« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Thermopylaeing the Republican Party

I just turned one of the most famous Greek battles into a verb. Let me just enjoy that accomplishment for a moment.

Before I go on, full disclosure: my personal beliefs on abortion and gay marriage are not up for debate. I am very certain you and I disagree on some social issues, but as Mr. Erickson pointed out to me earlier today, the Republican party is more diverse on the issues than the Democrats are. But, anyway, back to the point.

What do I mean by that? “Thermopylaeing?” Well, after Tuesday’s election, everyone looked for someone or something to blame. I, for one, blamed my brother, who opened the Necrominicon, but I digress. Almost immediately, everyone turned to social conservatism and the wacky antics of Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock. These two, if you’ve been living under a particularly sound-proof rock, caught a lot of national recognition for their beliefs on abortion, and it’s believed they cost themselves their own race and had a hand in ruining the race for Mitt Romney.

Sure, to an extent, they did hurt things a bit. The president’s campaign used women’s health issues as a way to gather the women to his side. He did that with various issues, actually, and look at the coalition he amassed. A liberal friend of mine pointed something out on the day before the election that at the time I thought was just her “hatin’” as the kids these days (read: my generation) say. But after Tuesday, I realized how right she was.

“Just saying… you don’t see many who aren’t white and male in that Romney rally footage…”

She was  right, actually, and it bothers me. So, what does Greece have to do with this?

For those of you who don’t know your history or didn’t see Gerard Butler die heroically but tragically while his wife stabbed that jackass senator (I mean, who hasn’t wanted to do that?), Thermopylae was one of the most famous Greek battles, like, ever. 300 (that movie I referenced) Spartan troops stood against the Persians, defending their land until every man was cut down. It was heroic, but they were slaughtered. The strategy was to funnel the Persians into a narrow valley and take out more than that tiny group could have in an open field.

There is a large number of people calling for the removal of social conservatives from the Republican party if they are to have a chance at winning elections. While I am no mathematician (seriously, I’m a journalist and sociologist), I do understand this. If you are standing in front of a large army made up of a ton of smaller groups, it does not make sense to turn around to your own army, look at the biggest group on your side and say “Go home guys. We got this.”

Why, when facing a coalition of Democrat/Obama supporters are we telling our guys to go away? If they can get a coalition of different bases who, when you think about it, have little in common and some borderline don’t like each other, why can’t we? Because Obama already has them? Do you think they’re going to stick with the Democrats when Obama steps down? Do you think that Biden is the successor to Obama’s legacy? You see, for a party’s lineage to continue, there needs to be a successor. Biden cannot do it. He’s old as it is and Stonewall Jacksoned (I am turning so many historical things into verbs today!) his own side too much. Hillary? Nope. Reid? I can’t even type out his name in this situation with a straight face. Pelosi? Plastic surgery has ensured she can never have a straight face.

Don’t chase away your own. Band together and fight. We won big in 2010. We can do it in 2014. With the way the political pendulum works, we can do it in 2016 and make a big difference.

Lastly, I want to say this because this, too, has bothered me: In the great timeline of nations, not once has a 4-8 year period made a difference on its own. There has never been a span of less than a decade that has been directly responsible for the downfall of a nation. It is always a series of decades, with one thing after another crushing the nation and its government. We are far from that point. We can recover, and we will.

Don’t lose patience. Round three is coming up.

 

————————

See this post and others of mine here. Follow me on Twitter: @joec_esquire

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    But after Tuesday, I realized how right she was. “Just saying… you don’t see many who aren’t white and male in that Romney rally footage…”

    Actually, it’s garbage and BS.Romney’s 60 million votes included tens of millions of women, millions of hispanics and blacks, and many Jews and diversity of people of all faiths. And a portion of them helped the campaign and showed at rallies etc. When you go to small-town Ohio or Iowa, though, you get the people there.

    Now, it is true that Obama’s coalition is ‘multi-cultural’ but has seemed to skip rural, gun-owning, white-bread, flyover America. And so, yeah, the people that Obama looks down on as bitter clingers are the backbone of Romney’s / GOP support. And since Obama has been tough on breadwinners, its not surprising that men have taken in particularly hard.

    If we are to win, we need to use the politics of addtion not subtraction. Keep the social conservatives, but bring on board more diversity, more of those who for whatever reason saw something in Obama.

    Just sayin’ (you can pass this on…)

    • runner12

      I do agree with FT here. While I like most of your points, your lib friend was quite wrong. Romney actually close the gender gap significantly.

      • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

        More specifically (see stats on my diary “It was GOTV after all”), Romney lost single women 2 to 1. Romney won married women and won white women.

        So … there were probably no low-income single black women at the Romney rallies.

  • runner12

    I made a similar point to a poster earlier. The ole “blame the socon” argument no longer holds water. The reality is that we make up a large portion of the GOP base that will not be replaced. This notion that if we all of the sudden go socially liberal, people will vote for us is foolish and short-sighted. In the end, if both parties look similar people vote for the one that gives them free stuff. Not to mention that the very demographic we must make inroads with are largely socially conservative. Remember we lost the last two elections with moderates. So can we officially kill this meme?

