The synergy between the House of Representatives and the Executive Branch is so finely tuned that Nancy Pelosi’s health care bill HR 3962 has finally provided a vehicle for Barack Obama to deliver on the promise of creating shovel ready jobs, specifically in the area of public safety.

According to the US Department of Justice, at the end of 2007 there were 2.3 million people incarcerated and as of 2008 that number jumped to 1 in 100 Americans. If all goes well for Pelosi’s health care bill, that number could more than double, providing a myriad of opportunities to help get the 10% of unemployed Americans back to work.

Extending a hand of assistance to the President’s sagging poll numbers, the Speaker of the House has provided a possible means for employing millions of Americans.  Even in a sluggish economy—opportunities abound.   If HR 3962, which passed in the House, succeeds in passing in the Senate, Obama can rely on ribbons being cut at correctional facilities, jumpsuit factories and correction officer training schools all over America.

The healthcare bill specifies that those who refuse to purchase health insurance and fail to pay the fine of about 2.5 percent of their income, face penalties of up to five years in prison.

Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year

Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.

It should be duly noted that according to a recent analysis by the Congressional Budget Office insurance that would keep Americans out of jail, for “the lowest-cost family non-group plan under HR 3962, will cost $15,000 by 2016.” The bill will only subsidize what breaks down to be about $1195.00 a month after families making $45,000 have paid 8%, or $3,600.00 a year and those earning $65,000 have contributed 12%, or $7,800.00 a year.

Constitutionality aside, these premiums serve two purposes.   First, subsidizing a very expensive program on the backs of young people who might normally decide against buying high priced catastrophic insurance policies and second, to funnel heaps of money into insurance company coffers as a means of motivation to sign onto an initiative, which private insurance might otherwise reject.

In the “home of the brave and the land of the free” intimidation, by way of misdemeanor and felony incarceration, has never been a great motivator. Nevertheless, the new Chicago-style formula for a “healthier” nation, more jobs and a better economy has been reduced to coercion and bullying. In a spirit of fairness, kindness and concern for all Americans and to save health care and the economy Obama, Pelosi and company seem more than willing to hold hostage millions of people.

Truth is if 99% of Americans kowtow and pay the mandated $15,000.00 a year for health insurance, as far as response rates go would be an extremely high percentage. Taking that into consideration, the number of Americans over the age of 18, or 1% of 217 million would amount to about 2+ million people who, by law, would promptly be fitted for zebra stripped prison garments.

The possibilities for tax revenue and job creation is endless for a Congress that continues to overstep the limits of its power and push health-care mandates by threatening anyone who doesn’t follow the dictates. If based on so profound an unconstitutional premise, 10% of the population decides to refuse to buy the policy, prison populations could swell nearing 21,700,000, creating lots of those much talked about “shovel ready” jobs.  Yellow Caterpillar backhoes could instantaneously be rolled to various and sundry sites to begin construction on sprawling, brand new prison facilities.

Yet, one has to wonder how Pelosi and Company justify spending an average of $30,000.00 per year to incarcerate people for exercising the Constitutional right of refusing to pay $15,000.00 for a health insurance policy? Notwithstanding, stubborn “Live Free or Die” Americans who persist on being obstinate, whose fines would climb to $250,00.00 apiece with jail sentences upwards to five years.

Obama’s compliance incentives are as ridiculous as mandating all citizens eat apples and penalizing anyone eating a grapefruit and then when appearing in court, having the ticket agent pay double the price of the fine he or she issued the offender.  According to HR 3962 Americans must buy a $15,000.00 insurance policy—if they refuse, off they go to jail where the federal government pays $30,000.00 to teach a lesson about the high price of insubordination—which anyone would agree is pure political genius!

The OBO (Obama Budget Office) fails to realize that for every one individual incarcerated for a twelve months, two health insurance policies could be paid for instead.  But, we need to remember that this brilliant idea was hatched from a President and administration that brags about spending $248,000.00 in stimulus money to create or “save” one job that likely pays less than $50,000.00 a year.

