agreements. Hamas has said that it will not agree to any of these conditions.

Well, of course it won’t. That would go against their whole reason for being. Hamas has been committed, from its origins, to the utter elimination of the Jews of Israel. Their very charter, Hamas’s founding document, is a declaration of war — against Israel, and against all of non-Muslim humanity. Here is the second paragraph of the Hamas charter in its entirety:

“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it” (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).

And do not suppose that Hamas intends to fold up shop once they’ve obliterated Israel. The charter is a manifesto of global Islamic conquest. Here’s a sample, from Article 7, which appears under the heading “The Universality of the Islamic Resistance Movement”:

As a result of the fact that those Muslims who adhere to the ways of the Islamic Resistance Movement spread all over the world, rally support for it and its stands, strive towards enhancing its struggle, the Movement is a universal one.

And what would life be like in Hamas’ utopia? Poor, nasty, brutish and short. That’s the only kind of life unmitigated hatred can yield.

I will never forget the heartbreaking scenes in 2005 as Israeli soldiers evicted their own fellow Jews from their homes in Gaza, so that Israel could give the whole Gaza Strip to the Palestinians — in hopes of peace. And I’ll never forget how sick I felt as that gift was trashed by its recipients.

Before

After

The Jewish settlers in Gaza had built some of the most state-of-the-art agricultural facilities in the world, exporting flowers, fruit and vegetables to Europe and elsewhere, and employing thousands of Palestinians, Israelis, and others. Wealthy Jewish philanthropists in the U.S. (as well as a couple of prominent non-Jewish ones such as Bill Gates) bought the Gush Katif hothouses for $14 million and donated them to the Palestinian Authority. The hothouses had taken years to build, but as PA police looked on, Palestinian mobs ransacked them within hours of the Israeli exit. They stripped them of their glass, wiring, computer and electronic equipment and irrigation pipes and timers, destroying a vital source of employment for Gaza Palestinians in the process.

In some cases, the mobs even burned them down. After all, Jewish minds had conceived and designed the greenhouses, Jewish hands had built them, Jewish families had earned their livings in them. We sure don’t want anything that’s been contaminated by those filthy Jews!

It would seem that the most well-honed skill in Gaza now is the art of cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face. The mentality of the suicide bomber.

There is only one way out of this pit. The late, great Israeli prime minister Golda Meir saw what it was. She said:

“Peace will come to the Middle East when the Arabs love their children more than they hate us.”

Cross-posted at The Heartlander

COMMENTS

  • Karina
  • Wubbies World

    …. In the aftermath of World War II and the Holocaust, the world asked, “how we could have let this happen?”, and “Why didn’t we catch the warning signs?”. In retrospect, all the warning signs were there plain as day, but everyone ignored them. Then everyone who ignored those warning signs sat there as if they had no way of knowing afterwards. “How were we to know?”, was the refrain.

    Those same warning signs are there today, but the same left of center, politically correct crowd doesn’t see those same warning signs today, just as they were there then.

    History repeats itself because we forget the past. This is a case today as well.

    There is a wonderful documentary on DVD that is simply titled, “World at War”. I have it. All a person needs do is watch the first two episodes. It opens with the scenes of Oradour-sur-Glane. Google it and know what the Hamas has planned for Israel.

    • acat

      The part where I don’t agree is that human nature is a funny thing – there’s simply stuff that some folk can’t look at.

      Friend of mine passes out at the sight of blood. Extremely competent woman, mother of four, investment broker, and accomplished singer but .. every time one of her kids has a bleeding injury, she has to hand them off to someone else.

      Man’s inhumanity to fellow man is akin – some people literally can’t look at it. They can’t get their heads around the idea that human nature is inherently evil, so avoid looking at any evidence to the contrary… until there is no choice. In the meantime, evil grows.

      The hard part is getting those who mentally black out when confronted with raw human nature to stop navel-gazing and wishing it weren’t so, and to hand off to those who can look unflinchingly at the dark, and see what must be done.

      Mew

      • Wubbies World

        The element of others unwilling to accept and acknowledge the evil of human nature is real. The “why” of the blindness’ existence, or at least for a certain segment of the population, is the only question. However, there is also those who are glad to let others do the dirty work of what they agree with exists as well.

        The only issue is being able to pinpoint which reason it is for each person. That is the only hard part. The blindness is still real.

        • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

          Great book by Prager on how the Jews piss people off due to their sincere attempts to live up to the Moral Law.

          The problem in Palestine are the people themselves that venerate teenage suicide bombers killing innocents, and not the various names of the parties of their political factions.

