« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Bob Bennett Pledges to Repeal Obamacare – Will He Now Pledge to Kill His Own Healthcare Bill?

As most RedState readers are aware, The Club for Growth launched a great website called www.repealit.org, designed to garner pledges from current office holders, candidates and citizens to make clear their intention to work to repeal ObamaCare (or any variation thereof) should it pass.

Senator Bob Bennett (R-UT) has signed the pledge for candidates, the text of which is:

I hereby pledge to the people of my district/state to sponsor and support legislation to repeal any federal health care takeover passed in 2010, and replace it with real reforms that lower health care costs without growing government.

He has done so for an obvious reason. He is nervous he is going to lose his primary.

We, of course, welcome his signature on this pledge to fight ObamaCare. But, what about Senator Bennett’s own healthcare bill (S.391) co-sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)? Will he similarly denounce it?

He should. Compare the Bennett bill to ObamaCare:

    Does it call for an “individual mandate” to purchase health insurance? ObamaCare – Yes. Bennett – Yes. (see Title I, Subtitle A, Section 102)

    Does it provide for criminal penalties and/or fines if someone fails to buy a government –mandated plan? ObamaCare – Yes. Bennett – Yes. (see Title I, Subtitle A, Section 102)

    Does it give Washington Bureaucrats significant authority to regulate every American’s health plan? ObamaCare – Yes. Bennett – Yes. (see requirements and involvement of the Secretary throughout the bill, as well as massive involvement of IRS to administer the plan)

    Does it force millions of Americans to change from existing health coverage, even if they like it? ObamaCare – Yes. Bennett – Yes.

    Does it increase taxes on Americans? ObamaCare – Yes. Bennett – Yes.

    Does it increase the cost of healthcare premiums? ObamaCare – Yes. Bennett – Yes.

    Does it cover illegal aliens? ObamaCare – Yes. Bennett – Yes.

    Does it force taxpayer funding of abortion? ObamaCare – Yes. Bennett – Yes. (see Subtitle B)

Given the similarities, it would seem that if Mr. Bennett is now committed to stopping or repealing ObamaCare, that he would be equally opposed to his own bill. Of course, Bennett will not oppose his own bill, instead, he and Republican co-sponsors Lamar Alexander, Lindsey Graham, Judd Gregg and Mike Crapo will give lip service to how it is not “single payer,” but instead, creates competition and promotes the private sector. Nonsense. The bill empowers federal bureaucrats to control healthcare policies, mandates coverages, funds abortion and will increase taxes and premiums.

As noted by Ramesh Ponnuru of National Review in his April 2008 article on the Bennett bill:

The closer you look at it, the more it appears that Bennett-Wyden is a “compromise” in which the government takes over the financing of health care but, to save face, conservatives are allowed to pretend that the private sector is still in charge. Their plan is, in important respects, to the left of the ones being offered by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, and has been celebrated as such in liberal magazines.

Bennett’s healthcare bill should be rejected. But even more, Bob Bennett should be rejected in the Utah Republican Primary – Utah and America deserve better.

COMMENTS

  • acat

    How is a pledge like this enforced?

    The carrot in this deal is obvious, Bennett wants to keep his job – but what’s the stick if he signs it and then backs out?

    The answer is, there is no enforcement. This is, to use someone elses’ phrase, “Words. Just words.” – and the only thing the paper is good for is lining my litterbox.

    Bennett may, in fact, have had a “Come To Reagan” moment and found his inner conservative – I hope he has – but it’s more likely he’s just interested in keeping “his” seat. I hope the people of Utah take a page from the people of Massachusetts and remind Bob that it’s their seat, not his.

    Mew

    • arc_ut

      Bennett’s bill, S.391 Healthy Americans Act, had some of the same provisions that Bennett voted that the current healthcare bill was unconstitutional.

      I guess it was fine for Bennett’s bill to be unconstitutional, but the democrats bill, which is unconstitutional is not OK?

      Also, his bill required insurance companies to offer an abortion coverage, with the exception of religious owned companies.

      Bennett’s bill, S.391 Healthy Americans Act:

      (3) COVERAGE FOR FAMILY PLANNING-

      (A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a health insurance issuer shall make available supplemental coverage for abortion services that may be purchased in conjunction with enrollment in a HAPI plan or an actuarially equivalent healthy American plan.

      (B) RELIGIOUS AND MORAL EXCEPTION- Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to require a health insurance issuer affiliated with a religious institution to provide the coverage described in subparagraph (A).

      • acat

        The question is why is Utah, a pretty red state, represented by a guy who, as you point out, is happy to support a potentially unconstitutional takeover of health care as long as it’s done to his specifications.

        My view is Bennett, like McCain, is dancing to the right to try to not lose in the primary since that’s the tougher race in a red state.

