« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

An Utter Lack of Testing: Will President Obama Become an Object Lesson in What’s Wrong With Our Presidential Selection Process?

Though the deepening economic crisis is certainly enough to fulfill most citizens’ worry quota for the year (if not longer), President Obama’s impotent flailing about on the economy shouldn’t be Americans’ only reason to be concerned about their president, a relatively young man who has shown no ability to succeed at any non-campaigning endeavor in his brief but highly publicized career. As noted here on RS before, the UK Telegraph recently quoted a source “close to members of Mr. Obama’s inner circle” as “express[ing] concern that [the President] ha[s] failed so far to ‘even fake an interest in foreign policy.’”

Obama is overwhelmed,” the Telegraph quotes the source as saying. “There is a zero sum tension between his ability to attend to the economic issues and his ability to be a proactive sculptor of the national security agenda.”

With global threats like a near-nuclear Iran, an unstable and passive-aggressive North Korea, a once again expanding Russia, a quickly-fading counterterror ally in Pakistan, and unrelenting Islamist terrorism — just to name a few — present and growing, this is a very, very bad time to have a young, untested man who is reportedly “facing exhaustion over America’s economic crisis and is unable to focus on foreign affairs” sitting in the White House making decisions that literally affect the lives of people all around the globe.

It’s even worse time to have someone at the controls who is giving strong signals, through his response to that crisis, that his reaction to domestic crises will be to attempt to shoehorn reality into his dogmatic-leftist worldview, and to international crises will be to immediately assume a position of weakness and begin negotiating for “peace” from there (ask Pakistan how well that’s working out for them so far).

A Lack of Testing

Military special operations training always includes a portion known, whatever its formal name, as “Selection.” This iteration, which usually takes place at the beginning of the training process, is designed for the most part to find out who can perform under intense pressure — both mental and physical — and who cannot, and to weed out those who fall into the latter group. The Selection process includes putting people who have already mentally and physically prequalified for training through a grinder of continuous mental and physical stresses, which are then compounded, during portions of the program, by the addition of environmental extremes like heat, freezing cold, and sleep deprivation.

The purpose of this exhausting process is twofold. First, as mentioned above, it is to find out who can handle such stresses in such a way as to perform necessary tasks and to continue functioning in such a way as to not endanger either teammates or mission (and to get rid of those who cannot). Second, it is to impart into those who do succeed, through experience, the knowledge that they can continue to perform and to succeed under the most exhausting of mental and physical conditions, and to provide them with something to fall back on when they inevitably find themselves facing a similar situation in real (combat) life.

If there is a single Achilles heel in our electoral system that I can point to as being the greatest risk to our nation’s security and future, I would have to say it is the fact that a person can ascend to the highest, most powerful, and most vital office in the land without ever once having shown how he or she would react when actually tested in a stressful situation — let alone in a crisis, when millions of lives hang on the thread of that leader’s ability to remain calm, cool, and rational when everything is going to hell around him.

President Obama is already showing the strain and exhaustion that come from being burdened with the highest office in the land — and it’s only been seven weeks. With him, we could very well be heading for an object lesson in the utter lack of testing and preparation we require our candidates for the Presidency to undergo. We may also gain a reprieve in this respect, and escape such an object lesson; however, avoiding that lesson now simply delays the inevitable, and allows us to operate for a bit longer under the delusion that our system actually allows us to pick the very best leader and president available.

Only one thing is for certain in this regard: Whenever we do have to learn that lesson, it will be an incredibly painful one, with consequences that reach farther, and last longer, than we can presently imagine.

COMMENTS

  • Dan McLaughlin

    it just produced a bad result in this case. The voters had plenty of information about how McCain handled crises and the fact that Obama never had.

    • techsan

      the process includes a press which should challenge the candidate. In this case, the press, who is a part of the process in my view, didn’t do their job.

      • djemi

        But I seem to me that it’s the left that has the problem not the right

        • techsan

          and fundamentally, I don’t mind Repulican candidates being asked challenging questions and being held accountable for their statements. It’s a discipline the MSM should apply uniformly to all candidates….but alas, the stars in their eyes blind them as they gaze lovingly at their “savior”.

