« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

ROMNEY INTERNAL POLLING — 337 Electoral Votes As Headlines Read: “Romney Ryan Landslide Victory”

INTERNAL POLLING

ROMNEY-RYAN WIN IN LANDSLIDE!

The professional pundits and pollsters know the November 5th major polls 50% tie (see Gallup  Rasmussen) means a Romney win.  The internal polling suggests Romney-Ryan will be celebrating in 24 hours with those of  us who have fought so hard for them and conservatism for the last four years.

You can lose 67 votes from my list (see below) and Romney still wins the Presidency.

Over-confident? It’s genetic, but I have examined honestly the polls combined with the intangible human element to this historic election.

Human Internals vs Pollster Science

Five decades of following the stories that make America what it is today, along with involvement in the back and forth swings from the financial, national security, and cultural cliffs offers some credibility to internal polling that the scientific polls cannot measure.

I disagree with professional pollsters fundamental presumptions that this is a “tight” election and will go “down to the wire.” People are only numbers and “margin of errors” to politicians and pollsters.

To the rest of us they are family, friends, and communities of individuals with emotions, natural human needs, desires, and inclinations to:

  1. Be fully employed.
  2. Choose health and personal welfare without government interference.
  3. Pay less than $4.00 a gallon for gas, milk, and a loaf of bread.

 

Back to the Future by Reading Between the Lines: 

So here we are.  It may be that this simple human needs calculation will give Romney-Ryan what I believe will be the largest electoral college landslide since Reagan’s 1980 campaign against the lack-luster and over-reaching liberal Jimmy Carter and his “misery index.”

With the main stream media gloating over Gallup  Carter’s “polling edge” of 4% to 8% lead weeks prior to the 1980 election, history teaches us the value of polls set against the non-measurable enthusiasm metric of Americans for real change.

The American Spectator Comparison:

“Ronald Reagan clobbered Jimmy Carter winning 51.7% to Carter’s 41% — a 10 point-plus victory in the popular vote. Third place Congressman John Anderson managed a mere 6.6%.

Reagan carried 44 states for a total of 489 votes. Carter won 6 states plus the District of Columbia for 49 electoral votes.”

Along with Dick Morris the one honest pollster willing to make a landslide victory prediction for the Romney-Ryan ticket is Michael Barone with 315 electoral votes going to Romney.  Here’s why he is right.

 Human Internals for the Prediction:

Time changes things as much as things change the times. Any polling sample conducted upon the premise of 2008 and before is fundamentally flawed.  Why?

Rasmussen today points out this shift:

> 39.1 percent of voters now identify themselves as Republicans and 33.3 percent identify themselves as Democrats.

> Independents have increased slightly, claiming 26.4 percent of the electorate in Oct. 2008 compared to 27.5 percent in Oct. 2012.

Then there are these very real but less measurable reasons for poll flaws which cannot reliably predict a swing to the GOP:

  • All polling samples among mainstream media polls have traditionally followed the past Democrat skewed system offering from 2% to 12% Democrat oversampling.
  • The 2008 election of Barack Obama was conducted on a scale weighted with the history of the moment – the first African American to run for President.
  • The Tea Party conservative renaissance, a spontaneous 2009 born ground-swell of traditional American values voters, did not exist prior to that time.
  • Tea Party driven elections of 2010 stunned the press, pollsters, and politicians as the largest change in congressional seats for the GOP occurred in over 70 years.  That momentum continues.
  • The mainstream liberal supporting media invented its own narrative about the conservative grassroots movements and believes it four years later.
  • Sustained social networking with Facebook and Twitter only began to show its connectivity power in 2008. It continues through today.
  • Polling: Old methods of relying upon telephone land-lines and voter identification presumptions are no longer a modern reality.
  • Turnout & enthusiasm gap: Whatever the pollsters predict, they are in for a surprise. Dynamics of 2012 are not 2008.
  • Early voter trends Romney as shown in the swing state sample of Ohio already reversing the Obama 2008 margin of 250,000+.
  • Independent values voters have been alienated by Obama’s “misery index,” broken promises, and a perceived attack upon religion (58 million is a lot of Catholics)

Truman and Reagan’s Blue Dog Democrats replaced by FORWARD Leaning Progressive Apparatchiks

They were different days. Tip O’Neill is dead and the Democratic Party of yesteryear is in name only.