          The reason they persist is the refusal of the civilized world to defeat them utterly, as in Antietam or Dresden. They need an ass whooping.

          • acat

            The punchline of which has the Texan adjusting his hat and saying “Ain’t played cowboys and islamists yet.”

            Mew

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
      • Green_Lantern

        Sometimes I wish I could communicate just one single thought to everyone, everywhere at the same time, and have them understand it. I would pick your reply above, acat. Really well said. It slides right into the old adage “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” Well said.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
    • rightwingmom52

      saw a lot of bad reviews about the BluRay version. Advice was to order a previous version. What do you suggest? There seem to be several available.

  • juumanistra

    If for no other reason than Operation Samson laying in its pigeonhole and everyone knowing about it.

    • acat

      is the 12th imam cult. It’s just taken a while for it to catch on. Stated differently, mutually assured destruction only works if the other guy doesn’t have a death wish. Some of these guys seek to bring about ragnarok.

      History doesn’t repeat like a record skipping, it more echoes like ripples from a stone… except there are many stones, and many ripples, sometimes amplifying other ripples, sometimes muting.

      Mew

      • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

        I don’t know how many ordinary Iranians believe in the 12th imam — but the mullahs/ayatollahs in charge of the place sure do. In fact, they believe that he’s alive — and grand-ayatollah-in-chief says he’s seen him and talked to him.

        This is bad, folks. They WANT global nuclear war.

        Our elite refuses to take them seriously because our elite thinks that anything that THEY don’t believe, nobody else could possibly believe either. So other people’s reality never registers with them. That’s why the breakup of the Soviet empire caught them by surprise. They were totally not registering the religious revolution that was going on in places like Rumania. Not on their radar screen.

        That’s what is happening now, I fear — only what they’re failing to foresee this time is not something good like the fall of the Berlin Wall, but rather, something very, very bad, that could get a bunch of us killed — and totally wipe out Israel.

        • juumanistra

          It’s rather hard to achieve global nuclear war when you don’t have a delivery system with global reach. Or a warhead capable of being mounted on your non-existent system. Or the resources to build up a sufficient first-strike arsenal to actually achieve the kind of devastation you want. Or the resources to build the second-strike capacity necessary to guarantee your enemies die a heathen’s death if they dare to attack you, even with conventional force.

          If the worst comes, the Iranian state will be utterly destroyed, and there is a more likely than not chance that the Jewish state will be as well. While a tragedy of unfathomable proportions, it cannot and will not produce a global nuclear war. Regional, to be sure, with tens of millions dead and displaced. but not global.

      • juumanistra

        The thrust of the diary is that a second Holocaust is in the making via the unilateral creation of a Palestinian state and the recognizing of such by the international community, including the U.S. In order for this to happen, the Palestinians must acquire some infusion of martial strength which they do not, at this moment, possess: If, tomorrow, the U.N. recognized a Palestinian state, Israel would still have more than sufficient strength to strangle it in the cradle. Given that the extant balance of forces of the Hezbollah-Iran axis is insufficient for the task at hand, presumably this infusion would have to come from Egypt and/or Turkey, which have reasonable methods of approach to bring force to bear and are now friendlier to Islamists than they have been in decades. Simply put, however, neither state is in the thrall of the Twelfth Imam’s cult. Yes, MAD doesn’t work against Iran, but in the formulation of this diary, that’s neither here nor there. It’s the powers that’re most likely to intervene to support such a Palestinian state that MAD needs to work against, and none of them have displayed the slightest taste for nuclear brinkmanship.

        A not-insubstantial part of the Iranian governmental apparatus is under the thrall of an apocalyptic cult bent on incinerating the Jewish state. No quibbles with that. But if that was the point the diarist wished to make, then that should have been touched on. Rather than ham-fisted allusions to the Holocaust and dredging up the latest attempt to give the flotsam of international affairs a change-of-address form.

        • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil truth

          Just immediately above your comment (and almost two hours earlier) the diary author herself just said that she was very concerned about Iran and its intentions to exterminate Israel.

          So for your to declare at length that “Iran has nothing to do with this diary” either reflects an inability to read or arrogant disrespect to the diary author.

          And it doesn’t help your cause to then go on the attack that she should have written a different diary and that she made ham-fisted allusions to the Holocaust and dredging up the latest attempt to give the flotsam of international affairs a change-of-address form..

          Regarding the substance of your comment: what you’re ignoring in your smug dismissal of the threats to Israel are the strengthening noose of anti-Israel states that would be surrounding a tiny country: 1) Egypt that is falling under the sway of the Muslim Brotherhood (or others) who will likely abrogate their treaty with Israel once they can the a pretext and who also will be actively facilitating arms smuggling to Gaza; 2) Gaza, under Hamas;3) Lebanon, a client state of Syria/Hezbollah; 4) Syria, actively allied with Iran and importing weaponry and Iran agents; 5) West Bank.

