Congressional Democrats are committed to overhauling the healthcare system and while doing so obviously do not intend to let the public know what the legislation contains for fear Americans will reject the QVC sales pitch.  Instead they are embarking on a successful method employed during the 2008 election of false advertising and selling a bag of goods without revealing the ingredients or the effect.

In a hurried effort to pass a bogus health care bill it is imperative that the merchandise’s contents be hidden from those it’s being sold to.  Instead, Democrats have dragged out a conceptual Vitameatavegamin health care bill for public consumption void of legislative language and whose obscure costs and implications no one bothers to consider.

Anyone over the age of forty remembers Lucille Ball playing the part of a woman auditioning for a Vitameatavegamin commercial where a tonic is presented as the, “…answer to all your problems.” In the episode, Lucy’s director is unaware that the “healthful” concoction of “…vitamins, meat, vegetables and minerals,” also has listed in the fine print a 23% alcohol content.  The Democrats might as well be holding up a bottle of Vitameatavegamin every time they speak on behalf of the health care proposal.  However, unlike Lucy’s director, Democrats are well aware of sinister particulars residing in their legislative proposals, but continue to resist posting ingredients online in an attempt to present a benign product that ultimately delivers a punch.

For all intents and purposes, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is our very own Lucy convincing America to sign onto a product she knows nothing about.  Smiling a forced, phony grin Nancy continually auditions to retain her seat of power. The only thing missing from the Speaker’s head is a lovely, little retro-lace Lucy-style bonnet.  Nancy, like Lucy, assures America that the Vitameatavegamin health care bill is a panacea that will be the ultimate, “…answer to all our problems,” especially if it includes a high-potency vitamin packed public option she guarantees it will include.

In the episode clip, Lucy auditions for the part of Vitameatavegamin girl beaming widely into the camera.   The director tells her to recite the script.  After citing the ingredients, the director tells Lucy to take a big mouthful, smile and wink saying what Speaker Pelosi alleges today about health care, “…it’s so tasty too…just like candy!”  However, after Lucy lifts the swill to her mouth the look on her face tells the whole story.  Yuck!  Her lips invert, the two muscles in her neck pop as she attempts to down the ghastly medicine. A similar situation could pose a problem for Pelosi’s sales pitch as personal commitment to a product ultimately clinches the sale.

After Lucy’s adverse reaction to the liquid remedy her director tells her, “No, no, no…you’re supposed to like the stuff. You’ve got to smile and be happy,” which was even difficult for someone determined to win the title of Vitameatavegamin girl.  The content of what Lucy was forced to swig was not fit for human consumption, which is precisely why, unlike a compliant Miss MaGillicutty, Democrats repudiate for their own consumption a product they are pushing on us.

Barack Obama disregards the vomitacious nature of the proposal and perseveres repeating, “OK, take it from…It’s so tasty too!” And, despite national rejection of the proposed fix, the Director-in-Chief personally holds our nation’s nose while dictatorially insisting we say “Ah.” According to studies, ninety-three percent of the American population feels a remedy is unnecessary for a condition that doesn’t exist.  Yet, the Vitameatavegamin health care sales team continues to drone on asking the wary, “Why don’t you join the thousands of happy, peppy people?”

In the fifty-year-old episode, Lucy slowly becomes desensitized to the questionable ingredients in the bottle as her ability to focus diminishes.  Her reaction to the product presents a potential ruse that Democrats could employ in their quixotic quest to control life and death. Bleary eyed and inebriated Lucy smacks her lips and says, “This stuff tastes pretty good…after you get used to it!”  Thus, if Democrats have their way, they will continue to force a tonic of half-truths and obfuscations on the public.  With any luck the effort will result in an America, so disorientated by lies that without question, the majority will guzzle down a Vitameatavegamin health care bill—consigning even the sober to endure its influence.

Speaking on behalf of the Director-in-Chief, our very own little Vitameatavegamin girl, Nancy Pelosi, has gotten to the point where she is encouraging, “Everybody to get a bottle of this stuff!”  What began as a coherent attempt to convince America to sign onto sane cost and competition directed health care reform has now been reduced to statements about public options that are on par with Lucy asking, “Do you pop out at parties…are you unpoopular?”

Nancy, Harry and Barry – are modern day snake oil salesmen.  Their medicine show consists of constant hawking to step right up and join the millions of Americans who have yet to read the ingredients, have no idea what it tastes like, or how it will affect them–but look to government to provide them with a healing elixir.