      • IJB

        Either:

        1) They reform, and make themselves an important part of the process again, by retaking on their proper role. Or,

        2) They continue to behave as they have, are totally discredited, and are effectively removed from the process.

        Either way, people will have long memories of this little abject lesson of 2008, and they won’t too soon forget the lessons learned.

        The Press is rapidly coming up on a choice – they can actually do their jobs, or they can continue to cover for and fawn over this disastrous mediocrity and will go ‘down with the ship’ with him.

        It’s their choice.

        But, either way, the process will inevitably improve as a consequence of this ‘bad result’.

        • techsan

          The press had made their choice…go all-in for BHO…and they are being given lessons…but I’m not seeing that they’re learning from them.

          NYT is going through some legal and financial process to remain viable. Many newspapers are folding (ok…pun intendied). MSM News organizations are struggling. The market is taking care of it slowly. And blogs like RS are growing in popularity.

          I think it’s going to take a lot at this point to earn trust again, if at all, since most of us have found other credible, fact-based outlets for our news.

          • Praying

            Oh, there have been a few in the media who have “expressed doubts” – Christopher Buckely, and David Brooks (or did he recant?) but how on earth can this guy still have a 58 – 63% (depending on who you listen to) approval rating? My gosh – what is it going to take? I understand the members of the underclass who are looking for the status quo – more government handouts, etc. But what about the surburbanites, driving around in their BMWs, who voted for this guy because he was cool and hip and besides, they wanted to prove they weren’t racist …They ignored the messages we tried to get out – intentional denial, they didn’t want to hear it, besides, Bush had disappointed them and didn’t they want to be associated with the liberal “intellectual elites” more than the redneck “conservatives”? So how’s that working out with their 401Ks now, and how about that investment account… How are they going to afford Johnny’s ivy league education now that the inherited stock value just tanked, and the president is going to raise income taxes and capital gains taxes and then there is that pesky cap and trade thing – heaven forbid I should give up my beemer for a Prius… I’m just sort of thinking these folks didn’t really bargain for all this (I know quite a few people like this, actually) not that I feel sorry for THEM – you know what they say about buyer beware, but damnit, they sank the entire country! The final, last gasp act of the “its all about me” crowd – and American freedom and liberty goes down the drain. When will they wake up, and learn?

          • Finrod

            Check out the Rasmussen trend numbers here. While the 56 percent approval may not seem like it’s moved a lot from the 65 percent right after the inauguration, check out the strongly approve minus strongly disapprove numbers: after the inauguration, that was 44 – 16 = +28; now it’s 38 – 32 = +6. The number of people that strongly disapprove of Obama has doubled in less than two months.

          • IJB

            So the raw “number” is less important than the trend.

            And the trend for Slobama is *straight down* right now.

            There’s a reason that I chose June or July as the benchmark for Obama’s approval ratings – it will probably take that long (possibly longer) for the idiocies of this Administration and Congress to seep into the thick skulls of the generally uninformed ‘mushy middle’ and the self-proclaimed ‘moderate’ and ‘conservative’ Democrats out there.

            So let’s see what his numbers look like in 3-6 months…

          • techsan

            I’ve been mulling this over for some time now. How do you convince someone that the freight train they’re riding is heading toward a cliff? Heck…how do you convince them that the first 3 cars have already flown off?

            Our friends are just not paying attention. In this part of Wisconsin, we’re still relatively well employed…the pain hasn’t been felt….other than the paper money of our 401ks which have another 20 or 30 years for us to return (myself, I’m beginning to hope even that’s long enough with each new bill that comes out of congress).

            Frankly, they just are not paying attention. The best I’ve come up with is to plant seeds of knowledge…so that as the house of cards falls that is the current Congress+Administration…they will hopefully understand it’s BHO’s mess.

  • Common_Cents

    It’s a matter of time before we will see some rumblings of how a vast right wing conspiracy has set up the first black president to fail! Those racists!

  • http://www.phxgonline.com phxg

    there needs to be a modification to the primary process. There is no reason to hold open primaries; giving us McCain and the lame duck as he is.

