« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A note to David Frum, Ross Douthat, David Brooks and every other self-important, self-designated savior of the Republican Party… PLEASE STOP.

“I can tolerate … your boring books that some Republicans read to prove they are ‘introspective’ and thoughtful about the movement. What makes me want to scream … is your self-indulgent, holier-than-thou proclamations about how wrong most of us ‘conservatives’ are.”

Please stop telling us what is wrong with… well, US. Seriously, I just cannot take it any more.

It’s like Yankees who come South because it’s generally such a nice place to live and then tell us we’re all a bunch of idiots and that we need to “do it like they used to do it back in Detroit.” Spare me – move back to Detroit and leave me alone.

We all recognize the problems we face as a nation, and as a Party. You want a frigging medal because you, too, can read polls and recognize that we need to sort out the Hispanic-gap, the suburban-soccer-mom-gap, the generational gap, the new-young-christian-gap or any other gap the numbers indicate? No freaking crap, geniuses. We just want to start with principle instead of a craptacularly stupid effort to buy-off their votes.

I can tolerate (while vehemently disagreeing with) your random ideas about traffic jams and ramping up police forces, your gas tax to pay for other tax cuts and a green agenda, your musings about FDR somehow being the model for 21st Century conservatism, and I can even tolerate your boring books that some Republicans read to prove they are “introspective” and thoughtful about the movement.

What makes me want to scream – and I mean a pull-my-hair-out, punch-someone-in-the-face kind of scream – is your self-indulgent, holier-than-thou proclamations about how wrong most of us “conservatives” are simply because you have seen the light after all this time writing for the New York Times, all of 5 minutes working for the Bush Administration, or all this time well, doing very little other than writing a book called Grand New Party and putting yourself out as the savior of a movement you apparently want little to do with.

I do not want – as I suspect most Republicans do not want – to suggest that we cannot have a fine debate about ideas within the movement. We always have. We always will. There is nothing new about that. I do it all the time with a great many smart conservatives. And you three have offered some fine ideas along the way, when not spending your time trying to re-make us.

Yes, we are a big tent… but we are a big tent with principles. Those principles vary a little bit, but there are large, common threads – freedom, personal responsibility, limited government and an appropriate deference to the Almighty are just a few of those principles the VAST majority of conservatives and Republicans I know embrace.

I love being a conservative and am proud to call myself one – so please do us a favor… quit calling yourself conservative, moving the goalposts on us, and then complaining we are on a different field. If you want to have a discussion of ideas, gentlemen, put them out there and we may find common ground. But STOP the condescending babbling about how “bad” we are and recognize that life is too short to go around being pompous and angry in your self-promotion.

p.s. If you are wondering what triggered this particular reaction, it was this post by David Frum, but it was only because it was the most recent… it could have been any one of hundreds of others…

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • johnCV

    pundicrats such as kristol, frum, buckley (the lesser) and even lately krauthammer and barnes have been beating this theme about exapnding the party to inlcude groups not considered conservative. The difference is in HOW you do it.
    Reagan presented a principled and cohesive view of what America is and how to make it better – which was based on Conservative principles. People understood and gravitated to him and his message. The above noted pundicrats simply find it easier to note where the republicans are weak and insist that emulation of the demcrats will yield the neccessary votes. Fools. The advocate shredding our principles for political gain – they don’t explain what we would have of we won ( actually, it won’t be a problem with this strategy – witness mccain et.al.).

    BTW, I just read buckley the lesser’s most recent article where he seems genuinely baffled as to what obama is trying to do with his economy wrecking policies – WHB would be sorely dissapointed.

    • ted40

      Respectfully and candidly, I don’t think the GOP is going to win many elections if it appears that Rush is the de facto leader of the party.

      That’s what Frum seems to be saying in the article you’ve linked. Candidly, I think it’s good advice.

      I think the pattern that’s gotten established over the last couple of months, where GOP pols are not allowed to establish any distance between themselves and Rush — and have to publicly apologize whenever they seek to do so — is absolutely toxic to the party’s electoral prospects.

      • victor_cocchia

        …as I said in another post (to Erick) I am not a big Rush listener, nor follower, but, with that caveat I say that in fact I think people will begin to realize that the ideas that he is espousing are the ones that will lead us out of this mess.

        Obama’s policies have been an utter disaster, and not just his economic ones. He is a horrible leader, the stimulus, TARP II, the budget, all of these policies/initiatives are sheer disasters. The releasing of the documents today regarding Bush was utterly classless, and near seditionary. His foreign policy to date is abhorrent . I mean he has given $1B to basically rearm Palestine, he is abandoning the missile shield, Iran is near a nuclear weapon and he wants to talk. As soon as they have it they will use it on Israel. The list goes on.

