In preparation for the upcoming Senate confirmation debate, supporters of Judge Sonia Sotomayor are stooping to a new low… According to McClatchy Newspapers, they are going after the Connecticut firefighter at the center of one of the nominee’s most controversial rulings - the one recently overturned by the United States Supreme Court in Ricci v. DeStefano.

This is not unusual. It is the M-O of liberals… they’re all for the “little guy” as a political poster-child, but they simply don’t bat an eye at running over him if it’s necessary to accomplish their agenda.

Mr. Ricci, whatever his past may reveal, is a private citizen who had his day in court… but not just any court, he had his day in the United States Supreme Court, and he won. And now liberal special interest groups want to go after HIM - personally - simply because Judge Sotomayor wrote a lousy opinion with her colleagues and now is getting repudiated for its foolishness.

Republicans should object strongly to these types of personal attacks… and so should Judge Sotomayor.

Below are the last four pre-hearing “daily” questions offered by Senator Cornyn. These, and all those offered to date, are critically important questions for someone seeking confirmation to the United States Supreme Court. She should answer them.

Next week, we will find out if she will.

July 10, 2009: What is Judge Sotomayor’s judicial philosophy?
July 9, 2009: What is the proper role of judges in defining marriage and the family?
July 8, 2009: What limits does the First Amendment impose on campaign finance regulation?
July 7, 2009: Should constitutional interpretation resemble common law decision-making?

To view all twenty questions posed by the Senator, click here.

Read More →

While a little late and lacking an official position against her, the National Rifle Association has expressed its “very strong concerns” with the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the United States Supreme Court.

In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy and Republican Ranking Member Jeff Sessions, the NRA used particularly harsh language for an organization often hesitant - to say the least - to appear partisan. To wit:

But the organization’s letter is far from partisan - rather, it focused intently on Judge Sotomayor’s dismal record regarding, and lack of respect for, the Second Amendment and the right of American citizens to keep and bear arms.

Senator Cornyn continues to put out a question of the day for Judge Sotomayor in anticipation of the hearing to begin next week. The following question was put out yesterday - my apologies for the late posting - but it is particularly important given recent judicial interference with punishments chosen by the people through the democratic process… for example, overturning the death penalty for child rapists.

Sen. Cornyn’s Daily Question for Judge Sotomayor
Question 16: Monday, July 6, 2009

Should the Constitution be interpreted to allow the death penalty, and if so, under what limitations?

Read More →

Today, Senator Cornyn asks the question of Judge Sotomayor to which an increasing number of Americans seem to be interested in knowing the answer… what with her recent slap-down by the Supreme Court and her past comments on the issue of race.

What say you, Judge Sotomayor?

Sen. Cornyn’s Daily Question for Judge Sotomayor
Question 15: Thursday, July 2, 2009

Is the Constitution color-blind?

Read More →

Senator Cornyn has been sending out a “Daily Question for Judge Sotomayor” for the last several weeks and will do so up to, and possibly through, her hearing that is scheduled to begin on July 13th. These questions are very good - and her answers to them would be enlightening… that is, IF she answers them fully and honestly.

We shall see.

To see the Senator’s previous questions, click here.

Today’s question (Wednesday, July 1, 2009):

Has the Supreme Court made any missteps in the last fifty years that might justify public skepticism about lawyers and the courts?

Read More →