« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Romney and Intellectual Honesty for Emotionally Challenged Conservatives

Romney is no “Obama Light” as is the too often repeated cliche among those who have an emotional or intellectual challenge regarding his past political history and now future as the GOP Presidential nominee.

I will simply post a list and expect vilification from those who can’t handle the perfect coiffed, married, father of five handsome sons,  grandfather, Mormon, former Governor, entrepreneur capitalist, moderate, who happens to have never been broke, and enjoys making and spending money, candidate.

What has me tired of anti-Romney chat is this:

Emotions are the stuff of liberal practices. Yet the childish cry against Romney with such newly minted nouns as “Mittens” and “Obama-Light” ad nauseum, is so intellectually vacuous; so riddled with obscure slurs based upon highlighted past alone, that no serious discussion of accomplishments seems to come to the forefront; no examination of actual capabilities, just the incessant sophomoric chants of radio-wave and other sarcasm-driven skeptics and pundits plus emotional parroting fan base.

To this conservative/independent (no political party affiliation, just “Tea Party”) the Primary season presidential cheerleader rhetoric nonsense is getting a bit worn out.

The numbers are not “emotion” driven. We have what we have now.  Inevitability of Romney as the GOP candidate and presumptive conservative torch bearer is the real deal.

Time to act adult and examine the side of the coin all the nay-sayer Facebook (friends of mine) chanting, ”We’re screwed now...” and “Stuck with Obama-light…” when Santorum dropped out, do not seem willing to examine.

ADULT REALITY CHECKLIST:

1. Romney is overtly capitalist. By all metrics Obama is a socialist. Romney has created jobs. Obama has lost jobs.  (We could probably stop here and just start voting…)

2. Candidate Romney served as an “Executive” of a government — Massachusetts. Obama served as a community organizer, a “present” voting State Senator, and US Senator with 2 years experience.

3. Candidate Romney served as CINC of a state National Guard in wartime. Obama served as… well a war protester before becoming Commander in Chief of all US Armed Forces.

4. Governor Romney inherited a state debt of 3 billion. He immediately cut spending and raised revenue cutting the deficit by 1.5 billion in the first year. At the end of 4 years he left the state with a balanced budget and a 2.3 billion “Rainy Day Fund.”

5. Governor Romney was a Republican Chief Executive in a left-of-left state who managed as a fiscally responsible adult, eschewing cronyism, offering budgets every year, creating revenue while cutting spending in a total liberal tax &  spend environment.  (Reagan was in the same situation as CA Governor for 8 years, by the way)

6.  Mr. Obama has been favored with zero opposition in his first two years as a first-timer executive, never presented a budget until 2012 (defeated in the House 414-0), increased the deficit by over 5 trillion dollars, and favors tax increases including increasing capital gains and a “Special Billionaire Tax” (Buffet Rule) among attempts to foment discontent and incite class warfare on America’s producers.

7.  Romney followed constitutional authority when his state sought to enact a comprehensive health care program (State’s rights–10th Amendment). Obama is now arguing the constitutionality of liberal driven Obama care with 26 states bringing law suits before the Supreme Court.

8.  Romney enacted illegal immigration reform as Governor. Obama sues states who seek to control illegal immigration where the Federal government refuses to do so (think Arizona).

9.  Under Romney Massachusetts gained 51,362 jobs while gaining 26,500 new residents. That resulted in a 2 to 1 job creation. The state’s unemployment rate fell from 5.6% to 4.7%.  Obama’s unemployment success rate has grown from 7.8 to 8.3% since taking office, with a job loss of 740,000. (“Bush’s fault”)

10.  Within a year of leaving office (having offered 250 “line-item vetoes” the year before to the 2006 legislature proposed budget) the tax and spend legislature and new Governor ended fiscal 2007 with a $307.1 million deficit and in fiscal  year 2008 with a $495.2 million deficit.

11.  State tax reform was encouraged by Romney with repeated hammering on the legislature until a roll back from 5.3% to 5% (flat tax) was achieved.  ‘He also proposed a “tax-free shopping day”, a property tax relief for Seniors,[27] and a manufacturing tax credit.’ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governorship_of_Mitt_Romney)

John Adams said, “Facts are stubborn things.” All the negatives on Romney have been repeatedly brought to the front of our attention. The “flip side to facts” tell the truth as well.  If after reading the short list above, you still believe Romney is “Obama-light” and “We are screwed now…” — as so many intellectually challenged conservatives fear – then there is no hope until you chill out, and leave the liberal plantation of ”information-light” and emotionally charged skepticism as the driving force behind your actions.

Romney is NOT LIKE YOU. He is perfect in looks, wealth, family, and faith (oops a Mormon…back tracking), sometimes a moderate, and I say, “SO WHAT.” Time to continue the Tea Party challenge of a constitutionally, fiscally sound, and morally responsible government. As an attitude, we may wish to adopt what Reagan often said in attempting to foment change in all branches of government:  “You ain’t seen nothing yet!”

James Michael Pratt

 

 

 

COMMENTS

  • natek58

    Tea Party people: Shut up and vote for him anyway – even if you can’t stand his guts.

    I’ve seen way too much cherry picking of the facts like this to be swayed. Almost everything you say above could have been said similarly about Bill Clinton. Would he make an acceptable Republican nominee to you?

    • garfieldjl

      Playing loose with the facts is often a bad idea.

