« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Three Step Prescription To Restore America’s Fiscal Health

They say, “feed a cold, starve a fever.”  This might be the best advice America could take to restore its fiscal health.  America’s politicians are deathly ill with spending fever and they’re infecting the rest of the nation with it.  The only viable solution is to starve that fever and here is my three point prescription plan to make that happen.  If Congress and the President will follow even a portion of this advice, the nation will get on the road to recovery faster than if it had gone to a faith healer at a tent revival.

Step One – Eliminate the federal income tax.  Let taxpayers file one return with their state, then have each state pay the federal government a fixed percentage of the income tax it collects.  This would eliminate the social engineering and special interest provisions that make a copy of the federal tax code heavier than a main battle tank.*

Step Two – Conduct a 10th Amendment audit.  While the federal government has been delirious with spending fever, it’s wandered well outside the lines of authority granted by the Constitution.  The Constitution has a list of “must do” and “may do” functions that the federal government is charged with conducting.  The 10th Amendment says any other functions are the responsibility of the states.  Conduct a wall-to-wall audit and transfer unauthorized functions from the federal government to the states, then let the states decide if they want to continue each function, modify it, or eliminate it.

Step Three – Conduct an audit of foreign aid spending.  The Secretary of State announced this morning that she wants $200,000,000 additional humanitarian aid for Syrian rebels, meanwhile 10’s of thousands in New York and New Jersey still have no electricity.  We’re borrowing money from Red China to give to nations who do not consider the US a friend.  This is insanity.  International friends are made through good foreign policy, not cash payoffs.  Foreign aid is out of control.

Could our government leaders even consider any of these three steps?  Possibly, if there are still any elected leaders who remember that their job is to represent the views and needs of their constituents when at work in Washington, not represent the needs of Washington during those rare visits home to visit their continuants.

 

* I know you engineers and Methodists are wondering how much a tank actually weighs – an M1 Abrams main battle tank weighs a little over 67 tons.

COMMENTS

  • norris

    I think you have been reading my mind . This makes sense without the debt problem we gave money to Egypt and Libya and the US is worse off for it. The NEA educates no student but dictates which books are bought for the country. If everyone is thinking the same thing somebody is not thinking. The tenth amendment is our protection against tyranny .

    • John Liberty

      Thanks for the comment!
      My original inspiration was simple reduction in duplicative activities, such as collection of income taxes. The federal tax code OBVIOUSLY exceeds Constitutional authority in the way it favors one tax payer over another due to personal spending habits, etc. I’m not proposing a “flat tax” or implementation of the much-discussed “fair tax.” I’m just saying that the tax collection process has become too corrupt and too expensive. Those problems get worse when we pile on un-Constitutional activities and stupid spending at the federal level. The 10th Amendment sought to handle that, but politicians ignore it as they build their Washington power base at the expense of the citizen.

      • norris

        Why should federal tax money that was collected from Ohio be used to control the state . We are lucky to get back 20 cents on the dollar after the feds take what they want.

        • John Liberty

          My plan is to keep those dollars in the state and send up to the federal government only what it needs to run federal functions. It seems stupid to send tax money to Washington, then get that same money back for police, schools, etc. after Washington has taken a big bite out of it. Time to cut out the middle man.

  • rickredfrog

    What you have there, before you even get to step two, is a recipe for essentially eliminating the federal government. If each state pays the federal government only a percentage of the income tax it takes in, then there is a great incentive to replace state income taxes with other sorts of revenue sources, such as sales taxes. And to the extent that states would still collect income taxes, you haven’t eliminated concerns about special interest provisions, you’ve just transferred them to the state level.

    So that takes care of about half of what the federal government takes in, with the lion’s share of the remainder being payroll taxes. At most the federal government that’s still in place is merely a bureaucracy administering Social Security and Medicare. Nothing else, really.

    If you want to do away with the federal government, just say so — don’t couch it in terms restoring fiscal health or putting the country on the road to recovery.

    • John Liberty

      Thanks for the comment.

