If you haven’t read Senator Cornyn’s post from this morning on the NRSC endorsement of Governor Charlie Crist over Marco Rubio in the open Republican primary for retiring Senator Mel Martinez’s seat, go here and read it now, and be sure to thank the Senator for taking the time to post a response to our concerns about his actions and decisions as head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
I have a few comments and concerns about the Senator’s actions, and about the ideas expressed in his post here today.
Florida Governor Charlie Crist (R) may be a shoo-in for Mel Martinez’s Senate seat in terms of sheer electability. However, it strikes me as being very vaild to ask whether we (i.e., the GOP) want to elect someone to represent our party and our brand in most exclusive club in the nation who is a proven tax-hiker and runaway spending supporter.
Further, if, as Senator Cornyn has said, blowback over tax increases and failed Stimulus spending promises to be a major factor in bringing out Republican voters (and in pulling independent voters away from the Democratic party) in 2010, do we really — and think about this, please — do we really want our nominee for the U.S. Senate to be someone who was on the wrong side of both of those issues?
As the Senator said in his post, the GOP isn’t a monolith; no successful party is. The Republican parties of Texas and Georgia don’t equal the Republican parties of New York and Minnesota, because values and people are different in those different places, and so a Republican won’t necessarily be the same thing in both. Unfortunately, in trying to make his case about this reality, Senator Cornyn decided to adopt the Obama-esque tactic of hastily constructing a strawman and swatting it down for the purpose of looking both smart and reasonable.
This morning, the Senator wrote, “Some believe that we should be a monolithic Party…comprised only of people who agree with us 100 percent of the time. Excuse me, Senator, but with all due respect that’s utter tripe, and you know it.
The argument against the NRSC’s endorsement of Crist isn’t being made by people who want to Assimilate Florida Into The Monolith. In fact, many of the Republicans who are standing up to the NRSC and Senator Cornyn on this aren’t even doing so out of opposition to Charlie Crist becoming the prospective GOP nominee for the Sunshine State’s open Senate seat. Rather, the argument is being made by those who oppose the head of the official Senatorial campaign committee — a man who has been assimilated into the inside-the-beltway Washington world — bringing his Beltway-based organization into an open primary and throwing its weight (and deep pockets) around for a particular non-incumbent candidate.
That goes double for a candidate like Crist in a race like Florida’s. Simple common sense, which I understand time inside the Beltway deprives all once sound-minded men of, would tell anybody that in a race featuring a person who represents the core principles of a party and a person who has recently and repeatedly flaunted those core principles by signing massive tax hikes, expanding the nanny state, and campaigning with the leader of the opposition party for the passage of a bill that violates everything his party stands for fiscally, the only smart thing for a national party organization to do would be to stay out of it and let the Republican voters in that state have their say.
The GOP isn’t a monolith by any means, and we don’t want it to be. However, one thing that is necessary when attempting to come back from a shellacking like the GOP took the last two election cycles is a set of core principles we don’t violate — period. At a time when the biggest domestic grievances people are going to have against those currently sitting in office are higher taxes and runaway spending, going out of your way to back a major tax-hiker and an endorser of that runaway Washington spending — without even making him defend those issues in a primary against a willing challenger with a sterling record on them — is, quite frankly, a loser of a decision.
Senator Cornyn’s decision to bring the full power of his Republican campaign machine to bear on behalf of a tax-hiking Obama supporter against a lifelong conservative in an open GOP primary is even more foolish than his decision to use donors’ money to go after Pennsylvania Democrat Arlen Specter with television ads less than a week after he enthusiastically endorsed the Senator in his Republican primary contest.
The question which must be answered when deciding on, and defending, moves like the Florida endorsement is this: What is the goal the NRSC is attempting to accomplish?
Senator Cornyn points to Crist’s name ID as proof of his electability. That’s fine; he may well be more electable than Marco Rubio in the 2010 Senate race. However, how much does the GOP gain if we pick up one more seat, but the person who fills it neither adheres to, nor particularly believes in, our core principles as a party?
