« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

What Tomorrow Means (Hint: It’s Not All About Race)

Tomorrow, we will witness one of the great events in human history. Yes, an African-American will be inaugurated president for the first time since America’s founding — and I’ll get to that momentarily — but that’s not what I’m referring to here.

What I’m talking about here is far more underrated, and far more consistently historic. You see, tomorrow we will witness that rarest of political occurrences: the peaceful, non-dynastic transfer of power over the mightiest country in the world, yet again, from the outgoing leader of the past eight years to the incoming leader of at least the next four.

The fact that America’s transitions from president to president are so regular, so peaceful, and so orderly has led us to take for granted this occurrence which, in the context of human history, is an incredibly rare and spectacular event.

This is far more rare, and far more amazing, an occurrence than we ever give it credit for. The ancient pioneers of democracy whose tradition we are carrying (and building) on were not able to continue such a tradition.

The legendary democracy of classical Athens, for example, took over a century to establish, then underwent fits and starts during its century and a half of existence, ceding preeminence to tyranny after Solon’s early 6th century tenure, to an an oligarchy during the late-5th century Peloponnesian war, and ending in Macedonian monarchy after the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC.

Rome’s fragmented republican system lasted longer (around 400 years if the traditional founding date of 509 BC is accepted), but it endured more upheaval and violence than the halting Athenian system, finally ending in the 3/4-century long inferno of repeated proscriptions, tyrannicide, and seemingly endless civil war.

Barack Hussein Obama’s accession to the presidency is not being met by military mobilization, riots, or widespread conspiratorial assassination attempts. In fact, it’s not even being met with the protests, the threats of violence, and the widespread claims of “he’s not my President!” which were directed at the last recipient of presidential power eight (and again four) years ago, when we came the closest we have in living memory to breaking our historic cycle of peaceful, non-antagonistic transitions.

Tomorrow’s inauguration of the 44th President of the United States (and the first African-American president) will demonstrate two things above all else:

  1. That America, its citizens, and its leaders still respect the rites of democratic succession to such a degree that, for the 42nd time, we have had our electoral say and as a result power is changing hands peacefully, with (despite the far Left’s paranoid claims of the last eight years) no armies being marched on The Mall and no last-ditch attempts being made by the outgoing leader to hold onto power or to keep the presidency within his dynastic line; and
  2. That the idea of racism as an institution imposing a glass (or steel) ceiling on the level to which African-Americans can rise is as dead as Nathan Bedford Forrest himself.

Building on #2 above, allow me now to change gears to address the race issue.

The inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama as the 44th President of the United States of America shows once and for all that the identity politics and categorical identification and treatment of Americans according to race, religion, and gender — which has for so long been a key tool in the Left’s political toolkit — is both outdated and irrelevant.

With the swearing-in of a racial minority to the highest office in the world, attempts to supposedly make up for past transgressions by implementing race-based quota systems, rather than actually allowing minorities to succeed on their own merits without the cloud of racial favoritism and “white guilt”-induced pity hanging over their heads, should be recognized as the irrelevant mechanisms of outcome equality that they are, and should be left by the wayside with “separate but equal” and other similarly outdated doctrines.

America as a whole crossed the threshold into a largely “colorblind” society years ago. Unfortunately, as is their wont, politicians and government (particularly on the left side of the aisle) have lagged far behind their countrymen in this area, and have continued insisting on identifying, categorizing, and regulating Americans by their race and gender, rather than by their common humanity.

This will not immediately cease to be the case with tomorrow’s inauguration — but it should, and, with the accession of an African-American to the presidency for the first time in U.S. history, there is no longer any excuse for it not to.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Mercury821

    I can’t say I agree with your conclusion that America has passed completely into a colorblind society. I can point to anecdotal evidence, such as racist remarks from my own family members, but I think the problem cuts deeper than just racism and hate crimes. Driving through one of the poorest and crime-ridden cities in my area (East Cleveland, OH) will paint a picture of the reality. While I totally agree that the majority of society might have moved on from ideology of racism and Jim Crow, the physical remnants are all too clear. To this day, there is a huge wealth disparity between blacks and whites, and that disparity can be traced back to the policies and discrimination of the past. There is a huge problem, ingrained into the African-American culture in so many areas, of cyclic poverty, crime, drugs, hate towards white people, and indifference to parenting and schooling that still needs to be addressed.