    The issues we have are deeper than this silly argument. First, our GOTV needs serious overall and we need new consultants who are competent in running a good campaign. I feel sorry for Romney and Ryan that they were bamboozled by such jokers. Secondly, we need to make a concerted effort to reach out to minorities and not simply write them off as hopelessly Democrat.

    Some numbers coming out of Breitbart/Judicial Watch (here:http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/08/What-the-Breitbart-Judicial-Watch-Poll-Means) are both sobering and encouraging. Most Americans agree with our governing philosophy, but do not trust either party. We have done a horrible job of educating people about Conservative principles and how it benefits them. We need to help the dependency class out if their dependency through education about how dependency cripples opportunity and growth.

  • Bill S

    Married women favored Romney by 5 percentage points. Single women were his weak spot, and I’d submit that has more to do with age than gender.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      Yeah, we should / could break it down by income, age and ethnic group.
      I’d bet it will turn out to be the young and/or minority single women.

      Romney lost single women 2 to 1.
      Romney won married women and won white women.

  • federalfarmer1

    Social conservatives are the Republican party. My prediction is that further analysis will show Romney lost because he screwed over Ron Paul supporters/libertarians who then stayed home, and because social conservatives did not turn out as usual because of his pro-choice history/Romneycare/Mormonism.

    • runner12

      I would go with the former more than the latter. Evangelicals turned out more for Romney than McCain, so I do not think it was socons who stayed at home. But the RP supporters/libertarians, maybe.

    • revtm

      Paul supporters voted, Gary Johnson had strong numbers, It was regular old republicans who did not vote. Hamilton County, Ohio, the area around Colorado Springs, thats what cost us this election. Period.

      • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

        “Gary Johnson had strong numbers,”
        And this helped defeat Obama how?!? Doh!
        (Actually, no he didnt have strong numbers.)

        • revtm

          actually Gary Johnson had strong numbers for a third party candidate. The Ron Paul folks werent voting with us, its a bigger tease than Pennsylvania. Regular old republicans lost this for us, the birthplace of the Pro-Life movement Hamilton County, OH, shit the bed. Colorado Springs didnt come out.

  • MiamiDave

    You hit the nail on the head, Joesquire. Conservative values are a bedrock of the Party, and social conservatives are at the heart of the movement. As I noted in a few other threads today, the problem in 2012 with social conservatives wasn’t the message, it was the messenger: that is, we let the left-wing media define what it meant to be a social conservative, instead of defining it ourselves through artful and articulate socially conservative candidates who could speak to the noble ideals that our values represents. We can’t make that mistake again. Our values are OUR values; they do not belong to the Left to mock and twist. In the future, we must make sure we define our values before they do.

  • crimsonchampion

    “Pelosi? Plastic surgery has ensured she can never have a straight face.”

    Best line in your post.

  • Pingback: Wai Youngren

  • Pingback: Paul Cozzy

  • Pingback: Errol Christensen

  • Pingback: Desire Even

  • Pingback: Car Forum

  • Pingback: alcoholic beverages

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: Investment House

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: alcohol distilling

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: portal randkowy

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: rubinetti prezzi

  • Pingback: Our mma blog

  • Pingback: weddings in italy

  • Pingback: Virus

  • Pingback: Why Not Check Here

  • Pingback: You Could try these out

  • Pingback: You Can Try This Out

  • Pingback: bgdfgdfgdfgdf

  • Pingback: breastactives pills

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: Sink for sale

  • Pingback: madamlux

  • Pingback: working from home jobs uk

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Zachery Tesar

  • Pingback: haccp zachodniopomorskie

  • Pingback: breaking events

  • Pingback: Wilmer Ammirati

  • Pingback: Store Fixture Installations

  • Pingback: lecteur datamatrix

  • Pingback: growing aloe vera

  • Pingback: Angla Dallam

  • Pingback: meio ambiente

  • Pingback: active instagram followers

  • Pingback: Dumpster Deliveries

  • Pingback: Dumpster Rentals

  • Pingback: [5]

  • Pingback: cv

  • Pingback: cv

  • Pingback: Angla Dallam

  • Pingback: Clint Lamberton

  • Pingback: weight loss diet

  • Pingback: babys r us registry

  • Pingback: land of nod weebly

  • Pingback: free annual credit report

  • Pingback: Youtube Make Money

  • Pingback: bear grylls messer

  • Pingback: Solavei

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: make money online

  • Pingback: cheapest car insurance

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: Mario Lemp

  • Pingback: the green coffee

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Medical Practice Marketing

  • Pingback: California outsourcing

  • Pingback: sexy latina babe

  • Pingback: weight loss diet

  • Pingback: texas driver education

  • Pingback: Medical Marketing

  • Pingback: http://ldlhdlcholesterollevels.org/

  • Pingback: Vernia Slappy

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: HarleyDyse.com

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: psn

  • Pingback: hair loss treatment for men

  • Pingback: Justin Bolner

  • Pingback: Enoch Stewert

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: lida satis

  • Pingback: scrapbooking

  • Pingback: Visit Website

  • Pingback: Scooters

  • Pingback: Wilhemina Walin

  • Pingback: Lloyd Biehn

  • Pingback: extreme weight loss

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: wellness

  • Pingback: darmowa strona randki