« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Focus on the Family and Pam Tebow Play the Pro-Abortion Left like a Stradivarius*

They Got That Worked Up Over *That*

The job done by Focus on the Family and the Tebows with their much-publicized Super Bowl advertisement was nothing short of masterful. In fact, I’m not sure that word describes the level of mastery Focus on the Family showed with their domination of the pro-abortion left through last night’s ad and the public relations battles leading up to it.

To fully understand what a massive PWNing of the Left this was, it’s necessary to briefly look back at the last couple weeks of hype and debate over this ad. When it was reported that Tim Tebow (who, despite being a dirty, jeanshorts-wearing Florida Gator, is a model citizen and upstanding individual) was appearing in a Focus on the Family commercial with his mother which was being aired for the purpose of encouraging people to Choose Life, the Leftists in the media (a redundancy, I know) and in the political sphere went into a frenzy.

Is Tim Tebow endangering his NFL career by being political? asked ESPN, which features columns almost weekly that engage in political discussion by decrying racism in sports (such as accusing a college football teams of not scheduling an in-state school because of a fear of black people), patronizing blacks as inferiors who need Benevolent White Folks’ help to have a chance in life (see “Rooney Rule”), and by delving into plenty of other issues that have nothing to do with sports. Columnist Tim Keown even claimed that Tebow’s status as a Christian meant he was guaranteed to be exploited by “extreme-right fundamentalist groups that would love to trot him out as their hood ornament.”

NOW, NARAL, Planned Parenthood, and others went much farther in response to what they expected to be an affront to their pet issue — promoting abortion — and demanded that CBS refuse to accept Focus on the Family’s $2.5 million and turn away an ad whose whole purpose, they said, was “to create a climate in which Roe v. Wade can be overturned.”

“The spot, which has not been released, is said to feature Tebow…and his mother telling the story of her decision 23 years ago to ignore medical advice and continue a risky pregnancy,” reported the Washington Post. This, of course, was an untenable situation for these groups. “Focus on the Family has cynically set it up so they can say anyone who disagrees with airing this ad is disrespecting one woman and her choice!” declared NOW’s Terry O’Neill, in between frantic checks under her bed and in her closet for George W. Bush and Karl Rove.

When CBS refused to pull the ad, pro-abortion activists ratcheted up their alert level to DEFCON 1, and went into full character-assassination mode (for evidence, just peruse the 284,000 results of a Google search for “Pam Tebow liar”) while defending the decision to abort a baby as every bit “as tough and courageous a decision as is the decision to continue a pregnancy” in the pages of the Washington Post.

Needless to say, these tactics — in the face of silence from anybody at Focus or in the Tebow family — rubbed a good portion of the American population the wrong way. A good example of this was Sally Jenkins, the self-described pro-choice sports columnist at the Washington Post who wrote, “Tebow’s 30-second ad hasn’t even run yet, but it already has provoked “The National Organization for Women Who Only Think Like Us” to reveal something important about themselves: They aren’t actually “pro-choice” so much as they are pro-abortion.”

At that point, as Jenkins said, the ad hadn’t even run yet, and the pro-abortion left was already driving people away from their side with their growing cacophony of smears, outrageous claims, and demands that those who pick the “life” side of the “Choice” coin be silenced.

Then, after all of that buildup, the ad aired, and the pro-abortion left was revealed in all their horribly humiliated glory:

That — that — was the ad that caused the pro-abortion crowd to go into a frenzy of censorship advocacy, character assassination, and mask-slipping demonization of mothers who dare choose life over death for their unborn children.

In one fell swoop, Focus on the Family and the Tebows exposed the real pro-abortion left to a larger audience than, perhaps, had ever seen them in their natural state: as abortion-loving autocrats who despised Choice almost as much as (infant) life itself — all without really having to do anything.

Brilliant.

The fact that the commercial was not overtly pro-life (or anti-abortion) made the PWNing even sweeter, and likely brought far more people over to the Life side of the issue (or, at least, divorced them from the pro-abortion side) than an overtly anti-abortion spot would have. This is, in part, because the pro-abortion left used the run-up to the Super Bowl to reveal themselves to a massive audience as being solidly anti-Life and pro-abortion, and because the ad that actually ran demonstrated how laughably needless the left’s character assassination and censorship efforts really were.

