As one of the few MOTs (members of the tribe) willing to admit to a politically conservative slant, I get asked all the time (by liberal Jews), how can you be politically conservative and a Jew? I would argue to them, how can you be a Jew and NOT politically conservative? Conservative principals such as limited government, individual responsibility, free enterprise, traditional morals and manners are all deeply rooted in Jewish tradition.
In B’reishet (Genesis) we are told that man is created in God’s image, since we also believe that our maker has no bodily form, it can’t mean that we are all ringers for the “big guy upstairs.” We are taught that just as God acts as a free being, so does man. Just as God acts without prior restraint, so does man. Just as God can do good as a matter of His own free choice, so can man. Man is therefore spoken of as being created in the image of God because of our free choice.
The Rabbis teach us that each man is born with free will. It is further understood that in order for Man to have true free choice, he must not only have inner free will, but also an environment in which a choice between obedience and disobedience exists. God thus created the world such that both good and evil can operate freely; this is what the Rabbis mean when they said, “All is in the hands of Heaven except the fear of Heaven” (Talmud, Berachot 33b).
Free will is the divine version of limited government. We are created in God’s image, it is our nature to do the right thing, but it is up to each of us personally to make the decision to do the right thing. God does not force us to do the right thing.
I once read that when God created the world, sparks of his holiness were spread across the earth. Every time that a person performs one of the 613 mitzvot in the Torah (the Five books of Moses) one of those sparks is purified and sent back to heaven. Through that process we become closer to God. In other words that all are sent here to this world to make the choice to improve ourselves through our good works.
Liberal/Progressive government takes away that choice. It assumes that left to our own devices, we will do the wrong thing (or at least what they say is the wrong thing) so government takes over the role of God, and steps in to control our decisions. While Judaism sees good vs. evil as a personal decision necessary for us to grow, liberalism takes away that choice and gives it to the government, retarding our spiritual development and the opportunity to get closer to our Maker.
Judaism also teaches us that we cannot rely on God’s help to bail us out all of the time, the responsibility to take action falls upon each and every one of us. Even the famous story of Moses splitting the Reed Sea teaches that lesson (Red Sea was a typo made when the Torah was translated into Greek). In S’mot (Exodus) Chapter 14 Moses sees the Pharaoh’s troops bearing down on the Israelite nation, who are trapped against the sea. Moses starts praying to God, but God says stop praying and do something!
15 And the LORD said unto Moses: ‘Wherefore criest thou unto Me? speak unto the children of Israel, that they go forward.
The Rabbis teach us that even when Moses lifted his staff the water did not part. The Egyptians were closing in, and the sea wasn’t moving. So a Hebrew named Nachshon took the responsibility upon himself to act, and just walked into the water. He waded up to his ankles, then his knees, then his waist, then his shoulders and just as the water was about to reach is nostrils the water parted. The lesson is that it is OK to believe that God will eventially help us, but we cannot get that help until we take personal responsibility and act on our own.
On the other hand a Liberal/progressive government teaches citizens that the government will always bear the responsibility of protecting you, there is no individual responsibility, just the collective bailout, there is no personal responsibility.
Everything that follows, the way we do business, treat other people,etc, all flow from that free will to do the right thing and to take personal the Talmud is the first journal of business law, and the first book of social etiquette. It lays out all the rules in front of us. But it is up to each and every one of us to make that personal decision to do the right thing.
Maybe that’s why liberal/progressives interpret freedom OF religion (meaning that everyone is free to practice the faith of their choice) as freedom FROM religion (meaning that there is an iron wall separating church and state), because if faith is allowed to get too close to our government as it now exists, people might remember that government is not a substitute for God. The Jewish picture of God, is our creator who gave us personal responsibility to do the right thing, but with the choice to accept that responsibility or not. There is no room in Jewish law for a government that forces us to do (their interpretation) of the right thing.
In the end the question should not be “Is It OK For a Jew to Be Politically Conservative?” The real question should be “Is It OK For a Jew NOT to Be Politically Conservative?”
If you would like to read more from Jeff Dunetz, CLICK HERE To Go To His Blog THE LID
Jeff Emanuel
Jeff, my question is...
nessa (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 1:02PM EDT (link)…HOW did so many Jews become Liberals?