    I probably oversimplified the problem, but my point is that there is still a lot of work that our society should do to right the wrongs of the past, and help free those people from the aforementioned cycle. I’ve seen it first hand, and it is troubling. But I agree that affirmative action isn’t going to solve the problem, and is probably counter-productive in this day and age. The problems run deeper than that, and I hope our law-makers realize that and start actually doing something about it.

    • skorrent1

      Thomas Sowell, Walter E. Williams, and others , you would understand that the “huge problem, ingrained into the African-American culture in so many areas, of cyclic poverty, crime, drugs, hate towards white people, and indifference to parenting and schooling” has very little to do with “the policies and discrimination of the past” and much to do with the attitudes and policies of the present. An African-American president could do much to change those attitudes and policies, if he chose. I very much fear, based on his Chicago experience, that Obama will choose to play upon those very attitudes and policies for support.

    • mobius2702

      I also hope that the mayors and councilmembers of these failed cities realize that the problems run deeper than what affirmative action can resolve and actually start doing something about the problems of their poor, crime-ridden cities.

      If that fails, perhaps the residents of these failed cities can someday stop re-electing the same failed politicians that run their cities into the ground.

    • HappyBunny

    • baserunr

      to” right the wrongs of the past”. I thought that looking forward to a future of “Hope & Change”, and not dwelling on the failures of the past, was what the election was all about. I am obligated to treat my fellow man with dignity and the respect they EARN. I am not obligated to have prodigious amounts of my wealth usurped by the governments, at all levels, to “free those people from the aforementioned cycle”. I would prefer to be able to divest myself of my wealth in the manners and times of my choosing, so as to positively affect the lives of others as I see it, rather than having the government do so as my stand-in, with my money. On a level playing field, there is still a winning and losing team. Those that work harder, and have more talent, will more often win. But competence, efficiency, and perseverance are rewarded as well as hard work. Applying these is “doing something about it”.

      • gekster
      • Mercury821

        is a “level playing field”. If there actually was a level playing field, I would agree with you 100%. But there isn’t and there never has been. That’s why the powers that be created affirmative action in the first place. Unfortunately I don’t think it can be solved that simply — the problem is more fundamental than that.

        And believe me, your wealth is going to continue to be usurped one way or another to sustain these people– be it welfare, medicaid, higher health insurance premiums to support the uninsured, and, of course, the prison system.

        I don’t think we should throw more money at the problem — I think a better approach is to look at how the money we’re already spending is not solving anything, and redistribute it to other programs that may have a better impact. I don’t know what those programs are, but I’m sure there are plenty of really smart people who can offer their suggestions to a willing government ear.

        • Josh LeGuern

          ….older people who have certain attitudes about people of other races (no matter what race those people themselves are.) I would classify that as prejudice, there will always be prejudice, this we cannot help.

          The institution of racism, the systematic oppression of people based on the color of their skin is pretty much dead as a doornail. We may be dealing with the consequences of this in some ways, but most of the time, as someone else pointed out, the plight of the African American community in particular has more to do with problems and attitudes within their own community.

          • Josh LeGuern

            I just realized my post sounded really bad. I want to clarify, I think ALL people and people groups have problems and issues, most of which are self-inflicted.

            Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians all have issues within their communities that only THEY can solve. Just like we have issues with in our own lives that are mostly self-inflicted and things that only we can solve.

            Are there somethings out of our power? Yes. Are there things our parents, grandparents, etc. did that still affect us today? Yes. The great thing about America is that we can rise above these things and accomplish them! Tommorrow, for the struggle of African Americans, it will become more apparent than ever.

            As President-elect Obama himself said yesterday, In America, anything is possible. This is one issue I can agree with the new president on 100%

        • mobius2702

          First, you need a willing government ear.

          And that starts at the local level, unless you advocate “nationalizing” the failed cities.

