In one of the links above SHE said that SHE was still “processing” invoices from her prior campaigns to determine whether or not they were appropriate.

As a small business owner, I am offended that a candidate would run for office without first having bothered to go through the unpaid invoices from a campaign 2 years earlier to determine whether or not the invoice should be paid.

Whether its rent payments, printing expenses, or what have you, the woman HASN’T BOTHERED TO EVEN EVALUATE INVOICES THAT ARE TWO YEARS OLD.

How would you like being a vendor of hers? Not very accountable/responsible now is it?

So Socrates, why don’t you provide a service to my campaign, and maybe by 2012 I might actually look at them? I hope your employer doesn’t treat you that way.

Its not about money, its about responsibilty. Nothing wrong with being poor, but you don’t induce people to do things in exchange for the promise of payment if you aren’t at least serious about paying.

Waiting TWO YEARS to “process” invoices is indicative of an entitlement mentality. I would hate to be one of her vendors.

The FEC violations, liens, college degree no college degree, invoices that she is still processing, my oponent is gay, etc.

Same facts with a different political ideology and you would be laughing at her candidacy,

I hold her to the standard that a person shouldn’t run for office to fix their personal financial and professional problems. That is a recipe for really bad representation.

want to extend the Bush tax cuts, voted against the stimulus, and voted against Obamacare?

Being a populist? Nobody in the history of mankind has ever called be a populist? Do you even know what the word means? There is nothing populist about any of my positions or my politics,

I supported all the tea party insurgent R candidates this year—each and every one of them. I draw the line at supporting someone who can’t even manage her own affairs properly.

When she gets around to “prcessing” her campaign invoices from 2008 and 2006, I will get around to thinking about her candidacy.

What kind of conservative person seeks additional authority when they can’t even handle the responsibilities that they currently have?

O’Donnelll, were she to win, would beclown herself on a weekly basis. She is not ready for prime time, and never will be.

I used to think that Democrats would vote for anyone so long as they voted the right way. Now I am learning that a fair number of Republicans will do the same thing.

If O’Donnell is a fiscal conservative who will bring accountability to government, she should first bring a little accountability to the vendors she used in her 2008 campaign.

When will she get around to looking at those invoices? I mean I know how important she is and all, but two years to even “process” an invoice from your printer?

I support Rubio, Miller, Angle, Paul, and other “liberals” like Castle. In 2008, I was a big fan of Fred Thomspon, another “liberal” like Castle. Just like an O’Donnell supporter to ignore easy to find facts (like my consistent support for the “young turks” of 2010).

So yeah, in the Bizarro non-logical world of “O’Donnell is a great candidate” I am obviously a liberal. However, in the real world in which adults of sane mind live and work, neither of those statements is true. I am not a liberal, and O’Donnell is not a great candidate.

If you actually bothered to read anything I said, you would note that I have consistently said that I would vote for O’Donnell in the PRIMARY as well as the general. So there is no “real question” to be answered. I have also consistently said that I would not give her a single penny because she will only beclown herself and the tea party movement if she wins. O’Donnell is a liability to those of us who understand that it only takes one embarassment to embarass an entire class of conservative elected officials.

I am not suggesting that people vote for Castle, I am suggesting that O’Donnell supporters wake up from their dream world.

I suspect that as a group of people, many of you are Huckabee supporters. I am looking for a vaccine for your collective minds so that in 2012 we won’t have to deal with that clown either.

(i.e. I am NOT accusing O’Donnell of ANY of these things)

Would you still be an O’Donnell supporter if it turned out that any of the following scenarios were true:

a) she was selling military secrets to the Russians
b) she killed someone while driving drunk
c) she forced herself on a 15 year old boy
d) she stole money from an employer
e) she had a tendancy of being high at public appearances

In all of the scenarios above, she would still be the more conservative candidate than Castle, but would you still vote for her over Castle?

Everyone has a line somewhere where at some point, a problem with the candidate overshadows agreement with them on the issues. I am sincerely interested in hearing where you draw that line.

as an FYI, I don’t care at all about the Liberty matter. I am limited my criticism to things that Christine personally says and does.

To compare Christine to Palin is a SMEAR against Palin. Palin is an accomplished individual. Christine is a perenial wanna-be who hasn’t accomplished butkis in her life besides draw attention to herself.

I so hope you become a vendor to the O’Donnell campaign so your cash flow can be put in the toilet for 2 years before she looks at your invoices.

I note that you simply won’t respond to that point, probably because you hate men. All of you men haters are alike you know. I don’t care if you are sick because man-haters should be sick.

I also note that I was “bashing” Christine yesterday, and that wasn’t the popular position on this site yesterday. So were you a populist yesterday? How do you keep track of such things and still polish your nails, keep your hair groom, organize the shoe closet, and shop for nice looking outfits?

There is nothing gender specific about that.

People who still haven’t gone through their list of bills from 2008 to decide which bills are properly payable and which bills are unauthorized probably should get through that first before deciding to incur additional expenses in a run for the US Senate.

If you interpret such common sense as sexist, you must be a sexist for assuming that one sex is different than the other in this regard.

Now, saying something like “Christine should find a man, have babbies, and leave politics to the men”–that would be sexist—but that isn’t what I said.

Is there a pulse?

Is the person conservative?

Yup, strong candidate.

What if the person is so irresponsible that they don’t process their 2008 campaign invoices until 2010? A fiscally responsible conservative who will bring accountability back to government?????? LOL

I so hope that you end up on her payroll so you don’t get paid. We shall see how supportive you are at that point. Please do find some way to provide her services.

I am, in case you haven’t noticed, a big fan of people actually looking over their bills before they make new purchases.

What kind of conservative spends money on their credit card to buy something when they haven’t even looked at their credit card bills from 2 years prior?

Answer: A Jennifer Conservative

I hope you are more selective in your choices of doctors, lawyers, and dry cleaners than you are in your choice of politicians.