I would hazard the guess that they take their religous education as lightly as most Christians.
Great diary! Thanks!
“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Contributor to Unified Patriots
teh twitter
great conservative manifesto supported by Judeo-Christian values, and nessa, as to WHY so many Jews are lib/dems
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 6:57PM EDT (link)read Dennis Prager’s columns and books, and esp “Why the Jews?”
more later
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com and Charlotte Observer columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
5
aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 1:10PM EDT (link)Dennis Prager’s stuff on this is interesting.
“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke
beautiful diary
hickorystick (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 1:54PM EDT (link)best I have ever read on this sight. Thank-you.
AWESOME! I loved it....so true and something...
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 5:32PM EDT (link)I question all the time about all faiths. That God has given man the ability to think for himself and for man to turn that over to Government is insane! That is why the statists have worked so hard to remove Religion from the public square and to demean and debase EVERYONE’S God!
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Jaded, and which one would that be? -nt-
CincoSolas_del_Bronx (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 5:43PM EDT (link)Those dreading urbanization should remember that though the Kingdom of God first appeared in a temporal Garden, at the end of the book it is established in an eternal City. (paraphrase, James M. Boice)
soli Deo gloria
That would be the one to whom...
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 6:15PM EDT (link)each individual person speaks to, if your question is in regards to the God statement. He is different to many people as you may well be aware or not, whatever.
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Thanks, Jaded. There are three inconsistencies
CincoSolas_del_Bronx (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 9:14PM EDT (link)in your logic, one logical, one historical and one political, all with theological overtones. I’ll keep them short because as we all know this isn’t a theological site–at least until somebody jumps into the pool first, as happened above.
In your replies to the OP and to me, your references to “God” make incompatible shifts of essence and attribute.
In the first (“God has given man”) you implied that God is a single entity capable of at least causation, and by extension, possibly volition. In the second (“EVERYONE’S God”), the ambiguity of English leaves open the question of whether an objectively single entity is in view or not, but the singular “God” does limit every member of “everyone” to having not more than one. In your response to me you begin with “the one”, but then inexplicably shift to “he is different to many”.
At the very least, long-accepted–indeed, one could even say conservative–rules of logic and grammar frown on self-contradictory usages by the same individual. It also calls into question your use of the word “true” in your original reply’s title; if even God cannot be defined other than subjectively … what is truth?
Your definition of what might better be called “the enity formerly known as God” which you gave is probably the predominant one here and is certainly so in our culture. The staggering historical inconsistency which you share with many here is the attempt to preserve the original language, meaning and intent of our country’s founding documents while simultaneously holding to a definition of God which most of the authors of those documents would never have countenanced.
The political illogic is then simply an extension of the above. What assurance do you have, having proffered your own definition of God–which differs incalculably from another substantiated by an infinitely higher authority than your own–that you yourself are not demeaning and debasing, not everyone’s self-defined entity, but a very particular God in the process. And if that is difficult to answer, what grounds do you have for castigating those on the Left for doing much the same?
Those dreading urbanization should remember that though the Kingdom of God first appeared in a temporal Garden, at the end of the book it is established in an eternal City. (paraphrase, James M. Boice)
soli Deo gloria
that was ridiculous ... first line sb "in your replies" -nt-
CincoSolas_del_Bronx (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 11:55PM EDT (link)Those dreading urbanization should remember that though the Kingdom of God first appeared in a temporal Garden, at the end of the book it is established in an eternal City. (paraphrase, James M. Boice)
soli Deo gloria
Cinco, you may be the only person
eastbaylarry (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 11:23AM EDT (link)that is confused or takes exception with Jadeds’ comment. I find your bloviating useless and uninformative.
2+2=4 dammit!
Eastbaylarry, beyond savoring the irony of your dredging up a 10-week-old post for castigation in re efficacy,
CincoSolas_del_Bronx (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 12:50PM EDT (link)I’m compelled to point out that your own sig line perfectly illustrates my point. As soon as one allows a subjective definition of God, all other “facts”, including good ol’ “2+2=4″, become irretrievably subjective and thus able to be maintained only by mere assertion, e.g. “dammit”.
