« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Biden, check. Palin, checkmate.

Sarah Palin would be an even better VP pick than Mitt Romney

I’ve already shown how Sarah Palin would be a smart pick by John McCain to be his running mate. In light of recent events, she’s looking like a smarter selection .



The announcement made early this morning by the Obama camp that Delaware Senator Joe Biden is Obama’s choice to share the Democrat presidential ticket with him sets the stage for McCain to name his own vice presidential nominee. The conventional wisdom seems to be that it will be former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. Although I think Romney would be a strong selection, the Biden pick would make Gov. Palin an even stronger one.



Within three hours of news of the Biden selection being aired, Team McCain produced and released this hard-hitting ad with video clips of Biden dissing Obama’s inexperience and praising his old friend and Senate colleague, John McCain:

There’s no shortage of similar clips from the GOP primariy season depicting Romney attacking McCain and McCain returning fire. A Romney pick would guarantee that the Democrats would use it and effectively cancel out the impact of the McCain ad. But Palin wasn’t involved in that fight, so there’s no such ammunition for the Obama campaign to use against her. McCain’s ad could run from now through election day, and the Democrats would be denied the opportunity to reply in kind. Instead, Biden would be forced to explain his criticism of his own running mate.



One of Romney’s strongest assets is economics. He was very successful in the private sector and has won acclaim for turning the Winter Olympics in his home state of Utah around. But to most Americans today, “economics” is translated as “oil”. The price of gasoline at the pump and food at the grocery store is what’s on their minds. The financial markets and corporate arenas where Romney earned his creds might as well be on a distant planet. Sarah Palin knows all about oil. She’s an avid proponent of drilling in ANWR and makes a strong case for it.



But Palin is no stooge of Big Oil. She stood up to the oil companies in her state and pushed through a modest 2.5% increase on the state taxes they pay for their access to Alaska’s bountiful oil deposits. That raised the tax from 22.5% to 25%, an amount the companies can pay and still enjoy considerable profits. The oil companies and some of her fellow Republicans had fought against the bill, arguing that the extra 2.5% would would put a damper on future Alaskan oil exploration. That has not been the case. Conservatives don’t like tax-raising, but Palin justified the increase by pointing out that the previous 22.5% tax was passed in 2006 under suspicious circumstances. Several members of the legislature that set the amount of that tax were convicted or indicted on federal bribery charges related to the bill. Palin also explained that the ’06 tax did not perform as advertised, and she offered as evidence an $800 million shortfall in expected revenue. Whether you agree or disagree with Palin’s actions, you have to admit that the Democrats can’t paint her as being in the pocket of Big Oil.



Gov. Sarah has also pushed through her legislature a gas pipeline project which will bring a fresh supply and lower prices to those of us in the lower 48:

The legislature had been trying for 30 years to authorize something like this and, up until now, had blown it. Palin got it through. Getting it off the ground, the state says, will be the biggest construction project in U.S. history.



Palin considers the $26 billion project her biggest accomplishment as governor. “It was not easy,” she told IBD. “Alaska has been hoping and dreaming for a natural gas pipeline for decades. What it took was getting off the dime and creating a competitive market in Alaska.”



The 1,715-mile gas line would stretch from Alaska’s North Slope to Fairbanks and down to Alberta, Canada. Then it would take existing gas lines to Idaho. In 10 years, Palin says, the lower 48 states would receive 4.5 million cubic feet of natural gas a day. By 2030, according to Energy Department estimates, Alaska’s annual natgas production would quintuple to 2 trillion cubic feet.

In light of the inablity of the U.S. Congress to do anything about our energy problem, voters will be favorably impressed with this “can-do” governor and her determination to move the ball downfield on energy. While others talk the problem to death, Sarah Palin has been doing plenty about it.



A McCain-Palin ticket would offer hope to Americans angry over our energy dependence on foreign – and often hostile – sources. It would stand in stark contrast to Obama and Biden, both of whom opposed increased domestic drilling. McCain is for drilling offshore, but has yet to be convinced to embrace drilling in ANWR. Sarah Palin is perhaps the only person who could convince him. McCain-Palin could even adopt a variation on the “Energy for Alaska” theme used by Sarah in her contest for Alaska’s governorship – “Energy for America.” It’s a good one, and it should resonate with American voters who have been strapped for cash by high pump prices, as well as those concerned about America’s energy security. Romney, as good as he is on economic matters, just can’t relate to American voters on energy issues the way Palin can.