Yet, the Democratic sales pitch appears to be breaking down with every slam of the clapboard. As Pelosi, Reid and Obama work together to preserve their bottle of bureaucratic belladonna it becomes apparent they are the ones intoxicated with power. Presently, what we are witnessing is a desperate coalition of Democrats reduced into a desperate band of marketing mavens attempting to convince dubious consumers to invest in Handy Brushes.

In the famous Lucille Ball Vitameatavegamin episode the more she persisted in promoting her product the clearer it became what it actually was.  Hope endures that just as Lucy buckled under the influence of a shoddy product, the American public will recognize that like  a bottle of Vitameatavegamin, the bill the Democrats in Washington DC swear will surely be as easy as “spooning our way to health,” has neither our health, nor our well being in mind.

Inspired by his own celebrity, and regardless of the rival, it appears Obama believes exercising oratory muscle can bring opposition to its knees and “one voice” can wrest victory from the jaws of defeat. Always at the ready when liberal ventures are in peril of hitting the skids, Obama can be counted on to fly in and save the day by orating every obstacle into submission.  So secure is he in his rhetorical proficiency Barack Obama enthusiastically inserts himself into the midst of international competitions and high profile political campaigns.

One can’t really blame the guy for his personal view of himself. Barack Obama’s speaking skills are so superior that with no experience, and after eight unimpressive years in the Illinois State Senate, carefully placed words on a teleprompter, exquisitely timed pregnant pauses and cheesy slogans catapulted him directly into the Oval Office.

The reason for this type of stratospheric rise to power can only be explained by the principle that “Exceptionally articulate politicians begin with a great electoral advantage because the opinion-forming class is in love with words.”

However, like a bad actor with a brilliant script Obama is, “…discovering the truth about the power of oratory; it can only get you so far.”   Travelling to Denmark to vouch for the Olympics coming to Chicago and spending weeks campaigning for a horrendous blue state Governor, Obama’s empty rhetoric is disclosing to a formerly enamored world an amateur costumed in impressive attire, but void of substance.

Obviously, Obama learned nothing when pressing Presidential responsibilities took a back seat to spending 10 million dollars jetting to Copenhagen to dazzle the IOC and make short work of securing the 2016 Summer Olympics for Chicago.   In Obama’s mind, after months of deliberation, all that was necessary to seal the deal was a last minute visit from a luminary such as himself.  His purpose was to convince the International Olympic Commission that whatever had been decided, prior to his appearance, would pale in comparison to the power of his presence and words.

Obama nonchalantly arrived in Denmark fully convinced of his ability to sway the Olympic committee to place a duly deserved crown of olive leaves upon his egotistical head. He didn’t, and they didn’t, which “…raised serious questions about his perceived international star power.”

Obama flying to Copenhagen was questioned internationally after the U.S. was eliminated in the first round.  What many failed to comprehend was that the Olympics being hosted by Chicago was undecided for everyone except Obama.  His unwavering trust in his own charisma and public speaking skill has delivered the impossible for him every time.  Yet, this time when Obama flew in…America lost!

Addressing the embarrassing situation diplomatic Fox political analyst Tucker Carlson remarked that, “It’s good for us to fail in a high profile way every once in a while because it reminds us that we’re not God and there limits in our ability to sway other people.”  Earth to Tucker, earth to Tucker…while that may be true for some people, your hypothesis is nonapplicable when it comes to Barack Obama.

Based on what he said while campaigning in New Jersey and for Creigh Deeds in Virginia, a totally clueless Obama didn’t seem to understand the “growing disenchantment” with his incessant action-deficient talk. “Faced with real crisis and insecurity,” people sick of rhetoric are, “…demand[ing] substance and want to know precisely what mechanisms you are proposing to install to bring about that glorious and beautifully evoked future that you advocate with such forceful sincerity.”

Yet, Obama flew to New Jersey five times and spent the time talking mainly about, you guessed it, Barack Obama. “Listen, I want you to remember, when I ran for – when I ran for election, I did not say— (applause) –wait, wait, wait – wait, when I ran for election, I did not say this was going to come overnight.” Self-absorbed comments indicated that Obama perceived voters’ pulling the lever for John Corzine, as recommitment to none other than Obama. The President’s appeal to New Jersey voters was not for Governor John Corzine but rather an obvious appeal for reaffirmation of Yes We Can policy, which have proven to be a flawed, faltering failure.