If we lack that in those who are elected to represent both us and our brand, then what have we in fact gained by putting another warm body in the legislature whose only break with the other party is his choice of the letter after his name?
After knocking down his last strawman of the morning, Senator Cornyn wrapped up his case for endorsing Florida’s tax-hiking, Obama-supporting, Stimulus-promoting Governor for the Republican Senate nomination by saying,
“Winning back the majority requires not only that we hold the Democrats accountable, but also that we embrace the vast number of issues upon which Republicans agree. …
If we succeed in electing Republican Senators in 2010, issues like relocating Gitmo detainees to the United States, socializing healthcare, and eliminating workers’ secret ballots may never reach the floor of the United States Senate.”
With all due respect to Senator Cornyn, that final paragraph is an incomplete statement which should have begun with the phrase, “If we succeed in electing Republican Senators who represent the core principles of the GOP in 2010,” etc., etc., etc.
If our Senators and Representatives do not represent the values their constituents and their party as a whole stand for, and with which its brand is meant to be synonymous, then those Senators and Representatives do the people whom they purport to represent no good whatsoever.
The GOP isn’t a monolith, and every state’s Republican party has the right and the ability to select candidates and nominees that represent them. At very least, voters in a state like Florida should be allowed to do so without a Washington-bound, visionless organization like the NRSC breathing down their necks telling them what’s really good for them, and who would really “fit their state.”
The Republican party has been brought down far enough in recent years by its Washington-dwelling contingent. Though he has been sound on many issues in the past, Senator Cornyn’s words about the 2006 and 2008 elections bear out the fact that he is one of those Washington dwellers. “As a Party, we were stunned,” Cornyn wrote this morning, by the electoral shellackings the Democrats handed us in 2006 and 2008.
Senator Cornyn, the insulated creatures of the Beltway were the only Republicans who were really stunned by those outcomes. The rest of us very clearly saw that the party’s leaders had lost their way and failed to live up to the core principles of the GOP.
To this I only have one thing to add: If you think using your inside-the-Beltway organization to bigfoot a real conservative out of an open primary in favor of a tax-hiking, Obama-supporting, Porkulus-endorsing Democrat-lite is the way to, as you put it, “regain the ground we lost,” then the level of stunning you’re going to get in 2010 will make ‘06 and ‘08 look like cakewalks.
Nice try, Senator Cornyn, but no dice on this one.

New Paradigm
donnac1188 Friday, May 29th at 11:03PM EDT (link)Wouldn’t it stand to reason if the GOP was so stunned by the losses in 2006 and 2008 they’d be trying to come up with a new paradigm instead of the “this is the way we’ve always done it” routine?
Even more simply, why wouldn’t the NRSC just keep their powder dry until the general election; and let the Florida voters make their choice, unhindered by the inside-the-beltway crowd, in the primary? They’ve always tried to control every primary, and look where it’s gotten them.
Honestly, you feel as though you’re beating your head against a stone wall trying to get through to these people. When will they ever realize that we elect them to go to DC to represent us, but we don’t elect them to tell US who to elect!
Summed up my 1,000 words in about 100
Jeff Emanuel Friday, May 29th at 11:08PM EDT (link)Well done.
JE
Sorry Charlie
steelstand Saturday, May 30th at 5:18PM EDT (link)Being from the TampaBay area , I can tell you Charlie is the Democrats favorite Republican. He is NOT a Conservative. Charlie Crist wants to go to Washington, where he can better serve Charlie Crist. Rubio is a born winner who believes what he says. and is not afraid to say what he believes.
I would truly love to see an actual debate
itrytobenice Friday, May 29th at 11:08PM EDT (link)between you and Sen. Cornyn. This a most excellent rebuttal. You did a magnificent job. Thanks for saying so well what so many of us believe.
The problem with America is stupidity. I’m not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don’t we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
A-fricken-MEN!!!!....nt
Aaron Gardner Friday, May 29th at 11:12PM EDT (link)Aaron’s Archive
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
I think you covered every point, except
INC Friday, May 29th at 11:12PM EDT (link)you forgot to mention that Rubio has a “compelling” life story!