        Mew

        • piratecoastbucs

          We The People of Utah are paying much more attention to the details, just like the rest of the country is waking up, as opposed to just voting for the (R) or (D). Most Americans showed apathy for politics in general until Bush/Gore in 2000. Don’t single out Utah for doing that, every state in the nation is guilty of the same.

          Information is more readily available, communication is instant now, voting records are available for all to see. Bennett has been exposed for the fraud he is and he is going to be held accountable by We The People.

          DON’T BLAME UTAH.

          • eburke

            are the votes there to toss Bob during the nominating convention? Do you happen to be a delegate to that?

            Take him out man…take him out (figuratively speaking of course)

          • acat

            Bennett used to be able to do the dance – to press release conservative at home, but vote liberal in Washington. Other than the few who were truly motivated to figure out what he’s doing, he could get away with it. Bennett is hardly alone in this – took South Dakota a while to figure it out as well.

            Beautiful state, by the way.

            Mew

  • utah_1

    So Senator Bennett signs a pledge to repeal Obamacare? The pledge also states “and replace it with real reforms that lower health care costs without growing government”. So does that mean that he won’t try to pass the bill that he sponsored with a liberal democrat? The bill that has a federal mandate that all Americans must have health insurance, that funds abortions and provides coverage for same sex partners. And as clearly stated above, it expands the role of the federal government.

    So in signing this, it just goes to show that he is just another typical politician. Pandering to the public in an election year. Thankfully the delegates in Utah are an educated and engaged bunch who will not fall for it. They will vote him out on May 8th. And they will vote in Mike Lee.

  • arc_ut

    I believe that Cherilyn Eagar is the only one running for the 2010 US Senate seat who has supported and been active in fighting for conservative values for the last 30 years at the local, state, national and international level. [That includes Bennett]

    http://www.eagar4senate.com

  • saintgeorgegentile

    Heard on the radio this morning that Naught Gingrich is going to be campaigning here in Utah for this supposed Republican.

    • eburke

      Witness his knee-jerk support of ScuzzyFuzzy while taking shots at the grassroots for supporting Hoffman.

      • acat

        Alas, poor Newt. Should have moved back to ‘Lanta and gotten involved in Georgia politics. Instead, he decided to stay in D.C. .. and it’s not done his brain any good.

        Alas.

        Mew

  • arc_ut

    Mitt endorsed Chris Cannon when he was running against Jason Chaffetz, and then endorsed Jason Chaffetz when Jason got the nominee.

    I will expect these two to endorse someone other than Bob Bennett come May 9th, when Bennett looses in Convention May 8th.

    Many Utah state delegates are less apt to support Newt and Mitt in the future, they want Bennett gone.

    • eburke

      I’m stunned I tell you…simply stunned.

  • ddg7

    Will Bennett also swear to oppose amnesty?

  • justcase

    So now that we see the election slipping away, we’re bringing in the big guns. Looks like you’ll do anything to stay in office. Bring in Mitt Romney, now Newt Gingrich and finally “pledge” to go against Obamacare.

    Thank you RedState for pointing out how obviously polictial this man is. Bob’s own health care bill is just as bad as Obamacare.

    Who is doing the most to repeal Obamacare right now, and rally the doctors to drop their AMA standing? Well she’s not even in the Senate . . . yet. My pledge goes out to Cherilyn Eagar.

  • piratecoastbucs

    Let me just say that he is in for a very rough ride. Don’t forget, we are the reddest state in the union (Clinton came in 3rd in 1992).

    Bennett has been part of the entire problem in Washington, and he will be held to the fire this time. Believe it or not, Hatch is not on the favorite list around here either. Utah may be the leader in the “KICK THE ENTIRE PROBLEM OUT OF WASHINGTON” movement.

    Bennett will lose. Hatch will have trouble when his time comes. I don’t care if a freshman senator from Rhode Island (or anywhere) replaces Hatch in his ‘position of power’ on the judiciary committee as long as that representative helps repair this country.

    • piratecoastbucs

  • ecfinder

    That’s very interesting. I happen to think Bennett’s plan is brilliant and very much unlike what the democrats have offered. I might note that there are several other well-respected Republicans who happen to be co-sponsors of Bennett’s heatlh care bill. Clearly such distinguished individuals wouldn’t sign on to a bill that was unconstitutional. I am repeatedly dumbfounded by the things you post on your blog that have no merit.

    • streiff

      1. to participate you have to address the issues. We don’t do pronouncements here and we don’t treat them very respectfully.

      2. Several “well-respected Republicans” sponsored McCain-Feingold which the USSC has just gutted as unconstitutional.

      3. I’m repeatedly dumbfounded by the number of people who show up here, are presented with a cogent and well-researched argument they disagree with it, and expect anyone to take them seriously because they just don’t like it.