Last year states spent the vast majority of $52 billion on prisons to house 2.3 million inmates, add an impending 2 million, or a 1% insurance infraction influx to that number and costs rise to well over $100 billion.  In order to save on the “high cost of health insurance” the federal government is willing to pay $50+ billion a year to punish those who refuse to submit to tyrannical laws not based on the Constitution? A perfect example of how coercion delivers a poor return on investment.

Touting the historical nature of providing health care as a “right,” despotic Washington politicians continue to define the meaning of “acceptable health insurance coverage.”  In doing so, Democrats in Congress led by Pelosi and Obama are preparing to subject insurance scofflaws to numerous and criminal penalties which, if the bill passes, will imprison millions either behind bars, or shackled to heavy fines, premiums and tax burdens.

In another attempt to convince campaign; Pelosi and Obama could disguise the poison dart in the full quiver of “free” benefits by stressing health care provides a healthier, fairer and more equitable America, as well as millions of jobs for law abiding citizens.  By building and maintaining facilities to house and curtail lawless insurance delinquents, Obama can then persuade America that while enjoying the benefits of universal health care one man’s crime is another man’s job opportunity.

America, face it…there is a new Sheriff in town.  In the meantime, while ground is broken and construction started on thousands of penitentiaries and in exchange for federal clemency, Nancy and Barry could recruit Joe Arpaio to design pink prison garb and tent cities to house felonious Americans. In addition, HR 3962 can replace the Constitution and be ensconced as a manifesto to historical advances in Democrat benevolence. After being merited for saving a flailing economy, the Pelosi bill can also go down in perpetuity as the document verifying that if Liberals are in power freedom goes to prison, while tyranny roams free.

Cross posted at:  www.jeannie-ology.com

I have to first say, I’m not a conspiracy theorist.  I was born and raised in the United States.  In all of my 55-years I cannot remember one occasion where I’ve gone to fill a prescription and  then been told  there was a shortage of any drug.  I  recently had that experience, while attempting to fill a prescription for the antibiotic, Cipro.  I was somewhat taken a back when alerted to the fact that it would be months before Cipro was available again, a troublesome situation for a woman with a raging bladder infection.

Then hubby Jerry went to the doctor expecting to receive the routine yearly “seasonal” flu shot he has gotten for the last 30 years.  Much to his surprise he was promptly informed that there were no seasonal flu shots.  When he asked when he could get the shot? He was alerted to the fact that there weren’t any around and it was unlikely there would be any available for the rest of the season.  A hard spot to be in as Tamiflu shortages makes India (a third world country) a potential source for an alternate type of flu medication.  Hoping to find an alternate source, I typed our zip code into awww.flu.gov location finder and came up with only one location administering flu vaccines and it was in a health clinic somewhere in the inner recesses of Springfield Gardens, Queens.  My husband would have a better chance of surviving the flu than he would if he ventured into Springfield Gardens.

Then of course you have the first government controlled foray into health care administration and preparedness in the form of H1N1 vaccines.  Promising 80-120 million doses by flu season it is now November and to date the government has overseen the production of approximately 16.5 million vaccines.  To date, we’ve seen 13% percent of the promised inventory, which means we’re 87% behind on the delivery of promised dosages.  To put things in perspective, we’re still 119,999,994 doses short of the 120 million and we have 400 million people to vaccinate.

Something is afoot here – in Communist countries past and present it’s a well known fact that shortages prevail in everything from consumer goods, drugs, light bulbs to food.  The only thing there is never a lack of is Stolichnaya® Vodka to quell the pain.   Way back in 2001 an article regarding the formerly communist Poland in the European Banker said that “There remains a pent-up demand for almost everything after 45 years of state socialism when shortages were endemic, there were no choices in domestically produced consumer goods, imports were limited, and political controls rationed who could buy cars and who could get flats and telephones.”

My question is why are shortages making their way to America?  What is fostering this situation?  In less than a week I’ve run smack into four unrelated instances in a country I’ve lived in for more than half a century and never experienced a shortage before.

Now last night, out of the corner of my ear,  I hear that Eggo Waffles are in demand because of nationwide shortages.  The Kellogg Company is blaming the projected month’s long scarcity on flooding in a plant in Tennessee causing an Eggo Waffle dilemma until the middle of next year.  I don’t buy it…I don’t mean the waffles, I mean the excuse – since when does a flood stop the top cereal manufacturer in the nation from being able to find a way around a flooding problem in a single factory?

