« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Crap Is Hitting The Fan Across America

The United States government is in the process of creating “perfect storm” conditions that will increase the amount of violent crime across the country.  More than any other factor, government policies are creating a more dangerous America while at the same time making it more difficult for law abiding citizens to protect themselves.  In other words, the crap is hitting the fan.

A recent example comes from the City of San Bernardino’s City Attorney, James Penman.  In response to questions about why San Bernardino has a crime rate twice the national average for a city its size while employing a police force less than half the size of cities with comparable levels of violent crime, he told citizens at a community meeting in November to “Go home, lock your doors, and load your guns.”  After considerable backlash in the press, Penman followed up his remarks in a recent interview:

“I can understand how people who don’t live or work in the City of San Bernardino and don’t hear the sirens every night, the gun shots, the helicopters overhead, as many San Bernardino residents do, might not understand the significance when you have people being killed in their homes.”

And…

“We need to stop giving people false hope.  We have to start encouraging people to protect themselves. The situation is that bad in San Bernardino.”

Why blame the federal government for violent crime in San Bernardino and elsewhere?  It’s easy to connect the dots.  Here are just a few of the federal policies that are encouraging violent crime in America:

  • Amnesty for illegal aliens.  A City of San Diego police chief once estimated that 75% of street crime in that city is committed by illegal aliens.  Yet the federal government refuses to enforce existing immigration laws and control the most dangerous border crossing areas.
  • Push for restrictions on individual ownership of certain types of weapons.  In other words, gun control advocates want to ban weapons that afford individual citizens the best protection.
  • Expansion of the welfare state.  The number of households receiving government assistance has exploded in the past four years.  But government assistance does two things: 1) provides income without work, affording recipients plenty of free time to get into trouble, 2) provides minimum subsistence that is often supplemented through criminal activity, especially in the days prior to receiving the next payment.1
  • Uncontrolled voter fraud.  Voter fraud has been around since the founding of the nation, but now it’s out of control.  The current administration refuses to investigate precincts where votes counted are 120% or more of registered voters, where poll workers were documented illegally influencing votes, or where GOP candidates received no votes despite a good percentage of registered Republicans in the area.  The federal government has also taken no action to ensure that members of the Armed Forces serving overseas are guaranteed ballots and that those ballots are counted.  Election results no longer reflect the will of the people, thereby making the entire process a farce and any leaders selected by it illegitimate.

The list goes on to create a lawless environment in which violent crime is encouraged because of the government’s lack of action to discourage it.  Criminals are emboldened by government policies that appear to actually encourage crime.  Until the current administration changes its policies, which is unlikely, or subsequent administrations put new policies in place to safeguard neighborhoods and businesses, America has no choice but to lock its doors and load its guns.

The crap has hit the fan.

 

“Welfare Payments, Liquidity and Crime” Foley, Fritz (Associate Professor, Harvard Business School). VoxEU.  http://www.voxeu.org/article/welfare-payments-and-crime

COMMENTS

  • Nobody’s Business

    A few comments, just to consider:

    1. Much like the indictment of the “rich” by Democrats as the persistently invulnerable oppressors of the middle class, I would contend that even if 75% of street crime is committed by illegal aliens, as a politician, you would find it extremely politically disadvantageous and horribly unfair to punish all illegal aliens (many of whom are very hard-working and will take jobs that you and I wouldn’t even have nightmares about doing) for the actions of a few. This is where Republicans continue to lose face in the eyes of both the *legal* immigrant population and among moderate voters. Furthermore, in cities like Detroit, DC, Camden, Newark, and LA, the vast, vast majority of the crime is committed by perfectly legal, home-grown American citizens. If crap is hitting the fan, I’d say that violent criminals as a whole are to blame, not merely the illegal ones.

    2. I don’t believe that even Democrats truly *want* the expansion of the welfare state, but the issue is that Republican policy-makers have proposed little in terms of effective alternatives to simply mailing the check. Where are the retraining programs for fired employees to expand their skillsets and re-enter the workforce in more demanded ways? Where are the non-monetary (food stamps can be exchanged for cash, so I’m not even counting those) support systems that will actually provide the poverty line and below with non-welfare support, e.g. state-sponsored day care and rehab? While I sympathize with the fact that many people are simply mooching off of the system and have no desire to fix anything, until the Republican aisle proposes more comprehensive reforms to enable those who actually DO want to fix their lives and become productive, contributing members of society, we’re giving Democrats an easy way to justify any and all expansions of the welfare state.

    3. Yes, voter fraud is a problem, and I absolutely agree with Voter ID laws, but I can guarantee you that voter fraud did not account for the margin of victory for President Obama at any level whatsoever. Perhaps it played a more integral part in smaller, county-wide races, but I think the idea that “voter fraud” is seriously that major of an issue as to constitute “crap hitting the fan” is a bit hyperbolic.

    • John Liberty

      1. San Diego police chief who quoted the 75% figure was not an elected politician, he was an appointee hired by the mayor and confirmed by the City Council. He made the quote in response to a reporter’s question at a news conference where he discussed a recent multi-victim murder for which two illegal aliens had just been arrested. He (and I) were not talking about legal aliens, just illegals. Every illegal alien is, by current law, has committed a crime by entering the US illegally, making them a criminal in the pursest sense of the definition.
      2. What happened to the “jobs bills” that President Obama pushed when he came into office? What about his promise to stop exportation of jobs from the US and to stop issuance of H1-B visas to foreign workers who take American jobs and never leave?
      3. The crap has hit the fan. Elections are a shame at every level.

      • Nobody’s Business

        1. They may be “criminals” in the purest sense of the definition, but since when did we prosecute every by-definition criminal? Do you expect a cop to pull you over for speeding for going 3 over? What about states that have bans on multiple sexual positions within your own home? Context matters, and blanket deportation of illegal immigrants is an extraordinarily harsh and Draconian way to deal with a problem that does not require a sledgehammer to solve. Ultimately, you’re never going to simply round up all of the illegals and throw them out of the country anyway, so you might as well find smarter ways to deal with the problem rather than what I would call a rather tunnel-visioned idealist solution that is remarkably unfair to the illegal immigrants who actually are productive members of society.

        2. Telling someone to dig a hole and fill it up (stimulus) is not the same thing as comprehensive poverty management reform. If we (Republicans) are serious about actually trying to find a solution to the expansion of the welfare state, then we need serious ideas that actually solve the problem, not simply (again) unfairly punish people who desperately need help by telling them to get lost. How do you propose that we solve the expansion of the welfare state?

        Obama has absolutely no control over the exportation of jobs to other countries whatsoever, short of the auto bailout which, arguably, was one of the most horrendous methods by which the government kept jobs in the United States ever undertaken. If you think that the outsourcing of jobs to other countries – particularly in manufacturing and first-tier technical sectors – is not completely and utterly the responsibility of the companies that employ effective cost-cutting methods to do so, then you’re looking in the wrong place to find blame. The company I work for utilizes an Indian company as its first-tier technical support response, and does so at a fraction of the cost and with much greater efficiency than it would hiring the same group of American workers for many multiples of the same cost. How do you propose that any government stop that? Why should they?

        Finally, what jobs are illegal immigrants taking from people, exactly, that they would even want to work in the first place? Fruit-picking? Housekeeping? Fast food service? Mowing lawns? The truth is that the vast majority of illegal immigrants aren’t beating out your college-educated son and daughter for their analyst position at the hedge fund – they’re taking the awful jobs that you and I would never want even if we were unemployed. Does it mean that they’re completely in the right by not having any legal citizenship here? Absolutely not, but claiming that they’re taking all kinds of jobs from American citizens is hyperbolic at best.

        3. I think the Republican party has far bigger problems mobilizing enough voters to get into its corner even without voter fraud to consider this a major priority issue.

        Crap may be hitting the fan, but it’s in the realm of national debt, unemployment, inflation, extremely low interest rates, and so on – issues that actually impact our every day lives.

        • John Liberty

          Yes, context matters. Illegals have the opportunity to apply for a visa while in their home country, but choose not to. They disrespect our laws and expect us to do nothing? Here’s another 75% – babies born in Los Angeles County hospitals to illegal aliens. Just a coincidence?

  • mtmnd

    Voter fraud is a core reason the crime rate is high in San Bernardino? Really?
    Absurd arguments like this do more to hurt the conservative movement than help it.

    As for your claim about illegal immigrants and crime in San Diego county, the 75% number is preposterous, whoever said it. If arrest records are any indicator of crime (and they are) the percentage of crimes being committed by illegal immigrants in San Diego County is about commensurate with their population. About 7%. http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sdcounty/region-illegal-immigrants-less-than-percent-of-people-booked-into/article_c5f617c6-cabd-57a0-b83b-ef6dbb7d2561.html

    Conservatives have to start dealing in reality if they are to have any hope of winning future elections beyond stronghold areas.

    In the meantime, perhaps you should change the name of your Diary to “The B.S. is Hitting the Fan.”

    • John Liberty

      Widespread voter fraud is an indication of how badly our “system” polices itself. If the people have no confidence in the honesty of elections, what should they think about the leaders that they’re not sure were honestly elected?
      The 75% street crime number came from the City of San Diego Police Department and included crimes for which an arrest was made plus crimes where a warrant was issued by the suspect had not been arrested. Watch the evening news in San Diego and you’ll see that 7% is an obvious lie.

      • mtmnd

        You say that the 75% number came from SDPD. Can you point me toward the specific document or interview where the claim was made. Because if true that would be astounding. Thanks.

  • dsmurf

    I grew up in Riverside, bordering San Bernardino to the south. I always view the “Inland Empire” of some half a million at last recollection, as a bedroom community to the Los Angeles area. All of the traffic into Los Angeles suburbs is proof that continues to this day. Rush mentioned that 18% of the people provide the taxes needed for California. This is also a ground zero area for the sub prime mortgage debacle. My parent’s home purchased in 1979 for 30k was worth as much as 300k in the mid 2000s- not so much anymore. Fed policies, check out a Bernanke speech from BIS for yourself, are designed to help housing in such areas to reflate, lol.

  • 1stRichard

    The manure has engaged the rotary oscillator on this for a long time. Much of the blame must go toward the loss of our founding values and immigration.

    Our founding values, as written in the MA Constitution by John Adams, second president of the United States who drafted this State Constitution. “As the happiness of a people, and the good order and preservation of civil government, essentially depend upon piety, religion and morality; and as these cannot be generally diffused through a community, but by the institution of the public worship of God….” In proper context, this Individual Conscience must be destroyed so that a collectivist totalitarian doctrine can incarcerate a society. This is well documented in history as well in the official doctrine thereof.

    Immigration, the Jurisdiction Clause may be the most overlooked social contract that applies to all citizens. , Sen. Lyman Trumbull, who inserted the phrase; “The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.” The complete jurisdiction thereof should mean allegiance to our founding values, all of them. Somewhere and somehow, this was separated from Immigration and Citizenship.