« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Democrat representative: “Bush Threatened Martial Law if We Voted ‘No!’”

Here’s a nugget from Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA 27), in a floor speech made yesterday just after 7pm CDT:

Transcript:

Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill, on Monday, the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points in the first day, another couple thousand the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted No.”

That’s what I call fear-mongering. Unjustified. Proven wrong. We’ve got a week, we’ve got two weeks, to write a good bill.

The only way to write – to pass – a bad bill: Keep the panic pressure on.

Well, the bill defeated Monday was thirty-four times longer than the original Paulson plan, and the one voted on today was 450% longer than that. I still don’t see any martial law; however, I do see a constantly-growing piece of legislation that, despite Mr. Sherman’s claims, would not likely have gotten “better” over the course of “a week” or “two weeks.”

Good to know the “fear-mongering” about Bush and martial law is still taking place among Democrats, though. Maybe one of these days, when he’s been out of office for a few years or more, America’s lefties will finally concede that George Bush isn’t hiding under their beds or in their closets, carefully crafting strategeries to steal or cancel elections and to impose martial law.

Maybe.

COMMENTS

  • Moe_Lane

    Actually, they’ll stop hating him as soon as McCain takes office. That’s the usual rule of thumb.

  • Rod_Patrick

    This is entirely UNFAIR accusation against the President.

    If I were Bush, I would veto this Bill.

    • Darin_H

      You see, evil Chimpy Bushitler will still control things, he’ll just be telling McCain what to do and all of his handlers will be handling McCain.

      Plus, you forget….

      the JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSS

  • jsteele

    If Sherman has evidence that the President threatened martial law then he should make it public and immediately begin impeachment procedings against the President.

    Why is no Republican calling him out on this? Because its all BS? Well then why isn’t some Republican calling him on BS? Why, why does our side roll over and play dead and let these b*stards get away with this kind of nonsense?

    • Pomme

      This is all Karl Rove!!! I know it!! And the ultimate plan is to get Palin in there with her direct tie to BIG OIL!!!

      LAWL!

  • Mark_Kilmer

    with martial law, evidently.

    Here’s this from Sherman from Thursday:

    “The one thing that’s been proven is the absolute fear-mongering that’s being used to drive us is false,” Sherman said. “I’ve seen members turn to each other and say if we don’t pass this bill, we’re going to have martial law in the United States.”

    Never mind him. He’s only fear-mongering.

    • Raven

      Photobucket

      • Raven

        I need to start previewing these things again…

  • Raven

    I have heard this clip twice and the entire speech once. Never does he say the President. In fact, with his comments from before about congressmen saying to each other that there’d be martial law, it sounds like the threats originated in the House.

    Sounds to me like he’s throwing this at Pelosi. How did he vote?
    .

    .

    .
    BTW, I fully agree with him. Lots of fear mongering. No supporting results. And I DO blame President Bush, and Paulson And the Senate And the House AND a few of the directors of RS for that fear mongering.

    • speciallist

      n/p

      • Darin_H

        because only the President can declare Martial Law.

  • csstudent

    The republicans, including the Bush administration, are very guilty of trying to use scare tactics to push this through. It was the same tactics they used to get us into the Iraq war.

    I’m not implying that Pelosi et. al. didn’t use fear, but Bush and crew are the masters at using it to get the job done.

    • Dave_in_Fla

      A student too! How adorable! Can we put him in a box and keep him as a pet? I see he is well trained in being able to recite talking points from memory, and has no capability for independant thought. I’m just a twitter with joy!

  • aceintx

    and their ability to see plots and schemes carefully crafted by the duffus GW Bush in his inexorable and never ending tricks that somehow fool them every time!

  • aceintx

    and their ability to see plots and schemes carefully crafted by the duffus GW Bush in his inexorable and never ending tricks that somehow fool them every time!

    • Alberta

      I like you Dave, and I know what your saying, but the guy is at least half right on this

      Bush: The worlds ending
      Paulson: The worlds ending
      Bernake: The worlds ending

      All 3 together: Vote for the bailout or the world ends

      My father runs a Financial Services company. We have rich and not so rich clients. A lot of both were scared silly because of Paulson and Bernakes rhetoric which was echoed by Bush.

  • BuckeyesforMcCainPalin

    martial law isn’t such a remote possibility. Put on that O and be quiet.

  • izoneguy

    Martial law?? Give me a break. Our military could not be able to contain Millions of angry gun-toting bible clinging voters.
    It took 5 years to kill thousands of terrorists in Iraq.

  • Fr_Martin_Fox

    …to try to blame the Democrats AND THEN let Bush the GOP off the hook.

    Blame the Dems? Yep: they are in the Fannie/Freddie mess up to their ears. This is mainly their bill; that they tarted it up with consumer baubles doesn’t change that.

    But letting Bush and the GOP off the hook? This is his “Crap Sandwich” — and the GOP leadership made sure to muscle enough of their own to get it passed.

    Look close, folks: the Republicans who voted against this, the second time, are the only conservatives you can count on. Don’t be fooled by the higher number of Republicans; the remaining Republicans can be counted on to join the Party of Government when the chips are down.

  • Stayright

    I certainly do not know the truth, but in the past I’ve found Rep. Sherman credible. He’s a libtard, so he’s far from perfect. But I have a hard time believing he made that comment up. Also, Sherman did not say Pres. Bush made the threat. It might have originated with Democrat House leaders or anyone else pushing hard for this socialist trainwreck.

    One reason I am willing to cut him some slack is because of this two minute video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONUSxiGN4m4

    It starts with Rep. Sherman, but stick with it, because Senator DeMint makes the same point. Mark Levin has also discussed this. After seeing Rep. Sherman several times this week I think he took this issue seriously. And either he and Senator DeMint need to take off the tin hats or we’ve been lied to by a lot of people.

    • gamecock

      5

  • Stayright

    Oops, I posted that link incorrectly.

    Click hereto see the Youtube video with Senator DeMint and Brad Sherman.

    I might add, that video is the one everyone should be discussing, not this martial law business. If the motivation for the bailout was an extortion threat from the Chinese, we’ve been lied to and the American people need to know it. Sadly, as far as I know, no conservative pundit has picked up on this.

    • Raven

      A Pelosi Congress.

      Many of them may not think Bush has mentioned Martial Law, but they could very well be so caught up in their BDS that they can scare Themselves with the idea that he might just declare it.

      Think about it. They’ve been saying such horrible things about him for so long that a few of them Must actually believe their own words by now. Get a couple of them thinking Martial Law and soon you’ll have the whole flock screaming it.

      • Raven

        Some of us do not take so kindly to having our Armed Forces maligned. The US Armed Forces most certainly COULD enforce Martial Law even on the entirety of the USA.

        The question is: WOULD they?