A Jan. 13, 2003, report in Newsweek on Stalinist North Korea says, “Food shortages there were so bad that “more than 2,000,000 people died of starvation over the last decade.” We’re far from being relegated to bread lines and no one has starved to death yet, but I find it curious that in one week I’ve happened upon 4 specific deficiencies just going through every day life–in a nation that lacks for nothing in ingenuity or ability to produce.

An article in Newsweek dated Jan. 8, 2001, said that “In Eastern Europe, the fall of communism unleashed political freedoms, open markets and a bright array of consumer goods.”   Now, in America creeping socialism is having the opposite effect — less freedom, more government control and now suddenly we’re being confronted with drug and food shortages?

One is forced to contemplate government induced controls as a way to foster dependency and cultivate panicked need in people.  A crisis trial balloon is sent up to see public reaction to waiting, which instigates a frenzied response when the product is made available.  The result equals control of the masses through medicine and food. Wait until Eggo releases its first batch of waffles after a six-month famine, people will rip them frozen from the box in the grocery store, glomming them downlike famished children from Biafra!  Same with H1N1, if you were considering skipping the government recommended shot… a shortage may convince you that you might as well get it while you can just in case you change your mind and there’s none available.

As for seasonal flu shots –  that’s a double edged sword, the group the most in jeopardy of suffering from flu ravages are the elderly, which works to the government’s benefit as they contemplate budgetary concerns having to do with health care reform.   And for those hoarding Cipro – you may  well survive your first Anthrax attack, but be aware, the next one might be very, very  iffy.

H1N1 aside, the government may have nothing to do with any of this and the shortages are more likely caused by complicated manufacturing and inventory issues.  However, it’s a good preview of what lies ahead for our nation if Obama gets his way and socializes both the means of production and the health care industry.  Until then, my message is to the one aspiring to control every aspect of American society including medicine and food, “Hey Barry, I’m on to you — Leggo of my Eggo!”

Cross posted at:  www.jeannie-ology.com

I have a very wicked habit – I gawk.  I am a visual person who takes in every detail.  I can describe anything down to the minutest element.   I stare at people.    I scrutinize lines on faces and if someone is interesting or unusual looking I drink in the facets of what I’m seeing even more.  My bad habit has become a tool in writing, which provides a paint box full texture and interest to what I’m attempting to convey.

When I was a little girl my Dad told me, “Stop staring!” He said it was impolite and made people feel uncomfortable.  If I saw a handicapped person with a deformity, I brought staring to a whole new level.  If I happened upon a person who was mentally challenged, my father would have to literally drag me away because my reaction was as if I encountered an otherworldly phenomenon– eyes wide, mouth agape frozen and fixated.

Now, as a Grandma, I have learned to curtail my habit and feed off the treasure trove of past staring information that I stored away.  However, the practice of staring has given me insight as to why the situation we find ourselves in as a nation irritates me the way it does.  I realize that there are people who beg us to look at them and then censure us for doing what they dared us to do–like people with full body tattoos or ten penny nails through their pierced eyebrows.

After many years of contemplating my annoyance and impatience with a certain people group that doesn’t like being stared at,  I finally figured out what bothers me about Muslim women outfitted in hijāb.

I want to clarify, although I realize that the burqua marginalizes women and is a symbol of the inequality between males and females in the Muslim culture that isn’t what irks the living daylights out of me. Freedom of religion aside –I know myself enough to know that I’d be unable to control my reaction if confronted on the street by Casper the Friendly Ghost.  Trust me, I would stare.

The crux of the matter is that the Muslim culture has invaded our nation and their repressive, 5,000-year-old outerwear is being inflicted on us in our day-to-day life.  Muslims make some sort of costume statement and we’re being told to dare not ogle?   If we do, because we can’t believe our eyes–it’s interpreted as religious discrimination against Islam.  You know what I say, “Tough! If you don’t like it, woman-up and take off that ridiculous outfit.”