        I think in six months time Rush’s following will grow as the country sees left leaning policies do not work, they endanger us, they weaken us economically. I just hope that our “leaders” (can you hear me Steele) see things the same way and realize true conservative principles never go out of style.

      • $peciallist

        GOP pols will be leaders of a conservative movement….or they get ZERO support from me….the line is drawn

        You better wake up…or the Dems are going to Pwn you

      • St_Louis_Conservative

        …..with Rush Limbaugh and Obama and the fact that the Republican Party is associated with him is of bigger concern and therefore a bigger vote-deciding issue than a $4 trillion budget, a $1 trillion tax increase, bailout after bailout, militant abortion advocacy, socialized healthcare, etc.

        If that’s the case, then it doesn’t matter anyway because the country is screwed.

        • joeljournal

          He’s great. Emanuel & Co. are using him as a diversion. While the country is arguing about Rush, the Dems are about to pass a bloated spending bill with 9,000 earmarks, give up on missile defense, etc. As a former lefty Democrat I can say that I listened to Rush BECAUSE I disagreed with him, and now I tune in on occasion because I agree with him. His ideas have remained the same. Republican politicians have changed, and not for the better (though there are some good ones, let’s not forget).

          Who holds Obama accountable for what Keith Olbermann says or doesn’t say? This whole thing is ridiculous. It is what would-be authoritarian governments do–and I should know. I have lived under one. Let Rush be Rush. The real question, after all, is not why Rush wants Obama to fail but why Obama wants America to fail.

          • UpLateAgain

            Rush is on the radio three hours a day. He talks a lot. And if Obama and company can label him as the defacto spokesman for the GOP, they can start taking him out of context (as they already do) and attribute that out of context remark to the GOP as a whole.

            e.g…. they’ll quote him as saying he wants Obama to fail, without ever showing the explanation of what he means by that or explaining the context in which he said it… and then because they’ve labeled him as the GOP spokesman, they’ll portray that as the official position of the Republican party….. and a certain percentage of the not-all-that-politically adept populace will buy into it.

      • hogan

        Likewise respectfully, the only ones suggesting Rush is the “leader” of the Party are the media, liberals and the Frum/Douthat/Brooks types. And they are doing it on purpose to try to get to their own ends.

        The problem is not Rush – the problem is a lack of actual leadership anywhere in the Party. In that void, Rush especially shines – almost alone.

        And no one would have to apologize if they didn’t say stupid, unprincipled things from which they then felt they needed to back away.

        • $peciallist

          We will not purchase that premise…

          • $peciallist

            ‘White House Lets Limbaugh Be Voice Of GOP Opposition’

            “If White House officials were trying to elevate Rush Limbaugh to the leader of the opposition, they may have succeeded.

            After the radio host delivered a raucous red-meat speech Saturday afternoon at the Conservative Political Action Conference, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” the next day: “He is the voice and the intellectual force and energy behind the Republican Party, and he has been upfront about what he views, and hasn’t stepped back from that, which is he hopes for failure.”

            Fight the Lies!

  • thirteen28

    … and the votes will follow.

    Reagan in 1980 and the Gingrich-led Republicans in 1994 won by doing exactly that.

    Frum, Douthat, Brooks, and the rest of the casterati either forgot that or never learned it in the first place.

    • ted40

      as they lost election after election. “We’re just not being true *enough* to our liberal principles,” they told themselves. “If we nominate someone who’s really *genuinely* liberal, the voters will respect us for the courage of our convictions.”

      It’s what a party out of power always tells itself. For the first two or three losing election cycles.

      • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

        Glad we had that settled.

        • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

          …be sure that it convinces me that you’ve actually read up on the Congressional elections of 1980 through 1992.

        • AKSteveB

          why is Michael Steele letting Obama set his agenda?? Taking shots at Limbaugh because Obama somehow framed this all as “Rush Vs. America.” I’m going to go bleach my brain right now to get this “minstrel show” idea out of it. And I hate myself for even thinking it, but there you have it. Someone better have a come to Jesus talk with this guy and fast.

          • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

            RNC chairman Steele is trying to reach out as best as he knows. He was a perfect pick and fit for MD Governor Erlich’s lieutenant in 2002, yet lost his U.S. Senate run because of his ineptitude when he goes all solo in his “reach out” efforts, as evidenced by his cuddle puppy video here:
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7wjJyMDUH0

            and here:
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pHe2NfQ4kM&feature=related

            I was on the verge of contributing heavily to his Senate run until I saw that ad, then I was like, “he’s off the reservation”. A real shame, for when he works to advance causes, he is spot on. When he works to fit in & be liked, his brain goes into defrag mode. Go watch him on CNN’s D.L. Huley to see what I mean.

