« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

It’s the Message Stupid

Try this completely non-scientific experiment. Answer this simple question:

What does the GOP actually stand for?

Have an overflow of answers? A nice list of solid conservative principles? Your psyche brimming with a litany of reasons why it’s awesome being a Conservative Republican?

That’s the problem.

“I like to watch the Fox News Channel when things go badly for Republicans, so I’ve been watching the Fox News Channel a lot lately. I enjoy hearing the excuses that their commentators make for the GOP. The spin out of GOP-TV is that President Barack Obama won because voters are stupid, selfish, or sinful. Now, there’s a winning campaign message for you. Conservative columnist George Will said Sunday on ABC that the Republican Party must “quit despising the American people.” I knew that if I waited long enough, I would agree with Will on something.” stated Brad Bannon of USNews.

The rant of a lefty with standard anti-Fox vituperations? It’s easy for us rightward types to dismiss. There is a point in his column. It is largely the point I intend to make; the GOP does not have a single, clear message.

Depending on who you ask; the GOP is the party of social conservatism, the party of fiscal sanity, the party of law and order, the party of personal responsibility or the party of old men. White men for that matter.

I’d be willing to bet most Conservatives would agree with all but the last point. That’s the problem.

Ned Ryun of the Washington Times had this encapsulation, “We tried to convince Americans of Mitt Romney’s merits without a unified message, using the most annoying tactics possible: hundreds of thousands of demagogic ads and pestering robo-calls. That’s no way to build a movement.”

Ned is certainly on point; we are without a single, unified message.

As Republicans spend months beset with navel gazing, it is worthwhile to consider that even amongst the party loyal, no single one of us can really enumerate what is the rallying point for the GOP.

A recent Harvard Business Review article discusses this, “The single biggest driver of stickiness, by far, was “decision simplicity”—the ease with which consumers can gather trustworthy information…”

The authors further state, “Shifting the orientation toward decision simplicity and helping consumers confidently complete the purchase journey is a profound change, one that typically requires marketers to flex new muscles and rethink how they craft their communications.”

It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve said this; a party that fancies itself a home for the business sector, Republicans have a woeful understanding of simple Marketing 101 concepts.

Agree or not, the liberal Democratic Party has a simple, clear message; we believe government will help you. What’s the Republican single, simple and clear message?

Everything the Democratic Party says is in support of that simple message. Be it positive or negative messages, it supports the central concept.

While much of the discussion about connecting with minority voters is a substantive and important conversation, it is meaningless if the message doesn’t connect.

Over the upcoming months, the fits of Conservatives will focus on issues, direction of the party, broadening the base or connecting with undecided’s. Do we talk about immigration, gay marriage or abortion?

I think a rather unique perspective is provided by Artur Davis. Unique, in that he has been in the machine. He was centrally located within the Democratic Party. Finding himself more in line with the Republican Party, as we all well know, he officially moved to the GOP. Not that the GOP isn’t littered with former liberal folk, his was a recent change.

In writing about Romney’s recent loss, “Romney’s frustrations are the musing of a candidate legitimately perplexed by the Democrats’ ability to hold together a base that should have been frayed by the economic deterioration of the last four years….exactly how does a political majority keep intact when so many of its underlying policies aren’t exactly working in the interests of the coalition inside that majority?”

Artur further stated, “There is nothing untoward or unpredictable in electoral groups siding with a party that has pursued initiatives friendly to their interests…The more accurate assessment is that Democrats have stitched together a coalition that is linked less by dependency on government than by a shared perception of Republican and conservative insularity.”

In stitching together coalitions that often should not get along, Democrats have done so out of a single rallying concept. Consider that the Democratic coalition weaves together minority groups to whom religion plays a prominent role with those who historically are less so such as the gay community…and even atheists!

The problem is not with changing whom Republicans should be, to effectively change the soul of the party.

It’s the message, stupid.

There is nothing wrong with the product. It is a superior product. I mean, how do you argue the common sense of staying within a budget fer cry eye! It is the unmitigated failure to enumerate a single, simple message.

I had previously noted, “America wants to work. America was built by the strong hands, the gentle hands, the engineering hands, the teaching hands, the typing hands, the selling hands. America was built on the hard work of all Americans. By the simple idea that today, I can make the life for my family better than it was yesterday. Sure, this comes from entrepreneurs but it also comes from those who get up in the morning to build America one hour at a time.”

