As the Senate conspires today to jam Obamacare down our throats, I call again to all able bodied men and women that we need to up the grassroots ante now!

Tea Parties got us together and woke us up.
Town Hall Protests got our voices heard. (and they didn’t listen)

Let’s use Obama’s own words and break out the pitchforks!

Now at all Town meetings and all protests we show up with pitchforks! ( Even in Chicago, NY, D.C., CA and Detroit, they are legal.)

The pitchfork visual will provide the necessary prodding (pun fully intended) that we are not messing around.

Home Depot, Ace Hardware, and other garden and hardware stores carry this handy agricultural item. Get yours today.

Semper Fi,
Semper Vigilante,

Jacques Ditte

Tea Parties got us together and woke us up.
Town Hall Protests got our voices heard. (and they didn’t listen)

Now let’s show up with pitchforks. ( I believe that even in NY, D.C., CA and Detroit, agricultural pitchforks are still legal.)

Maybe the pitchfork visual will provide the necessary prodding (pun fully intended) that we are not messing around.

Upon hearing my proposal, some on our side still felt ‘pitchforks’ were “too strong, and would send the red neck message”. I disagree, however if you want to start off with plastic lunch forks for a while it would be a start in the right direction.

One man with a pitchfork is a target. A townhall full of pitchforks is a guaranteed viral response to get noticed, front page news on even State run media.

Either we fight this or we don’t. It’s no longer a “tea party-pass the crumpets please.”

We need to step it up to the next notch. This time peacefully up the ante and go for the pitchfork. It will be visual, laden with symbolic historic meaning and one step toward a last step constitution option we’d rather not get to. The visual will get the media to go viral. Some senators might get the hint, enough to come short of the 60 votes..

What have we got to lose? Oh yeah…. our country and our consititution!

Semper Fi,
Semper Vigilante,

Jacques Ditte

The Bill of Rights:
1 handwritten page. A total of 482 words.

The United States Constitution:
4 handwritten pages.

Mao Tse Tung’s “Little Red Book”: 312 Pages

The Koran: 467 Pages.

The Holy Bible: 608 Pages

Adolph Hitler’s Mein Kampf: 720 Pages

The Russian Provisional Revolutionary Government, 1917: Documents. 3 volumes: 1,841 pages.

Obama Healthcare Bill: 1,990 Pages.
Author: Nancy Pelosi,( with special thanks to Harry Reid, Obama and the Democrats of the 111th Congress)

On a private note, my own healthcare insurer (Emblem Health) sends me a booklet describing my healthcare plan every year. The complete benefits manual, detailing all my benefits, costs, deductibles, co-pays, prescriptions and legal fine print: 50 pages.
Author: Emblem Health (evil private insurance company whose plan I use and love!)

So as inquiring minds ask questions, I’d like to understand, why does it take Congress 1,990 pages to do describe a healthcare plan, when my insurance company can describe my plan in 50 pages? Or put differently, If a healthcare plan can be detailed in 50 pages, what is lurking in the remaining 1,910 pages of this bill?

Until Congress can come up with a Healthcare proposal that can be described in 50 pages or less, I will hold on to and hone my First and Second Amendment rights in particular, and demand that our unruly servants keep their laws off my body.
You may want to speak up and do the same.

Jacques Ditte

“The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite .”
-Thomas Jefferson

Mao Tse Tung’s “Little Red Book”: 312 Pages

The Koran: 467 Pages.

The Holy Bible: 608 Pages

Mein Kampf: 720 Pages
Author: Adolph Hitler

The Russian Provisional Revolutionary Government, 1917: Documents. 3 volumes: 1,841 pages.

Obama Healthcare Bill: 1,990 Pages.
Author: Nancy Pelosi,( with special thanks to Harry Reid, Obama and the Democrats of the 111th Congress)

By the way, my own private healthcare insurer (Emblem Health) sends me a booklet describing my healthcare plan every year. The complete benefits manual, detailing all my benefits, costs, deductibles, co-pays, prescriptions and legal fine print: 50 pages.
Author: Emblem Health (evil private insurance company whose plan I use and love!)

