<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question(s)of the Day for Soto - Will She Answer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/hogan/2009/07/11/questionsof-the-day-for-soto-will-she-answer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/hogan/2009/07/11/questionsof-the-day-for-soto-will-she-answer/</link>
	<description>Just another RedState: Conservative News and Community weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marcus_Traianus</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/hogan/2009/07/11/questionsof-the-day-for-soto-will-she-answer/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus_Traianus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/hogan/?p=267#comment-757</guid>
		<description>Beyond that, nothing substantive will be answered.

In her cases, statements and basic fealty to the law there is very little to show she will be impartial or fair. As proof, the American people will get years of cases on the SCOTUS were you can predict with 100% accuracy Sotomayor,s position, especially those involving minorities.

Blind justice and respect for the law? Hardly. A brilliant thinker and Constitutional scholar? Oh, please-  more like another contra intellectual liberal using her personal whims as a substitute for sound judgment based on the law.

The Constitution weeps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beyond that, nothing substantive will be answered.</p>
<p>In her cases, statements and basic fealty to the law there is very little to show she will be impartial or fair. As proof, the American people will get years of cases on the SCOTUS were you can predict with 100% accuracy Sotomayor,s position, especially those involving minorities.</p>
<p>Blind justice and respect for the law? Hardly. A brilliant thinker and Constitutional scholar? Oh, please-  more like another contra intellectual liberal using her personal whims as a substitute for sound judgment based on the law.</p>
<p>The Constitution weeps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mad_russian</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/hogan/2009/07/11/questionsof-the-day-for-soto-will-she-answer/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>mad_russian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 06:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/hogan/?p=267#comment-750</guid>
		<description>Why did she join a racial supremacist group whose motto is,

"For the Hispanic race, everything; for the whites, nothing."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did she join a racial supremacist group whose motto is,</p>
<p>&#8220;For the Hispanic race, everything; for the whites, nothing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