Barry traveled to New Jersey in a similar spirit with which he sojourned to Copenhagen.  Once again, deluded that persona and rhetoric would insure victory for a Governor whose liberal guiding principle of taxing and spending have wreaked statewide havoc in the same way Obama’s liberal policies have negatively affected America. In the face of defeat, the President venturing to the Garden State the weekend prior to the election indicated he believed the power of his personality so strong; it could stem the tide against disaster even at the eleventh hour.  Regardless of the effort, Barack Obama’s unshakable belief in himself was proven wrong on Election Day when a pattern that started in Denmark began to emerge.  Obama flew in and a loss for both Creigh and Corzine followed.

The question now is whether Barack Obama is self-aware enough to recognize his waning political influence after being humiliated internationally in Copenhagen and after witnessing the party he stumped for get its proverbial clock cleaned?  New studies indicate that the density of dopamine receptors in the brain determine whether we learn from our mistakes or not, which could explain a large majority of what our nation has experienced over the better part of a year, “dope-a-me-me-me-me-n.”

So, as the nation sat riveted to election results, instead of monitoring the success of the gubernatorial campaigns he stumped for, Obama had something more compelling piquing his interest–a HBO documentary, starring none other than himself. Barack Obama remains captivated, convinced and concerned with the always influential and ever enthralling Barack Obama, as well as oblivious to the fact that lately, in spite of what he says, when he flies in, crushing loss follows closely behind.

The Obama administration picks advisors based on ideology, which is why comedian Bill Maher would be the perfect “Choice Czar.”  Maher lacks the diplomacy and finesse of Harvard professor turned Regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, but in principle, they both adhere to similar methods.  Sunstein employs the tactic of nudging, while Maher’s advice to Obama on how to deal with those who continue to reject the public option, “…they’re stupid. Just drag them to this.”

In his book, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness Cass Sunstein said, “In many cases, individuals make pretty bad decisions.”  Thus, human beings are in need of what he describes as, “libertarian paternalism,” where choices are made for the masses by brilliant “choice architects” like Nancy, Harry and Barry.  Sunstein assessed that the public is, “systematically biased…toward our notions of what everyone else thinks.” Judging from the line at the Mac store, there may be a measure of truth to that statement.

According to Cass Sunstein, Obama agrees and “believes in doing law in a way that’s realistically based on human behavior.”  Thus, in order to control America and take the Nancy State to a whole new level of institutionalized paternalism, Americans who don’t appreciate being dominated or proscribed to need to instead be methodically prodded along.  Or, in layman’s terms, hoodwinked into believing their actions and decisions are the result of individual choice.

So, in hopes of discouraging a freethinking America, nudging has become a Washington DC pastime.  If Americans remain resistant to getting the H1N1 vaccine there is always the Tickle Me Elmo technique.  Fabricate a shortage and suddenly panic sets in and those who might have otherwise skipped buying the toy, take to storming Toys R Us. Tickle Me Elmo then becomes a must have Christmas gift even if you’re childless or if people are trampled to death in the process.

Motor Vehicles, though unlikely as a resource, can be utilized as a nudge zone if organ donations are on the decline.  The feds can poke the public by defaulting the option on a driver’s license to sign over your kidneys.  If you fail to opt out, someone on dialysis gets a new lease on life if making a right on red makes you a statistic.  The implementation of “mandated” policies, where government makes choices for you, insures fresh surpluses of organs from those who would otherwise be buried with corneas.

As nudging becomes engrained in the political playbook, it appears as if Sunstein has been tutoring the Speaker of the House on how to elbow people away from negative impressions associated with the controversial public option toward believing alternatives that don’t exist, actually do! Of course Democrats do all this with best intentions and to insure that the “stupid people”, “…wind up with better public and private policies.”

Left wing liberals must believe that if “competition” and “consumer” show up in a title Americans will buy anything. Based on the recent proposal to change the name of the public option to the competitive option, Democrats in Washington obviously concur with Bill Maher that most people are so dim-witted that merely changing the name makes the original legislation indistinguishable to the average citizen.  Someone should wax poetic and throw off the intellectuals in the Obama administration by asking, “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would [still] smell as…” fetid.

Presently, the people of this country are being nudged toward accepting a form of health care that the preponderance of evidence shows Americans radically oppose for any purpose other than competition and price control. Therefore, American sentiment is being manipulated, no, nudged by polls that continue to insist, 77% support the public option.  Yet, Democrats in DC still lack votes within their own party to pass a health care bill that includes a choice they claim “the American people” desperately want.  So what’s up with that?

