« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Why is the Associated Press deliberately twisting Gov. Sarah Palin’s words on foreign policy?

For a sense of how badly the Associated Press tried to twist some of Gov. Sarah Palin’s (R-AK) words on foreign policy from this evening’s interview with Charles Gibson, please bear with me through the following example.

The police in this country are charged with enforcing laws – if an individual, say, murders one of their fellow men, then the police are expected (required) to arrest the perpetrator for murder.

Now, let’s say a policeman (let’s make him a chief, just for fun) sits down for a media interview about, among several topics, police homicide policy. The reporter conducting the interview asks the chief about his department’s responsibilities when it comes to arresting an individual when, in fact, they have murdered another individual.

The chief, of course, speaks a bit about the investigative and evidentiary processes, and concludes by acknowledging that a known guilty party would, in fact, be arrested for murder.

Just to see how consistent this policy is, the reporter asks the chief, “Even if the murderer were, say, the President of the United States?

“Of course!” responds the law enforcement officer. “Our responsibility is to enforce the laws of our respective jurisdictions to the best of our abilities and in accordance with our oaths, regardless of the personal identity or position of a person who commits a crime.

Now, imagine for me that the Associated Press shot this over the wires as fast as it could, with the following headline:

Police Chief leaves open option of arresting President of United States for murder

Scratching your head yet? Yep — I was too, when I saw the equivalent of the above example come over the wires from the AP this evening. In her interview with Gibson, the story says,

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin left open the option Thursday of waging war with Russia if it were to invade neighboring Georgia and the former Soviet republic were a NATO ally. “We will not repeat a Cold War,” Palin said in her first television interview since becoming Republican John McCain’s vice presidential running mate two weeks ago.

Asked whether the United States would have to go to war with Russia if it invaded Georgia, and the country was part of NATO, Palin said: “Perhaps so.”

I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help,” she said.

That response — which was an absolutely correct promise that the U.S. will support its allies abroad (those few we have left, according to Obama&Co.) and not shirk its oaths and treaty obligations — garnered the following headline from the AP:

Palin leaves open option of war with Russia

What is the AP so afraid of in Governor Sarah Palin that they see the need to resort to headlines as blatantly fake as this?

Update: Then again, I suppose Palin Accuracy is not the AP’s strong suit these days anyway….


COMMENTS

  • Dave_in_Fla

    I think the answer is obvious :)

  • ETCartman

    Real Estate: Location. Location. Location.

    Mainstream Media: Agenda. Agena. Agenda.

    I’m surprised that AP (and others) didn’t take it further, printing something like ‘Palin promoting war with Russia’.

  • madtrapper

    I think we can honestly say that nothing is off limits to the media straight through to Nov.4th and will do, print or say anything they have to in order to enforce the election of their savior.

    They truly respect American citizens by sending the message, “Don’t bother voting, we will pick for you”.
    yea, thats like going to church and taking communion from Satan.

    Take heed America,Believe half of what you see and nothing that you hear.

  • dld1717

    Honestly, the title means [----] to me. What President every rules out force? How is this news?

    • Neil_Stevens
  • GregInFla

    The MSNBC ad is at the top of the page with this diary. Now at RS, even the ads are trolls.

    If I see the ad of the couple who married and has five kids again (and they are not the Palins), I think I’ll turn off image display in firefox (if you can still do that!).

  • Rod_Patrick

    AP’s twisting of Palin’s statement is nolonger NEW to me.

  • ChicagoLaura

    Points well made, Jeff! I think there is another point that needs to be made (on Gov. Palin’s behalf, if she doesn’t take up the conversation point herself)…. A better title for the AP wire would have been “Palin hopes to see former Soviet states strengthened against Russian agression.”

    The point that first Charlie Gibson, and then more notably, AP, missed, is that the relatively small but strategically important states of Ukraine and Georgia may only be able to deter Russian bullying by making strong friends. NATO alliances (which their neighbors, such as Turkey and Romana enjoy) would certainly be in their best interest, especially if they hope to remain self-governing in the face of mounting agression from their neighbor to the north.

    Their geographic position and democratic goals make them countries that it is in our best interest to befriend. (Or, really, to strengthen our friendships with.)

    It would be interesting to know if there are other treaties and alliances that Charlie, the AP, or the rest of the MSM would like to see the USA reneg on?

    Should we withdraw from the UN, which may…just may…draw us into a conflict in another area of the world?

    Are there other geographic regions that we should allow others to bully, because now we lack the moral strength to stand up for the freedom of other countries?