The logical disconnect is simply staggering to me. How can they endorse someone who has raised taxes and welcomed Obama to Florida to hype the stimulus and simultaneously say that repercussions from Obama’s fiscal decisions will mean Republican gains in votes???????
We are barely over the poison of Specter. Why would we want to welcome Specter redux?
This is one Floridian who is voting for Rubio.
"Why would we want to welcome Specter redux?"
eburke Saturday, May 30th at 12:18AM EDT (link)be..be…be…because he can *win*!
I mean…don’t you *get* it?
“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
“Dead fish go with the flow” ~ izoneguy
“We have a Statue of Liberty not a Statue of Necessity” ~ ColdWarrior
Good job of trying to clue them in Jeff.
Cowboy Saturday, May 30th at 12:54AM EDT (link)If they don’t start to figure it out soom 2010 is going to be UUUGLYYY!
The peculiar thing to me is...
MacAoidh Saturday, May 30th at 2:35AM EDT (link)…here we have a party whose principles involve the promotion of individual liberty, the free market and small government.
And that same party proceeds to dictate from Washington, DC who its nominee will be in statewide races in jurisdictions like Florida and Pennsylvania, rather than allow the party’s members to make those decisions for themselves.
Does anyone else see a major disconnect here?
Frankly, I don’t find this stuff funny. Who thought up the idea of the party screwing with its own primaries?
Actually, the more I see of it the less of a disconnect
eburke Saturday, May 30th at 3:58PM EDT (link)I think there is. John Cornyn was a vocal, staunch conservative….until he go into a leadership position. Unfortunately, it would appear that he works for and has been assimilated into a party whose upper leadership could give a tinker’s damn about liberty, free markets, and small government. All they want is their piece of the pie and will use the GOP to get it.
Just a different letter after their name, that’s all.
“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
“Dead fish go with the flow” ~ izoneguy
“We have a Statue of Liberty not a Statue of Necessity” ~ ColdWarrior
First Jeff, what New York Republican Party?
Marcus_Traianus Saturday, May 30th at 7:24AM EDT (link)It’s like trying to find Sasquatch. I have heard about it, read the meeting notices in newspapers and occasionally hear an odd sound in the woods that I believe might be the old guy. But alas; I never actually *see* it.
All kidding aside, I understand why Mr. Cornyn might be conflicted. I actually have been to GOP meetings in NY. I would relate my experience as something akin to sitting around with Cro-Magnon man and arguing about whether it is easier to build a fire or wait for lightening to ignite the forest- then bark at the moon-god in thanks so he provides more lightening in the future. It is metaphorically the same mindset that Mr. Cornyn proposes- chasing the so-called “sure thing” instead of an approach that is harder, but more practical and sustainable over time.
Should the party be monolithic? Silly question; but the answer is yes. Especially if one takes that term in a literal sense. The morphology of some monoliths indicates they are formed by many small and varied pieces cemented together by some other type of common stone. Sort of akin to the many different groups in our party being bound by common principles. Oh yes, they take time to form. But they are also some of the oldest geological structures on earth. Wow! Another good analogy that hopefully even Mr. Cornyn will get.
Crist is a spendthrift, Rubio is not. Seems as though the former is much less popular than the latter with our contemporary electorate. I can already envision the Florida opposition ads- the Democrat states how he/she is going to cut taxes and restore fiscal responsibility over a line-by-line rolling backdrop of all the junk Crist voted for. No thanks, I have seen this movie before.
“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson
Contributor to The Minority Report
Great job Jeff.
mbecker908 Saturday, May 30th at 10:02AM EDT (link)And the part I find the most interesting is the comment from Senator Cornyn, or maybe it was his staff, to your takedown. I also like the link on the NRSC blog to your diary with the note that it should be required reading for all of the leadership.
Oh. Where’s my coffee.
Do you have a link to Cornyn/staff on takedown?
INC Saturday, May 30th at 12:17PM EDT (link)I went to the NRSC blog and saw this:
which to me is just boilerplate. What great conversations? Cornyn posted a statement. At last count there were some 262 comments with no reply or defense or clarification or answer or anything from Cornyn.