Question?  If  you saw two people walking around in the grocery store in Renaissance attire acting like it was the most normal thing in the world, would you keep thumbing through the National Enquirer, or look?

For example on a recent foray into Walmart, the people’s market, I was subjected to quite an eye-opener.  Perusing the laundry detergent aisle and innocently comparing the prices between Tide and Purex,  I prefer Tide, whiter whites and all, out of the corner of my finely tuned eyes appeared a Muslim man outfitted in a floor length, galabiyya.  On his poorly coifed head, a wrinkled kufi. He had sandals on his, hygienically challenged bare feet and sported a full length, never been groomed, overgrown, Prophet Muhammad beard. Trailing right behind him, at a comfortably respectful, but no less repressive-submissive pace, was a woman dressed in full burqua, with niqab – and sunglasses no less.  And I’m not supposed to look?  I was gripped with horror like the first time I saw the Invisible Man – no skin, a mummy in Ray Ban’s.  I thought, “Is there someone in there?”

I couldn’t stop staring and as I did, I questioned reality asking, “Is this America?”  I know the argument that other religions dress funny like the Hasidic Jews or even the Amish, who by the way all look alike.  I’m sorry, there is a big difference between a head scarf, suspenders and a full body tent with two holes cut out for eyes —it just doesn’t compare.

Meanwhile, back at Walmart the woman in the niqab was struggling to see under her sunglasses, holding Windex in one hand and a pair of trendy pink flip-flops in the other.   Shoppers were making wide turns to avoid these two.  Although straining toward a politically correct effort not to gawk, I could see that inquisitive shoppers were just pretending to read the ingredients on the products they held in their hands,  while every eyeball was riveted on Abdul and Habibah.

Or how about the woman I encountered in Starbucks trying to drink a Caramel Macchiato in a burqua?  My thought at the time was maybe she should put the drink on the floor and snake a garden hose up under her garment and into her mouth.  Then, the only thing suggestive of latte drinking would be the veil covering her face billowing like a sail on a mizzen mast.

Originally, my first reaction to burqua-draped females was mild interest; my second, feigned respect and then following close behind was infuriated rage!  I became outright indignant and it showed.  In my heart and on my face I was ripping headgear off and throwing it to the floor in a blasphemous statement…and saving  Judeo-Christian foundations in the process.  After watching what could best be described as a religious sideshow I lost my ability to acquiesce to the First Amendment and wondered what the framers of the Constitution would say about the abuse American culture is presently being forced to endure.

The First Amendment does says that, “The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext, infringed.” However, Santeria is a religion and animal sacrifice, which is an integral part of that faith, is still against the law.  Can’t we outlaw burquas? Burquas offend much more and at least you can eat dead chickens.

I can’t help thinking America is presently the victim of a Santeria ritual being slaughtered under the oppression of a Muslim culture that is slitting the throat of cultural sanity.  I also can’t help but believe that to ask an American citizen to be subjected to the scene similar to  the one in Walmart, while simply buying laundry soap, is an “…abridgement of civil rights on account of Muslim religious belief or worship.”

The couple in Walmart had no problem inflicting on modern American culture a fashion statement instituted in the days of the Byzantine Empire and while doing so dared Americans to object.

Reality is, we’re under invasion, literally and culturally and the invasion includes subjugation.  American culture is being subjected to having to endure infiltration by a religious system that insists, regardless of how much it offends, that America submit to a 1500-year old tradition…and dare not complain about it.

Fatwa aside and risking suffering the potential fate of Salman Rushdie, part of my new plan to address the problem is to disobey my much revered late father and stare.  I plan on staring down every woman in a burqua I run across whether pumping gas or picking up dry cleaning. Hopefully, my staring will send a message making marauding shrouded entities more uncomfortable than they make me –forcing niqābīah; to either assimilate, take the sartorial hijāb off, or take it somewhere else.

Cross posted at:  www.jeannie-ology.com

Congressional Democrats are committed to overhauling the healthcare system and while doing so obviously do not intend to let the public know what the legislation contains for fear Americans will reject the QVC sales pitch.  Instead they are embarking on a successful method employed during the 2008 election of false advertising and selling a bag of goods without revealing the ingredients or the effect.