    Sen. McCain put it well when he said that “war is terrible beyond imagination.” He and his family would know better than most of us, and Gov. Palin’s family is about to tast that bittersweet sacrifice for a higher good as her son goes off to Iraq. Clearly the way to avoid wars is not by avoiding alliances with countries at risk in today’s world. In fact, we avoid war through these alliances, as has been evidenced through the history of peace on the soil of NATO states since the inception of the alliance!

    (Oh, and an aside for anyone who is still reading…. Pop quiz: Article 5 of the NATO Charter does say that an attack on one member state shall be deemed an attack on all. There has been one and only one major attack on one of the NATO allies deemed eligible to rally the alliance to defend the whole. What country was attacked? You guessed it…the United States was attacked on 9/11/01, and it was our NATO allies that responded along with us from as early as October, 2001.)

    • hunter

      about facts, fact checking, or integrity. He has a job to do: hurt Republicans and help democrats.

  • bk

    “Palin fails to rule out death penalty for women who receive abortions”

    “Palin does not deny that all welfare programs will be eliminated”

    The list is endless.

  • amabo

    Why can’t you guys simply face facts. Palin has been exposed as a mad, bad, niave, out of touch redneck.

    Time to post her back to hillbilly land. The future is bright. The future is Obama!!

    • Rod_Patrick

      Meet your Future Obama!

      Future of Obama

  • PaRep

    OTAY BUCKWHEAT !!

    Here’s a Cookie Now go back to DU or Kos

    You & your DimBulb Candidate are getting Dimmer

    • PaRep

      Don’t do that so early in the Morning O.K.

      • Rod_Patrick

        The Mods may delete it if it’s really a bad luck. LOL!

        • Moe_Lane

          Don’t get me wrong, xxxxxx.xxxxxx@tiscali.co.uk: we’re always happy to hear from our cousins from across the Pond. But do stay out of directly trying to influence our bloody elections, if you don’t mind.

          • itrytobenice

            Why would you do that to me?!?!

          • E_Pluribus_Unum

            And while Charlie Gibson may not be 100% responsible for every bit of this travesty, I HOLD him 100% responsible.

            He’s a Crash Davis Umpire, through and through, as is the whole bunch of them at ABC News.

  • stanpulle

    Those whom the Gods wish to destroy they first drive them insane, says a Greek proverb. This is what’s happening to the skunks in the MSM. Its worth if we can set up a special website for AP bias and place pressure on their directors to fire their biased line writers. Their game is up. They must be destroyed.

  • stanpulle

    Those whom the Gods wish to destroy they first drive them insane, says a Greek proverb. This is what’s happening to the skunks in the MSM. Its worth if we can set up a special website for AP bias and place pressure on their directors to fire their biased line writers. Their game is up. They must be destroyed.

    • Whitehorse

      I work with a very nice African American lady who looks like that from the eyes up!

  • Whitehorse

    I especially like the way you deconstruct the genesis of that headline.

    I guess next Palin will leave open the option for war with Luxembourg???

    How the MSM & Obama campaign do not realize their intense focus on Palin is hurting the Obama campaign is beyond me.

    • fromthetop

      Do you want to know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about Sarah?s comments to Charles Gibson? The socialist interviewers and their readers always hear and see what they want from an interview. They also continue to badger all GOP interviewees with the same question phrased in a different style hoping they will finally get their ?I gotcha?.
      http://volokh.com/archives/archive20080907-200809_13.shtml

      The top journalists in the nation give us different plays on the ?Bush Doctrine?. Sarah was correct to ask for a specific question on the subject. Read more truth about the scam Gibson uses to ask a baiting question that even he cannot answer concerning the ?Bush Doctrine? presented by Richard Starr.
      http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/09/021487.php

      Anne E. Kornblut. Washington Post reports from Fort Wainwright Alaska with even more distortions about Sarah?s send-off speech to her son and his Infantry Stryker Brigade that departed for Iraq on the 7th anniversary of 9/11 that they would, “defend the innocent from the enemies who planned and carried out and rejoiced in the death of thousands of Americans.” Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard clarifies the truth.
      http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/09/021487.php

      I believe the real reason Sarah is grinded up by the media grist mill is her executive experience which is equal to and better than Clinton?s, Obama?s and Biden?s combined. So the feminists of the sixties, a bit long in tooth, are jealous of the pretty VP nominee in high heels wearing a dress.

      Elizabeth Williamson of the WSJ wrote, ?She stood before two wall-sized U.S. flags. Flanked by friends and local pols, she stepped to the podium. The crowd, many in flannel shirts and jeans, waved signs reading ?Welcome Home,? ?Drill Baby Drill,? and even: ?You can put lipstick on a community organizer but they?re still a community organizer.?

