Media Matters Confuses the Constitution With the Healthcare Bill


While I hesitate to waste even a few seconds of my God-given time on this planet responding to Media Matters (you know, the “progressive” Media Matters… a 501(c)(3), tax-exempt organization dedicated to “comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media..”), with respect to this monstrocity of a bill, I SHALL “leave everything on the field” as they say.

So, in response to my post earlier titled “Words Mean Things,” in which I list just a few of the many words in the Senate health care bill that highlight the massive amount of power given to government at the expense of freedom, Media Matters wrote this dismissal.

What is so laughable about the liberal – er, uh, I mean “progressive” school of thought is the fact it simply ignores the Constitution until it suits “progressive” purposes (such as killing babies in the name of privacy – I wonder if Media Matters will do a word search for “privacy” or “penumbra” in the Constitution – but I digress), and even when “progressives” do tacitly acknowledge its existence, they ignore the rich history of its adoption.

The Constitution was, of course, the result of significant negotiation and compromise. Whether one agrees with the federalists of the day, the anti-federalists of the day, or finds himself in between – the reality is that the Constitution was all about power. That was its purpose. It’s a CONSTITUTION. It’s purpose was, and is, to use words like shall, may and tax, and to do so in a way that would be an acceptable balance of the power it would authorize.

Now, everyone with an elementary understanding of the history of our nation’s adoption of the U.S. Constitution understands this simple concept. They also understand that the Constitution was one that limited the powers given to the central or national government – and that by so limiting that power, any legislation offered by the Congress would not be about power-grabbing, but about focused legislation constrained by the limits imposed by the Constitution.

No one who has even an ounce of respect for the Constitution would suggest that this Obama/Reid Senate healthcare bill, the Pelosi House healthcare bill, or any variation thereof, fit within the limits given the national government.

They don’t.


Category: , , , , , ,

RSS feed

12 Comments Leave a comment

I am so irritated by this

baserunr (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 6:21PM EST (link)

refusal by the left to recognize the idea behind the Constitution. The point is to LIMIT the scope of government. This country is great not because of government, but in spite of it. Obama and his minions are of the mindset that this statisim just hasn’t been tried by bureaucrats as smart as they are. Rubbish! And as for the desire to turn over health care to the federal government; please STOP. I don’t need a 2000+ page directive on how to buy a ham sandwich at my local supermarket. The ingredients are there, and all without federal edicts. The system works if government gets out of the way. The way to control costs in the system is to get government out of the way. Remove the barriers that discourage medical consumers from shopping for and dealing directly with medical providers. The Constitution has a wonderful way of solving all of these problems. You take care of you, I’ll take care of me. If I decide to help support someone out of a job, down on their luck, or in need of help with medical costs, I can choose to do that. The government is not empowered, and should not be empowered, to make these decisions for me,

“The day you think you know it all is the day your trouble starts.”

Rivkin and Casey sum it up...

writeblock Tuesday, November 24th at 10:59PM EST (link)

See:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204518504574416623109362480.html

“The Supreme Court construes the commerce power broadly. In the most recent Commerce Clause case, Gonzales v. Raich (2005) , the court ruled that Congress can even regulate the cultivation of marijuana for personal use so long as there is a rational basis to believe that such ‘activities, taken in the aggregate, substantially affect interstate commerce.’

“But there are important limits. In United States v. Lopez (1995), for example, the Court invalidated the Gun Free School Zones Act because that law made it a crime simply to possess a gun near a school. It did not ‘regulate any economic activity and did not contain any requirement that the possession of a gun have any connection to past interstate activity or a predictable impact on future commercial activity.’ Of course, a health-care mandate would not regulate any ‘activity,’ such as employment or growing pot in the bathroom, at all. Simply being an American would trigger it.”

There are also massive intrusions of privacy…

 
 

With or without Reid's opt-out provision

VizBiz (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 6:25PM EST (link)

The Red States for the most part understand this is an infringment. I’d like to see all of them come out now and rebuke this unconstitutional power grab. Stop focusing on pieces of the bill here and there, and rebuke the whole thing.

Runs with scissors, walks with Wacom.

 

They love the sixteenth amendment

Menlo (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 6:48PM EST (link)

When you get down to it, all of these bills are little more than tax increases (and not just for “the rich”).

They don’t want to admit it because they would have to acknowledge that Obama lied.

“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter

 

Morons.

Money Tuesday, November 24th at 6:57PM EST (link)

The Constitution is a social contract in which citizens imposed restrictions and limitations on the size and scope of the federal government. ObamaCare is a piece of legislation in which the federal government imposes on supposedly free citizens mandates and requirements exceeding constitutional authority.

Therefore, the shalls and shall nots in the Constitution apply primarily to the federal government, while the shalls and shall nots in the health care bill apply primarily to the supposedly free citizens of this once-free nation.