          So far the only thing stopping complete encirclement is Jordan, but its future is rather grim being as it’s likely to be caught between Iran and Saudi Arabia – and the latter has an historical tribal enmity with the Jordanian rulers.

          Palestinian statehood will deprive Israel of the ability to effectively defend itself against prolonged low-intensity conflict.

          I’ll stop here before I take up any more of my time.

          • juumanistra

            If we’re going to engage in pissing contests about reading comprehension, I will note that there was no mention of the cult of the Twelfth Imam in the original diary while heartlander goes to immediately conjuring Holocaust imagery via the Night of Broken Glass and accusing the West of doing nothing while history sets to repeat itself. Given that the only international player in the thrall of the cult of the Twelfth Imam is Iran, and its conspicuous absence from said original diary, I would say that makes the Holocaust references more than a l’il ham-fisted. Because without them looming the background, well…what is there to this, exactly? Hamas still wants to drive the Jews into the sea? They and Fatah are going to try yet another hare-brained scheme to delegitimize Israel? Neither of these exactly new or compelling, let alone warranting of dredging up the Holocaust, and should go without saying. (Because such as has been the PLO/PA’s dream for forty years, and Hamas’s for thirty.) Or, as I also said, if one’s goal is to talk about the messianic tendencies of the cult of the Twelfth Imam that currently holds sway in Tehran, then actually talk about it in your original diary.

            I do nothing to diminish or dismiss the strategic threats which face Israel: Simply that, in the context of the first-half of the original diary, nothing really changes. Syria, Lebanon, and the paramilitaries of Hamas and Hezbollah are already part of the existing balance of force: They are not capable of carrying the day in a conventional conflict against Israel, which would undoubtedly be needed to trigger the second Holocaust hinted at that would nominally start after Palestinian independence is recognized in September. Yes, Egypt’s falling under the sway of the Muslim Brotherhood could reopen the arms trade to Gaza: But that, by itself, is still insufficient to engineer a second Holocaust. Keep daily life disrupted and kill a few more of the filthy Zionist occupiers? Probably. Drive them into the sea? Not so much.

            But all of this has ranged rather far afield from my initial substantive point(that a second Holocaust is in the offing come September) and its knock-on point as developed above(that there’s no need to dredge up the Holocaust in the context of the Palestinians, and if one really means the Iranians, context so that such can be divined is most useful.)

          • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil truth

            “What well-known American political leader recently attacked his invited guest with the following statement:

            There’s nothing serious about a plan that claims to reduce the deficit by spending a trillion dollars on tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires. And I don’t think there’s anything courageous about asking for sacrifice from those who can least afford it and don’t have any clout on Capitol Hill . . . That’s not a vision of the America I know.

            Point taken.

            Actually, I’m not entirely clear on the 1938 analogy unless it’s comparing recognition of a Palestinian state to the Munich Agreement – and the effect that had on the defensibility of Czechoslovakia or later, Poland. And/or the world ignoring bad behavior – and how that ignoring led to Nazi Germany establishing hegemony over Western and central Europe which enabled the Holocaust to be carried out under its rule.

            None of us have an infallible eye to the future, but in a situation where Israel has a shrinking margin of error, one can’t make the assumption that the perturbation of a Palestinian state will merely shift the balance incrementally – and I think there are significant indicators that there will be some major shifts in response, some favorable and some threatening to Israel, and more of the latter than the former, I fear.

          • juumanistra

            As, really, that’s been about how long it’s been since any of them had an idea about fiscal policy that didn’t revolve around some variant of soaking the rich.

            I took the original 1938 mention to be a reference to the Krystallnacht, the two days of pogroms affectionately remembered in history as the “Night of Broken Glass”. Widely reported when it happened, it ended with a quarter of male German Jewry in the concentration camps and marked the point where the campaign against the Jews moved from one of harassment and encouraged emigration to outright internal deportation and sequestration. All the while with the West looking on, having cut a deal several months earlier for “peace in our time”.

            Were the Obama administration actually taking seriously something like the UN General Assembly recognizing a Palestinian state, then such allusions really would be apt: We’d be actively encouraging those are, at best, irredentist nationalist and at worst irredentist Islamists while rewarding six decades of atrocious behavior. As cynically optimistic as it may be, I believe that Obama’s handlers are not quite as stupid as to think he can win that battle of public opinion and that the U.S. will, when the time comes, condescending laugh at the General Assembly for being…well, what it is.

