« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A trillion dollar hit job – who really wins from the Herman Cain scandal?

Having spent three quarters of my adult life working in restaurants, I can tell you that I find the accusations against Herman Cain difficult to believe. Not that sexual harassment doesn’t occur in the restaurant industry, because it does. Rather, because the industry has no shortage of itinerant and attractive young women who would be more than happy to indulge Mr. Cain in whatever peccadilloes he might have. If Mr. Cain were prone to using his position to coerce women into sexual favors, which is exactly what Ms. Bialek is accusing him of, I cannot imagine that there would not be women coming out of the woodwork with stories of his antics. Frankly, he wouldn’t have even needed to use coercion. For a man of power and influence seeking to find willing partners, the restaurant industry would be the equivalent of shooting fish in a barrel.

Instead of credible, demonstrably true charges, what we have is a handful of women coming out with specifically non specific accusations of “sexual harassment”. And the problem is, there seems to be no way for Mr. Cain to escape the attacks. It’s like being asked “Mr. Smith, are you still beating your wife?” and you respond that you’ve never laid a hand on her but the headline the next day shouts “Mr. Smith says he’s no longer beating his wife.” The accusation alone is enough. Enabled by a pliant media, these women have been able to detour, if not derail, a promising political campaign.

Who might benefit from this? Primarily two groups: The left (read Democrats) and Washington insiders of both parties.

The left does not like Herman Cain for two reasons. The first is because he’s an unabashed believer in American exceptionalism. At the end of the day he believes that a man in America has the opportunity to succeed through his own efforts, regardless of their background or demographic characteristics. The second reason they don’t like him is that he has the temerity to believe those things while being black.

That latter bit is what really makes the Democrats nervous. The fact that Herman Cain is a black conservative who is a vociferous opponent of the entitlement state creates a potential fatal crack in one of their core constituencies, blacks. Blacks make up about 13% of the population and they vote Democrat in excess of 90% of the time – 96% of blacks voted for Barack Obama. To put that in perspective, if a candidate needs 50% of the total vote to claim victory and they automatically get 90% of the black vote, they already have 11% of their 50% right there. That means that of the remaining 87% of the population, said candidate need only attract 39% of the vote. That’s a pretty good deal for Democrats.

Herman Cain puts that math in jeopardy. By demonstrating that a black man can succeed in the United States without depending on affirmative action, without being a ward of the state, without being an agitator for redistribution of wealth, he shatters the myth propagated by the left that blacks are victims and cannot succeed without government help. Once they recognize that, that 90% Democratic foundation begins to crumble.

The veracity of this fact can be seen in the way that the left treats Cain. “He’s a black man who knows his place” or he needs to “Get off the symbolic crack pipe”. They are trying to demonstrate that he is not an authentic black, his story is an aberration and that his success is not the kind of success that other blacks can aspire to or expect from themselves or their families.

Therefore, his candidacy must be destroyed. It must not be allowed to succeed because if he were to convince even 20% of blacks to vote for him, President Obama and much of the Democratic machine would be toast. A Democrat party without its most reliable constituency would crumble.

At the same time, political insiders on both sides of the isle dislike Cain for a completely different reason. He seeks to upset their Washington metro apple cart. You know, the one that has the highest income level in the United States. The one that has the power to set the rules for the rest of the country.

The Herman Cain candidacy is potentially Armageddon for those people. As a conservative, Cain believes that the government should be limited to doing only those things it is constitutionally empowered to do, rather than all the things politicians and bureaucrats want to do. As such, he would likely clean house. He would likely slash, if not eliminate, major elements of the government bureaucracy, particularly in the areas of education and energy as well as environmental and corporate regulation.

To understand why this scares insiders so much, imagine the impact of his 999 plan. By streamlining and simplifying the tax code, by eliminating most exemptions, he would immediately gut the number of accountants America needs, as well as making tens of thousands of IRS employees redundant. That proposal alone would immediately save Americans’ hundreds of billions of dollars in accounting costs. Thousands of accountants and IRS types would have to find productive jobs elsewhere. Now imagine that same level of efficiency brought to the Departments of Education, Energy, HUD and HHS.