      • Jeff_Emanuel

  • Palin_Deal

    I’ve been stewing about McCain’s nomination ever since it happened. As I said in a previous post, I think the country needed someone with a cooler head, and a much better understanding of economic issues – like Romney.

    I’ve been trying to find a reason to support McCain though. Waiting for his VP pick, hoping I could get enthusiastic about the ticket again, I was crestfallen when I heard he had picked Palin.

    I’ve talked to friends, trying to work through my frustration, but nothing has better laid out my feelings than this NYTimes editorial from today:

    =========

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/13/opinion/13sat1.html?hp

    Gov. Palin?s Worldview

    As we watched Sarah Palin on TV the last couple of days, we kept wondering what on earth John McCain was thinking.

    If he seriously thought this first-term governor ? with less than two years in office ? was qualified to be president, if necessary, at such a dangerous time, it raises profound questions about his judgment. If the choice was, as we suspect, a tactical move, then it was shockingly irresponsible.

    It was bad enough that Ms. Palin?s performance in the first televised interviews she has done since she joined the Republican ticket was so visibly scripted and lacking in awareness.

    What made it so much worse is the strategy for which the Republicans have made Ms. Palin the frontwoman: win the White House not on ideas, but by denigrating experience, judgment and qualifications.

    The idea that Americans want leaders who have none of those things ? who are so blindly certain of what Ms. Palin calls ?the mission? that they won?t even pause for reflection ? shows a contempt for voters and raises frightening questions about how Mr. McCain and Ms. Palin plan to run this country.

    One of the many bizarre moments in the questioning by ABC News?s Charles Gibson was when Ms. Palin, the governor of Alaska, excused her lack of international experience by sneering that Americans don?t want ?somebody?s big fat r?sum? maybe that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment where, yes, they?ve had opportunities to meet heads of state.?

    We know we were all supposed to think of Joe Biden. But it sure sounded like a good description of Mr. McCain. Those decades of experience earned the Arizona senator the admiration of people in both parties. They are why he was our preferred candidate in the Republican primaries.

    The interviews made clear why Americans should worry about Ms. Palin?s thin r?sum? and lack of experience. Consider her befuddlement when Mr. Gibson referred to President Bush?s ?doctrine? and her remark about having insight into Russia because she can see it from her state.

    But that is not what troubled us most about her remarks ? and, remember, if they were scripted, that just means that they reflect Mr. McCain?s views all the more closely. Rather, it was the sense that thoughtfulness, knowledge and experience are handicaps for a president in a world populated by Al Qaeda terrorists, a rising China, epidemics of AIDS, poverty and fratricidal war in the developing world and deep economic distress at home.

    Ms. Palin talked repeatedly about never blinking. When Mr. McCain asked her to run for vice president? ?You have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission,? she said, that ?you can?t blink.?

    Fighting terrorism? ?We must do whatever it takes, and we must not blink, Charlie, in making those tough decisions of where we go and even who we target.?

    Her answers about why she had told her church that President Bush?s failed policy in Iraq was ?God?s plan? did nothing to dispel our concerns about her confusion between faith and policy. Her claim that she was quoting a completely unrelated comment by Lincoln was absurd.

    This nation has suffered through eight years of an ill-prepared and unblinkingly obstinate president. One who didn?t pause to think before he started a disastrous war of choice in Iraq. One who blithely looked the other way as the Taliban and Al Qaeda regrouped in Afghanistan. One who obstinately cut taxes and undercut all efforts at regulation, unleashing today?s profound economic crisis.

    In a dangerous world, Americans need a president who knows that real strength requires serious thought and preparation.

    • BlackRepub

      Been here for all of an hour, and all three posts are about how bad the GOP is. And then you cite your reasons for leaving in the New York Times?!?! Seriously-the New York Times! Have fun with your Obamabuddies back in KosLand. May the hopeandchange be with you loser.

      • bs

        • Palin_Deal

          I’ve read RedState for years – signed up today because I’ve had it – disgusted. I was hoping someone could talk me down, but I’m seeing nothing of substance to defend this VP pick.

          Last straw for me. I was proud of Republicans when the were free marketeers. But look at the bailouts – socializing the wealthy when they fail, privatizing profits when they win.

          They’ve bungled foreign policy and domestic preparedness and failed to defend our ally after spending millions in military training and weapons.

          I really don’t know what Republicans stand for anymore – other than fundamentalism, which I think this world has enough of already.

          When McCain picked Palin – I lost any hope that he could recreate a party that I could relate to. Now it makes no difference to me who wins – they both suck.

          And Palin a heart beat from the presidency is just down-right irresponsible.