As itrytobenice said yesterday:
S.N.A.R.K. 100%.
mbecker908 Saturday, May 30th at 3:41PM EDT (link)Of course there’s NONE of what I mentioned. None of it. And of course it’s a damn press release.
And, since I’m now on Jeff’s diary, I will note that Senator Cornyn is a troll. He, and the rest of the leadership, come here and post crap like that diary and NEVER respond to any of the comments. And you can bet your firstborn there won’t be a comment Senator Troll on this diary either. Engagement would demonstrate just how empty their so-called arguments are and it’s difficult to argue with someone like Jeff, who has a command of the English language and a solid set of principles, when you’ve been a Washington DC resident for a zillion years learning how to torture the language and when you couldn’t sell what “principles” you have for the price of a small McDonalds coffee including the Senior discount.
Sorry, my snark meter was off!
INC Saturday, May 30th at 4:24PM EDT (link)I read your comment and thought, wow, did I miss something?!!?
I went back and looked. Nothing.
Hence my question.
And your answer.
Not surprised!
I don't think I'd had enough caffeine
INC Saturday, May 30th at 4:28PM EDT (link)when I read your comment, or perhaps I might have picked up on the fact it was written sans coffee!
Good point...don't give me rah rahs about Senators taking the time to "Talk" to us at Red State...
AceInTX Monday, June 1st at 1:23AM EDT (link)They don’t “talk” to any of us…they recite their mantras and disappear into the mists surrounding Foggy Bottom!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Well said Jeff!!!
Pomme Sunday, May 31st at 10:01AM EDT (link)“The greatest single cause of liberalism in the world today is conservatives, who acknowledge our core principles with their lips, then walk out the door, and deny them by their lifestyle.” (Brennan Manning. Sort of)
“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views” William F Buckley Jr.
Yet another reason
usrbinperl Sunday, May 31st at 10:17AM EDT (link)why Sen. Cornyn should resign as chair of the NRSC and pass leadership to someone who actually has a spine, like DeMint.
You might be surprised, we do not all agree
JLenardDetroit Sunday, May 31st at 4:33PM EDT (link)There are alot of Diaries and Comments regarding the whole Crist, NRSC, and Rubio related situation. I just wanted to take a moment to say to anyone that has not decided what to think, or hasn’t seen the other side of the discussion yet, review/consider additional information discussed beyond just this (and others on same topic) Diary. All “I” ask of “anyone undecided/uncertain” (as I am not going to change minds made up, and others are not going to change my position) is that other “Opinions,” analysis, proposed strategies, commentary, etc… be considered. Review the points in this Diary and other Diaries and decide for yourself.
First, where I agree with the seeming majority here at RS. We need more Conservatives [Conservatives: Who,Where,When? Diary] in Leadership roles in the Party, Elected to Office, etc… Should we support Rubio? YES! At this Conservative Candidates Diary you can see about several Races (beyond FL Rubio and PA Toomey) and it includes a link to where you can donate to Rubio (it is a special RS setup by Erick so that it is secure and Rubio gets the donation knowing that it came from someone here at RS). We also AGREE that Pat Toomey is the RIGHT choice in every way for PA over Ridge (and an EFFECTIVE arguement was able to be made to stop the NRSC from helping Ridge into the Race and parts of that effective argument were: using Primaries to build up future candidates (which Toomey already accomplished and has the leg-up State-wide in PA [same examination can/should be made in FL, IMO]), working together, Voting Psychology (Bandwagon and other effects), and more. (You’ll find a link to Toomey’s campaign to donate to as well as Rubio’s in that Conservative Candidates link.)