Biden is going to be Obama’s attack dog, a role vice presidential picks are usually given so that the presidential candidate’s hands don’t have to be washed. Can Sarah Palin stand up to the crusty old Senator in a fight? It would be a mistake to write her off. Alaska is a tough place, and it demands much of those who choose to live there. Palin has taken on her own party by fighting corruption and using the line item veto to cut the budget, angering Democrats and entrenched Republicans alike. In a piece for the Weekly Standard last year, Fred Barnes wrote:

In the roughly three years since she quit as the state’s chief regulator of the oil industry, Palin has crushed the Republican hierarchy (virtually all male) and nearly every other foe or critic. Political analysts in Alaska refer to the “body count” of Palin’s rivals. “The landscape is littered with the bodies of those who crossed Sarah,” says pollster Dave Dittman, who worked for her gubernatorial campaign.



-snip-



Gov. Palin grew up in Wasilla, where as star of her high school basketball team she got the nickname “Sarah Barracuda” for her fierce competitiveness. She led her underdog team to the state basketball championship. Palin also won the Miss Wasilla beauty contest, in which she was named Miss Congeniality, and went on to compete in the Miss Alaska pageant.

Don’t let that pretty face fool you. She’s tough. I’ll wager that because she was tough enough to take on Alaska’s corrupt pols, she should have no problem with Biden in the VP debate or with bringing the elite Obama down a peg or two.



Palin has another appeal that Mitt Romney just can’t match, and it’s through no fault of his. It’s a matter of gender. Recent polling shows a problem for Obama:

Perhaps the biggest factor keeping the presidential race close has been Obama’s inability to close the deal with some of Hillary Clinton’s supporters. According to the poll, 52 percent of them say they will vote for Obama, but 21 percent are backing McCain, with an additional 27 percent who are undecided or want to vote for someone else.



What’s more, those who backed Clinton in the primaries — but aren’t supporting Obama right now — tend to view McCain in a better light than Obama and have more confidence in McCain’s ability to be commander-in-chief.

Obama’s decision to choose Biden and stiff Hillary has her supporters even angrier right now. By selecting Sarah Palin as his running mate, McCain would show them that he, unlike Obama, doesn’t take women’s votes for granted.



The Democrats are touting Joe Biden’s blue collar roots, which they will exploit to try to continue to define McCain as so out of touch with the average American that “he doesn’t even know how many houses he owns” – nevermind that all members of the Senate are rich, and Biden’s compound is not your average American crib. They will tell us how he had to take second and third mortgages on his house to send his kids to college, and they will have many more stories of Biden as the average Joe.



If McCain chooses him, Romney will be portrayed by the Dems, rightly or wrongly, as a zillionaire who’s out of touch with average Americans. They can’t define Palin that way. Her parents were school teachers. Her husband Todd actually worked for a living in a blue-collar production job for BP on the North Slope for 20 years. And he’s a commercial fisherman in the summer. Todd is also something of an Alaska sports legend, having won the gruelling 2,000-mile Iron Dog snowmobile race four times. Oh, and he raises the kids while mom is working as Alaska’s CEO. The couple’s youngest child has Down’s Syndrome, a condition the doctors made them aware of before its birth. Yet they never even considered abortion, and they say the baby is “a blessing.” The story marks a stunning contrast to the pro-abortion positions of Obama and Biden. Palin is also a lifetime member of the NRA, an organization which has given Biden an F-rating. He even boasted that he wrote the language contained in the assault weapons bill. Romney’s record on gun control is shaky, while Palin’s is rock solid. America’a 80 million gun owners will love her.



The Palin family is a great story waiting to be told to the lower 48 if McCain is wise enough to pick Sarah. Even the drive-by media will be fascinated by it and eager to tell it. As good as Mitt Romney is as a vice-presidential choice, Palin is even better.



-JP

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • dld1717

    I need to find more info on Palin anyone have any clips of her in debates?

    The McCain camp needs to vent her completely though

  • Maggie_in_Indiana

    Jindal/Palin 2012

  • wsjreader

    I wholeheartedly agree. But I doubt McCain has the killer instinct to choose Palin.

    Palin has lots of advantages as you articulately outlined. In addition, as a female, she has a secret weapon. The MSM boy clubs + bambi/biden will no doubt gang up on her, but the beauty is that you can expect huge backlash from every corner, especially from Hillary’s disgruntled female supporters.