The Democrats of the 1960’s along with the “Blue Dog” are an extinct breed with only 25 Blue Dog congressmen on record as caucus members today.

For all their rhetoric about “worker’s rights,” and “redistribution,” and “fairness,” and centralized government control with the same slogan “FORWARD” used by Lenin during the Bolshevik Revolution and Mao in China, the Democratic Party of yesteryear  could be renamed the, “Socialist Workers Democrat Union” and no one would flinch.

This coalition of hard left apparatchiks may be strong, but it cannot sustain the 2008 enthusiasm now that their leader has abandoned the center and alienated the conservatives of America entirely.

ELECTORAL VOTE PREDICTIONS

Left to right, west to east coast, this is the map I see based upon listed “human internals”:

States West Coast to East             Votes                                    Running  Totals

Alaska                                                   3                                                              3

Arizona                                               11                                                            14

Nevada                                                6                                                              20

Utah                                                     6                                                              26

Idaho                                                   4                                                              30

Montana                                             3                                                              33

Wyoming                                            3                                                              36

North Dakota                                    3                                                              39

South Dakota                                    3                                                              42

Colorado                                             9                                                              51

Kansas                                                 6                                                              57

Nebraska                                            5                                                              62

Oklahoma                                           7                                                             69

Arkansas                                             6                                                              75

Texas                                                   38                                                           113

Louisiana                                            8                                                             121

Iowa                                                     6                                                             127

Missouri                                             10                                                            137

Wisconsin                                          10                                                            147

Ohio                                                     18                                                            165

Indiana                                               11                                                            176

Michigan                                            16                                                           192

Kentucky                                            8                                                             200

Tennessee                                          11                                                             211

Mississippi                                         6                                                             217

Alabama                                             9                                                             226

Florida                                                29                                                           255

Georgia                                               16                                                            271

South Carolina                                 9                                                              280

North Carolina                                15                                                             295

West Virginia                                    5                                                               300

Virginia                                               13                                                             313

Pennsylvania                                     20                                                            333

New Hampshire                                4__                                                        337

Total                                                   337

 

CREATE YOUR OWN PREDICTIONS WITH THIS FOX NEWS TOOL 

November 7th Exit polls will offer weeks of pundit examinations and press head-scratching but  expect headlines to read:

ROMNEY-RYAN WIN IN A SHOCKER ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE FOR GOP NOT SEEN SINCE 1980

James Michael Pratt is a New York Times bestselling author of inspirational fiction and non-fiction, editor and owner of Jerusalem Reports, and frequent contributor to Red State and other conservative sites. His personal website includes biographical and other information regarding his work. He can also be found on FACEBOOK and Twitter.

COMMENTS

  • ctredstater

    this would be a true wave election. since the spring, I felt it would be around 320 – just a gut feel. I am more nervous than I would like to be right now – but I am very proud of our ticket – and I believe that a solid Romney-Ryan win will take place. After that, the Senate is huge. May God continue to guide and bless our great nation.

    • jamesmpratt

      Amen to that!

    • LTtavernkeeper

      I’ve said it on other threads, I’ll say it here because I believe it – Romney has at least 1 or 2 paths to the White House without Ohio. Obama has NO path without OH. Early voting is down by 100K for dem, up by 200K for GOP. This is cause for guarded optimism.

      • jackm

        You said Obama has no path to win without Ohio? What if he wins Florida? I’ve seen polls that have Romney up in Florida, polls that show Obama ahead, and polls that show a tie.

        What if Obama wins Virginia and Colorado? This seems to be within the realm of possibility also.

        Question: Do you think Romney will win Ohio? Or Obama?

        • LTtavernkeeper

          Based on early voting numbers, Romney will win OH. Its 29% Dem to 23% GOP in early voting, and you can bet there’s more Dem defections than GOP. Additionally, if Independents break anywhere from 5 – 10 pts for Romney, it will more than make up for an anticipated 70-30 deficit in Cuyahoga.

          All the states you mentioned were already carried by Obama in 2008. Florida is done, Obama has no shot there. GOP is outpacing Colorado in early voting which is a surprise, but that basically takes CO out of the Obama column. Virginia is closer but likely Romney. The wildcards are Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Romney carrying PA makes OH and perhaps even VA irrelevant.

