this isthe great CIA killer and Lefty fund-raiser.
Objective to ‘out’ the CIA spies,whowere all donks anyway probably. and to eviscerate our protection of the USA. Holder , Obama, and therestare protected and live in gated communities. The rest of us will be glowing in the dark. They don’t care.
Suicide Pact.–that is what they are arranging.

He should have been tried by military tribunal years ago.

Did the Bush administration think KSM would be able to be kept without trial for the rest of his life and no one would bat an eye?

This is idiotic and dangerous of Obama to bring KSM to New York. He will very possibly walk free on some (or several) technicalities. But, a lot of the blame for leaving him languish at Guantanamo belongs tho the Bush administration.. especially considering, as you correctly pointed out, the amount of classified information that will be made public should a trial ever take place.

What a mess.

and broken his neck… five minutes after the CIA had all of the information they needed out of him.

Al qaeda used KSM as a weapon against the US, now Obama uses him in much the same way.

Unchallenged and in fact aided and abetted by Obama.
I feel sick…seriously.
Does anyone in his administration ever think beyond their own destructive ideology? Ever?

Note to lefties;
“Don’t be afraid to see what you see.”
Ronald Reagan

Join the RedState Strike Force

Chip in to get rid of “Babs” (Yes ma’am) Boxer.

The left would want him alive to study him and ask him how he developed such a cult following, you know, like a rock star.

Put on your clown shoes and head down to the court house. The circus is coming to town.

when the trial is in NY to extend the hand of peace and sincerity to the Muslim world.

In the Presidential Suite.

http://www.jeannie-ology.com

How better to redirect attention from economic failure and foreign policy ineptitude than to create a show-trial that will distract the public and keep the MSM buzzing incessantly.

Alinsky’s rules strike, again.

that it’s being done like this because the “O” and his ilk:
1. Don’t trust the Military (which includes Military Justice)
2. Want the trials to be a huge distraction from how inept they are.
3. Think it will be a slam dunk trial.
4. Already have excuses for letting the terrorists off the hook…
5. Want to humiliate or harm America that much more than a swift Military trial would allow for…
6. All of the above…
7. ____________________

If not then this is nothing but a political show trial. I am gonna go with Lindsey Graham on this one ” Obama really screwed up”.

Of course, they won’t even allow that word in the sentence so it is just: War On Terrorist Crimes….

Hasan, KSM, and all the like, tie together to the Left. They’d prefer to, for many reasons, keep Hasan at just the “Crime” level - as we all know and covered:
1- PC
2- Can’t admit the Lib notion of PC infests/infects and leads to this uncaught
—- you know, those “connect the dots” thing when you can’t record dots
3- Terrorist attacks at home expose that Surrender Doctrine (let alone Dem’s weak on crime. Always!)
4- Regular courts allow focus to be on Bush, Cheney, EIT’s (which are NOT torture), etc.
and on and on….

As I said elsewhere:

We look for clues to prevent it ever happening again, Liberals look for excuses

Maj. Nidal Hasan was every bit the Military equivalant of the Robert Redford character in Liars For Losers (what I call “Lions For Lambs”), using a protected position and trying to convince them we are our own enemy, and should have been dishonorably discharged but instead was promoted. The message that “We Are The Evil” is not a question of “Diversity of Opinion” it is stupidly counter-intuative to a Force that VOLUNTEERS to fight our Nations enemies. Sally Quinn, was on O’Reilly, still going on and on about how we cannot tell yet and must INVESTIGATE, which she really means time is needed by Liberals to investigate the best way to SPIN the situation rather than deal with REALITY! We Conservatives warned endlessly about the discrepency of how the Liberals would rule (this yet another, treating Terrorism as Criminality like Bill Clinton did) over their conflicting Campaign rhetoric to lie their way into Office.

Liberals are trying to turn the FBI BA Division into the PC BS Division

YO LEFTISTS: Hasan committed an overt ACT OF WAR by attacking those who had fought those deemed as our Nation’s enemies. Hasan, finally all out decided he would rather side with our enemies and took up arms in their cause. That is an ACT OF WAR/TERRORISM, not a Crime. But back to the “Criminal” focus….