In a hurried effort to pass a bogus health care bill it is imperative that the merchandise’s contents be hidden from those it’s being sold to.  Instead, Democrats have dragged out a conceptual Vitameatavegamin health care bill for public consumption void of legislative language and whose obscure costs and implications no one bothers to consider.

Anyone over the age of forty remembers Lucille Ball playing the part of a woman auditioning for a Vitameatavegamin commercial where a tonic is presented as the, “…answer to all your problems.” In the episode, Lucy’s director is unaware that the “healthful” concoction of “…vitamins, meat, vegetables and minerals,” also has listed in the fine print a 23% alcohol content.  The Democrats might as well be holding up a bottle of Vitameatavegamin every time they speak on behalf of the health care proposal.  However, unlike Lucy’s director, Democrats are well aware of sinister particulars residing in their legislative proposals, but continue to resist posting ingredients online in an attempt to present a benign product that ultimately delivers a punch.

For all intents and purposes, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is our very own Lucy convincing America to sign onto a product she knows nothing about.  Smiling a forced, phony grin Nancy continually auditions to retain her seat of power. The only thing missing from the Speaker’s head is a lovely, little retro-lace Lucy-style bonnet.  Nancy, like Lucy, assures America that the Vitameatavegamin health care bill is a panacea that will be the ultimate, “…answer to all our problems,” especially if it includes a high-potency vitamin packed public option she guarantees it will include.

In the episode clip, Lucy auditions for the part of Vitameatavegamin girl beaming widely into the camera.   The director tells her to recite the script.  After citing the ingredients, the director tells Lucy to take a big mouthful, smile and wink saying what Speaker Pelosi alleges today about health care, “…it’s so tasty too…just like candy!”  However, after Lucy lifts the swill to her mouth the look on her face tells the whole story.  Yuck!  Her lips invert, the two muscles in her neck pop as she attempts to down the ghastly medicine. A similar situation could pose a problem for Pelosi’s sales pitch as personal commitment to a product ultimately clinches the sale.

After Lucy’s adverse reaction to the liquid remedy her director tells her, “No, no, no…you’re supposed to like the stuff. You’ve got to smile and be happy,” which was even difficult for someone determined to win the title of Vitameatavegamin girl.  The content of what Lucy was forced to swig was not fit for human consumption, which is precisely why, unlike a compliant Miss MaGillicutty, Democrats repudiate for their own consumption a product they are pushing on us.

Barack Obama disregards the vomitacious nature of the proposal and perseveres repeating, “OK, take it from…It’s so tasty too!” And, despite national rejection of the proposed fix, the Director-in-Chief personally holds our nation’s nose while dictatorially insisting we say “Ah.” According to studies, ninety-three percent of the American population feels a remedy is unnecessary for a condition that doesn’t exist.  Yet, the Vitameatavegamin health care sales team continues to drone on asking the wary, “Why don’t you join the thousands of happy, peppy people?”

In the fifty-year-old episode, Lucy slowly becomes desensitized to the questionable ingredients in the bottle as her ability to focus diminishes.  Her reaction to the product presents a potential ruse that Democrats could employ in their quixotic quest to control life and death. Bleary eyed and inebriated Lucy smacks her lips and says, “This stuff tastes pretty good…after you get used to it!”  Thus, if Democrats have their way, they will continue to force a tonic of half-truths and obfuscations on the public.  With any luck the effort will result in an America, so disorientated by lies that without question, the majority will guzzle down a Vitameatavegamin health care bill—consigning even the sober to endure its influence.

Speaking on behalf of the Director-in-Chief, our very own little Vitameatavegamin girl, Nancy Pelosi, has gotten to the point where she is encouraging, “Everybody to get a bottle of this stuff!”  What began as a coherent attempt to convince America to sign onto sane cost and competition directed health care reform has now been reduced to statements about public options that are on par with Lucy asking, “Do you pop out at parties…are you unpoopular?”

Nancy, Harry and Barry – are modern day snake oil salesmen.  Their medicine show consists of constant hawking to step right up and join the millions of Americans who have yet to read the ingredients, have no idea what it tastes like, or how it will affect them–but look to government to provide them with a healing elixir.