    I have argued this for a while, 50% of Hillary’s supporters are still not buying into Obama. This number has not moved one bit since the primary ended. 20% will vote for mccain, 30% are either sitting out or needing a reason for them to pull the lever for mccain. Make no mistake, these Hillary diehards are no fan of Mccain, they just loathe bambi even more. You have to give them a reason to pull the lever for the lesser of two evils. Sarah Palin will be the magic key for them.

  • shadowtax

    Palin is now my choice. She is the perfect candidate for this election cycle. Energy is the number one economic issue of 2008. I cannot think of any other candidate who can speak with as much authority on the subject.

    If Palin does get the nod, McCain will support drilling in ANWR. That issue is so important to Alaskans, I do not see her leaving the state without that quid pro quo.

    Most Americans do not know her. She has a great biography. That is a recipe for an exciting pick.

  • Adam_C

    Because there is no way a major party candidate would choose a VP under investigation during the whole general election time period.

    Even if she is eventually cleared, the first impression on every news show will be “McCain nominates GOV Palin who is under investigation”, “New documents in the Palin Scandal,” and “Will McCain ask Palin to step down over scandal?”

    I like Palin a lot and think she is part of the McCain/Jindal/Palin wing of the party that is serious about fighting corruption, pork and Big Government. But I don’t think she can surmount the fact that all coverage about her would deal with the investigation.

    • Achance

      I’m no great Sarah Palin fan, though, as I did when she ran for Gov, I’d support her.

      The allegations don’t amount to much, mostly inside baseball stuff, the kinda stuff nobody’d notice if a Democrat did it. But, she ran on this political vestal virgin image and she has to live up to it. She’s been waaay to coy with some things and after she denied that any of her staff had anything to do with trying to get the sister’s ex fired, out comes a tape of one of her closest staffers muscleing a supervisor about firing him. She needs to just get the thing over with. Even if she did pressure some people to try to get rid of the guy, most people here think he should have been fired, so they won’t much hold it against her. Another episode of “when you’re in a hole, put down the shovel.”

      • Adam_C

        And I doubt it would prevent re-election unless there is a new twist or turn that we’re unaware of.

        But I think it would dominate coverage of her if she were announced as VP. And that’s a problem regardless of how it affects her in AK.

        • E_Pluribus_Unum

          Mostly I leave you alone to do your thing, Adam. But 1 of these 3 doesn’t have all that much in common with the other 2. Porkbusting and anti-corruption, perhaps.

          But that’s about it, and frankly those are comparatively ancillary issues.

  • Tim_Schieferecke

    But as Adam said, she has that controversy hanging over her right now. Two words explain why it’s not a good idea to promote a candidate with any ongoing controversy. (George Allen) The media will have her painted as a skin head by the time they’re done with her. Their credibility means nothing to them anymore. I’m starting to think Kay Baily Hutchinson might be a good choice for McCain.

  • bk

    Won’t the MSM invent some reason that whoever McCain picks is “controversial”?

    • Tim_Schieferecke

      I have a feeling the whole controversy was blown out of proportion to pre-empt a Palin pick by McCain. I just don’t want to play Russian Roulette. Palin is a great future candidate, as I believe her current issue is much adeu about nothing, but it’s too risky to take the chance of underestimating anything. An Obama presidency scares the crap out of me.

      • paint_it_red

        the bigger question is whether they will be pissing off fence sitting Clintonistas who don’t like underhanded unfair attacks against women when they do it. Will the MSM piss these women swing voters off in their “controversial” portrayal of Palin? I guarantee it. They will find themselves coming to her defense against the unfair attacks of the more dim-witted MSM members and in doing so, they will find themselves coming to McCain’s side.

        • paint_it_red

          I respectfully disagree.

          George Allen lost because he ran a terrible terrible campaign. He called an ethnic minority “macaca”, which unknown to him, was a racial slur. That moved poll numbers significantly. His staff volunteers then manhandled some protesters at an event and it was captured on camera. Jim Webb won the military vote and ran a pretty disciplined campaign, which even still produced a 0.3% victory.

          Hutchinson has no executive experience, no major credentials which would boost the ticket appeal, and is simply unacceptable to social conservatives.

          • Tim_Schieferecke

            I’m just speaking from a position of fear. I don’t want to see the media successfully destroy her as they did Allen. Heck, they even sprayed the airwaves with the blatant lie that he put a deer head in a black family’s mailbox. They are absolutely capable of doing anything to give Obama cover fire. It is extremely unfortunate that Palin has this issue hanging over her right now, but she does and that can’t be changed. I brought up Hutchinson because I strongly believe McCain would do well to have a woman on the ticket to take advantage of the Obama/Clinton schism.