Those dreading urbanization should remember that though the Kingdom of God first appeared in a temporal Garden, at the end of the book it is established in an eternal City. (paraphrase, James M. Boice)
soli Deo gloria
Amazing
eastbaylarry (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 1:01PM EDT (link)You must be one of them thar ‘edgumacated elites’.
I don’t think that anybody who believes there is just one God has any doubt about ‘which’ God that is or what Its’ properties and attributes are.
Theology students may argue such things, but sensible people do not.
2+2=4 dammit!
Eastbaylarry, you'd be hard pressed to get
CincoSolas_del_Bronx (Diary) Thursday, July 29th at 3:04AM EDT (link)even a minority at this site who “believes there is just one God” to agree that they have “any doubt about ‘which’ God that is or what It’s properties and attributes are.”
Are you quite certain that, for example, Kenny and Martin would have no doubt that “In the unity of the God-head there be three Persons, of one substance, power and eternity?” Or that Jeff, after writing “God will eventially help us, but we cannot get that help until we take personal responsibility and act on our own”, would be in full undoubting agreement with all implications of “God in his ordinary providence maketh use of means, yet is free to work without, above, and against them at his pleasure … [The] effectual call is of God’s free and special grace alone, not from any thing at all foreseen in man, who is altogether passive therein?” And would you be so kind as to cite for me a recent instance when any representative of the more semi-Pelagian among us, whether of Roman Catholic or Evangelical stock, has agreed wholeheartedly that God justifies the ungodly, and that “not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous; not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ’s sake alone; nor by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing Christ’s active obedience to the whole law, and passive obedience in his death for their whole and sole righteousness?”
Or are these people, perhaps, not to be called … sensible?
Those dreading urbanization should remember that though the Kingdom of God first appeared in a temporal Garden, at the end of the book it is established in an eternal City. (paraphrase, James M. Boice)
soli Deo gloria
You are the only person I feel is not being sensible
eastbaylarry (Diary) Thursday, July 29th at 9:05AM EDT (link)Quoting from various doctines is not relevant.
All I’m saying is that monotheistic beliefs all refer to the same God. References to the “Holy Trinity” are pointless in that context.
2+2=4 dammit!
Eastbaylarry, holding the principle of contradiction in low regard
CincoSolas_del_Bronx (Diary) Thursday, July 29th at 1:00PM EDT (link)actually does produce useless and uninformative discourse. You have just asserted that the God of the Christian Scriptures is indistinguishable from both Allah and that most American of gods, The Man Upstairs. Such an assertion precludes any profitable interchange between us; I will leave you to ponder the implications of a society of chock-full of sensible people who eschew theological precision being confronted by a culture whose every move is orchestrated by such precision, especially if the sensible people have also tacitly agreed that the new god is really quite interchangeable with the old?
Those dreading urbanization should remember that though the Kingdom of God first appeared in a temporal Garden, at the end of the book it is established in an eternal City. (paraphrase, James M. Boice)
soli Deo gloria
I could hardly fail to disagree with you less /nt
eastbaylarry (Diary) Thursday, July 29th at 3:22PM EDT (link)2+2=4 dammit!
A soul is highly individual. Splains a lot. nt
redneck_hippie (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 5:40PM EDT (link)This aversion to "conservatism" runs very deep
civil truth (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 6:23PM EDT (link)and has the staying power of Skinnerian conditioning with intermittent reinforcement.
The roots go back to the era of Jewish immigration from Eastern Europe, the Askenazi component of the American Jewish community. (I’m not familiar with the Sephardim, except that they historically have little public visibility/participation in the political arena and thus tend to be ignored in political discussions of the Jewish community.)
Too long to go into in a comment, but through a combination of leftist ideology (e.g. the kibbutz movement), good intentions, guilt and projection, this dominant element of American Jewish community became allied with the Democratic party as the best guarantor of survival and prosperity against a Right that became imputed as being the antisemitic WASP Establishment that hated Jews.
This paragraph, of course, is woefully inadequate – but the take-home point is that this aversion to Republicans and conservatism is not intellectual or rational but rather a gut-level, deeply emotional response that is self-reinforcing within the community – and we know that such conditioning is EXTREMELY difficult to break in the face of intermittent reinforcement.
As the Exodus story tells us, it’s ultimately going to be up to the new generation to break free of this conditioning – and it’s going to take a dramatic shock, I’m afraid, to start the unraveling of the conditioning. Plus a critical mass of Jewish Conservativesso that conservatives are
not viewed as the Other = hostile outsiders. Conservatives are not trusted by instinct, and that is difficult to overcome
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
Absolutely true!
miri Tuesday, May 18th at 9:28PM EDT (link)As a Conservative (politically and religiously) Jewish woman I can tell you that what you say here is completely true. It really is a deeply emotional response…most Jews I know would NEVER EVER even consider voting for a Republican. You express it so well. To say it is immensely frustrating to us Conservative Jews is an understatement.
Do you think it is about party labels?
jeffreywturner (Diary) Wednesday, May 19th at 2:02PM EDT (link)Would it be more fair to say that these Jews would not consider voting for a conservative?
I mean, what about prior to the last realignment when the Republicans were the liberal party and the Dems where the conservatives? Did most Jews still vote for the Dems or where they Republicans back then? (like the blacks were)
“Life is too short, can’t we all just eat pork and kill some terrorists?”
The Dems were never "conservative"
aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 1:39PM EDT (link)they were, at first, a regional party, and only after individuals like William Jennings Bryan and Pres Wilson came to the fore did they truly become liberal. Before that time, Jews weren’t particularly involved in the political scene (politics were more of an Irish thing). Republicans generally became the anti-New Deal party, and certainly had a conservative strain, but that strain didn’t become dominant until around the 70s and, of course, Reagan. So post-Wilson, we essentially had two parties: a progressive party, and a really progressive party. Jews, in general, were supportive of the New Deal, and felt obligated to Truman for his steadfast support of Israel, so they’ve been reliably Democratic ever since.
“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke
Israel might be the issue that changes it
JamesSmith130 Wednesday, July 28th at 2:20PM EDT (link)One has to remember that GOP was considered by most Jews to be less pro-Israel than the Dims until very recently. There were a few exceptions. George McGovern was not trusted on Israel and thus Nixon got 35% of the Jewish vote. Jimmy Carter’s record on Israel was atrocious, and Reagan got 39% of the Jewish vote. But other than that, the GOP was not seen as the pro-Israel party until Bush Jr.
Well, Jeff............
Kenny Solomon (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 9:32PM EDT (link)I’m guessing it’s not all that ok, because most of my relatives and many of my Jewish friends haven’t talked to me in awhile.
My parents are lifelong Democrats, but there’s no way, not a chance in a billion, that they’d have voted ‘D’ in ’08. My Dad, God bless the man, hit hard with Dementia, saw something wrong from the git-go with our Dictator In Training Pants and my Mom, on first sight of Teh Won, said he was evil.
That's amazing, Kenny...
cactusjack Monday, May 17th at 10:48PM EDT (link)while the story about your Dem parents is, statistically speaking, “anecdotal,” it is the THIRD TIME and recently, I have heard that same reaction recounted, almost in exact fact patternl as yours…lifelong Democrats…gritted their teeth and voted for Clinton, even… but sensed something was not right with Obama and his handlers from way back in the 2008 campaign days, were picking up some really bad vibes on him. While we deduced it intellectually on our side. We gotta find a way to get as many of these post-Obama Dems to vote for worthy resistance now. Your parents’ instinct was right, Obama has destroyed the old Democrat Party, it just hasn’t been understood yet.
Beer Summit!!
snowshooze (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 1:09PM EDT (link)I’ll buy. Where you at?
The Holocaust Has Valuable Lessons
scottfactor (Diary) Monday, May 17th at 9:44PM EDT (link)I will say one thing about all of my Jewish friends….they know Biblical history better than anyone. It is apparent that they are taught this from an early age. That being said, it baffles me that they know so little about modern history. If Jewish people were indeed well versed on modern history, they would only look at the Obama camp and see visions of a man who rose to power in Germany by using many of the same political tactics the Obama camp is employing. If I were a Jewish man and had relatives that experienced the horrors of WW2 Germany, I’d be afraid….very afraid…of what I am witnessing in American politics today. The liberals are no less than facists, and we are all no less than their next victims.
Scott Factor
http://scottfactor.com
Scottfactor, you are right about the Holocaust.
penguin2 (Diary) Tuesday, May 18th at 10:20PM EDT (link)It has puzzled me why American Jews have distanced themselves from remembering and understanding the history that occurred before the actual Holocaust. Anti-Semitism of centuries permeated the entire culture of Europe, every time there was political unrest, the government (politicians) blamed it on the Jewish people. I’ve said it here several times, people must look at the 1930′s to see the seeds sown for the events of the 1940′s. I also believe, that we need to remember those lessons as regards the potential for future events. It won’t only be against Jewish people, but Christians are also under attack. Right now, it suits the Left’s purposes to try and paint Republicans as against Jewish interests. IMO, nothing could be further from the truth, but the Dems have controlled the message here as well.
As Civil said above, it has been conditioning and an insidious, yet successful, propaganda war. It will take something extraordinary to show people the truth.
Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills
Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List
Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots
It had better be OK, and PDQ too
cactusjack Monday, May 17th at 11:10PM EDT (link)Not Jewish, but been wondering, waiting, hoping when the American Jewish electorate and my socially conservative friends therein, going to start seeing & dealing with the cold, hard reality of this man and his backers. Obama and his crew are, in calculating fashion and from a cruel distance, dismantling the State of Israel about as fast as they can do it. There is no other way to put it for what is going on before our eyes.
And BHO ain’t no Harry S Truman, no way. Spread the word.
Not only can you be politically conservative
kowalski (Diary) Tuesday, May 18th at 8:38PM EDT (link)You can also get yourself educated and licensed (if necessary) and own a firearm. What you’ll find, if you really look, is that it’s not a silly thing or a crazy thing or an evil thing, or a hick thing, or a paleolithic thing, or any other thing — it’s an intelligent thing and an act of self-preservation. I can help if you’re interested — I live in one of the most restrictive states in the US (Massachusetts) and I have quite a bit of life experience working (in New Jersey) with Jews who also own guns. I was captain of my high school rifle team and several of my teammates and still best friends after all these years are Jewish men and women.
And believe me, they’re always a lot of fun to be with at the range, and in my experience they also shoot very well.
I own one of these, and I can tell you that it works really, really well. Made in Israel, and it’s the best magazine loader I would ever want to have.
Defend Liberty — Join the NRA | Live in Massachusetts? Join GOAL.
And I'm an "extremist"
kowalski (Diary) Tuesday, May 18th at 8:50PM EDT (link)In this position because I believe — as strange as it may sound, having cascaded through the entire political spectrum in my lifetime personally — that liberals should want their 2nd Amendment rights defended vigorously, also.
I tell my liberal friends: “You can try to make the State as big as you want, but when you really have to defend yourself, do you really believe it will be there for you? It never has been so far. In fact just the opposite.”
Defend Liberty — Join the NRA | Live in Massachusetts? Join GOAL.
It's a tragedy
aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 1:43PM EDT (link)That the groups best served by the 2nd Amendment (minorities, homosexuals, and women) are the ones duped into being most averse to taking advantage of it.
“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke
Depends on the meaning of Conservative?
theoldrang Thursday, May 20th at 7:26PM EDT (link)There seems to be a disconnect here.
Although I am a conservative, I am not a Jew.
In Israel, I am told, there are a lot of Jew, and many are ‘conservative.’
More think American ‘liberal’ Jews are in need of an oil change, so to speak…
ESPECIALLY after what they back this last election!!!
I think that it is largely an economic thing
aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, July 28th at 1:49PM EDT (link)For whatever reason, Jews seem to gravitate towards supporting economically liberal policies. The kibbutzim project h as already been mentioned, but even today, the state of Israel is easily the least free (economically speaking) of the Western states. (Mind you, that’s still better than any of the surrounding Arab states.)
“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke
I think the primary reason why
JamesSmith130 Wednesday, July 28th at 2:26PM EDT (link)Jews have not migrated to the GOP and conservatism is fear of conservative Christians. I don’t know why, but there appears to be just a great deal of fear and paranoia among Jews I know towards conservative Christians in politics.
It might have made sense why Jews were Dems 40 years ago. It doesn’t today.