Nudging tactics work to the benefit of manipulative politicians because “choice architects” remain unimpeachable by designing policies that assure responsibility fall solely on those they seek to manage. Washington plans to benefit from the same practices the credit card companies they regulate use when charging for a service and then continuing to charge if consumers don’t opt out. Paying $16.00 per month on a Visa statement, because of failing to “opt out” of a free credit report? Who’s to blame? Ask magazine marketers, opting out is an “option” few people avail themselves of.

In response to largely unfavorable opinion polls and based on the events of the past few days it appears as if the ultimate libertarian patriarch in the White House comprehended the need to prod the dense toward the definitive goal of a single payer system. So, under the probable tutelage of Cass Sunstein, “choice architects” Pelosi and Reid incorporated, “…small and apparently insignificant contextual details,” to the title of the bill in hopes of majorly affecting American perception and behavior.

While Barry maintains a low profile, Nancy and Harry circumvent Americans who continue to rebuff government run health care by campaigning for a bill that includes the perfect nudge.  The proposal Reid plans to bring to the Senate floor “… will include a public health insurance option that individual states could decline to participate in,” defaulting on a state-by-state basis to “opt out,” which they are unlikely to do. Subsequently, liberals in Washington will remain cosseted from culpability when Americans, bleeding out in health clinics, crammed with illegal aliens, recognize they’ve been both prodded and punk’d.

Polls continue to show that 87% of the American population is satisfied with the health care they presently have. Regardless, the expectation in Washington remains high that a name change from public to a consumer competitive option will provide the gentle nudge needed to accomplish what Cass Sunstein and soon to be appointed czar, Bill Maher insist is essential to haul the majority of brainless people to the public option.

Cross posted at: www.jeannie-ology.com

Listening to Barack Obama speak about the nation he leads, one would think Alex DeLarge had been wreaking havoc in the world for the last 200-years, raping the global economy, beating the hell out of the underprivileged and pillaging world peace. Who is Alex you ask?  Why, Alex was the main character in the violent, socio-economic, political horror movie Clockwork Orange.

Every chance Obama gets he “…fulfills his campaign vow to show the nations of the world that a new American leadership stands ready to atone for the transgressions of the old. ” Both here and abroad, Obama apologizes for perceived thuggery as if America were guilty of Alex DeLarge-style global mayhem.

In the movie Clockwork Orange, Alex and his bawdy band of droogs, plunder through a dystopian world with full abandon sans regret, compunction or remorse.  Now, a diffident Obama offers the hand of peace to hateful dictators by acquiescing as if he were the self-effacing parent of Alex DeLarge. Hell, Obama has a vision for utopia and if it wasn’t for the nightmare America has created he might actually be able to transform the planet into a socialist Shangri-La.

Alex and the droogs epitomize ignorance and brutality.  On the global stage liberals represent traditional America as nothing more than a droog, a utopia spoiling, intellectually dumb warmonger, whose lack of knowledge and aggression historically discourages solidarity with the global vision for negotiable world peace.

Five minutes into Clockwork Orange it’s obvious to the viewer that the dichotomous Alex DeLarge is not a “force for good.” Although he loves classical music he dons a mask, bowler hat and white overalls before fusing beating with indiscriminate forced sexual assault. Listening to Obama express worldwide lament for our nation you’d think an imperialistic/capitalist America prowled the globe like the profane Alex, “…whose principal interests are rape, ultra-violence and Beethoven.”

Liberals, led by Obama, believe symbolic goodness is something that can be mandated, legislated and implemented through transformative left wing policy. If America wants “freedom,” in the Obama sense of the word, the only answer is behavioral revision managed by leaders whose inspiration for egalitarianism, harmony and social justice is birthed in repressive control.  And for that, there could be no better adaptive model to emulate then the one found in Clockwork Orange.

Midway through the sardonic film, Alex DeLarge goes to prison for 14-years for murdering an elderly woman.  As a precursor, he is forced to undergo a body cavity search similar to the one America is presently enduring. Like Alex’s prison enforced rules, collectivism focused America, now forbids crossing lines drawn by dogmatic, politically correct policies and the threat exists that liberated people are about to be reduced to faceless, nameless numbers.

Trapped in a facsimile of H.M. Prison Parkmoor, America’s is having its psyche pulverized into submission as if we are deviant, rowdy, and renegade like Alex DeLarge.  However, in our case the goal of serum No 114-propaganda drug is to make America resistant to the concept of freedom, capitalism and Constitutional fidelity.  If our nation can be made to retch when presented with what she once held dear, Obama’s political experimentation will be a smashing success.

