« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

With friends like these…

Last fall, our nation’s leaders faced a choice. They could embrace a flawed, ill-conceived and, essentially, desperate plan to try to rescue our financial system and the economy – or they could stand on principle against an interventionist government and the risk of seriously undermining our capitalistic system.

Some Republicans panicked – notably, every member of Senate Republican “leadership” – and as a result, we are neck deep in government mandates, controls, ownership, and just general meddling.

A handful of Republicans did the right thing in the face of the indecipherable blustering of Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke, something we might refer to as ACTUAL leadership. Members such as Shelby and DeMint, Sessions and Vitter (see the vote here) did not succumb to fear, along with a handful of other Republicans.

And there was another stalwart worth mention – someone who raised serious questions about the viability of the “Paulson plan,” and was not afraid to point out the significant danger of heading down the path we’ve taken these last 6 months. That man was Senator Jim Bunning.

So, it is unfortunate to see how Republicans, and in particular his supposed friend Mitch McConnell, are treating Jim Bunning as he heads into an election cycle.

Now, anyone who follows this stuff closely is well aware that Senator Bunning is not exactly a warm-and-fuzzy kind of guy. He is 77. He is known on the Hill to be gruff, cantankerous, and easily frustrated. He says odd things that sometimes get him in trouble. And as a result of all of this (and a terrible Republican brand, generally – thanks in part to his fellow Kentuckian) he is facing a tough re-election…

So, he and Kentucky Republicans face a tough decision. Fair enough.

But something just doesn’t set well with me about how this is shaking out among his colleagues.

Republican Senators (through their rhetoric and the NRSC) BLINDLY supported (now-Democrat) Lincoln Chafee, the basically useless Mike DeWine and countless other weak, miserable candidates who constantly knifed the Party in the back. They did so regardless of their true viability or dedication to principle.

And, Senator Bunning held his fire last year regarding the misguided TARP bill when his “friend” Mitch McConnell (who voted for it) was on the chopping block, fighting for his life in a tough election.

So, why is it that the conservative Jim Bunning gets tossed under the bus? Doesn’t he deserve the benefit of the doubt? Doesn’t a man who has served his nation well and by all accounts honorably, generally supported his fellow Kentucky Senator and other colleagues, and voted consistently in favor of basic conservative principles (with some exceptions, as all have) deserve the support of his fellow Republican Senators?

I am not saying he shouldn’t step down. I am not saying he should. I leave that for him to decide along with his family and the decision-makers in Kentucky (out of the press).

But that some of his colleagues in the Senate are shoving him aside – openly and without shame – is just another example of the utter gutlessness that pervades every corner of the Senate Republican Conference… the same Senate Republican Conference which stood by Ted Stevens even as he tossed away a solid Republican Senate seat in Alaska because of questionable ethics, a federal indictment and a history of abusive spending.

At least Jim Bunning can say he is in the Baseball Hall of Fame and threw a no-hitter in both the American and National Leagues, one of which was a perfect game (1964) – all back when the game was THE GAME. I will tell my kids about Bunning… I will try to forget the current crop of Senate Republicans as soon as I am able… or until they stand up for principle.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Rod_Patrick

    They love the liberals and democrats more than they love their own.

    They call it tough love. I call it bs.

  • The_Rebel

    Many here at RedState are also very willing to throw Bunning under the bus, I’m sorry to say.

    Lincoln Chafee in the primary of 2006 beat Stephen Laffey, a very principled conservative, who lost by only 6% to Chafee. In the general, people wanted the real democrat, and Chafee lost by 8%. Laffey was supported by the Club for Growth. The turnout in that Republican primary was the largest in RI history, indicating a groundswell of support for Laffey. But no matter, the Washington elite wanted Chafee.

    And don’t forget Rick Santorum, who lost in 2006 after making some controversial statements. But he really lost in 2004 when he supported Specter, along with the establishment, over another principled conservative, Pat Toomey. Santorum was a very articulate spokesman for the party, and he made the conservative case very effectively.

    So given the recent track record of the Republican establishment, if I were them I would tread very lightly before throwing a good Republican under the bus.

  • IJB

    I guess, ultimately, it depends on what you are after.

    If you’re looking for a guaranteed conservative vote, in the form of someone who will probably be a thorn in the side of McConnell and other “go along to get along” Senate Republicans, Bunning is your guy.

    OTOH, if you want someone who can actually publicly *transmit* the conservative message with an appealing public manner, someone who’s not going to easily fall into the ready-made traps by the DNC-inspired “media, then Bunning is getting close to disaster territory.

    Frankly, what I wish, is that we could get someone who could do *both* things – be a reliable conservative vote and thorn-in-the-side to McConnell, while still coming off great (and not making bonehead mistakes) in ‘media’ situations.

    Unfortunately, I haven’t really heard of any Kentucky Republican fitting that bill.

    But Bunning only fills the first half of the bill, so basically he’s “problematic”.

    I don’t want to give McConnell a “win” here. But neither do I want Bunning around being forced to issue public mea culpa after public mea culpa.

  • Aaron Gardner

    No Kentucky Republican matches the bill better than Bunning already does, so what purpose does giving the seat away have?

    I think Bunning deserves the support not only because he is right ideologically, but also because he was respectful enough of the party as a coalition to be out campaigning in support of McConnell even though they disagree on some ideological dogma.

    If McConnell and the NRSC hang Bunning out to dry, especially while having no solid replacement, it will only cause more strife between conservatives and moderates.

    At least that is how I see it.

  • hogan

    My real point is not about whether Bunning should be the guy or not. Personally, were I him, I would retire… not because they want me to, but because I’ve served publicly for a long time, and I would enjoy NOT being in the Senate with all those arrogant fools… and I would want to spend the rest of my days hanging out with the grandkids and maybe doing something to save baseball from its current custodians (different rant)…

    Reasonable people can debate whether he should run or not… But what galls me is the way he’s been treated by the very “club” who sticks by EVERYBODY else… be they liberal like Specter or Chafee, or a corrupt, Party-destroyer like Ted Stevens.

  • mbecker908

    The really big question is, will they toss Arlen Specter under the bus next year? I doubt it.

    We need new leadership. Top to bottom in the Senate.

  • lawson

    Trey Grayson should be the nominee.

    Bunning will be 77 and has raised no money.
    Grayson can hold this seat for the next 30 years.