« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

KRAUTHAMMER’S “The Choice” — Historic Conservative Survival and Liberty or…

The choice

 

Brevity with a clear message is the essence of intelligent communication.

Through a historical lens, Krauthammer points out, in concise terms, what this election may mean.

Tuesday will offer either a “turn around” for America, and thus renew as Reagan put in 1964, “the last best hope for man on earth,”  or in a downward spiral American freedom and growth may become nothing more than darkness at the end of the tunnel.

I urge you to take a few minutes to read:

 KRAUTHAMMER’S

“THE CHOICE”

By , Published: November 1

“Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not.” That was Barack Obama in 2008. And he was right. Reagan was an ideological inflection point, ending a 50-year liberal ascendancy and beginning a 30-year conservative ascendancy.

It is common for one party to take control and enact its ideological agenda. Ascendancy, however, occurs only when the opposition inevitably regains power and then proceeds to accept the basic premises of the preceding revolution.

Thus, Republicans railed for 20 years against the New Deal. Yet when they regained the White House in 1953, they kept the New Deal intact.

And when Nixon followed LBJ’s Great Society — liberalism’s second wave — he didn’t repeal it. He actually expanded it. Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), gave teeth to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and institutionalized affirmative action — major adornments of contemporary liberalism.

Until Reagan. Ten minutes into his presidency, Reagan declares that “government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.” Having thus rhetorically rejected the very premise of the New Deal/Great Society, he sets about attacking its foundations — with radical tax reduction, major deregulation, a frontal challenge to unionism (breaking the air traffic controllers for striking illegally) and an (only partially successful) attempt at restraining government growth.

Reaganism’s ascendancy was confirmed when the other guys came to power and their leader, Bill Clinton, declared (in his 1996 State of the Union address) that “the era of big government is over” — and then abolished welfare, the centerpiece “relief” program of modern liberalism.

In Britain, the same phenomenon: Tony Blair did to Thatcherism what Clinton did to Reaganism. He made it the norm.

READ MORE: http://www.humanevents.com/2012/11/01/charles-krauthammer-the-choice-2/

 

James Michael Pratt is a New York Times bestselling author of inspirational fiction and non-fiction, editor and owner of Jerusalem Reports, and frequent contributor to Red State and other conservative sites. His personal website includes biographical and other information regarding his work. He can also be found on FACEBOOK and Twitter.

COMMENTS

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    This is one of the few times in which there can be no hyperbole’. Another Obama term would mean the destruction of the middle class and an entrenched Democrat/Union/welfare state for generations.

    Whereas a Romney win may only mean a slight delay in the same inevitability. It all depends on how much pressure we can continue to put on the republican party.

    • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

      I agree, Kyle.

      In case nobody has noticed, socialism is thuggism, with bureaucrats being the thugs. Socialist leaders are the Dons of the regime, with the supreme commander, or President, at the top of the Dons. If you are not in the upper echelon of political management, you are a serf.

      The key to, and the beauty of, the American experiment, is/was the fact that the PEOPLE were placed at the top of the pyramid, or perhaps the pyramid was simply turned upside down. In any event, the Constitution was supposed to protect us from the people we elected to handle the affairs of government. Now that some of those people have decided to test our resolve, our experiment is in peril. A pyramid balanced on its point isn’t all that stable without some force to keep it that way.

      If the Constitution is “alive,” it is dead. If it’s proscriptions can be evaded by sophistry, we are dead. John Roberts did much more harm than most people have imagined with his convoluted ObamaCare ruling. It may take to 2076 to undo it. Right now, the only thing standing between us and annihilation is the ballot box on Tuesday and our military leaders; I have no idea what they have in their hearts and minds. If General Wesley Clark is a representative example, we can depend only on the ballot box to save us.

    • jamesmpratt

      Well said.

  • Pingback: aci Sarault

  • Pingback: Hien Jou

  • Pingback: Heriberto Woolwine

  • Pingback: Newton Taulman

  • Pingback: Lane Reindeau

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: rzeszow randki

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: distill synonym

  • Pingback: randki w warszawie

  • Pingback: portal randkowy

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: charles david wedges

  • Pingback: Spyware

  • Pingback: Browse Around These Guys

  • Pingback: this hyperlink

  • Pingback: Hop Over To Here

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: breast active program

  • Pingback: karos registraciya

  • Pingback: madamelux

  • Pingback: working from home uk

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Julie Leiendecker

  • Pingback: Zachery Tesar

  • Pingback: Store Fixture Installers

  • Pingback: aloe vera side effects

  • Pingback: cv

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: Scooters