        • APA Guy

          Wow…what if Obama wins all 50 states?

          If Obama wins Florida, I’ll jump from the capitol dome.

          • idontbelonghere

            Hope you had a good life… adios!

          • rosenstern

            APA Guy – I hope you are as good as your word.

          • GremlinJones

            I hope you weren’t serious. It’s time to reexamine why we were all so convinced of a Romney landslide and the inaccuracy of Nate Silver. How did Rasmussen get this so wrong?

  • tyman

    I had a thought today that I searched for an answer and could not find. If Dims are so confident that O is going to win, why are practically all of the Senate candidates staying as far away from him as possible?

    Richard Nixon purposefully did no campaigning for any other candidates in ’72, and he won in a landslide against McGovern but the House and Senate elections were abysmal.

    I guess my thought is that Dims know O is toxic waste and they don’t want to be caught with him. That can’t be a good sign.

    I suppose you could say the same thing about Romney, but he isn’t the president YET!

  • http://rightwardjournal.com Jeff Swanson

    Boy, I do hope this is true.

    I am optimistic but not as optimisitic. I think it is my jaundiced view that the media has poisoned enough people that to have such an en mass defection to the ‘R’ side seems not as likely.

    That doesn’t mean that I don’t think Romney/Ryan will win. I do. Just not sure about the landslide.

    Mind you, I would love to be totally wrong about this!

    • jamesmpratt

      Keep the faith.

  • earlgrey

    I am proud of our ticket too. How reliable though is internal polling. Seems like it would favor the campaign doing the polling.

    • jamesmpratt

      Reasonable thinking on “internals.”

      • wrenhal

        nah, internal polling would want to be as true as possible so they have a measure of where they stand so as to know where to spend resources. The campaign manager that prefers to be jaded in the polling will not be campaign manager long.

  • The_Rebel

    Last week the Washington Post had a two week daily tracking poll asking the vote choice among likely voters who supported Obama in 2008. About 13% of those voters decided to back Romney. Since Obama received about 53% of the vote in 2008, this means he will get about 46% of the vote from his loyal supporters. He will get a negligible portion of the McCain voters. Since Democrat enthusiasm is down, I would not project any increase in his Democrat base over 2008. And this analysis doesn’t factor in the large Republican base who sat out in 2008 who will swarm to the polls this year. Thus, the total turnout could be as much as 5 million voters greater than 2008, with the vast majority of the increase going to Republicans. Putting this all together, it is not inconceivable that Obama may fail to get to 45%. If this does happen, nobody should be worried about the Senate.

    • jamesmpratt

      Well put together.

  • crimsonchampion

    Sorry, you lost me when (among other things), you gave Michigan to Romney. Obama is really weak this year, but Michigan? Seriously? Even Romney’s internals aren’t optimistic enough to include Michigan (anonymous GOP operatives have also said that Romney is conceding Nevada…but Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are in play). At this point I’m more interested in seeing how well the polls predicted the outcome. It’s time to vote.

    • tetrisd85

      Concern troll much? Yeah, obviously. You must’ve gotten a D in the class over at Kos University.

      • crimsonchampion

        Logic fail. Notice how I pointed out that Romney’s chances in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania were good? Reading comprehension much? Yeah, obviously not. You should sue your high school for malpractice for giving you a diploma.

        I’m just being realistic. Romney’s chances are good. That much is clear. I just think it’s unnecessary to make the kind of logical reach that the article’s author was making. Romney can win WITHOUT Michigan and no polls (internal or otherwise) have put Michigan within reach. So why even bring it up?

      • GremlinJones

        What is your problem? The tiniest criticism, that is completely logical in my book – I have yet to see one poll that showed Michigan even close – and you start screaming TROLL and KOS? C’mon, you’re better than that.

        • jamesmpratt

          All criticism allowed and encouraged. It clarifies crystal ball predictions.

    • jamesmpratt

      This is just personal diary optimism with oversampling & lower Dem voter turnout, and unhappy independents projected in my mind. Romney can lose 67 EVs from my list.

    • jamesmpratt

      HERE’S A LINK: Obama Internals Show Michigan tied: http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Obama-worried-Michigan-tied/2012/11/06/id/462963

      • crimsonchampion

        Thanks for both of your responses. I see your justification. Still, I don’t understand why Obama’s internals would show that while Romney’s wouldn’t. I figured that a close Michigan poll would be a huge press release for the Romney campaign. Hence my skepticism. But thank you for being thorough.