In Clockwork Orange, classical conditioning transformed Alex DeLarge from an insurgent into a pacifist.  Similarly, Obama is bent on amending American society through systematic administration of rewards and punishments in hopes of shifting belief systems, patriotic spirit and conduct. Obama’s definitive goal is the destruction of American dystopia in hopes of replacing it with international utopia. Yet, even the prison Chaplain in Clockwork Orange warned deviant Alex, that change isn’t gained that way, “When a man cannot choose he ceases to be a man.”

Regardless, a self-righteous President believes he has a better way for America.  Moreover, Obama has commissioned a Clockwork Orange-style, Ludovico Technique be administered on the nation with full knowledge of what a few hours of “shovel ready job” indoctrination can do to unite the workers of the world. Obama’s attendants in American aversion therapy are media pupil lubricators and a cadre of white-jacketed politicians, whose occupation is to monitor a social experiment of associating pain of retribution for actions alien to Obama’s utopian view.  Reprimands, which include discouraging war by leaving the military to die without reinforcements. Small businesses, private industry and corporate America taxed and regulated into capitulation and the demoting of Judeo Christian influence.

Every time Obama steps up to a podium he injects rhetoric with a hypodermic full of shame, lies, and remorse in hopes of distorting reality and fiction in American minds. The President’s despotic modus operandi includes, half-truths and repetitive encoding, coupled with punishment directed at capitalism, condemnation of Constitutional principles, castigating free enterprise and the systematic undermining of national security.

Like Alex, on Election Day a naïve America willingly submitted to being straitjacketed with inescapable limitations beyond imagination. As a result, we are presently experiencing a near death experience.  We are captive to autocratic tendencies and victimized by misinformation. Our eyelids have been clamped open and our head wired with electrodes in a tortured position where the national gaze is fixed on only what those in control dictate politically acceptable.

The illicit Alex was robbed of his individually and intrinsic humanity, tamped down into innocuous compliance and, in turn, made a “free man.” It was only then that he could be sent, “…out with confidence into the world again.” Obama attempting to alter national identity, personality and foundational principles does so to wrest control of the natural impulse of a free, democratic nation. His hope is to present a subjugated America to the world as a neutered, mind-numbed, docile Alex DeLarge–though independent at heart, “queer as clockwork orange,” bizarre internally, while appearing natural, human, and normal on the surface.

If the President gets his way, government will have the clout to exert power over American distinctiveness and exceptionalism.  In turn, the dream of authoritarian utopia will be established upon a foundation of domineering restraint, indoctrination and political propaganda.  Its time Americans inform our self-aggrandizing leader, Dr. Brodsky-Obama, that the United States is no Alex DeLarge.  Instead, he and the liberal, left wing band of social propagandists he leads are the “queer as clockwork orange” droogs in need of reprogramming…not us.

Cross posted at:  www.jeannie-ology.com

The world watched the first British citizen in 300 years marry an heir to the British throne on July 28, 1981.  Reminiscent of that day, the world celebrated the first African-American president sworn into office in a historic American election. Obama’s inauguration was the closest thing to the wedding of Charles and Diana ever witnessed this side of the pond. The event included all the pomp; pageantry and romance to earn it the title of, Camelot Part II. Just as, “the fairytale romance of Charles and Di, and the grand pageantry that, by binding them in holy matrimony, secured the future of the British monarchy” — Obama’s Presidency held the promise of hope and change for America’s future.

Yet, despite the historic nature of both events, sadness prevailed.  During our nation’s betrothal, America was so besotted by the cult of personality that we failed to realize Obama, like the Prince of Wales, wasn’t all he was cracked up to be.

When Barack Hussein Obama took the oath of office, for all intents and purposes, he married the Presidency.  In doing so, he committed himself to defending, protecting and preserving the Constitution as if it was his bride. Obama would have been better sitting in a pew with Camilla Parker Bowles then participating in a disingenuous ceremony whose vow he never intended to keep.

When Charles married Diana he wore Camilla’s cufflinks to keep her close to him in spirit.  Similarly, Obama took the oath but clutched close to his heart were the collective doctrines that have proven to be his first love.  On Inauguration Day Obama committed to “…preserve, protect and defend” a Constitution we now know he fundamentally believes is a “flawed” document.  If this were matrimony, perjury would be grounds for annulment.