      • $peciallist

        get it?

      • hogan

        …and, when have we had even mild respect for conservative principles of late?

        No, indeed – some of us believe that the core problem has been an abandonment of our core philosphy – a philosophy of limited government, fiscal responsibility, self-reliance and freedom.

        It’s not that we “aren’t conservative enough.” It’s just that we haven’t even been – even roughly – conservative.

        What would you prefer be the guiding philosophy and the action plan for the Republican Party?

      • Vegas_Rick

        They finally did it.

        He got 52%.

        Now we’re screwed!

  • flicka47

    ” Those principles vary a little bit, but there are large, common threads

  • 1stRichard

    That sight

  • BlueLandRed

    and long time lurker, I have to say that I hear a lot of talk about how the GOP is a big tent party, but I don’t actually see any evidence of that.

    Thing is you all want the GOP to become more conservative and that’s antithetical to any sort of Big Tent strategy. You can’t do both simultaneously.

    • hogan

      It’s about adhering to the principles that I believe most conservatives believe in… as stated before, a belief in limited government, freedom, personal responsibility, fiscal responsibility, deference to our Creator…

      These are the things that we believe actually create a big tent – because we know that most Americans believe in these principles, too…

      A big tent does not equal moderation. That is the false notion that seems to consume so many folks… A big tent means that we have a lot of folks with many different views brought together around a handful of core, fundamental principles…

      • BlueLandRed

        ideals… to be sure, tho’ as an agnostic, I’m not to big in to the whole deference to the Creator thing.

        Anyways, from experience, those lofty ideals always seem to get left by the wayside when the rubber hits the road. Just saying.

        • hogan

          There really is no room for second place when talking about America, is there? The fact the lofty ideals are left my the wayside would seem to me to be one of the key problems we are dealing with.

          And, I assume that as an Agnostic you appreciate the deference to the Almighty shown in our founding documents? “Endowed by our Creator,” and the many other similar references, including George Washington’s famous farewell address?

          We needn’t lose our collective sense of piety even as we respect that principle of freedom that allows us to believe what we want…

      • AKSteveB

        There are a number of us who …even if highly educated, wordly etc. just didn’t really believe that the U.S. would go THAT far into the socialist realm. Nobody has to moderate anything at this point, I suspect we’re angrier than most of the long timers. We need that tent open to us. Don’t purity test us out of it.

    • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

      Was there anything else? I ask because you seem to be overdue for trying again to depress us out of winning NY-20 and repeating Olbermann’s racism on Bobby Jindal.

    • Rapunzel46

      what does that mean? What are you then? There is really only two parties.. Democrats or Republicans. We have some pseudo-Republicans like Frum, Parker, Brooks, who claim they are Republicans, yet they want the Republican party to be democratic-lite.. if they want to be democrats then my opinion is change your registration and become a democrat, leave the GOP and let the party rebuild..

      So, I ask you, ex-Republican, what did Rush say you don’t agree with? Did you listen to the speech — the whole speech? Of course he was bombastic — that is Rush — but there was a great deal of good old fashioned philisophy in what he had to say Saturday, ‘

      Speaking for myself, I want a return to good old fashioned conservatism,., no more “Compassionate Conservatism”…. and certainly enough of all this liberal stuff we are looking at now… it didn’t work under FDR, it didn’t work under Carter and it won’t work under Obama either.

  • E Pluribus Unum

    I think we are all about welcoming back the *voters* who were so stupid and gullible, taken in by the massive media slobbering love-fest and reasonably slick packaging. Stupidity is a common enough virtue in America anymore. However, for the so-called “conservative” glitterati who should have known better , I feel somewhat differently.

    As to all those pundits and self-appointed ‘conservative’ experts who felt free to back a rather obvious Marxist huckster, to reject everything that made America great, and to sell their souls in a vain effort to be liked and accepted by the Treason Media establishment – when they come to their senses, far too late, while the free market system is swirling down the commode, I have a message for them, since I don’t think it took any more than a modicum of common sense to see through the Obama BS machine:

    They can GFT. Using a broom that has rusty nails in it.

  • davo119

    I happened to see David Brooks on The Chris Mathews Show. (I was still watching TV then) I was stunned and thought ,”What’s HE doing there?”. What followed was the most disgusting display of sycophantic hero worship I’ve ever seen. (Well, up till then) And of Chris Mathews no less. Sitting outside the group of regulars with a stupid little grin just waiting for a scrap to be thrown his way, he was literally bouncing up and down wagging his tail. that day I awoke to how utterly worthless is the opinion of so called moderate conservatives.

  • John E.