Simply put, Herman Cain is an outsider to the Washington insider cabal. That cabal, which includes bureaucrats, lobbyists and politicians of both parties, is shaking in its boots. The prospect of a businessman not accustomed to the built in inefficiencies, the go along to get along mentality that permeates Washington, scares those people to death. Unfortunately for them, Cain worries about the effects of government employees and regulation on the American people and the American economy, not the other way around.

His goal is to remove the yoke of government from the backs of the American entrepreneur so that prosperity can return. If you are a lobbying firm who collects hundreds of millions of dollars a year to influence government, you don’t want to see someone elected who might sink your ship. Same thing if you’re a bureaucrat living in Mclean Virginia and making $150,000 a year with rock solid job security. Same if you are a politician who sits on a committee that gives you power over 10% of the American economy. If you are part of that yoke on the neck of the American people, you don’t want to see Cain get elected and would do whatever is necessary to make it not so.

Herman Cain’s unorthodox candidacy and his outsider perspective presents a sufficient threat to both Democrats and Washington insiders that they will do whatever they must in order to get him out of the race. For the Democrats it’s their party, for the insiders it’s their power and privilege and for both it’s their basic survival. At the root, there are literally trillions of dollars are at stake. Every day we read about the most heinous of crimes being committed for far lower stakes, so why then does it seem so farfetched that this just might be an orchestrated hit job to sink the Cain campaign? Maybe it’s not so farfetched after all.

COMMENTS

  • http://mantei.wordpress.com mantei

    I have been supporting Herman Cain for President since January for these EXACT reasons. His election would be absolutely earth shattering to the Left and DC “professionals”. We don’t want Washington “experience”! We don’t want race-based politics! We don’t want a slick politician who claims to know everything and panders to everyone! We want “one of us”. We the People are reclaiming our nation and Herman Cain is our surrogate and champion.

  • nathanalbright

    …is that while you have been trying to debunk the accusations, Cain unloaded a bunch of wild accusations about who let the accusations out, looked like a elementary schooler at the National Spelling Bee in the debates talking about the mountains of Iran, and looked unable to form a coherent opinion on why collective bargaining for public unions is a bad idea when they are bidding against the taxpayers, what he would have done in Libya differently than Obama except for listened to some expert advice, or (now) wet foot-dry foot and our policy with Cuba.

    In short, you’re about three massive gaffes behind the curve. I understand, it’s hard to keep up with someone who gaffes every day, but unless your goal is to defend the man rather than defend him as a qualified candidate for the POTUS, you’re like the European politician in the sovereign debt crisis, a few days late and a few billion short.

    • pttx333

      xx

    • http://mantei.wordpress.com mantei

      He’s a real guy who has held real job and really worked his way up from poverty and has a real sense of humor and is a real leader. He has 40 years of business success and common sense to rely on. Get on board or get out of the way.

      • Tbone

        Cain is an unqualified fool.

        • acat

          Ron Paul is still running!

          Mew

          • Tbone

            Let’s give Cain another week and see what else he doesn’t have a clue about.

    • http://www.imperfectamerica.com imperfectamerica

      Not being an ostrich, I can’t but help see the problems that Cain has created for himself. This piece, however, was not about whether or not Cain is a solid candidate, which I think he can be, although he has challenges he must address. (Most of which could be cured by – asking him first – announcing that he would make John Bolton his Secretary of State or Defense)

      Rather, this piece focuses on the reason why the left and the insiders will find a way to derail him even he pulls it all together and wins the nomination. They simply can’t afford to allow him to win.

      • nathanalbright

        …I hardly think the beltway needs any help. If you are seeking to defend Cain as an honorable man, I think you would be vastly better off, and letting him show that he is resilient in bouncing back from crises, whether they are started by himself or enemies. That is what those of us who support other candidates look for, after all.