So as inquiring minds ask questions, I’d like to understand, why does it take Congress 1,990 pages to do describe a healthcare plan, when my insurance company can describe my plan in 50 pages? Or put differently, If it a healthcare plan can be detailed in 50 pages, what is lurking in the remaining 1,910 pages of this bill?

Until Congress can come up with a Healthcare proposal that can be described in 50 pages or less, I will hold on to and hone my First and Second Amendment rights in particular, and demand that our unruly servants keep their laws off my body.
You may want to speak up and do the same.

Jacques Ditte

“The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite.”
–Thomas Jefferson

I’d like to confess, that I’ve had a change of heart regarding President Obama.

I would like to thank Americans for electing Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States and for now, even overlook his questionable constitutional eligibility.

I hope you will stand with me and support our President and his aggressive policies.

Mostly, I am grateful to President Obama for his radical fascist agenda and affinity for ignoring, usurping and actively working to destroy the United States of America and the Constitution upon which it was founded.

Had Barack Obama not come in to our lives and enlightened us all with his manifesto, we would still be too busy to pay much attention to the daily activities of our government.

Thanks to this President we have rediscovered America’s founding principles. We have rediscovered the Constitution. We have read it and even re-read it and given out pocket copies to our friends and neighbors.

It’s thanks to the talents of President Obama’s community organizing expertise, that we have discovered that we too can speak up and speak out. Protesting is now no longer the sole dominion of the radical left. We are no longer the silent disenfranchised majority.

Normal, usually too busy and generally silent, everyday Americans are now finding the time to go to Town Halls and speak their minds and discipline their public servants.

President Obama’s contribution to our new-found empowerment is still being written and will be immortalized someday for all, by historians.

But already in a mere 7 months in office, he has successfully brought us together through his desire for socialized healthcare. Town Halls are now more popular than ever. People are sharing their passion against Cap and Trade, deficit spending and high taxes!

And even in the height of the lazy, hazy days of August when nothing is news worthy nor gets done, the visionary Obama seized the moment to surprise us yet again, with the exciting celebration of China’s 60th anniversary of the Communist revolution. He will fly China’s commie flag over our White House on Sept 20th!

But just when you thought he couldn’t possibly outdo himself any further, he treats us to another incredible blessing:
A special National Address to share his wisdom to our children as they head back to school. Not to worry, educators will be more than eager to explain any subtleties that may have escaped the kids.

How exciting and selfless it is indeed for this President to open the door for us to be able talk to our local school administrators!
Thanks to our newly honed Town Hall community activism skills, our school principals will surely be greeted with all the spirited engagement we have already bestowed on our elected servants.

So, thank you Mr. President for making us stronger and teaching us to stand up for our selves.

You are indeed “the one we’ve been waiting for.”

Hope and Change is finally coming!

Jacques Ditte

America don’t be fooled. We must not let up the fight.

It’s time for Ted Kennedy’s life dream of socialized medicine to rest in peace once a for all.
It is only fitting and respectful to give Kennedycare a proper funeral by driving it off the bridge at Chappaquiddick?.

And if the Dems live up to our expectations, they will help motivate us by shamelessly exploiting the tragic cancer death of Mr Kennedy for political gain just as they did at the Paul Wellstone memorial.

My letter to the editor printed this passed weak with bitting sarcasm appears should now be read to be the playbook for what is to come:
When it comes to Government run healthcare we can all agree health care is expensive. And if the government runs the show, it will have to find ways of controlling the monumental costs involved.

Ever mindful of never spending two or three trillion dollars more than necessary, President Obama quickly recognized that there exists great untapped opportunities for the government to streamline wasteful spending on needless medical tests and procedures. In one example President Obama responding to a question about providing healthcare to the elderly, said “end of life care” is one area where we might be able to really save. Perhaps “it might be better to just give her the “pain medication than the costly procedure”.