    • anotherindyfilmguy

      Absolutely. The RNC should either somehow ban cross-party voting in the primarys or move the primary dates for the cross voters to the end of the process.
      Or something…

  • anotherindyfilmguy

    outspending your opponent 700 million dollars to 80ish million dollars with almost the entire press corp doubling down the advertising with 80% positive coverage of their chosen candidate is whats’ wrong with the picture. With a truly neutral MSM and/or without Soros backing the most potentially destructive candidate the O’ would never have made it past the primarys…ever. even with all that plus rampant cheating it was still a close election…

    The system is relatively fine, and I think this is the election that has woke up a lot of people to the bias in the media and other stuff…

  • http://deafconservative.wordpress.com Cheetah772

    Lincoln was hardly experienced at handling political matters, much less a civil war with hundreds of thousands of soldiers dying on both sides. But somehow, he managed to survive the carnage of Civil War and make important political decisions.

    I guess the point is that NO ONE is fully prepared for the task of presidency, not even George W. Bush. The real test is how a newly elected president is able to manage his time and be able to stand up on toes making tough, decisive decisions on all domestic and foreign policy issues. The presidential selection process is fine, it’s just that it happens a slight majority of Americans disagree with you and elected Obama, for good or ill.

    We all like to blame on liberal media for making it as easy as possible for Obama to sail in to Whie House. But on deep inside, I think the real blame belongs to Americans going to booths and electing whom they think is the best candidate for president. At the end of day, it is sole responsibility of every American out there to check out on his or her preferred candidate and make a wise decision on whom to elect.

    The liberal media didn’t force Americans to elect Obama. In fact, I am reminded of a verse in the Bible where it says the devil cannot force you to sin, the desire to sin always starts with your inner self. The devil simply entices or lure you to sin in flesh, but forcing you to sin? No way. That’s the same case with liberal media, Americans, and Obama.

    Americans hath spoken, and behold, Obama is our new King.

    There is an old saying, which I think is applicable here, that Americans always get what they deserve in electing leaders. They elected Obama, and that is what they deserve to have, again, for good or ill.

    Other than that, I agree with the basic premise of your article.

    • Dan McLaughlin

      has at least had the experience of military command.

      We got very, very lucky as a nation with Lincoln. Obama needs to be Lincoln to succeed, and he’s just not.

    • Achance

      Spin wasn’t invented in the late 20th Century. Lincoln and the Republicans deliberately cast the “Log Cabin to President” image for Lincoln; they needed the EVs from Illinois and wanted to obscure the fact that the Republicans were at heart a fairly radical Northeast party.

      Lincoln may have split rails at one time but he was quite good at splitting hairs as the attorney for several major railroads at a time when Chicago was emerging as America’s railroad hub to the West. My heritage militates against “holding much for Mr. Lincoln” but he was tested both in the rough and tumble world of 19th Century law on behalf of powerful but controversial clients and a long series or REAL debates with Douglas. That is infinitely more testing and seasoning than The One has had. And even with that, he made more than his share of mistakes.

  • johnt

    foreign leaders aren’t impressed by skill in teleprompter reading, they must have reasons before adjusting their interests to negotiation, foreign policy doesn’t sell well to a dull electorate, it doesn’t satisfy a liberals urges to domestic power and permanent office holding. Much more but to shorten it; it requires skill, thought, and long term planning and expectations, in other words, it’s tougher.

    A marshmellow like the Big O and his gang of circus clowns and tax evaders aren’t up to it, and the Big O isn’t up to or interested in asserting leadership or his limited attention to the problems that actually threaten America and the world.

    The selection process is ok,the media and too many citizens are or have gone down hill in a civic and intellectual/moral sense.

    • mom2oneson
  • Caleb

    All I can say is ditto.
    – c

  • bs

    Stop pestering poor Barry with such things. He has better things to do, like run for office in 2012. That’s what he DOES… don’t you understand that? He can’t be bothered with making hard ol’ decisions. He’s a campaigner.

    So now you just be quiet, you big meanie. He WON. That means the rest of you just need to shut up and leave him alone.