        • izoneguy


          Herman Cain Has Never Heard Of “Wet Foot, Dry Foot,”

          As you can see in the video, Caputo was the first to ask Cain about the “wet foot, dry foot” policy (which says that Cubans, in general, can stay in the U.S. if they make it to dry land, while those caught at sea are returned) during his earlier stop in Sweetwater. He was met with a confused “wet foot dry foot?” from Cain.

          • Tbone

            a Pat Paulsen candidate. The only way Cain should get in the White House is with a tour ticket. The man is an ignorant joke.

          • retire05

            that is unaware of the “wet foot, dry foot” policy of the U.S.? Who of us have forgotten the Elian Gonzales fiasco?

            Cuban Americans are staunch, loyal Republicans. They, more than any other ethnic group, understand oppression, real oppression. Talk to any Cuban American and they will tell you how much they hate Obama because they see in him the same national path taken by Cuba. Yet, Herman Cain was obviously clueless about the “wet foot, dry foot” policy so he did what he could only do; dodge the question and ignore the reporters.

            More and more it seems that Herman Cain is nothing more than a vanity candidate. And his claim that he will appoint those who are wise and informed to aid him on issues he is weak on flys in the face of his continuing to hang on to Mark Block. Block is not wise, nor informed, and is nothing more than a hit man.

            I cannot believe that there are still people who support Cain.

          • izoneguy

            My wife has some friends – twin sisters who are in their late 50′s and fled from Cuba with their parents. Some of their relatives were left behind. They would probably go ballistic if they saw this Cain video. I cannot write here what they say about Obama……

          • nathanalbright

            ….but as a Floridian I know very well what wet foot, dry foot is. It’s hard to be a politically aware person in Florida and not be aware of the Cuban refugee problem.

          • jqcjones

            VIABLE candidates with a better platform.. NOT. I am sick and tired of pseudo-conservatives who do nothing but pine for the “perfect” candidate when none exist… As if everyone must know everything presented them, especially when these candidates are so pressed for time, have barely any time to sleep, eat, heck, even take a dump without being ridden into the ground for a comment here or there on MORONIC topics that have no other purpose than to try and make someone stumble for a soundbite or excuse to prop up their own, woefully inadequate candidate. Hypocrites, all… But that is your right, everyone.. to say stupid things when it best suits you, I suppose.

          • nathanalbright

            At least Romney, Gingrich, Perry, and Cain are “viable” candidates at this point. And none of them are perfect. But the answers that Cain stumbles on have not exactly been all that tricky. Anyone running for a Republican primary knows better than to talk up public unions. And anyone running for POTUS should have a better idea of global politics than Cain does. Heck, any high school student should have a better knowledge of global affairs than Cain does.

      • eabjr

        Thanks for the article “IA”…it seems anyone who tries to be reasonable and objective about anything here on redstate inevitably draws “tbone” and his minions around to insult, ridicule, and brown shirt those who try to think through things. But such is the way of substance-less offerings! With “friends” like these who needs the left…! Good objective article…

    • determinedconservative

      I have no desire to pick a fight with Cain backers, who no doubt have good intentions…but as Cain has received more and more scrutiny, he has not held up well. We can leave all the sexual harassment allegations aside, and there’s more than enough evidence to show that he just doesn’t have the gravitas, the understanding of policy, that a serious presidential candidate needs to have. I’m really surprised his poll numbers are still as high as they are, and to be honest I feel like it’s a little bit embarrassing to the conservative cause. We don’t do ourselves any favors by making him the face of conservatism, believe me.

  • texasroots

    We have a “foggy foreign policy”, “we have a foggy foreign policy crisis”. And don’t forget “go to the source closest to problems, you will find solutions,”

    Help!

    • redmymind

      Yikes!

  • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

    I nominally offer as evidence last Wednesday’s Cain debate watch party in NE Atlanta. A quarter of those in attendence were Black (or African-American… I didn’t ask each one what they prefer). Most were middle-aged men, but one particular 23-year old female stood out. She said she now regrets her 2008 vote for Obama. There were other post-college students there too, who shared the same sentiment.