Where I part company from some of my fellow RedStaters is that I openly/often state that am prepared to support Crist IF he is the General Election nominee, beyond just the discussion of the Primary battle (and that “I understand” where those supporting Crist for the Primary are coming from “Strategy” wise). Should we donate to Crist now? NO, IMO. I am not, he has a good start and will have enough financial support in FL, and that is part of the many points (see those here: Crist/Rubio 12 points [with links]) of why even retiring FL Senator MEL MARTINEZ ENDORSES CRIST (the Hill) for the U.S.Senate seat he is retiring from (see for yourself). Martinez has also endorsed someone to replace Gov. Crist Martinez endorses McCollum since Crist should move on to the Senate (IN MARTINEZ’S thoughts/strategy/plan/opinion). As if you hadn’t heard yet, Cornyn/NRSC endorsed Crist based on some of the same reasoning/strategy noted in that “12 points” link I mentioned earlier. It is all about an overall Strategy to defeat Democrats and return Republicans (and the GOP (still Conservative) Platform) to a position to exert power, but first we must get Democrats away from the 60 Senator mark, and losing the FL Senate seat to the Democrats is NOT an option (some are of the opinion Rubio may win the seat while other opinions are that Crist will win the seat, but that Crist has less an uphill climb to achieve it, allowing Time/Energy/Money to be focused in other Senate Races [IL for one?]) in these strategies. The strategies employed are on a Location by Location basis viewing each battleground with an eye to achievable objectives both short and long term (both theirs, and mine - as we will NOT have Conservative control of the country w/o Republican control of the country also). We must halt the ObamAgenda creating ObamaFAIL while working toward our own CONSERVATIVE successes.
I have specifically said to Erick in one of his Diaries that I understand, appreciate, AND SUPPORT, the need to keep pressure on the NRSC. I am NOT asking anyone to stop commenting about the NRSC. It IS needed, if/when/where done in a manner to remind them that the CONSERVATIVE STANDPOINT/MESSAGE IS NOT WHAT LOST - THE REVERSE IS TRUE! Democrats running as CINOs and PLINOs co-opted the Conservative message to get elected yet still support the Ultra-Left ObamAgenda. We must return to the Conservative path regardless of who is on the ticket and in office! I do not consider it an effective strategy to just scream at them about it. Which is why I take it beyond just talk/print and I devised a Strategy to send the NRSC, RNC, etc, a PHYSICAL message via the “3D” (creating an NRSC:) Daily Dimes Dichotomy Strategy, all our words may be ignored but when the message shows up in PHYSICAL FORM at their doorstep we can/will be more effective. So I also ask you to consider to be part of something more than just creating posts they probably are ignoring anyway and send them an actual message via that strategy at that link (additional discussion on the Daily Dimes Dichotomy or Dimes Donations Dichotomy - 3D - strategy here). Why? Because they seem to understand MONEY and we need to speak AT them in the language they understand!
Concluding. Support Conservative Candidates [with donation links] in PRIMARY Elections, Support Republican Candidates in General Election Campaigns as we will NEVER have Conservative Control without Republican control and we must stop the ObamAgenda, Donate where/when you can, review all available information!!!
(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (Reco) (Quotes) (removeRINOs.com) (Merry RSmas)
+ 0bama Lies & your Bank acct will Die! (4/15 Truthers)
+ Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
+ I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
“The first Liberal was Satan” - a Rush caller (other Quotes)
You wrote all that to say...
AceInTX Monday, June 1st at 1:29AM EDT (link)NOTHING!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
I've been away from the computer for the last 3 or 4 days...please tell me this is a joke?
AceInTX Monday, June 1st at 1:47AM EDT (link)After the blunders Cornyn has made on the Crist thing from the start, I can’t think of a better way to dig the hole deeper by exponential increments almost instantaneously than to post on Red State such an ill thought out, insulting, juvenile and amateurish response to the firestorm the Senator started with his endorsement!
Seriously…I’ve loved this man and worked for his election in all his statewide campaigns to one degree or another…but this is truely embarassing to me and a painfull thing to behold…I think it’s official…the water in Washington DC has softened Cornyn’s brain…and he’s now as dumb as a stump!
Oh how the mighty have fallen!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
sigh....
AceInTX Monday, June 1st at 1:49AM EDT (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Oh...maybe someone could get the not sp esteemed Senator to announce when he intends to endorse Toomey...
AceInTX Monday, June 1st at 2:01AM EDT (link)or are they still waiting for a squish to ride in so they can endorse another liberal to replace the liberal Specter to help Crist remake the Republican Party?
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC