« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Medieval America: A Nation On The Brink Of Revolution

The President Has Run Out of Flour

There is a real and visible disconnection between the American people and its leaders.  It’s as if they live in separate universes, the latter snug in luxury accommodations paid for with the labor of the former.  While thousands of hurricane victims suffer with no electricity, the President plays golf.  While many elderly struggle to live within the simple means provided by an endangered Social Security system, government employees and federal elected officials enjoy the guaranteed income and benefits of the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS).  It appears that America has functionally become medieval Europe.

Medieval America takes its sociopolitical heritage from ruling classes of days gone by.  From the Senators of the Greek Republic to the royals dethroned by the French Revolution, those who held power usually maintained it, for a period of time, by mastering the art of controlling the masses.  Using strategies like agrarian reform, progressive tax systems, and government sponsored charities, ruling classes have given the masses just enough social and financial medicine to sedate them into allowing their governance to continue.

Then, in the late 1700’s, Marie-Antoinette, Queen consort of France’s Louis XVI, is said to have responded with “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche” (“let them eat cake”) when told there was no more flour to make bread for the poor.  Although historians say there is no evidence that she ever actually said this,* today’s political class should take a lesson from it.  Making promises to the masses and then not delivering on them seldom ends well for those in government.  One way or another, the masses will affect a change in leadership.

Marie-Antoinette met the guillotine in October 1793.

In Medieval America today, the President seeks to solve every financial problem – from feeding the poor to eliminating the nation’s massive, unsustainable debt – by raising taxes on the rich.  This is a trick being played on the American people and the results of the recent election may indicate that it worked.  The President and his advisors know that if they confiscated the total wealth of America’s hated 1% it would barely make a dent in the national debt.  It would, instead, cause further economic recession as the rich are forced to liquidate or reduce investments to pay additional taxes, thus taking capital out of the market that is normally used to create and grow companies of all sizes that provide jobs.

The “Tax The Rich” mantra gained another term for the President, but the shine on the apple won’t last.  Medieval America will discover within a year or two that 1) taxing the rich is not a real solution to America’s short or long term financial problems, it is a fraud, and 2) the President is out of flour.

And so America will soon be on the brink of another revolution.  Its leaders have lied to stay in power, creating unrealistic expectations for the masses, especially swing voters who vote with their wallets.  The fraud will be discovered and America will be thrown into further economic distress.  “Tax the rich” will fall on disbelieving ears as the results of this failing strategy are brought to light.  The seeds of revolution have been planted by the very government that will fall to it.

The coming revolution will not be peaceful.  To unseat the current administration, Americans must work together without regard for political party affiliation to understand the fraud and find common ground to move the country forward.  It will not be easy.  The President and his political machine have mastered voter fraud, fear mongering, and dirty tactics.  Those who would follow this President will embrace his methods.  They will hide the results of their fraud as long as they can, and when it comes to light they will deflect blame to the most convenient target available, friend or foe.  But it won’t work for long.

The President will soon run out of flour and the masses will feel the pains of hunger and regret.  Truth will spread throughout the land and the revolution will grow.  In 2014 and 2016, revolutionary soldiers of all backgrounds and beliefs will join together and engage the one weapon that America uses better than any other nation to secure its rights and freedoms – one man, one vote (women, too).

 

Mai les Etats-Unis d’Amérique vivent longtemps et prospèrent.

***

*French historians say more evidence exists that “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche” was actually uttered by Marie-Therese, wife of Louis XIV, about 100 years earlier.  But the circumstances and political lesson remain similar.

COMMENTS

  • Ausonius

    Italian novelist and “semiotician” Umberto Eco several decades ago noticed the possibility of the “medievalization” of America from assorted signs. (Semiotics is the study of small and large signs and symbols produced by a society.)

    Things like the rise of gated, walled communities in suburbs, analogous to the walled towns of the Middle Ages to keep out barbarians: in our case, the barbarians are the criminal classes. Another aspect is the unification of international elites, where multi-national corporations have international personnel at the top with more in common with each other than with the “peasants” of the countries where the business elite was born, analogous to the European aristocracy inter-marrying, sending e.g. a German to become a czarina in Russia (Catherine), and an Austrian to become queen of France (Marie-Antoinette).

    Also similar: decaying areas where people used to live, co-existing with areas of some affluence.

    Last but not least: governments attempting to assert central control over those affluent areas for the purpose of taxation.

    • Viet71

      America today is unlike any precedent.

      There is a great deal of personal freedom, assuming one isn’t poor and black. And even for poor blacks, there’s lots of freedom.

      Government invades few lives except through taxation. Damn the 16th Amendment.

      Ausonius, don’t get locked in the past. Today is its own thing.

      • Ausonius

        No, not locked, just cautious! :) Eco is not necessarily right, but may not be completely wrong. To be sure, many many things are different: one is our present medium. Medieval peasants had little to no possibility of quick communication for a general uprising. As a result, revolts were easily quashed since discontented areas could be kept incommunicado and squelched one by one. Plus, 150 million armed pick-up trucks could speak loudly! :)

        • John Liberty

          I can’t believe that anyone is considering an armed uprising in the US. I certainly wouldn’t support it. But a book or TV movie with the high concept – “what if an American president refused to step down at the end of his term?” would provoke a lot of public comment. Would the military take action to defend the Constitution? If so, who would be the Constitutionally-correct civilian authority they would take orders from?

  • DerKrieger

    I believe, as I’ve written about regularly in my diary, that a quick and aggressive to return to federalism can strip the federal government of its usurped powers and act as the catalyst to reestablish our constitutional liberties.

    Most of what the federal government does these days are far removed from its enumerated powers and we’ve turned the constitutional relationship between the federal government and the states on its head.

    When the states created the federal government they didn’t agree to become subservient to it.

    If even half of the solidly Red states banded together to fight federal tyranny just by saying No! the federal government can be put back in its box.

    If that fails then I’m more than ready to divide the country in half so the Leftists can self-destruct without our interference and without taking us down with them.

  • Pingback: grotlopt