      [quote]4. Governor Romney inherited a state debt of 3 billion. He immediately cut spending and raised revenue cutting the deficit by 1.5 billion in the first year. At the end of 4 years he left the state with a balanced budget and a 2.3 billion

      • gekster

        [quote]4. Governor Romney inherited a state debt of 3 billion. He immediately cut spending and raised revenue cutting the deficit by 1.5 billion in the first year. At the end of 4 years he left the state with a balanced budget and a 2.3 billion

        • garfieldjl

          Romneycare was funded with FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS, he left his successor with a rather hefty deficit.

          It’s easy to make it look like you are improving things when you feeding off of Federal Tax money to prop up your state.

          • gekster

            Re-read.
            Answer the question I asked.
            Nothing more than that.

          • garfieldjl

            In order to answer the question as you posed it, I would have go with an assumption that is false.

            Romney, actually left the next Governor with a pile of deficits because the Federal Money for Romneycare dried up, among other things.

            As someone from Indiana, I shouldn’t have been footing the bill for Romneycare, especially since I’ve never even been to Massachusetts.

            @mbecker
            I’m not interested in videos of your family, nor their squawking.

          • gekster

            Here, try again.

            If the state constitution says they must balance the budget,
            how did he (Romney) inherate a 3 Blln dollor deficite.

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            nt

          • jakeofalltrades

            YMMV

          • funwithknives

            anywhere-near perfect candidate this time around. There are scores of reasons to not vote for Mitt, and I have no doubt even his true-blue supporters have some qualms about his stick-to-it-ive-ness. {is this a word?}

            A brokered convention? Fantasy Island, when so much else is at stake.
            Third Party? Horrors, personified.

            Reduced to simplicity, This Is the Deal: BHO must Go and Mitt is It. Period. Myself ,I too wanted ,expected and was prepared to go to the mat, with a leader of worth. What I got, was what we see. I’m not giving up, nor laying down and sitting it out. All our futures are at stake here, and the alternative literally scares the sh– out of me. As it should you.

            Can we lay down the cudgels and clubs long enough to make this work, and then climb right up his backside on 1/21/2013, and start anew? Lots to do and by all the differing opines here, he does follow trends and the tide. So we make a tide and a trend. Relentlessly.

            Face it , and don’t throw this chance to the roadside. It’s not only Mitt, guys. There’s We, ‘the intensly interested’, and the Congress who, Creator willing is going to be looking hard at him as well.
            Let’s do this thing ,starting today.{Or really ,really soon.}
            If you’re actually reading this, thank you for your time.FWK

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

        • wintermute

          at this point, I am so over this guy and his class warfare, his soak the producer, discourage hard work, pro Russian flexibility mentality that if shoe was running with sock as his running mate, id vote shoe/sock 2012

          • ennaneko

            Seems like such a gamble.

            Will enough people be ticked off at Obama to just Romney?

          • wintermute

            but i sure as hell will. im also trying hard not to be the type to tell everyone else how to think even though its not in my speak-first-apologize-later tendency. its just hard when i know this president is so bad for the country.

    • APA Guy

      I know you may not want to hear it again, but it is a FACT that Obama is president for another term if Romney isn’t elected.

      And this Romney supporter in the general will never tell you to “shut up”. I will ask you to think about your country before considering your actions between now and November.

      • garfieldjl

        While I might vote for Romney in the General simply because he is less corrupt than Obama (and for a while Romney honestly did look just as corrupt). I’m not going to sit here and lie for Romney, and I’m not going to lie and say he accomplished things that he didn’t.

        If that’s what the Romney supporters have to do to try to get people to support Romney, then I’m sorry we’re going to lose and Obama will have 4 more years.

        APA Guy if Obama gets 4 more years, it won’t be the fault of Conservatives for not supporting Romney enough, it will be because the establishment rigged things to make sure a liberal was the nominee.

        • APA Guy

          It seems a little selfish and narcissistic to me, but your decision is on YOUR conscience. Obama v. Romney = easy decision. I’ll take the GOP candidate any day of the week.

          And no one is asking you to lie for Romney. Just to consider the alternative.

          BTW…what’s this “I MIGHT vote for Romney in the general”?

          It sure seems as though you are predisposed to another Obama term…which would make you something less than a conservative who cares about the future of this country.

        • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

          • ennaneko

            There are democrat politicians who claim to be religious, have a family, claim to be faithful to their spouses, have tons of children but they enable and bow to the whims of the left wing social activists.

            Being a 33 year old virgin, with a beard, a white robe, and sandals doesn’t make you Jesus.

            Fitting the profile of what a conservative should look like is not enough for a lot of people. People don’t think he has an ideology. People don’t believe what he says. He has a trail of prancing around with the “enemy.”

      • natek58

        I can think of one thing: A middle of the road (at best) Republican gets in there, preserves RomneyCare and does nearly everything else that BHO would have done and Republicans get the blame. Yes, that would be worse.

        Anyone besides me think it could happen with Mitt?

        The problem is we have no way of knowing what this Libtard is really going to do. He doesn’t even know what his position is going to be tomorrow, how can anyone voting for him know?

        • michael_j_lambert

          We could get someone actually intelligent and competent who desires the destruction of the United States. I doubt Romney is that person. I doubt anyone who is could try to pull an Obama and pretend to be otherwise. With competence comes paperwork.

  • Pingback: click here