On top of all that, the absence of an abortion message in the ad meant the pro-abortion left had to bear the entire burden of publicizing such a divisive and touchy issue all by themselves.

This was made possible, in part, by a brilliant non-information campaign. The ad’s contents were kept entirely secret until last night, with only the aforementioned media summary having been allowed to go public. In this absence of detail, the pro-abortion left immediately assumed the worst, treating the ad as though it would approach the issue as they do: by getting in people’s faces and shoving views down their throats.

The fact that Focus on the Family did nothing of the sort made the pro-abortion left’s smear-and-silence campaign into a massive overreaction — and made Focus’s effort an EPIC WIN for the pro-life side of the aisle.

*hat tip to RedState reader eburke for the apt phrasing

COMMENTS

  • EagleWatcher

    Focus on the Family made NOW, NARAL, Planned Parenthood look like the intolerant, totalitarians they really are. Although…it’s getting easier and easier to do that nowadays.

    • AngryMatt

      They’ve come out against the ad AFTER it was played saying that it carrying “an undercurrent of violence against women.” Wow, just wow. Absolutely brilliant fake-out by FOF.

      • bassethound

        This ad was really benign. In fact, I couldn’t tell what they were advertising. For all I know, it could have been Campbell’s Chunky Football Player Pleasin’ Soup.

        The fact that the NAGS are screaming that the ad “celebrates violence against women” makes them look especially dumb.

        • throwback59

          for the first time (I was busy stuffing my face when it aired) and can’t believe anyone could object to it. But remember, the NAGS were offended that Sarah Palin didn’t have an abortion. Soon they will object to even showing a baby (born or unborn) on the air.

  • teresakoch

    I agree – this was absolutely brilliant marketing – kudos to the Tebows and FoF. A well-played “game”, indeed!

  • http://thefilthybeast.com KathW

    . . . because I couldn’t believe such a sweet nothing inspired so much controversy. The pro-aborts created all the grief and they were the ones hurt by it. Justice.

    • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

      n/t

  • itrytobenice

    Kinda funny to watch him string out some of the people who hate him. To me at least.

    • lorig77
    • cwilson

      .

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Jim Dobson, if he thought about it in the terms Jeff describes, may be a smarter man than his enemies believe.

    • AngryMatt

      NOW and NARAL were expected an iso run over the guard with a power fullback (or in this case, a QB built like a FB) lead blocking. They were expecting a run right up the gut on this issue.

      Instead FOF lined up with the jumbo package, dialed up a beautiful playaction fake and lobbed a soft pass to a tight end that faked a block, snuck off the line and picked up ten yards.

      Moving the chains in the right direction; that’s good for another Pro-Life… FIRST DOWN!

      • USNJIMRET

        Opening play of the Second Half of the Super Bowl.
        Whole world still watching, some recovering from The Who and the show just concluded.
        An On-Side Kick!?!?!?!?!?!
        To Start the Second Half of THE most important game in the history of the New Orleans Saints??????
        And it worked!
        In fact, it was kind of down hill for the Colts from that point on.
        As for the subject of the thread.
        Yes, brilliant and masterful indeed!
        FOTF and the Tebows executed what can only be called an absolutely flawless slam dunk of the hypocrisy that is the alleged “Pro-Choice” movement.
        That the only response from that baby murdering scum of a movement is to complain about some underlying violence against women?????
        I assume they also had the same reaction to the Snickers ad with Betty White?
        With an added bit of umbrage at the obvious age discrimination?
        And perhaps just a dash of outrage that only old WHITE people were so depicted?
        And finally just a whiff of barely contained rage at the lack of inclusion of people of color in a CHOCOLATE candy bar advertisement??
        When foolish people spend their every waking moment looking to find offense and slander at every utterance and act of others, they are so easy to set up for the stumble and fall on their idiotic faces.

      • rightwingmom52

        Tebow’s “jump pass” into the end zone for a touchdown. Just a soft touch. Go Vols!

  • kyoufuu
  • michael_68_1999

    The Republicans now have, thanks to Focus on the Family and Andrew Breitbart, a perfect campaign marketing roadmap. Let the Left go hysterical, then come out with a calm, sedate ordinary policy statement.

    The ranting, foaming at the mouth Left doesn’t represent anything but a sliver of the population. It’s time to use their marginal hatred on display as a weapon against all so-called mainstream Democrats.

    • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel
    • irishgirl

      n/t

  • neyney

    I love it when the whole karmic/reap/sow/goes around/comes around thing hits these lefties right in the kisser. It was a joy to see this much ado about nothing moment. Nothing like shining a light on the loony lefties to show how unhinged these so called “pro-choice” tools are. By the way as a woman and the mother of a 17 year old girl I want to break it to Jumanji Green that the word is choice. That doesn’t mean a choice between an early or late-term abortion. It’s a choice between whether to have an abortion or NOT to have one. A choice means that BOTH sides get to have their say. What infuriates both myself and my daughter is that these so-called womens groups were trying to shut down free speech. If they didn’t like the message they always had the choice to pony up and pay for a pro-abort ad. What did they choose to do? They came up with some lame you tube ad with two guys talking about giving their daughters the right to abort their grandkids.

    • robp

      If someone I know is pro-abortion asks me where I stand, I tell them I am pro-choice: I believe everyone should choose NOT to have an abortion.

      Blank stare. Then, “Oh, then you’re really pro-LIFE” or “Oh, then you’re really ANTI-chioce”. No, I am pro-choice, I believe that a woman should be able to make a choice not to have an abortion.

      This exposes them as not really being pro-choice but pro-abortion, because MY choice is not really a choice on their terms.

      But admittedly, the pro-aborts have done a masterful job, empty as it is, of claiming the high ground of defending a woman’s right to “choose”.

  • http://teejaw.com Ken_Willis

    I hate this term “PWNing” because I don’t ever know what it means. I know it represents a misspelling of the word “own.” So why not just say “own?”

    I guess because this sentence: “To fully understand what a massive PWNing of the Left this was,” would not make sense if it were changed to: To fully understand what a massive OWNing of the Left this was,”

    But it doesn’t make sense with “PWNing” in it either. What does it mean? If one wants to communicate why would one use a word that is so confusing?

    • ceili_dancer

      n/t

    • Laura

      …just a half-second before I got to that sentence in Jeff’s (very well-written!) story. I have never been a fan of the word, but I guess it’s creeping into my vernacular, probably because it’s short and expressive.

      H/T (hat tip) to bs for defining ?pwned? earlier this week here:

      Quoting from bs, who quotes from the Urban Dictionary:

      pwned ? A corruption of the word ?Owned.? This originated in an online game called Warcraft, where a map designer misspelled ?owned.? When the computer beat a player, it was supposed to say, so-and-so ?has been owned.?

      I think we’ll keep hearing this term, since we hope to pwn the lefties almost as much as we hope to play them like Stradivariuses (Stradivarii?) in ’10 and ’12….

      Hope that helps!

      Instead, it said, so-and-so ?has been pwned.?

      • Laura

        Sorry, meant to give you the quick definition, as well as the etymology. Also from Urban Dictionary.

    • huskerchuck

      I’ve played WoW for about 2 and 1/2 years, and I still can’t stand the use of the word there. It’s more of the ‘leetspeak’ or the ‘netspeak’ that people use… and simply drives me nuts. But yeah… sadly… the ‘PWN’ word was creeping into my thoughts as well. Doggonit, you blasted kids! :D Okay… I’m not THAT old… but some days… :D

    • red_baron

      • red_baron

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fhb89V43KWc

      • taliesin319

        At 70 years of age one needs all the linguistic help one can get to say
        nothing of good political commentary. Thank you all for the daily enlightenment.

    • bass_man

      TebOWNED!

      (Can’t take credit for that one – heard it somewhere else.)

  • talgus

    Wonderful soft touch. It allowed the truly violent humans (NOW, NARAL, etc.) to show themselves as HUMAN KILLERS first and foremost. Now to just get the disadvantaged in the inner cities to see that they are the true targets of these KILLERS

  • Composer_Man

    but pro “choice” is definitely NOT one of them.

  • huskerchuck

    Just for background, I’m married, with two little children. The kids and I went to my folks to watch the game last night. Dad hadn’t heard about the ad or the controversy, and I filled him in on it. I didn’t get to see the more in-depth ad that ran before the game, but I did see the spot during the game. My father saw both. Dad isn’t a big politics person, more center than I am, has his opinions, which agree a lot with mine. That to tell you who he is, so that I can say this:

    He said, after he had seen the commercial during the game, ‘That was what they made a fuss about? I didn’t even understand the first part of it. And there was no mention of the issue at all’ He also said that there wasn’t any mention in the ad prior to game either, and that it was benign also. I just sat there and thought to myself… ‘huh… looks like you brought a WHOLE lot more attention and publicity to a commercial, and publicized an issue, and alienated a LOT of people… over something that really didn’t do anything that you claimed it did.’ And then to hear on Rush coming in this morning, the bash on ‘violence on women’… I practically laughed out loud… rough-housing with your mother (when talking about how tough she was and had to be in their family, no less), and that glorifies violence? No, folks, it shows a LOVING relationship between mother and son. Something NOW, NARAL, and PP clearly knows NOTHING about.

    • huskerchuck

      Thank you… to FoF, but especially to the Tebows.

      Not only for what I just stated, though that would be plenty thanks enough. No, this thanks is for showing what those who believe in Right to Life are really all about… loving, caring families, committed to fostering a loving atmosphere of life and happiness for children. (I know, too sappy for some, but that’s my thoughts about this family right now. :)

  • http://teejaw.com Ken_Willis

    Thanks and Thanks to Laura, red_baron, and all the rest for your help with the word “poned,” er, I mean “PWNed” and its various iterations…PWNed, PWNing, Double-PWNed, and more to come I’d wager.

    The video is…PWNsome!

    Now that I have it, I will understand!

  • wyllyness

    At the very end, Mrs. Tebow says, “You’re not nearly as tough as I am.”

    I think the ad is promoting *strength* in women!! After all, we have to be tough to decide to give birth. An abortion is the weak, easy way out — in the short AND long term.

    But the NOW and NARAL “womyn” don’t that. They give up before they have even given it a chance.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      over which flavor of Wrigley’s Cardboard Gum tasted best it would be a brutal example of mysoginistic and domineering tendencies. I couldn’t help myslef, you see. It’s all the poisonous testosterone in my veins.

  • lunaticrex

    I checked the google link provided in Jeff’s post, and most of the search result slugs (well, links) make reference to abortion being illegal in the Republic of the Philippines, and gave that as the main justification that they “reasoned” Pam Tebow is being disingenuous in the ad(s). As someone who spent a couple of years living in Angeles City (where Clark Air Base was before Pinatubo erupted), all I can say is these people will need to come up with something better than that. In the R.P., as in many underdeveloped countries (hope that term is OK), “illegal” simply means “costs more.” Prostitution, as one might expect, is also illegal in the country, whose population at that time was around 85% Catholic (thanks to the Spanish). I was a young man then, and I can say without hesitation that prostitution was rampant everywhere in Angeles, as well as in Olongopo City where the U.S. Navy had a large base. Such services were VERY inexpensive at the point-of-sale, and as I understood it, bar owners simply paid protection to law enforcement and political officials to look the other way.

    Besides all of which, the legality of any practice is irrelevant in any country or region and for any activity when one can simply pay one’s way out of trouble. In the R.P., I always believed many laws existed simply to ensure government officials could continue to be enriched by those willing to pay for what the Catholics call “indulgences.”

  • thecoondawg

    “When it was reported that Tim Tebow (who, despite being a dirty, jeanshorts-wearing Florida Gator, is a model citizen and upstanding individual)”

    Well played Sir, well played…..Gators eat boogers.

  • http://www.dcworksforus.com Kenny Solomon

    NASCAR is a family……. If you’re not into watchin’ my rednecks makin’ quicker-’n-spit circles, you may not realize it, but ask anyone……. NASCAR is a family.

    http://www.daytonainternationalspeedway.com/Articles/2010/02/Gatorade-Duel-Grand-Marshals.aspx

    Tim Tebow, the quarterback for the past four seasons with the University of Florida, and Jacksonville Jaguars running back Maurice Jones-Drew will serve as Grand Marshals for the Gatorade Duel At Daytona on Thursday, Feb. 11.

    Tebow, who won the Heisman Trophy as college football?s top player in 2007, will deliver the starting command ?Gentlemen, start your engines? for the first Gatorade Duel while Jones-Drew will give the command to fire engines in the second Gatorade Duel.

    —————–

    Nice choices. :)

    They also each get the ride of a lifetime: Front passenger seat in the pace car for the start of their race,

    Cheers !

    • nessa

      LOL, flipping off PP and algore at the same time. What a sport!! Go #9!!