          We can all provide our own suggestions to improve the state of poor, crime-ridden cities. As long as the local leadership keeps crying “More” with their hand held out, any suggestion falls on deaf ears.

  • skorrent1

    We did have, in our history, the election of the 16th president, which served as the spark for rebellion and military conflict before he even took office. Other than that, our transitions, even to radically different administrations, have been peaceful.

    As to the suggestion that Obama’s election has shown that we can procede “without the cloud of racial favoritism and ‘white guilt’-induced pity” in our political affairs, I must disagree. Can you actually look at the campaign conducted by Obama, and its fawning reception by the media, and see anything other than the application of affirmative action to the office of the presidency? I wish I could see a portent of a color-blind society in his accession, but I’m sorely afraid that we will be subjected to (at least) four years of “How dare you oppose anything proposed by our First Black President? You must be a racist!”

    • Cheetah772

      It can be argued that CSA fought to preserve its peculiar institution — slavery, but to overthrow the legitimately elected government, of which Lincoln is the leader? I don’t know about that.

      I believe that had CSA won the war, it is more likely that CSA would leave Lincoln alone and require that its independence be legally recognized and Union forever broken up for good. That’s what I believe anyway, but thankfully that has not happened at all.

      Lee was urged to let his men loose in woods to wage guerrilla war, but he didn’t do that, so I can only guess that Lee saw the writing on the wall and wanted to make sure reconciliation could occur peacefully. And that’s what CSA gave Union — its acceptance of surrendering to Union forces on an understanding that no brutal reprisals would occur against soldiers and generals who rose in rebellion against Union.

      CSA laid down its arms peacefully and allowed Lincoln (if only briefly before his assassination) to have the final say. And the elections of presidents went on as if nothing happened during the preceding four years. America passed the test, Union was preserved, and Constitution more or less intact, etc.

      • skorrent1

        To remind those afflicted with a modern public-school education, that there was an exception to the normally peaceful transition of power. Let’s hope it remains the sole exception.

        • Cheetah772

          In 1864, Lincoln could have suspended the election in order to focus the energy on winning the war. But he didn’t have to do that, as Sherman marched on to Altanta. You will have to excuse me if I got some historical information wrong.

          Lincoln proved he was willing to let the people to decide who’s best for the job of managing the civil war. I’m sure to his relief, Lincoln won the election. And the rest is history, what more can I say?

      • DRP

        Whether or not the CSA would have launched an offensive war into the Union is largely irrelevant, isn’t it?

        Imagine if after 2000 all the Blue states decided “Screw this” and seceded from the Union to form a new country, defending it if attacked. Whether or not they would have ignored the remaining Red states if left to their own devices isn’t really at issue.

  • smill1953

    before they hatch?

    “The fact that America?s transitions from president to president are so regular, so peaceful, and so orderly has led us to take for granted this occurrence which, in the context of human history, is an incredibly rare and spectacular event.”

    This hasn’t happened yet in this election cycle. Remember that the Democrats are making noises about putting members of the previous administration on trial, in the great tradition of oh so many banana republics.

    • izoneguy

      And if they did that it would spark the next revolution

      • Lamplighter331

        Wait a minute, you mean we’re not looking forward? But “The One” says he’s only concerned about the future, he’s not concerned with the past…

        (Okay, a bit snarky, I apologize)

        It can’t be, there’s no way we’re going to have Congressional Committees working with the UN and The Hague to convict Bushites as War Criminals.

        My Obama Tattoo on my backside says so…”Hope We Can Believe In”

        (Now, THAT was snarky.)

  • DefendUSA

    PEBO used his race to get elected, how does that make us colorblind? It does no such thing. Merit is important, but instead, he sold them the dream that was someone else’s. And PEBO supporters, who will they blame when it turns out he can’t make it happen? I am a cynic, I know.
    I am tired of the move towards socialism and this is the only thing i see coming in the words “Hope, Change, Yes we can”
    No, I don’t want Obama’s hope and change, and No I cannot give up any more of my money for the entitlements he wants to give his cronies.
    YES, I do want what is best for the country I just don’t have reason to believe it is PEBO.