My intent is to point out that the Republican Party has so fractured itself from within, so much so that the factions of specials interests have forgone the single rallying cry of what made America great. Social issues are important. I would not suggest we jettison the Conservative social fabric.

Without a message that speaks to all people; a message that each of us, no matter our so-called identity, can prosper.

The internal fracturus nature of the current GOP rings the death knell of a dying breed. We can hold dear to those issues we find important. Should all those things we hold dear lead as the key Party message?

Democrats have not bothered with issues that separated their identity groups, Democrats focused on the commonalities. A single message. A simple message.

Where even a wrong message is simplified, it will be digested more easily than one that is right but unclear.

Cross posted at the Rightward Journal

COMMENTS

  • rolandlind

    Good post.

    I would say the most consistent message I have heard is “small government.” Unfortunately, that message doesn’t translate in a way that people really feel. When Reagan pushed the small government message, most people could relate. As David Frum wrote in “Why Romney Lost”:

    “Even white male heterosexual Americans are freer then they were before [1962.] No Americans are subject to the draft, for one thing. Everyone may now legally buy birth control in every state in the union. All Americans may read or view virtually anything they want to, without a censor’s scrutiny or permission. Nor may the government any longer deny Americans the right to travel based on their political opinions, as it did to suspected communists in the 1950s.

    “In the purely economic realm, Americans can legally own gold bullion, a serious offense 50 years ago. They can legally own a telephone. (It seems beyond belief now, but that was not allowed in 1962. Phones had to be rented from the phone company – of which there was exactly one.) If they manage an airline, a trucking company, a retail brokerage house, a natural gas well, a railroad, an oil well, or a bank, they may set their own prices for their products and services without the prior approval of a government regulator. Nor do they have to worry that if they undercut a competitor’s price, they may face an antitrust prosecution. No longer are rules passed restricting how much farmers may grow.”

    It goes on and on. Small government as a message resonated in 1980 because the federal government was omnipresent. Most people deal more with their state and local governments these days, and then it’s likely the DMV or a hunting license, and it just doesn’t seem so oppressive.

    • http://rightwardjournal.com Jeff Swanson

      I was looking for something prophetic to write in reply but all I could come up with was > Yep.

    • commonsenseobserver

      I hardly think the fact that the federal government is spending more in order to do less is very comforting compared to the federal government in 1980 that spent more to do more.

      The fact is, the federal government is bloated. Of course it can’t be omnipresent or oppressive, it’s far too fat to even move around.

      I suppose, of course, that most ordinary people don’t really see red tape and cronyism.

      Perhaps we might emphasize the fact that we are the party of aspiring individuals, hardworking families, and those who are in need (and remember that there’s a lot of overlap). We stand for free enterprise and innovation, facilitated rather than restricted by a limited government that is honest and responsible. We also stand for the security and stability that comes with a strong defense and a robust economy, with more jobs, higher take-home pay, and a lower cost of living. We also stand for a strong, sustainable, and affordable safety net, especially in the form of the aid provided by communities and churches, that helps people to get back on their feet and cares for the old and sick.

      We see an America where dreams are fulfilled, work is rewarded, and lives are protected. And step one to that is reducing the size and cost of the federal government, mostly because we cannot afford much more red ink.

  • Pingback: grotlopt

  • dustinrose

    I agree with you totally. I am not a strong conservative. I am more moderate and I was surprised at the election when Romney’s staff didn’t know he was going to lose. I figured when they were saying that they were going to win, that it was just spin but afterwards I found out that they really didn’t know. That interested me and someone recommended this site to read about the conservative message.

    As someone who is on the outside of the conservative movement looking in, I really don’t know what the GOP stood for this year. I think that if you ask the average person what the GOP stands for, they would bring up social issues and trickle down economics. That is a messaging issue. The average person who spends most of their time working and taking care of their kids and who watches the local news as they make dinner and help with homework needs to be able to understand how you are going to serve their interests for them to vote for you.

    As I am reading a lot of these diaries over the last few weeks, I think that part of the issue is that Republicans have spent so much time preaching to the choir through Fox and the other conservative media that they sort of forgot how to talk to the congregation. You need to convince the congregation. The choir is already on your side.