Big Difference. Morons.

“Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject, so you know you are getting the best possible information.” — Michael Scott

 

Don't fret - MM completely misses

persiflage Tuesday, November 24th at 8:21PM EST (link)

the point of your prior post, and in their dismissal draws an eggheaded comparison between apples and skyscrapers (At times, you have to look up to see both of them, right? So, they are alike, right?). My IQ fell 30 points while reading their response. Head hurts.
The 2074-page Senate Health Care bill – “The Colossus of Rogues” I call it- is a blueprint for a centralized power grab of an additional one-sixth of the US economy. It seems MM is fine with that. Ignore them. They are not on your side, and they are too stupid or blinded by collectivist ideology to understand arguments about individual freedom of choice, self-determination, and privacy with regard to your health care.

“A republic, if you can keep it…” – B. Franklin

 

Democrats trample the Constitution with muddy boots, while Republicans...

RedBeard Tuesday, November 24th at 8:41PM EST (link)

…just tend to ignore it.

Tragically, I doubt we could find enough “original intent” members of Congress to fill an average committee, let alone fill both houses.

The United States Constitution means exactly what it says. It’s not difficult to read at all. Why do our elected officials have such trouble understanding it?

Standard-bearer for grouchy curmudgeonry since, oh, 1975 or so.

 

Here is some "counting" for MM...

yoyo (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 9:40PM EST (link)

$13,000,000,000,000.00 +/- $500,000,000,000.00, here or there. Current Federal Deficit (estimated) over the next 10 years.

For those who cannot understand the word DEFICIT, try bouncing a check for even .000001% of that number above. “They” would lock you in a cell, and throw away the cell.

What this bill (combined with the Porkulous, Omnibus, and TARP) constitutes is “Conspiracy to Commit a Felony” and they should all be jailed.

Nemo me impune lacesset
“No one will provoke me with impunity!”
=============================
Pukin’ Dogs – The Fighting 143
Sans Reproache
=============================
The ‘yoyo’ replaced my cigarettes January 22, 2006….

 

This all starts

michigan Tuesday, November 24th at 9:44PM EST (link)

in our broken education system. The left is being intellectually dishonest with their nullification of the intent of the Constitution. Our youth from the 80′s doesn’t have the personal history of statist governments. Those films of people trying to escape tyranny from East Berlin and being shot down and left to die like dogs. I don’t forget those images and the job the media was doing many years ago. People like Bill Ayres and groups such as the Tides Foundation have infused themselves into all levels of education to spread their ideology, and have done it well.

When I started going to school in 1980's

Richard Mullins (Diary) Tuesday, November 24th at 9:56PM EST (link)

they weren’t entrenched enough to make things bad for schoolchildren. Even by the time I graduated from High School in 1996, they weren’t as close as they are now. In the last several years, they have seem to take full control, some thing that even when I went to school didn’t exist.

Richard Phillip Mullins BlogThe Squash Satire SiteNews on Happy Jet Airlines
Rmullins Pics
Rpmullins Twitter

Joe Biden is like a Decrepit Park owner with a Meth lab that happens to not only be a dealer but a user.

Let’s Bankrupt the Democratic paty. Make spend all the money to defend thier candidates.

 

Where did all the smelly hippies go?

RedBeard Wednesday, November 25th at 7:08AM EST (link)

Into education, that’s where.

Michigan is quite right. Read Bill Ayers on the importance of corrupting young minds with left wing dogma. In his own words, “… be a teacher capable of hope and struggle, outrage and action, a teacher teaching for social justice and liberation.”

The problem isn’t Bill Ayers, the individual hate-America leftist. The problem is that he is a bellwether for the entire subversive agenda, and the tens of thousands of Ayers-like teachers, professors, and administrators who infest our education system like rats in a garbage-strewn alley.

I know these people personally. I knew them when they were running campus riots, because I was right there with them, screaming and acting ike a maniac. But then a funny thing happened, Most of us, the would-be radicals, opened our eyes, grew up, got a haircut, got real jobs, and became ashamed of our ridiculous left-wing mob mentality. But a while the rest of us were maturing, those hard-core Marxists and their useful idiot followers were moving into positions of influence in education.

The best advice I can give is to take the time to rear your own children, instill proper values, and do NOT allow the left-wing education industry to corrupt them. We did ok, despite the never-ending onslaught of leftist ideology the boys faced every day at school. We made them think independently, to question, to learn from many sources. And because they can think and reason, they are adult conservatives now.

Standard-bearer for grouchy curmudgeonry since, oh, 1975 or so.

 
 

Media Matters makes a habit of sniffing their own farts

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Wednesday, November 25th at 11:20AM EST (link)

dog_inspecting

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO