« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

An Essential “Otherness”: Why Obama’s Dog-Eating is 100% Relevant

There’s been much back-and-forth between campaigns and surrogates over the Seamus-on-the-roof / Obama-ate-puppies controversy for the past week or so. Funny stuff, huh? Pictures flying over the web of doggies in buns about to be consumed by the President; jokes about “German Shepherd’s Pie”…

The Obama campaign committed a welcome unforced error by attacking the Seamus angle, thereby opening itself to the ensuing proliferation of the reminder that Barack Hussein Obama is not a conventional American president – not at all.

Surely, the fact that Obama ate dogs can be written off as a cultural idiosyncrasy; irrelevant to the important issues of the campaign; a cheap line of attack. But that cultural idiosyncrasy and the questions it invokes is the point in paying attention to it at all, isn’t it?

There is an essential “otherness” to the man who sits in the Oval Office. This is exemplified in many ways, but perhaps this most ridiculous and frivolous way serves as the best example.

Until now, even the most liberal American presidents have been “of” us; raised-up steeped in the uniquely American culture. Regardless of their personal history, we were able to assume that their leadership and decisions were based on a cumulative life history and set of experiences that were born of 100% Americanism – experiences that were at least tenuously shared by mainstream Americans, class or regional differences notwithstanding.

Now we have a man whose past is intentionally obscured; who was carted around from nation to nation like unwanted baggage as a child; who was abandoned by his Muslim father, then by dog-eating Lolo, then by his very own communist mother; who was raised by communist grandparents; whose education records are sealed; who uses a Connecticut Social Security number even though he is never known to have lived there; and who sold himself as some kind of messiah of hope and change, but who has governed for 3 ½ years as divisively and cynically as history’s most malevolent tyrants.

Now we are reminded in his own words that he ate dogs as a child. It’s just one more piece to the puzzle, and it is relevant.

Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – the Leftist manifesto which Obama used as a teaching tool in his early years as a professor and Afro-centric agitator, and which he employs as President – gives us an indication of why we should not shy away from continuing to highlight the fact that Obama ate dogs, by using the text and audio recordings of his very own words, and the proliferation of images, to remind people.

Alinsky’s rule number 5 states: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

Judging by how effectively the Left wields it against conservatives in the service of promulgating lies, we surely ought to be able to wield Rule 5 in service of the truth.

Barack Hussein Obama has precious little in common with the vast majority of American people. His “otherness” began before even he can remember, and his experiences throughout his life have formed a man who – regardless or race or origin – is alien to us.

He has demonstrated a disdain for everything America has been, and only an appreciation for his vision of what she should become according to his transformational anti-American vision. He has shown a willingness to divide the American people along whatever lines serve his radical Leftist interest, and has done so with extreme cynicism, to the great damage of the country.

His radical agenda is contrary to everything that built American greatness, and yet he persists. So the time is long past for any Americans who have not yet reached the obvious conclusion that this man’s success is our failure, to wake the hell up.

I don’t believe the Romney campaign should or will linger on this angle much longer. But I think it is absolutely fair game for conservative surrogates like us to continue to proliferate the truth – Barrack Hussein Obama is “other” in many important ways. But this one relatively unimportant way is an effective example that drives the point home: Barack Obama ate dogs with Lolo as a child in order to absorb their “power”.

President Obama ate dogs. Yuck.

“Ever eaten a dog?”
“No.”
“President Obama has.”
“Wonder if he used ketchup?”
“Gross.”
“No doubt, sickening.”

Cross-posted @ “It’s About Liberty”, a conservative forum

COMMENTS

  • avgjo

    His political positions and some of his facial expressions conveyed that to me quite sufficiently.

    Nevertheless, good article.

  • redwood

    We’ve known it for three years or better. However, many are just
    becoming aware of his otherness and now is the time to help
    make it clear. Drive the point home.

  • Viet71

    IMO, Romney should post all his college grades and otherwise make himself an open book.

    • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

      …toward highlighting the massive effort to hide Obama’s past.

      • renny

        No medical records,
        no continuous private work history,
        no complete voting record from IL,
        no complete record from the 143 days he was a US Sen.,
        no agreed upon Soc. Sec. number (the one from CT where he never lived is only one of 20+ associated with his name),
        no clean draft card (without a stamp mistake),
        no law license,
        no known publications outside his memoirs,
        no known publications in the Harvard Law Review,
        no baptismal cert. from his conversion to Christianity (from what?),
        no known school records or transcripts,
        no known college records or transcripts,
        no known means of support for his education,
        no known passport for his travels in 1980-1981 (when supposedly broke and went to Pakistan, then on no visa list),
        no known childhood friends, college roommates, the white girl he said he was engaged to a long time, altho’ I have read of one student from the U of IL who claims he was in an o class,
        and what else, oh yes, a forged birth certificate entered into evidence as such in a GA federal court and NJ state court.
        The o could not play chess at the typical public high school that requires Athletic Office documentation of the student’s existence.

        • http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php kralizec

          I think they just located Obama’s vault recently!

          http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

          ; )

        • http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php kralizec

          I think they just located Obama’s vault recently!

          http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

          ; )

    • checkmate2012

      against Obama wanting 10 years of tax returns. Post the grades and college transcipts and ask for the same in return. It’s ridiculous that Romney who’s public life is transparent, especially at Bain, when the invisible man BO has no evidence of his life before the 2004 Democratic Convention. Transparency should go both ways.

      • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

        And it absolutely should not be an effective weapon by Obama against Romney. If Obama dares try to wield it as such, it should be a no-brainer to pummel him with his own obscure paper trail.

        I guess we’ll see what kind of killer political instinct Romney has. So far, it seems he’s been able to dispatch with every foe while appearing to be doing everything but.

        • checkmate2012

          I see after someone else was just warned of wasting good bandwidth but shilling for BO today.

          • Viet71

            n/t

          • gekster

            And we’ve had so many lately, can’t blame anyone for being “gunshy”.

          • checkmate2012

            against Romney that struck a bad chord since the post was about seeing who the real BO is & why it matters. And anyhead to head comparison b/w the two on all issues would be welcome in my book.

          • gekster

            It was the same way for the two elections that I’ve been here.

          • demsaresatanic

            one of the “1%;” make Obama one of the “0.01%” whenever possible, and shove Alinsky right up his barack.

          • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

            Probably not EVEN .01% of Americans have eaten dogs.

            That’s such a good illustration, I wish I’d have thought to include it in my piece. Well done.

          • redwood

            Hey, he only ate dogs that were a threat to the poor and the disenfranchised. The children? He probably ate them too.

        • checkmate2012

          apology.

          • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

            Apology accepted! Not exactly sure where the misinterpretation occurred, but it happens.

            For a moment there you had me wondering just how vociferously I need to rail against Obama in order to be clear how badly I can’t stand him!

          • checkmate2012

            Again, I read it wrong as in “should not be an effective weapon by Obama against Romney” as should be an effective weapon…, so thank you for accepting my apolgy. Saw some weird comments earlier and was on the wrong track when I read yours.

            Anyway, I think Romney has shown some guts this week by responding with good comebacks- now we need to go on offense.

          • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

            As frustrating as it has been sometimes to see Romney refuse to play hardball and STILL dispatch his more conservative opponents, his manner has proven effective so far, and it seems like he has a good instinct for when to stand back and when to attack – and HOW to attack, which may be even more important.

            I have made it no secret that I am not Mitt’s #1 fan. But now that he’s the guy, he’s the guy. His instinct is one of the things that has concerned me, but now that he’s essentially won the primary, it looks like his instincts are better than I thought.

          • checkmate2012

            stoop to Chicago-style thuggery. The independents will be turned off if he comes across as too abrasive since many of them voted for BO and now have buyer’s remorse. I would like to see him drop the “he’s a nice guy” but guess it keeps Romney likeable for not attacking him personally for those on the fence whose votes we need.

            Of course us on the right want him to come out swinging hard. I guess it will be like walking a tightrope and stay above the fray and hit him constantly with facts and let the surrogates do the dirty work.

          • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

            There is much about Barack Obama that people have been afraid to go after. That has got to stop.

            You remember in the leadup to ’08 when Michele Bachmann called Obama’s policies anti-American because of their socialist leanings, and the blowback was so fierce that even she was forced to recant.

            I don’t see the need for that anymore. There’s a track record, and it is fair game to call it what it is, in harsh and realistic terms. It is also fair game for Romney to go after Obama when Obama open the door, as he did with the attacks on Romney for traveling with the dog on the roof.

            To wit: “I’ll see your Seamus on the roof, and raise you puppie on your plate.”

            I think that kind of stuff is totally fair game without the accusation of “gutter politics.”

          • Ausonius

            We have said this before: use the quasi-dictator’s own words against him and point out his lies, half-truths, contradictions, and broken promises.

            That would be the most gentlemanly thing the opposition can do!

            Republicans timorously refrained from doing that when they ran an old Grandpa against the cool black dude in 2008.

            The cool black dude has turned into a cold beige dud. Let’s show why!

          • cheetah2

            Very well said. So thankful that all this is not being covered up or ignored as in the last election. Romney is off to a good start.

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

    -woof-

    • Jack_Savage

      Warning – there are pictures pre and post slaughter. It is not for the squeamish. The ironic thing is that BuzzFeed is trying to make the case that this is really not a big deal – I mean, heck, they only eat it for festivals and stuff:

      http://www.buzzfeed.com/expresident/all-about-indonesian-dog-meat

      Really puts this story in a grisly new light.

      • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

        People of the world eat all kinds of things. Differences are to be expected, and it is natural that those things we wouldn’t dream of eating turn our stomachs.

        But that’s exactly the point, and exactly why people are focusing in on this. Our president comes from an alien culture, and his cumulative life experiences are vastly different than those of his countrymen.

        By anyone’s expectation, the president of the United States should be in the category “consummate American”. Everything about the president should reek of Americana. Yet this man is so obviously alien to our country for all the reasons I mentioned above, that the fact that he was raised eating dogs cannot be so easily overlooked.

  • checkmate2012

    of America. And this week he said, “That’s why I’m always confused when we keep having the same argument with folks who don’t seem to remember how America was built.” This coming from a guy who lived in Hawaii from age 1-5, Indonesia from ages 6-10, and back to Hawaii from ages 11-19. So being that Hawaii became a state in 1959 Hawaii and isn’t exactly a reflection of the mainland, how is that he has a clue how America was built?

    I am not knocking Hawaii as I happened to be born there, in the same hospital, about 3 weeks before Obama. But after two years, the Navy transfered us as many times across this country and a lot of families feel a little water-locked after a few years. I’m just saying that it’s not exactly mainstreet U.S.A. and this is where Obama spent the majority of his influential growing up years.

    His world viewpoint is always on display and clearly shows an animosity towards American values and his distaste of it as an “imperialistic” nation. Why else would he remove the Churchill bust from the Oval office?

    So you are very right to say this incident is relevant to know how he thinks and what he thinks that shape his worldview.

  • Flagstaff

    it made me see something I’d missed, and it illustrates the damage the birfer movement did to us.

    There is no reasonable doubt that Obama is a natural-born citizen. But the argument about it never (IIRC) got around to discussing just why there is such a Constitutional requirement. It seems that a major reason must have been to eliminate the circumstance that frequently happened in Europe before the 20th century: a foreign potentate being installed as ruler of the country.

    Without going into excruciating detail, it means that our national leader is always (theoretically) a person who has shared our national experience and has a shared goal of future success for the country. Theoretically, because in fact, our current President has not shared the first, at least not the mainstream experience, and he may not share the second.

    At a time when most people lived their entire lives within 40 miles of where they were born (or so we’re told), the birth requirement was sensible. But it obviously didn’t protect us from the early upbringing of natural born citizen, Barack Hussein Obama.

  • redwood

    Any voter swayed by the birther movement away from voting Republican was already gone. Not saying it was a big help, at worst for us it was a wart and for those trying to make him appear a certified American it caused many sleepless nights.

    It costs a lot of money to leave no trail as long as his.

  • Argentum

    After all, it’s full of Fido-nutrients.

    OK, ok… sorry.

  • Dave_A

    Period.

    Some cultures do this.

    Some Americans have done it, while living among those cultures – weather it’s Obama in Indonesia, or some guy stationed in South Korea (the Koreans have a specific breed of dog they raise for eating)….

    We need to focus on his policies being a disaster, and not continue the failed line from 2008 that his being raised abroad as a kid somehow should DQ him from being Prez…

    Beat the man on the issues, not on Jerry-Springer drama….

  • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

    “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

    Barack Obama knows this, and employs it. Turnabout is fair play, and morally just.

    Attack his policies on one front, and ridicule him on the other.

  • http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php kralizec

    Amen!

    Policy attacks will come and they will be effective, but nothing drives the point home like ridicule based upon truth. All leftists squirm from its sting because they know the weakness in them it exploits and because of their decades of arrogant and erroneous belief that only conservatives are out of touch with people and therefor only conservatives are deserving of derision.

    Time to shatter their phony paradigm!