      If you think I’m out to eliminate the federal government, you read someone else’s article. In my step 2, I specifically say there should be a wall-to-wall audit to confirm that Constitutional mandates are being met and that un-Constitutional functions are transferred to the states so that states can decide what to do with them. Although I would continue programs like Medicare and Social Security, I suggest moving administration of those programs to the state level with built-in portability features. There would still need to be a federal office to oversee administration, but I’d put the actual service delivery organizations at the state level where citizens can keep a better watch on them.

      My plan does not call for the elimination of any tax except the federal income tax. States would be free to tax their citizens in any way they choose as long as they contribute the state’s fair share to the federal budget and the federal government would be free to continue collecting other taxes as appropriate. I would envision that the individual would see their state tax bill multiply by a factor of 3 or 4 when their federal income tax goes to $0. The net amount each taxpayer pays might not go down initially, but they would only need to file one return and the cost at the federal level would be eliminated.
      I was asked if all the millionaires might establish residence in states with the lowest state income tax rates. They could do this, but having more millionaires in a state would raise the amount the state would have to contribute to the federal budget, therefore the states would need to adjust their rates to near what other states are charging anyway.

      My plan calls for tax savings through elmination of un-Constitutional spending, transfer of programs to state control, and a reduction in wasteful spending. Taxes should certainly be collected sufficiently to cover proper government expedictures.

  • left

    I would like to understand your plan better. Could you expand on the details? Regarding step one, could you detail out

    a) How it would work. Do all states pay equally, or is it population based, etc. Does the federal government still send money to states? For instance, would Mass still send money to the feds, while Alabama still takes money, or would that change.

    And b) how does this eliminate the social engineering and special interests? I really don’t see how it changes that, but I would LOVE to change that, so please do go on.

    • John Liberty

      Thanks for reading my plan!

      In my step 1, each state would determine the details of how their citizens are taxed, e.g. whether or not they have a mortgage interest deduction, what their tax brackets/marginal rates would be, etc. How much each state contributes to the federal government could be based on the size of each state’s economy relative to other states, or some other method deemed fair among the states.

      I didn’t address the question of the federal government collecting taxes only to redistribute that money back to the states. However, that would be at least reduced by implementing step 2, transferring many federal programs to state control, thus removing the need for the federal government to collect taxes for those programs from the start.

      My plan eliminates social engineering and the influence of special interests, or at least reduces it, by placing tax policy at the state level where it is more visable to taxpayers. Not a perfect solution, but better than having politicians in far-away Washington adding tax riders onto bills that on the surface have nothing to do with taxes.
      ,

  • Pingback: Three Step Prescription To Restore America’s Fiscal Health | American Political Blogs Watch

  • Pingback: Nilda Zeman

  • Pingback: Heriberto Woolwine

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: distilling tequila

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: portal randkowy za darmo

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: distilled vinegar

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: strona z randkami

  • Pingback: girls in white dresses

  • Pingback: wedding planner toscana

  • Pingback: moonshine recipes

  • Pingback: Tune Up

  • Pingback: Check Here

  • Pingback: Check This Out

  • Pingback: breastactives breast enhancement pills

  • Pingback: Lamps for sale

  • Pingback: work from home uk

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Ruben Vossen

  • Pingback: Darwin Glatt

  • Pingback: Store Fixture Installers

  • Pingback: aloe vera side effects

  • Pingback: curriculum vitae

  • Pingback: cv wzór

  • Pingback: Sidney Chandsawangbh

  • Pingback: Shellie Spitler

  • Pingback: Darryl Domiano

  • Pingback: Marie Zable

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Logan Poynton

  • Pingback: unknown phone number search

  • Pingback: Darron Zarro

  • Pingback: Donnie Hueftle

  • Pingback: Antonio Lishman

  • Pingback: tailor made uniform

  • Pingback: Eugena Janower

  • Pingback: Eleonore Rhodd

  • Pingback: Scooters

  • Pingback: Erin Mcneff

  • Pingback: Jim Dant

  • Pingback: Investment House

  • Pingback: Kenton Yunk

  • Pingback: distilling alcohol

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: randka