      • theiowan

        apparently they were wrong, cuz we lost michigan

  • tetrisd85

    I have a source who may have access to sensitive Obama campaign information. I can’t say too much but they might be in serious meltdown mode since this weekend due to their internals showing Pennsylvania and Ohio as lean Romney states. KNOW HOPE, EXPECT REAL CHANGE.

    • jamesmpratt

      Obama Internals say Michigan tied: http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Obama-worried-Michigan-tied/2012/11/06/id/462963

      • jpalm

        PA & Virginia for Obama! This isn’t good news! Michigan ain’t crap if Romney loses Ohio & Virginia! What am I missing?
        Why are you sending us that link like it’s good?

    • supa

      This makes no sense. Why can’t you say too much?

      Time to put on big boy pants and just say what you know.

  • californiasquish

    I would be more excited about this diary if the ‘about the author’ didn’t start with “James Michael Pratt is a New York Times bestselling author of inspirational fiction…”

    • jamesmpratt

      sorry

    • Ausonius

      Would you be more excited if it had stated “William Henry Pratt” and told you about his accomplishments? http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000472/bio

      • californiasquish

        Yes. Yes I would.

        Just a joke, James. No offense meant.

        • jamesmpratt

          No problem. Fiction is make believe, but a H_lluva lot of research to get it right when you do history and thriller — which is what I do with an “inspirational” make-em-cry twist. ;)

  • jackm

    About that 2% (or 12%) Democratic over sampling, that’s just what you get when you take a random sample.

    • jamesmpratt

      yep

  • mc2mc5

    Anyone here care to wager on a Romney victory?

    • Bill S

      Care to go away?

    • APA Guy

      Get lost, dufus. Those who care about winning this election are engaged in far more useful activities…like getting our people to the polls. Take juvenile crap to some other site…and while you’re at it, enjoy that first comment…as it may well be your last.

  • jamesmpratt

    Interesting link to Obama Michigan internals: http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Obama-worried-Michigan-tied/2012/11/06/id/462963

    • Bill S

      Posting it once on the thread was quite enough.

      • jamesmpratt

        Yep – a bit overdone. ;)

    • jpalm

      This is not good! Read it! They have PA, VA & Ohio who care about Mi if they have the rest?

  • jpalm

    Obama internals say Virginia theirs???

    • commonsenseobserver

      Really, there is no need to repeat yourself.

      And we’ll see soon enough.

    • Bill S

      Go take a Valium and come back in a few hours.

  • theiowan

    Well, at this point, there is no way the above electoral college prediction will be even close to accurate. Having lost WI, PA, MI, and NH. Florida is still too close for comfort, and I have a a bad feeling about Ohio.

  • jamesmpratt

    Well stupidity reigns and I am “dumb” founded. I will work on “right and wrong” now not “left and right.”

  • rosenstern

    You are just a fool that does not know what you are talking about. I do not mind fighting the good fight and losing, but all of this happy talk about blow out victories is just foolish. We have to face facts if we are to understand how we can change this nation.

  • Pingback: Lane Reindeau

  • Pingback: Lane Reindeau

  • Pingback: Stan Benzee

  • Pingback: Alexis Fyler

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: home distilling kits

  • Pingback: randki za darmo

  • Pingback: warszawa randki

  • Pingback: wielu ludzi w jednym miejscu

  • Pingback: znajdz milosc

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: charles david rowdy boot

  • Pingback: rubinetti fotocellula

  • Pingback: alcohol distilling

  • Pingback: Web Design

  • Pingback: Navigate To These Guys

  • Pingback: Go To This Site

  • Pingback: Click Here

  • Pingback: breastactives breast enhancement pills

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: karos registraciya

  • Pingback: working from home uk

  • Pingback: madam lux

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Johnny Bobeck

  • Pingback: aloe vera juice for hair

  • Pingback: Rosamaria Froebe

  • Pingback: cv

  • Pingback: cv wzór

  • Pingback: Coretta Barlow

  • Pingback: Darryl Domiano

  • Pingback: whisky

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: More Info

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: bmx bikes

  • Pingback: distill magazine

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: koi

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: All Things of World