The chosen one’s logic is undeniable. Currently seniors are the biggest burden to private healthcare providers as they are constantly going to the doctor for one problem or the other. If government were to foot the bill under Nationalize Healthcare then we would all have to bare the heavy burden for the mounting medical expenditures of these old unproductive retirees, (who by the way are sucking the social security system dry as they keep on living despite their usefulness having long ago expired.) Yes conceivably Gramps could help out in a pinch, babysitting the kids while you’re out organizing the current week’s Acorn meeting, but that doesn’t justify the cost of keeping the old clunker going! And I won’t even get into the issue of liability or that he is undermining the local BUWA, Babysitter Union Workers of America with his free services.

It would be indeed much more cost effective to provide healthcare to all Americans based on their usefulness to the greater good. The young, the healthy, the employed and productive middle aged citizens paying in to the system should be entitled the best health care government will allow, within reason, of course.

Workers in green jobs, or those help the downtrodden through community activism could get extra health credits for good social responsible behavior.

The wealthy should pay a surcharge so they can pay their fair share, while badge wearing official government “End of Life Counselors” as proposed by our great leader Obama, should help Gramps understand that he had a pretty good run, but it’s time to come to grips with the fact that he needs to let go, as he is going to eventually to die whether he gets the costly pacemaker or not. Another year or two of life at his age is not going really help him in the end, but performing a costly procedure on someone with such a limited lifespan is plainly a poor use of taxpayer money and yields a poor return on life-investment expenditures. Needless costly procedures for the elderly really put a heavy financial burden on the rest of us. So for the greater good, Gramps, take two morphine, and we’ll call the morgue in the morning.

Also there is great promise for rest of us with diminishing returns. Soon we may be able to “opt-in” (voluntarily of course) to an “early end of life incentive program” where the Government gets to give you a tax credit for choosing an early exit, sparing all us the expense of you becoming a future burden.

That’s the hope and change we’re all talking about, right?

Ever mindful of never spending two or three trillion dollars more than necessary, President Obama quickly recognized that there exists great untapped opportunities for the government to streamline wasteful spending on needless medical tests and procedures. In one example President Obama responding to a question about providing healthcare to the elderly, said “end of life care” is one area where we might be able to really save. Perhaps “it might be better to just give her the “pain medication than the costly procedure”.

The chosen one’s logic is undeniable. Currently seniors are the biggest burden to private healthcare providers as they are constantly going to the doctor for one problem or the other. If government were to foot the bill under Nationalize Healthcare then we would all have to bare the heavy burden for the mounting medical expenditures of these old unproductive retirees, (who by the way are sucking the social security system dry as they keep on living despite their usefulness having long ago expired.) Yes conceivably Gramps could help out in a pinch, babysitting the kids while you’re out organizing the current week’s Acorn meeting, but that doesn’t justify the cost of keeping the old clunker going! And I won’t even get into the issue of liability or that he is undermining the local BUWA, Babysitter Union Workers of America with his free services.

It would be indeed much more cost effective to provide healthcare to all Americans based on their usefulness to the greater good. The young, the healthy, the employed and productive middle aged citizens paying in to the system should be entitled the best health care government will allow, within reason, of course.

Workers in green jobs, or those help the downtrodden through community activism could get extra health credits for good social responsible behavior.

The wealthy should pay a surcharge so they can pay their fair share, while badge wearing official government “End of Life Counselors” as proposed by our great leader Obama, should help Gramps understand that he had a pretty good run, but it’s time to come to grips with the fact that he needs to let go, as he is going to eventually to die whether he gets the costly pacemaker or not. Another year or two of life at his age is not going really help him in the end, but performing a costly procedure on someone with such a limited lifespan is plainly a poor use of taxpayer money and yields a poor return on life-investment expenditures. Needless costly procedures for the elderly really put a heavy financial burden on the rest of us. So for the greater good, Gramps, take two morphine, and we’ll call the morgue in the morning.

Also there is great promise that rest of us with diminishing returns may soon be able to take advantage of an “early end of life incentive program” where the Government gets to give you a tax credit for choosing an early exit.

Also there is great promise for the rest of us when we reach the stage of diminishing returns. Soon we may be able to “opt-in” (voluntarily of course) to an “early end of life incentive program” where the Government gets to give you a tax credit for choosing an early exit, sparing all us the expense of you becoming a future burden.

That’s the hope and change we’re all talking about, right?

<a href=”“>