And he sounded like what he is–a con artist. Nothing changes. Nobody was converted.

After all, when a baby whines, you stick a pacy in its mouth.

Perhaps we should put a “T” for every tango kill on the presidential limousine- it will be nostalgic and REALLY COOL, like him!

To all you critics, I bet Plouffe and Axelrod would like the idea. SO there.

Anyway, after years of war, drones that President Bush put in the air and the entire “War on Terror” that Mr. Obama says doesn’t exist- he throws out the body count. Nice SOTU talking point- I am sure the almost 20% unemployed really care. Plus I am certain it impressed the heck out of the folks at Fort Hood and the almost victims of the hapless “underwear bomber”. My friends in the military that actually watch this tripe? It solicited a round of twinkie and Chicken Fajita throwing at the set. They turned the channel back to watching Nova vs. ND.

I guess his proposal was to continue leveraging all of the heavy lifting Mr. Bush did and continue claiming the successes as his?

The President certainly thinks highly of his “ability” to craft and deliver words because that is all he gave last night…words.

The Earmark promise is not a very strong one. Instead of putting all earmarks on a web site - how about getting rid of them all.

I thought the most unseemly moment in the speech was when he he attacked the Supreme Court for their reversal of McCain-Feingold with all of the Democrats standing right behind them and applauding. Despite his words “with all due respect” it was a completely classless and disrespectful attack on a separate and equal branch of government.

The media is reporting that Justice Alito mouthed the words “Not True”. If it had been me, I would have mouthed the words “***k You!”

I wonder if the Supremes will take any revenge? Perhaps the time has come for the “Birthers” to finally get their day in court. Or maybe the recent ruling by the EPA that CO2 is a pollutant should be re-visited in the light of Climategate. And of course, there are several Constitutional Issues related to Obamacare.

Beyond being classeless, it was stupid and bad politics. The Court can fight back and could totally trash the Obama agenda.

for the next administration after suffering O’s Chicago style politics.
The audacity of this man railing against something his very own campaign seems to have done - I was for it (campaign reform) before I was against it (when I ran) now I am for it again ( when it looks like the American People are gonna whoop my a - - in 2012.
Geez

Yes, please Mr. President, get a new job and leave us alone.

Like a re-hash of his campaign speeches. Was there anything new in there except for mentioned the words “tax cut”?

Sarge

Permanent Campaign Mode. Nothing more.

Feel like asking BO if he wanted some cheese with that whine?

All those goodies come with strings attached. The strings by which the puppetmaster controls our every move.

From the state of the union “Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.” They are going to “right this wrong” political free speech?

The 5-4 vote left intact limits on corporate gifts to individual candidates but ruled that corporations may spend as much as they wish to support or oppose candidates in advertising. All these pro capitalism free market corporations that provide jobs would have a voice and it is “wrong.” I think Madison correctly argued it should be tolerated because the only way of determining such is by free examination and free communication among the people thereon. This is the foundation of our freedom, free and open debate, to stifle such is unconstitutional, un-American, a horrible decision, dangerous and erodes individual freedom. This is the most dangerous of slippery slopes to step on when we start to abridged speech. There may be some that think hate speech or burning the flag should be made illegal and controlled by the government, this is wrong. However precious or distasteful an opinion may seem, we depend for its correction not on the conscience of judges and juries but on the comparison of other ideas. Every part of this inalienable liberty belongs to “We the People” and especially political speech must not be abridged in any way. It is up to us to decide, We the People and not the government.

I think this is one of the most dangers, how would all of you rate it?

Obama’s whining about his inability to pass anything because of “a few senators” (also saying in the same sentence that the larger the majority democrats have the more responsible republicans are to govern??) seemed to imply that he will do everything he can to eliminate the filibuster.

I know that has been brought up by other dems and written about here. Seems to corroborate that they will try - and fail at - another unpopular endeavor.

He said he wants to forgive student loans after 20 years, and after 10 years for people who enter public service. Unclear on if the timer starts when you take the loan, or after you graduate.

Either way, they are LOANS, not gifts! Or they shouldn’t be gifts. And why the deference to people who enter public service?

Spread the wealth liberalism on full display.

-nt