Being from the royal line of Henry the VIII, Charles was well aware a ceremonial step was a necessary means to providing an heir.  Off spring drove the Prince to the altar; after his sons were born…he cast off his bride. Obama accomplished the goal of becoming successor to power by bamboozle not bloodline. What drew Obama to the Presidency was the potential to circumvent the Constitution as a precursor to insure a legacy where socialistic seed produces fairness and shared equity. Like Charles forsook Diana, Obama is presently in the process of, “…breaking free from the essential constraints that were placed by our Founding Fathers in the Constitution.”

Twenty-eight years earlier, the Prince of Wales bumbled his vow to share ‘his’ earthly goods with Lady Spencer.  He then put her ring on the wrong finger and forgot to kiss the bride.  Obama, on the other hand, firmly planted the kiss of death on the Constitution by prophetically misspeaking his vow to “execute the office of president to the United States, faithfully.”  To date, and to our detriment, Obama has executed everything he swore to defend.  Barry has been as faithful as Charles meeting Camilla for secretive trysts, never missing an opportunity to ravage the Constitution.

Through the years Obama in no way made it a secret that he believed, “…the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.”    His true intentions have reduced the President to a Charles-type groom who marries and then, on the honeymoon, spurns the mate he had no desire for prior to the wedding.  Yet, it was a less than perfect Charles that crawled into a virginal marriage bed. Likewise, Obama stained with the sin of socialism attempts to defile the purity of the Constitution by injecting his rabid ideology into our democracy.

Our wanton President is smitten by a whorish socialistic system and is guilty of cavorting with radicals since youth.  And so our nation eagerly engaged a politically licentious groom. On Election Day, America was so busy stuffing yards of tulle into a glass coach we willingly overlooked Obama’s leftist past. Barry Sotoero came to the altar to be inaugurated, breathless and disheveled from promiscuous associations with ACORN, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the Gamaliel Foundation, Bill Ayers, the New Party, and the Arab American Action Network and many, many more.

Throughout the 80’s, Charles brazenly carried on his sordid affair with Camilla.  In the same way, the third entity of socialism is presently threatening fidelity to a Constitution Obama made an oath to uphold. It is becoming apparent that Obama came to this union from the get-go with two-timing intentions to destroy and attack the tenets of democracy by “…entering into issues of redistribution of wealth, and … basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.”

Why can’t we recognize betrayal when we see it? The world watched for two decades as adultery, infidelity and deceitfulness destroyed the storybook marriage of Charles and Diana and eventually destroyed the Princess’ life.  British tabloids reported that,  “The night before his wedding to Lady Diana Spencer Charles and a ‘blonde woman’ spent the night on the Royal Train. Diana rightly guessed it was Camilla, but she hoped Charles would eventually grow to love her and forget his old flame.”

America, like Diana, was deceived into believing that Barack Obama would eventually grow to love liberty and forget the flame of socialism that stole his youthful heart. Like Charles with Camilla, Barack Obama remains fiercely loyal to his first love. The promise of the fairytale blinded a naïve nation to willingly disregard what was so painfully obvious.

Now that the honeymoon is over, its time to check the Presidents collar for lipstick stains because his paramour is surveying the Constitution’s residence awaiting the directive to move in. Obama’s actions, policies, statements and czars indicate that he desires to cast out Liberty and move into the palace a mistress whose shadow can be seen hiding lately in every corner of the halls of power.

Charles’ many years of public philandering caused Diana to meltdown on the global stage.  His perversions slowly became accepted as the world was desensitized to the Prince’s faithlessness. After Diana’s untimely death the British eventually justified Charles replacing the Princess of Wales with his consort.  America should take heed as czars wrest power from Congress and government seizes the means of production, undermines Capitalism, the free enterprise system and democracy.  We like the Brits are in danger of being slowly desensitized to our beloved Constitution being made to live in a political Kensington Palace, while socialism resides in bed beside a presidential prince.

At the royal wedding ceremony Lady Diana Spencer broke with tradition by refusing to promise to obey Charles. In keeping with that independent spirit, hope endures that the American people will decline submission to a disloyal President who refuses to keep his vow to our founding documents and remain faithful to our Constitution. As a young nation hopefully we’ll evict the adulterer from the main quarters before America suffers an end where Obama lives in the White House with his very own Camilla, while our Constitution, like the Princess of Wales, lays six-feet under in a cold and lonely grave.

www.jeannie-ology.com