It goes further than all that - just their (Lib’s) desires to tamp down for their own protection, of poor policy reasons, rather than the FACTS and what it was! This ties, for Lib’s/Dem’s, to KSM and all the others, and their desire to keep all these things criminal if for nothing that we can add one more to the reasons above that they (Lib’s/Dem’s) disdain the Military itself. Trying to go/examine beyond that though…. It is like the Lib’s position exposure in the Movie - “The Kingdom” where the FBI is sent to Saudi Arabia. I will agree with the movie premise of that we want to be sure and clear who/how commits these acts so we can learn from them to try and prevent, better know our enemies methods/tactics, try to ID any accomplices, etc - there is valid concern for use of “Criminal Investigation” techniques (but as always, Lib’s/Dem’s never know where/when we are far beyond that line into “MORE”) - trouble is, when it is OBVIOUS, and even to the point where the enemy claims responsibility, the Lib’s still don’t want to do anything but pull a Bill Clinton and lob a couple of Cruise-missles at folks and call it a day!

IF, and remember this is NOT being conceded, but IF these things (KSM example) were “Crimes” they would NOT be handled just by the U.S. As there are Federal Laws, the FBI, etc, to handle across State lines crime, entities exist to handle across Nation States. This would/should be a case of International Crime/Law - Interpol, International Courts, etc. AGAIN - we, of course, DO NOT agree with this as we want it prosectued for the WAR CRIMES it is and not as if these were just another minor violation like pick-pocketing, but I think you get my point! I am surprised they haven’t even tried to go to that level as it would allow them to take the Anti-American, Anti-Bush, appeasement, etc, Dog-and-Pony Show agenda to the World stage. Yes, yes, pro-Leftist outlets will carry the fiasco world-wide, but I think you get my point! Perhaps the KSM Defense team will go for it in the “change of venue” need for a “fair trial” demands.

At least the Dem’s/Lib’s are consistent — unfortunately for Freedom loving people everywhere they - consitently WRONG, consistently dangerous, consistently _______ (fill in the blank). It is just a shame people have to re-learn these lessons every Decade!

to Martyr KSM…. Of course, the Liberals/Democrats won’t even imagine that could happen, won’t take the needed Security (FISA) precautions - we wouldn’t want to trip up any other Nadir Hasan’s accidentally, etc….

The only reason this wouldn’t be the case is that they (Al-Qaeda) want to let the fiasco run its course of BLAMING AMERICA!

Could you imagine if an all out Mumbai style attack to attempt to FREE KSM from us “Infidels” ?!?!? They would, of course, consider it a success whether they get him out or get him “Martyred” either way.

The only real reason for having the trial on US soil is to put the previous administration and their policies on trial. Because of the trial being in the US, and with the Constitutional protections; e.g., Miranda etc., the defendants will get off free because it will be ruled that any information that was ‘gleaned’ from these dangerous twits is inadmissible. Any other information will be from classified sources - the legacy media will be screaming for an open court (which the Obama administration will permit), and will not be presented in open court. Consequently, the defendants will be set free, and the previous administration and it’s policies will be blamed for the Obama administration ‘losing’ these cases.

Eric Holder has wanted to prosecute the Bush administration since it became the Bush Administration. Only this way……he gets to blame it all on the bad guy, the rule of law, and the defense team. He has taken a page from the Obama “let somebody else do the dirty work” playbook. I for one Eric, will hold you and Obama accountable for every minute of this and every piece of information disclosed and every tear that is shed yet again by families of the dead. I am waiting for the legal team to assemble and try to select a “jury of peers”. That in itself is pathetic.

The point of prosecuting terrorists in civilian court is to obtain the documents needed to prosecute GW Bush and Cheny in the UN as war criminals.

Seriously, does Obama think he is Stalin and Bush is Trotsky?

Civil courts require miranda right be observed. It would seem that all evidence acquired before the accused, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, was read his miranda rights would not be admissible in civil courts. Miranda rights would apply or this is just a show trial staged by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., and the Obama administration.