Yet, the Democratic sales pitch appears to be breaking down with every slam of the clapboard. As Pelosi, Reid and Obama work together to preserve their bottle of bureaucratic belladonna it becomes apparent they are the ones intoxicated with power. Presently, what we are witnessing is a desperate coalition of Democrats reduced into a desperate band of marketing mavens attempting to convince dubious consumers to invest in Handy Brushes.

In the famous Lucille Ball Vitameatavegamin episode the more she persisted in promoting her product the clearer it became what it actually was.  Hope endures that just as Lucy buckled under the influence of a shoddy product, the American public will recognize that like  a bottle of Vitameatavegamin, the bill the Democrats in Washington DC swear will surely be as easy as “spooning our way to health,” has neither our health, nor our well being in mind.

Cross posted:  www.jeannie-ology.com

Listening to Barack Obama speak about the nation he leads, one would think Alex DeLarge had been wreaking havoc in the world for the last 200-years, raping the global economy, beating the hell out of the underprivileged and pillaging world peace. Who is Alex you ask?  Why, Alex was the main character in the violent, socio-economic, political horror movie Clockwork Orange.

Every chance Obama gets he “…fulfills his campaign vow to show the nations of the world that a new American leadership stands ready to atone for the transgressions of the old. ” Both here and abroad, Obama apologizes for perceived thuggery as if America were guilty of Alex DeLarge-style global mayhem.

In the movie Clockwork Orange, Alex and his bawdy band of droogs, plunder through a dystopian world with full abandon sans regret, compunction or remorse.  Now, a diffident Obama offers the hand of peace to hateful dictators by acquiescing as if he were the self-effacing parent of Alex DeLarge. Hell, Obama has a vision for utopia and if it wasn’t for the nightmare America has created he might actually be able to transform the planet into a socialist Shangri-La.

Alex and the droogs epitomize ignorance and brutality.  On the global stage liberals represent traditional America as nothing more than a droog, a utopia spoiling, intellectually dumb warmonger, whose lack of knowledge and aggression historically discourages solidarity with the global vision for negotiable world peace.

Five minutes into Clockwork Orange it’s obvious to the viewer that the dichotomous Alex DeLarge is not a “force for good.” Although he loves classical music he dons a mask, bowler hat and white overalls before fusing beating with indiscriminate forced sexual assault. Listening to Obama express worldwide lament for our nation you’d think an imperialistic/capitalist America prowled the globe like the profane Alex, “…whose principal interests are rape, ultra-violence and Beethoven.”

Liberals, led by Obama, believe symbolic goodness is something that can be mandated, legislated and implemented through transformative left wing policy. If America wants “freedom,” in the Obama sense of the word, the only answer is behavioral revision managed by leaders whose inspiration for egalitarianism, harmony and social justice is birthed in repressive control.  And for that, there could be no better adaptive model to emulate then the one found in Clockwork Orange.

Midway through the sardonic film, Alex DeLarge goes to prison for 14-years for murdering an elderly woman.  As a precursor, he is forced to undergo a body cavity search similar to the one America is presently enduring. Like Alex’s prison enforced rules, collectivism focused America, now forbids crossing lines drawn by dogmatic, politically correct policies and the threat exists that liberated people are about to be reduced to faceless, nameless numbers.

Trapped in a facsimile of H.M. Prison Parkmoor, America’s is having its psyche pulverized into submission as if we are deviant, rowdy, and renegade like Alex DeLarge.  However, in our case the goal of serum No 114-propaganda drug is to make America resistant to the concept of freedom, capitalism and Constitutional fidelity.  If our nation can be made to retch when presented with what she once held dear, Obama’s political experimentation will be a smashing success.

In Clockwork Orange, classical conditioning transformed Alex DeLarge from an insurgent into a pacifist.  Similarly, Obama is bent on amending American society through systematic administration of rewards and punishments in hopes of shifting belief systems, patriotic spirit and conduct. Obama’s definitive goal is the destruction of American dystopia in hopes of replacing it with international utopia. Yet, even the prison Chaplain in Clockwork Orange warned deviant Alex, that change isn’t gained that way, “When a man cannot choose he ceases to be a man.”

