<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Contraception deception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google &quot;Glenn v Holder&quot; to see Gary Glenn&#039;s (Conservative champion/warrior and Candidate for US Senate in Michigan http://www.GaryGlenn.US or http://www.michigan4conservativesenate.com) fight for Rights of Religious Conscience under the First Amendment. Liberals want to &quot;prevent Standing&quot; as if immediately once a Law infringes your Constitutional Rights you don&#039;t receive &quot;immediate harm&quot; by definition of having Government infringe the Rights it is sworn to uphold/protect!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google &#8220;Glenn v Holder&#8221; to see Gary Glenn&#8217;s (Conservative champion/warrior and Candidate for US Senate in Michigan http://www.GaryGlenn.US or http://www.michigan4conservativesenate.com) fight for Rights of Religious Conscience under the First Amendment. Liberals want to &#8220;prevent Standing&#8221; as if immediately once a Law infringes your Constitutional Rights you don&#8217;t receive &#8220;immediate harm&#8221; by definition of having Government infringe the Rights it is sworn to uphold/protect!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An open letter to Sandra Fluke:

Remember the old saying: &quot;You&#039;ve come a long way Baby&quot; ?

Well, guess what.... You&#039;ve REGRESSED a long way Baby...
... if you have to depend on the ultimate &quot;Man&quot; (Government, or anyone/anything else) to pay for your Pills!!!

You&#039;ve long abandoned any notion of the original Feminist philosophy.

GROW UP, get a job, PAY FOR YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITIES!!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, March 18, 2012 9:05
Heritage Foundation ? @Heritage 

Gimmicks Won?t Resolve HHS Mandate?s Religious Liberty Assault http://herit.ag/RkU

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, March 18, 2012 9:11
TheBlaze.com ? @theblaze 

#WeeklyRecap: American Indian Tribe Given OK to Kill Two Bald Eagles for Religious Purposes http://tblz.us/9IDT9 via @theblaze

The Obama administration wants this story trumped up - all part of their games of &#039;guilt by BROAD association&#039;.....

Another salvo in Obama&#039;s WAR ON RELIGION. Just another ploy. This is their attempt to imply that all Religions would be about &#039;sacrifices in blood&#039; if left to their own devices and why ALL Religions must be shunned, or at least CONTROLLED!!!!!

Do NOT let them play this game. You know better! Inform others of the games Obama and his minions are playing.

Oh, but we forget... There is one Religion (see: Liberals&#039; Religion is Government) that REQUIRES Human Child sacrafice - that is, of course, the Cult known as the Democrat Party and there demands for Abortion of Children as part of their worship!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, March 19, 2012 12:36
Big Government ? @biggovt 

The Conscience Mandate and the Battle Within the Catholic Church: The archbishop of New York, Cardinal Timothy D... http://bit.ly/A1qovN

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:56
Big Government ? @biggovt 

Liberal War On Women: Leahy Stalls Bill To Track Down Fugitive Sex Offenders: In March 2011, Senator Jeff Sessio... http://bit.ly/GDA3ux]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An open letter to Sandra Fluke:</p>
<p>Remember the old saying: &#8220;You&#8217;ve come a long way Baby&#8221; ?</p>
<p>Well, guess what&#8230;. You&#8217;ve REGRESSED a long way Baby&#8230;<br />
&#8230; if you have to depend on the ultimate &#8220;Man&#8221; (Government, or anyone/anything else) to pay for your Pills!!!</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve long abandoned any notion of the original Feminist philosophy.</p>
<p>GROW UP, get a job, PAY FOR YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITIES!!!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Sunday, March 18, 2012 9:05<br />
Heritage Foundation ? @Heritage </p>
<p>Gimmicks Won?t Resolve HHS Mandate?s Religious Liberty Assault http://herit.ag/RkU</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Sunday, March 18, 2012 9:11<br />
TheBlaze.com ? @theblaze </p>
<p>#WeeklyRecap: American Indian Tribe Given OK to Kill Two Bald Eagles for Religious Purposes http://tblz.us/9IDT9 via @theblaze</p>
<p>The Obama administration wants this story trumped up &#8211; all part of their games of &#8216;guilt by BROAD association&#8217;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Another salvo in Obama&#8217;s WAR ON RELIGION. Just another ploy. This is their attempt to imply that all Religions would be about &#8216;sacrifices in blood&#8217; if left to their own devices and why ALL Religions must be shunned, or at least CONTROLLED!!!!!</p>
<p>Do NOT let them play this game. You know better! Inform others of the games Obama and his minions are playing.</p>
<p>Oh, but we forget&#8230; There is one Religion (see: Liberals&#8217; Religion is Government) that REQUIRES Human Child sacrafice &#8211; that is, of course, the Cult known as the Democrat Party and there demands for Abortion of Children as part of their worship!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Monday, March 19, 2012 12:36<br />
Big Government ? @biggovt </p>
<p>The Conscience Mandate and the Battle Within the Catholic Church: The archbishop of New York, Cardinal Timothy D&#8230; http://bit.ly/A1qovN</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:56<br />
Big Government ? @biggovt </p>
<p>Liberal War On Women: Leahy Stalls Bill To Track Down Fugitive Sex Offenders: In March 2011, Senator Jeff Sessio&#8230; http://bit.ly/GDA3ux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I gave RedState a shout-out in mentioning my/this diary while on #RedEyeRadio (formerly, Midnight Radio Network) and now a shout-out to anyone who surfed in to see the post from hearing about it on RedEyeRadio.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave RedState a shout-out in mentioning my/this diary while on #RedEyeRadio (formerly, Midnight Radio Network) and now a shout-out to anyone who surfed in to see the post from hearing about it on RedEyeRadio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it does NOT have to be the first (and is NOT the only) option and other treatments for what is &quot;wrong&quot; can, could, should, be addressed by those other methods FIRST. For the exceptions and where it is the only, or &quot;supposed&quot; best option, it can be covered but by APPLICATION (on appeal, even if necessary) with a Second Opinion - rather than handed out like Candy using any &quot;convenient excuse&quot; rather than real diagnosis for an issue/problem.