          • ChicagoLaura

            …but I hope that I am not wasting my time (and RedState’s space) by engaging in a fruitless conversation. (And, by the way, your post and this response are probably a little off the topic of Jeff’s original post on a specific point made in the ABC interview. I hope it’s OK to respond here, though.) You indicated that your frustration with Gov. Palin exacerbates your frustration with the GOP for selecting Sen. McCain, and that you were a Romney fan.

            A couple of thoughts in response to a few of the words in your post:

            the country needed someone with a cooler head

            When have you seen Sen. McCain lose his temper? The ol’ Straight Talk Express didn’t have too many casualties, did it? Has there been a story about a specific instance where his anger clouded his judgment or destroyed negotiations? He may be quick to anger, but perhaps it’s righteous anger? At injustice, stupidity, waste? I’d suggest there are many worse characteristics in a president than some hotheadedness, and that the stories we were hearing a lot about during the primaries were probably anecdotal.

            better understanding of economic issues – like Romney

            OK, so you liked Romney. He didn’t win, and it was frustrating. But he, with his great understanding of economics endorses…McCain! His is a full-throated, believable endorsement, as well! And, maybe best of all, this leaves Romney to a potentially more consequential post, such as Sec. of Commerce or Treasury?

            nothing has better laid out my feelings than this NYTimes editorial

            You must have gathered this by now, if you are an independent-minded individual, as you represent yourself. The New York Times publishes mostly biased anti-Republican spin! If your “feelings” about Gov. Palin seemed to be expressed therein, they may stem not from an assessment of the facts objectively presented, but from a 13-day barrage of anti-Palin spin from all forms of MSM. (As well as less mainstream media!) I have found it nearly impossible to find balanced information on Gov. Palin–I’d suggest you research each point that troubles you.

            so visibly scripted and lacking in awareness

            This is actually a great assessment of Obama, who only speaks compellingly when scripted. I think a VP candidate ought to stick to the script for starters; I don’t need lack of clarity, but consensus, from the ticket. Also, you must admit that she has great awareness in some areas, and less in others. Not less than the Presidential candidate on the Democratic ticket, though, in key areas!

            denigrating experience, judgment and qualifications

            You know, she did “fire back” during her acceptance speech, and she, as the VP candidate, will be the one more likely to be the attack dog, as Biden will from the other side. However, in the interview, we heard a lot about her experience, judgment, and qualifications, and very little “denigration” of anybody!

            shows a contempt for voters and raises frightening questions about how Mr. McCain and Ms. Palin plan to run this country

            This is just remarkably incendiary rhetoric. Come on…”contempt” for voters? “Frightening” questions about governance? Not only do I not see it in the McCain/Palin ticket, but I do see contempt in Obama’s painting himself as someone he’s never been in the past (reformer, agent of change in government) and in his ongoing position changes. And, if truly frightening questions are to be asked about a candidate, mine would be about the radical friends and colleagues that would have access to an Obama White House.

            opportunities to meet heads of state

            If you think about it, do you really expect any candidate who is a Washington outsider to have substantive connections with foreign heads of state? I mean, if she had such contacts, I’d be delighted with the resume filler, but this cannot be a disqualifier for a VP candidate, especially. Oh, and once again, what heads of state are facebook friends of Obama’s…as candidate for president? I know he had met with Mahmoud Abbas before his summertime adventure through Europe and the Middle East, where he secured a number of handshakes and short meetings….

            the (Bush Doctrine)

            So much has been said even in the MSM about how condescending a question this was, about how there is really no one “Bush Doctrine…” It’s not like she didn’t know the War Powers Act or the Monroe Doctrine, which do have solid, generally accepted definitions. And, yes, it was awkward, but she actually responded appropriately despite the lack of clarity and (alleged) condescension. There are a multitude of great posts on this, but I’d suggest this one by Charles Krauthammer.

            President Bush?s…policy in Iraq (being) ?God?s plan?

            Anyone who has looked into it knows that Mr. Gibson misrepresented her actual quote, and the way he read it, she sounds like she was declaring a holy war! In fact, her real quote was as follows:

            ?Pray *for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also *for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God. That?s what we have to make sure that we?re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God?s plan.? (emphasis mine)

            Even a simple Politifact check here will give the entire quote and explain the relevance of how Abraham Lincoln himself expressed similar sentiments.

            I hope that some of these thoughts and links are helpful to you, or to others, who are on the fence.

          • Mr_Write

            In a dangerous world, Americans need a president who knows that real strength requires serious thought and preparation.

            And Obama’s that guy, right, NYT? Puhleeze!

  • gamecock

    Like it has 7 of the past 10 presidential elections.

  • streetwise
    • streetwise

      Just go here.