Regardless, a self-righteous President believes he has a better way for America.  Moreover, Obama has commissioned a Clockwork Orange-style, Ludovico Technique be administered on the nation with full knowledge of what a few hours of “shovel ready job” indoctrination can do to unite the workers of the world. Obama’s attendants in American aversion therapy are media pupil lubricators and a cadre of white-jacketed politicians, whose occupation is to monitor a social experiment of associating pain of retribution for actions alien to Obama’s utopian view.  Reprimands, which include discouraging war by leaving the military to die without reinforcements. Small businesses, private industry and corporate America taxed and regulated into capitulation and the demoting of Judeo Christian influence.

Every time Obama steps up to a podium he injects rhetoric with a hypodermic full of shame, lies, and remorse in hopes of distorting reality and fiction in American minds. The President’s despotic modus operandi includes, half-truths and repetitive encoding, coupled with punishment directed at capitalism, condemnation of Constitutional principles, castigating free enterprise and the systematic undermining of national security.

Like Alex, on Election Day a naïve America willingly submitted to being straitjacketed with inescapable limitations beyond imagination. As a result, we are presently experiencing a near death experience.  We are captive to autocratic tendencies and victimized by misinformation. Our eyelids have been clamped open and our head wired with electrodes in a tortured position where the national gaze is fixed on only what those in control dictate politically acceptable.

The illicit Alex was robbed of his individually and intrinsic humanity, tamped down into innocuous compliance and, in turn, made a “free man.” It was only then that he could be sent, “…out with confidence into the world again.” Obama attempting to alter national identity, personality and foundational principles does so to wrest control of the natural impulse of a free, democratic nation. His hope is to present a subjugated America to the world as a neutered, mind-numbed, docile Alex DeLarge–though independent at heart, “queer as clockwork orange,” bizarre internally, while appearing natural, human, and normal on the surface.

If the President gets his way, government will have the clout to exert power over American distinctiveness and exceptionalism.  In turn, the dream of authoritarian utopia will be established upon a foundation of domineering restraint, indoctrination and political propaganda.  Its time Americans inform our self-aggrandizing leader, Dr. Brodsky-Obama, that the United States is no Alex DeLarge.  Instead, he and the liberal, left wing band of social propagandists he leads are the “queer as clockwork orange” droogs in need of reprogramming…not us.

Cross posted at:  www.jeannie-ology.com

The world watched the first British citizen in 300 years marry an heir to the British throne on July 28, 1981.  Reminiscent of that day, the world celebrated the first African-American president sworn into office in a historic American election. Obama’s inauguration was the closest thing to the wedding of Charles and Diana ever witnessed this side of the pond. The event included all the pomp; pageantry and romance to earn it the title of, Camelot Part II. Just as, “the fairytale romance of Charles and Di, and the grand pageantry that, by binding them in holy matrimony, secured the future of the British monarchy” — Obama’s Presidency held the promise of hope and change for America’s future.

Yet, despite the historic nature of both events, sadness prevailed.  During our nation’s betrothal, America was so besotted by the cult of personality that we failed to realize Obama, like the Prince of Wales, wasn’t all he was cracked up to be.

When Barack Hussein Obama took the oath of office, for all intents and purposes, he married the Presidency.  In doing so, he committed himself to defending, protecting and preserving the Constitution as if it was his bride. Obama would have been better sitting in a pew with Camilla Parker Bowles then participating in a disingenuous ceremony whose vow he never intended to keep.

When Charles married Diana he wore Camilla’s cufflinks to keep her close to him in spirit.  Similarly, Obama took the oath but clutched close to his heart were the collective doctrines that have proven to be his first love.  On Inauguration Day Obama committed to “…preserve, protect and defend” a Constitution we now know he fundamentally believes is a “flawed” document.  If this were matrimony, perjury would be grounds for annulment.

Being from the royal line of Henry the VIII, Charles was well aware a ceremonial step was a necessary means to providing an heir.  Off spring drove the Prince to the altar; after his sons were born…he cast off his bride. Obama accomplished the goal of becoming successor to power by bamboozle not bloodline. What drew Obama to the Presidency was the potential to circumvent the Constitution as a precursor to insure a legacy where socialistic seed produces fairness and shared equity. Like Charles forsook Diana, Obama is presently in the process of, “…breaking free from the essential constraints that were placed by our Founding Fathers in the Constitution.”