    In last week’s column, Brooks as much as admitted that he has been duped. But yet he is still swooning over the power — palpable in the blue sea in which he swims — over people to be had by The President as Savior. It’s a fitting paradoxical snare for the elite mindset. It is unsurprising that they think that Republican’s must engage it to be successful.

  • navychick1993

    And might I add, The Great One aka Mark Levin, just finished reading your post on-air. I think the sleeping beast has been awakened and this is just the beginning of a revolution within the Republican Party. Conservatives are leading the way to take back our great nation!

    Once again…excellent post!

    • shelbysbest

      tonight Hogan, and is singing the praises of Redstate.com and you for writing about this topic. Mark is fired up as usual about conservatism and he said move Redstate.com to the top of the links. Mark praised your article and mentioned you by name. “Well said” was the last thing he said after he read from your article. There was high praise all across the board for Redstate.com from the “great one”, Levin.

      • JadedByPolitics

        CONGRATULATIONS! how kewl that the greatest on the radio that GREAT Mark Levin would mention your diary and Redstate.com Hell this should make a lot more conservative eyes come on by….GOOD DAYS :-)

      • E Pluribus Unum
  • From ME to You

    applause

  • Chieftain1776

    Conn Carroll of the Heritage Institute made a similar point (http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/15848?&in=00:34:04&out=00:39:56). Basically Frum, Brooks, Douthat/Salam, etc. are just egghead parasites on the movement, as Rush alluded to at CPAC. They, and their “moderate” perches at NYT wouldn’t exist if there wasn’t a principled conservative movement to “moderate”.

    Believe me if the conservative movement succeeds they will come crawling back into the fold somehow rationalizing their previous positions. They, being career pseudo-intellectuals, have no other place to go to feed off the conservative movement. Unlike Bush they don’t get to retire to a ranch after screwing up the country.

    As to their “new” ideas of “interest group conservatism”. LBJ tried it in the 60′s, Nixon in the 70′s, Bush in the 2000′s. Y ou can’t intervene with the economy to favor specific groups or you get this an “ownership society” where bubbles are created and then burst when the politicians are done and ready to jump into cushy consulting jobs with a congressional pension. Leaving accusations of “predatory lending” and “oppression” by those evil people forced to give you a loan by the government.

    More insidiously, a group of people who believes government tinkering is the cause of their prosperity…which Rush which addressed well in his CPAC speech…will always want more government tinkering. The lack lack of control over their lives will create resentment which will be riled up by leftist panderers. Just think of any RINO proposal and add “more” and you’ll have the (winning) Democrat position.

    In conclusion the response to the RINO egghead’s proposals should be simple:

    You and what army?

    Sorry for the rant.

  • $peciallist

    5

  • http://rageofjared.blogspot.com/ yambles

    nt

  • Chieftain1776

    and his admonition against attacking Obama. Dee Dee Myers, Clinton’s press secretary made this excellent point on Meet the Press yesterday:

    “MS. MYERS: Right. Big problem is they don’t have any leaders, they don’t have an opposition program and they’re afraid to take on President Obama directly. This was something that we faced in 1994 from the other end. You know, we, we came up with a strategy for fighting back against Newt Gingrich and the rising Republican revolution by saying we’re going to take on Reaganomics, but we’re not going to take on Ronald Reagan. We’re never going to mention President Reagan by name, but we’re going to go after Reaganomics. It failed. You have–you know, you can’t separate the person from the program when somebody’s as popular and high profile as the president.”
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29453052/page/4/

    She should know…remember how they turned the Federal Government Shutdown into “Newt Gingrich’s feelings were hurt”. Tom Delay remarks:

    “He told a room full of reporters that he forced the shutdown because Clinton had rudely made him and Bob Dole sit at the back of Air Force One…Newt had been careless to say such a thing, and now the whole moral tone of the shutdown had been lost. What had been a noble battle for fiscal sanity began to look like the tirade of a spoiled child..The revolution, I can tell you, was never the same.”

    Frum’s point about Rush being the face of the movement is well taken but we just need the SAME message articulated by a credible elected politician.

    Also Frum knows he’s the one on the chopping block. Who’s been

  • http://brockwayfamily.spaces.live.com/ Erick Brockway

    the RINOs and squishes will come crawling back alright. But then when Rush or some conservative talker speaks they’ll say instead;
    “If he keeps talking like that we’ll soon be out of power! *sniff*”
    Once a squish always a squish.

  • UpLateAgain

    Especially in this time when the contrast between us and the Democrats will be SO stark and SO apparent, and the results of what is being espoused currently show themselves more and more….. you won’t have to go to them. They’ll come to you. They always have. And if they don’t, I really don’t care for what would result if another big gov. GOPer finds his way into office anyway. There’s no victory for the country in that.

    My question is…. when do we get to start hunting liberals in the streets?