            As without the U.S. on-board, there can be no hope of strong-arming an Israel threatened by increased geopolitical instability out of what it will be entitled to do under international law when Hamas invariably launches Qassams over the border again. Which is why I’m rather…condescending about the whole exercise, because the only the way it can work is if the U.S. restrains Israel from not leveling the newly minted Palestinian state for the first transgression originating from within its borders. No American president, no matter how dovish and in the Arabist camp, could make such work in light of the resultant firestorm it’d kick up. Least of all one seeking re-election with the economic headway that prevails today.

          • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

            …was to the Munich Agreements signed by Neville Chamberlain, followed by Hitler’s invasion of Austria and occupation of the Sudetenland. In other words, I was referring to the way that the cowardly, misguided caving of the West enabled Hitler to go on the march.

            My 2:02 p.m. comment on Iran was a response to acat’s 11:47 comment, which was acat’s response to juumanistra’s comment at 11:38. I guess acat and I both assumed that Operation Samson was a reference to Iran. Are we mistaken?

          • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

            I misrepresented your comment. I just re-read it, and now I see that you were bringing up the 12th imam cult as something counter tothe Operation Samson dynamic.

            My bad!

          • acat

            that others see the Iranian death cult for what it is… I hope I’m wrong about why it’s important.

            Mew

          • acat

            was that the Operation Samson juumanistra mentioned at 11:38 was a reference to Israel’s nuclear weapons program. It further appeared, from the comment, that juumanistra was placing faith in some sort of mutually assured destruction idea.

            Given that assumption, and given that Iran are funding Hamas, Hezbollah, etc, which, with Saddam off this mortal coil, it made sense to mention that the 12th imam cult renders MAD useless.

            Mew

          • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil truth

            by bringing down the temple on himself and his enemies because he was enslaved and had no hope of escape or freedom (not to mention having been blinded)…

            I would then assume Operation Samson would be the prospect of Israel firing its nuclear arsenal at a multitude of enemy targets designed to produced unprecedented destruction of its enemies as a final act of revenge in the context of facing military defeat and imminent annihilation.

            Or to put it another way, OS represents plans for a all-in second strike as a deterrent against such an attack. To be effective, Israel 1) must have a credible nuclear arsenal, 2) convince its enemies that it has the will use them in extremis and that the consequence will be sufficiently horrendous to its enemies to deter them from trying. Consequently, Operation Samson is a very brittle plan because it’s all-or-nothing.

            And that also means, in response to your question, that it has been directed against any country or alliance that would act to annihilate Israel, not just Iran. Nor it is a response only to a nuclear attack, but to any military action that destroys the nation. Iran’s imminent nuclear capacity just ups the ante.

            If someone here knows differently, I will stand corrected.

          • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

            …but the high position of Samantha Power in this administration — and the rumors of her elevation to SecState after Hillary’s departure — are quite frightening to me. Power is on record as favoring U.S. military assistance to the new Palestinian state to aid it in showing Israel who’s boss.

          • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil truth

            …to place Israel in extreme peril against a world determined to see it disappear from this planet. And given how Obama (and for that matter Bush) by inaction has allowed Iran to acquire nuclear weapons capacity DESPITE everyone swearing up and down that this was unacceptable, allowing this under cover of duplicitous UN inspectors (and at the critical time a US security assessment about Iran that was a deliberate lie by its authors). And the U.S. public has not risen up against these actions, not have there been more than token protests by Congress.

            And then we have the actions of the U.S. over many years in response to every Israeli military action to prevent them from being decisive, going back to 1956.

            In light of that history, I have no confidence that the U.S. will stand up to the rest of the world. And once you have a Palestinian nation, then all the other countries will line up with it against any Israel act of defense – they’ll find some reason, truth has nothing to do with it. And this will be worse than before because we’re now talking about a nation calling upon the UN to defend it against an attack by another nation.

            And all the U.S. has to do is to not intervene. Though if some in the Adminsitration have their way, they would use the Libya example to demand that the U.S. act similarly towards Israel on specious “humanitarian” grounds…

            And incidentally, I believe that UN recognition requires only a General Assembly vote, not the Security Council. Which means the U.S. has no veto, just persuasion to keep statehood from happening. And the U.S. public opinion will not be a deterrent, given the obfuscation that will surround this action n concert with the anti-Israel convictions of the left and the media (but I repeat myself)..

          • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil truth

            Apparently admitting Palestine as a UN member does require prior Security Council action before certain approval by the General Assembly. Which means a US veto is all that would stand in the way.

            Doesn’t that fill you with confidence?