Twenty-eight years earlier, the Prince of Wales bumbled his vow to share ‘his’ earthly goods with Lady Spencer.  He then put her ring on the wrong finger and forgot to kiss the bride.  Obama, on the other hand, firmly planted the kiss of death on the Constitution by prophetically misspeaking his vow to “execute the office of president to the United States, faithfully.”  To date, and to our detriment, Obama has executed everything he swore to defend.  Barry has been as faithful as Charles meeting Camilla for secretive trysts, never missing an opportunity to ravage the Constitution.

Through the years Obama in no way made it a secret that he believed, “…the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.”    His true intentions have reduced the President to a Charles-type groom who marries and then, on the honeymoon, spurns the mate he had no desire for prior to the wedding.  Yet, it was a less than perfect Charles that crawled into a virginal marriage bed. Likewise, Obama stained with the sin of socialism attempts to defile the purity of the Constitution by injecting his rabid ideology into our democracy.

Our wanton President is smitten by a whorish socialistic system and is guilty of cavorting with radicals since youth.  And so our nation eagerly engaged a politically licentious groom. On Election Day, America was so busy stuffing yards of tulle into a glass coach we willingly overlooked Obama’s leftist past. Barry Sotoero came to the altar to be inaugurated, breathless and disheveled from promiscuous associations with ACORN, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the Gamaliel Foundation, Bill Ayers, the New Party, and the Arab American Action Network and many, many more.

Throughout the 80’s, Charles brazenly carried on his sordid affair with Camilla.  In the same way, the third entity of socialism is presently threatening fidelity to a Constitution Obama made an oath to uphold. It is becoming apparent that Obama came to this union from the get-go with two-timing intentions to destroy and attack the tenets of democracy by “…entering into issues of redistribution of wealth, and … basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.”

Why can’t we recognize betrayal when we see it? The world watched for two decades as adultery, infidelity and deceitfulness destroyed the storybook marriage of Charles and Diana and eventually destroyed the Princess’ life.  British tabloids reported that,  “The night before his wedding to Lady Diana Spencer Charles and a ‘blonde woman’ spent the night on the Royal Train. Diana rightly guessed it was Camilla, but she hoped Charles would eventually grow to love her and forget his old flame.”

America, like Diana, was deceived into believing that Barack Obama would eventually grow to love liberty and forget the flame of socialism that stole his youthful heart. Like Charles with Camilla, Barack Obama remains fiercely loyal to his first love. The promise of the fairytale blinded a naïve nation to willingly disregard what was so painfully obvious.

Now that the honeymoon is over, its time to check the Presidents collar for lipstick stains because his paramour is surveying the Constitution’s residence awaiting the directive to move in. Obama’s actions, policies, statements and czars indicate that he desires to cast out Liberty and move into the palace a mistress whose shadow can be seen hiding lately in every corner of the halls of power.

Charles’ many years of public philandering caused Diana to meltdown on the global stage.  His perversions slowly became accepted as the world was desensitized to the Prince’s faithlessness. After Diana’s untimely death the British eventually justified Charles replacing the Princess of Wales with his consort.  America should take heed as czars wrest power from Congress and government seizes the means of production, undermines Capitalism, the free enterprise system and democracy.  We like the Brits are in danger of being slowly desensitized to our beloved Constitution being made to live in a political Kensington Palace, while socialism resides in bed beside a presidential prince.

At the royal wedding ceremony Lady Diana Spencer broke with tradition by refusing to promise to obey Charles. In keeping with that independent spirit, hope endures that the American people will decline submission to a disloyal President who refuses to keep his vow to our founding documents and remain faithful to our Constitution. As a young nation hopefully we’ll evict the adulterer from the main quarters before America suffers an end where Obama lives in the White House with his very own Camilla, while our Constitution, like the Princess of Wales, lays six-feet under in a cold and lonely grave.

www.jeannie-ology.com