Frankly, IMO, it should NOT otherwise be covered because its primary design is NOT to cure any actual disease. Again, if the &quot;supposedly&quot; only option for a treatment, it can then be covered if the Doctor and Patient are willing to sign on the dotted line of a FRAUD PREVENTION statement it is truly required - then it could be provided (WITH CO-PAY)!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it does NOT have to be the first (and is NOT the only) option and other treatments for what is &#8220;wrong&#8221; can, could, should, be addressed by those other methods FIRST. For the exceptions and where it is the only, or &#8220;supposed&#8221; best option, it can be covered but by APPLICATION (on appeal, even if necessary) with a Second Opinion &#8211; rather than handed out like Candy using any &#8220;convenient excuse&#8221; rather than real diagnosis for an issue/problem.</p>
<p>Frankly, IMO, it should NOT otherwise be covered because its primary design is NOT to cure any actual disease. Again, if the &#8220;supposedly&#8221; only option for a treatment, it can then be covered if the Doctor and Patient are willing to sign on the dotted line of a FRAUD PREVENTION statement it is truly required &#8211; then it could be provided (WITH CO-PAY)!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregInFla</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>GregInFla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That should make all those healthcare-advocates happy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should make all those healthcare-advocates happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[your contention has no basis in reality.

If someone wants contracetption, they can, could, should, pay for it entirely out of their pocket. IF it is indeed deemed NO OTHER WAY TREATABLE, then Contraception can, could, and should, be covered by WRITTEN APPLICATION ACCEPTION (sworn Doctor statements, 2nd opinions, etc) then covered. 

There are APPEAL process&#039; and procedures for such rare cases. It should NOT be automatically covered so casually! Same with ED pills, give me a break - NOT reproducing while one is UNHEALTHY and/or unfit is a NATURAL protective feature of the Human body. Other Meds are available for those other illnesses/concerns one &quot;supposedly&quot; gets these pills for also. Same APPEAL/exceptions should be made!

This is how it is done with several Drugs regarding various &quot;illnesses!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your contention has no basis in reality.</p>
<p>If someone wants contracetption, they can, could, should, pay for it entirely out of their pocket. IF it is indeed deemed NO OTHER WAY TREATABLE, then Contraception can, could, and should, be covered by WRITTEN APPLICATION ACCEPTION (sworn Doctor statements, 2nd opinions, etc) then covered. </p>
<p>There are APPEAL process&#8217; and procedures for such rare cases. It should NOT be automatically covered so casually! Same with ED pills, give me a break &#8211; NOT reproducing while one is UNHEALTHY and/or unfit is a NATURAL protective feature of the Human body. Other Meds are available for those other illnesses/concerns one &#8220;supposedly&#8221; gets these pills for also. Same APPEAL/exceptions should be made!</p>
<p>This is how it is done with several Drugs regarding various &#8220;illnesses!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowshooze</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>snowshooze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State your premises and positions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State your premises and positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lapert</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>lapert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually there are various issues related to the menstrual cycle among other things that warrant contraceptive pills as medical treatment. It isn&#039;t theory and even the Catholic Church, per Humanae Vitae #15, is ok with their use in those circumstances.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually there are various issues related to the menstrual cycle among other things that warrant contraceptive pills as medical treatment. It isn&#8217;t theory and even the Catholic Church, per Humanae Vitae #15, is ok with their use in those circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowshooze</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>snowshooze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the benefit? 
  I agree in theory. I do. 
 But then we have to lay them out as a solid foundation. 
  Are you up for that?
  If so, we best get started right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the benefit?<br />
  I agree in theory. I do.<br />
 But then we have to lay them out as a solid foundation.<br />
  Are you up for that?<br />
  If so, we best get started right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonnman</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>bonnman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are numerous diseases, some lifelong, that would make pregnancy for a woman life threatening where the woman or the baby would have no chance of survival. This is by no means the vast majority of contraception use but it most definitely is healthcare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are numerous diseases, some lifelong, that would make pregnancy for a woman life threatening where the woman or the baby would have no chance of survival. This is by no means the vast majority of contraception use but it most definitely is healthcare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregInFla</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/2012/02/08/the-contraception-deception/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>GregInFla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/jlenarddetroit/?p=961#comment-421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And does not belong with &quot;Healthcare&quot;. It does not help fight any sickness or disease, and lack of it does not directly adversely affect one&#039;s health. It&#039;s like requiring health plans to cover methadone for those who decide to voluntarily take heroin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And does not belong with &#8220;Healthcare&#8221;. It does not help fight any sickness or disease, and lack of it does not directly adversely affect one&#8217;s health. It&#8217;s like requiring health plans to cover methadone for those who decide to voluntarily take heroin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