          • paint_it_red

            That would only backfire. There’s even less substance to that than the alleged McCain affair the NYT and Wash Post ran several months back, and look what happened in the aftermath of that – McCain shot up in the polls, because conservatives hate to see one of their own dragged through the mud unjustifiably by a liberal MSM hit piece. The same happened when they tried hit pieces on McCain for ties to lobbyists back in the 80s.

            So it goes with the pro-women voters who are very very reluctantly supporting Obama right now and would like to make good on their primary threat to vote McCain. They hate to see a women unjustifiably accused and dragged through the mud. The McCain/Palin poll numbers would shoot up. The real reason these allegations were made against her is that the same corrupt party political machinery she helped to take down were desperate to sling some mud back. Look at the narrative on this one. It makes no sense to blame her. Her sister had been divorced for several years for goodness sake. If there were any documents that could have been unearthed to bring about her demise, that would have happened by now. And, her poll numbers, not surprisingly, remain astronomically high. As she herself said when asked by a reporter, “it should not be an issue because I’ve done nothing wrong.”

            And, every veep candidate has minuses. But every major portion we need of our base and the independents, and the Clintonistas are going to love her. She’s perfect for 2008. There is no other ethics reform champion / porkbuster champion / social conservative / fiscal conservative veep choice out there, man or woman.

          • paint_it_red

            And I see your point of view on the “controversy” too. But there’s just nothing there. Any pick will have some risk and a media army coming after us. But this issue has been vetted already. I don’t think the media can make into an issue, and I think the more they try, the more women they drive into our camp.

            And just wait for Biden’s diarrhea of the mouth and brain to lead him to say something stupid to insult Palin that will be generally offensive to women.

          • Tim_Schieferecke

            I’m feeling better about Palin’s issue now. She is absolutely a great Governor, and I like fighters that have no remorse about ruffling feathers. I hadn’t thought of the blow back angle you mentioned. I was royally pissed off at what they did to George Allen in ’06 as I am a huge fan of his. My MSM fears are probably blown out of proportion. Have a good one.

          • Adam_C

            They are the ones who want to buck the old system of paying to play and pleasing those who pay for earmarks. The oppose those roots of corruption that have stymied most of the conservative agenda.

            I’d throw other people on the list but they aren’t in the running this time around (Sanford, DeMint, Kyl, Coburn).

  • ZootSuit

    I think she has a great future and think she will be a front-runner in 2016 but putting her on the ticket in 2008 would be a disaster. First, there is the “scandal” of her involvement with her (former?) brother-in-laws firing. That is exactly what will dominate the headlines from the moment she is nominated to the second the last ballot is cast.

    Second, putting the less-than-one-term governor of a state with a smaller population than the neighborhood I grew up in in Chicago makes a mockery of all claims that Obama is not qualified. Frankly, I do not believe that Obama is qualified; I am not going to be a hypocrite and start arguing that Palin is just because I agree with her politics.

    Quite frankly, I think everyone who is claiming that Palin should be McCain’s VP pick to gain Clinton’s disgruntled women supporters is a hypocrite. Despite their hemming-and-hawing to the contrary, they’re just playing the same old gender/racial identity politics that they condemn Democrats for. And if they are going to play that game, I might as well vote for Obama. My new motto might just as well be:

    Voting Obama 2008, because RedState has taught me that identity politics is what really matter!

    • bk

      HRC supporters don’t like BHO and would like any excuse to vote against him.

      • gamecock

        strong argument man

        • WOSG

          In that if the Veep is criticized it is still just a veep.

          The palin firing issue is pretty small potatoes.

          • wpc

            It’s just that we identify with people’s ideals and values instead of gender and the amount of melanin that someone possesses.

            I don’t think taking advantage of the opposition’s flaws in this regard is hypocritical. Somewhat pragmatic, yes.

            I do understand what you are saying, I admire the ideological purity of it. But if the candidate has good conservative ideals, and would do a good job, I don’t think it wrong to look at how electable they are.

  • Hammer2008

    A good (and healthy amount) of Gov. Sarah Palin’s background can be found here , here and also with that classic housewives’ gone mad touch!

    Consider contacting Sen. McCain at JohnMcCain.com