Why McCain should win Tuesday


Four reasons the MSM won't mention

I believe John McCain will pull off an upset victory in the general election next Tuesday, just as he revived what all the “experts” had said was a dead campaign and went on to win the primaries which earned him his party’s nomination. There are five reasons for my optimism for the McCain-Palin ticket’s chances.

First, the media isn’t really fooling many with their anti-McCain bias. Late in July a Rasmussen poll found that:

49% of voters believe most reporters will try to help the Democrat with their coverage, up from 44% a month ago.



Just 14% believe most reporters will try to help McCain win, little changed from 13% a month ago. Just one voter in four (24%) believes that most reporters will try to offer unbiased coverage.

Americans don’t like it when the media keeps trying to deceive them. Many of them take it as an insult to their intelligence. All they ask of the media is to present useful information about both candidates to them in a balanced and impartial manner so that they can make their own decisions. When someone tries to decide for them, as the media has done, they get very angry with the media, and there is a spillover effect which harms Obama’s campaign.



Also, most polls are not presenting a true snapshot of the voting intentions of the electorate. They oversample Democrats, which exaggerates Obama’s numbers and underestimates McCain’s. The degree of oversampling can range from just a few percentage points to as many as fifteen. So the poll results will vary. Adjust accordingly. You may find that in that poll which shows Obama in the lead, McCain could actually be out front.



Another reason I think McCain should win is Obama campaign hubris. Many Obama supporters have been talking like their guy has already won this thing, and recent news of meetings by the Obama transition team, plans for a big Obama victory celebration and such have done little to dispel the notion that they believe it’s all over but for the coronation. Americans don’t react favorably to such arrogance, and it could have a significant boomerang effect on the Obama campaign. Even Obama’s considerable cash advantage over McCain could work against him in the minds of some voters if they perceive that he’s trying to buy the election.



In addition, there are Obama’s friends. His relationships with the likes of Bill Ayers, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Fr. Michael Phleger, Tony Rezko, Rashid Khalidi and others have been catalogued in “The Real Barack Obama” - a series of twelve videos from Fox News’ Hannity’s America program. Most voters don’t have an encyclopedic knowledge of Obama associations. But only the seeds of doubt need be present in their minds to - at the very least - question the judgment that candidate Obama’s track record has shown. For undecided voters who must choose between the two candidates, that seed of doubt is all that many will need to persuade them that John McCain is the choice with much less risk packed up in his baggage.



Finally, the United States is still a center-right nation. A series of thirteen Battleground polls conducted by a respected and bipartisan partnership confirms that those who consider themselves to be very conservative and somewhat conservative are in the majority. In all thirteen of these polls, the percentage of this majority has been at a consistent 59% to 60%. Liberals, by contrast, have never amounted to more than 38% in the same thirteen polls, which were conducted from June of 2002 to August of this year.



The center-right majority has been rejecting candidates they perceive as liberal for forty years. That’s why Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis and John Kerry failed to win the presidency. Jimmy Carter, who was perceived to be centrist at the time, managed to win one term in 1976 and Bill Clinton won two terms in the 1990s. Al Gore, who was also perceived to be centrist at the time, almost pulled it off in 2000.



The big question is how will they perceive Barack Obama? He has certainly done everything he could do to cast himself in the mold of a moderate, including switching positions on most issues. If enough of the center-right majority aren’t fooled by the moderate Obama veneer, they will vote against him. Recent events have put the spotlight on Obama’s rather leftist ideas on the redistribution of wealth, which a majority of undecided voters frown upon.



In the end, most voters are a risk-averse lot. They will go into the voting booth and, with so many nagging doubts about Barack Obama in their minds, vote for John McCain, a man they’re sure will, like his campaign slogan says, put the country first.



- JP

Category: , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

6 Comments Leave a comment

You only left out one reason, Josh, why McCain will win.

janis Friday, October 31st at 10:27AM EDT (link)

The reason is that so many Dems are voting for John and Sarah, and that’s not an idea that pollsters and the MSM are talking about, or even acknowledging.

You're right.

Josh Painter Friday, October 31st at 10:40AM EDT (link)

And a big part of that reason would be “The PUMA Factor,” which is the topic of my next journal entry.

Thanks,

  • JP

“An armed society is a polite society” - Robert A. Heinlein, “Beyond This Horizon” (1942)

 
 

Polls Shmolls!

bigfoot Friday, October 31st at 10:40AM EDT (link)

I’ve been hammering this the past several weeks. The great Rasmussen polls. Scott is weighing the dems with an 8% advantage.

He doesn’t disclose how he arrived at this. If he’s not correct his poll is utterly meaningless. Let me repeat, meaningless.

Not one pollster has any idea what percentage of dems are gonna crossover.

This is a presidential election. People think differently than state or local elections. We have no precedence. Ergo, no way to predict.

“To believe in nothing is to believe in everything. To believe in everything is to believe in nothing”

Poll weighting...

Josh Painter Friday, October 31st at 12:56PM EDT (link)

is an attempt by the pollster to predict what the electorate will look like on election day. Scott obviously thinks that there will be a high turnout among young and newly-registered Dems.

This goes against historical precedent. In the past, these voters haven’t turned out, even though it is always predicted that they will. “This time will be different,” is what they say, and they say it every fout years.

The reason they believe that this time will really be different is because of the widely-hyped excitement that The One has generated.

But so far, early voting numbers are not backing up this assumption. These young and new voters will have to show up on election day.

personally, I don’t think they will vote in appreciably higher numbers than they did in 2004, which would be bad news indeed for the Obama campaign.

We will see…

  • JP

“An armed society is a polite society” - Robert A. Heinlein, “Beyond This Horizon” (1942)

ACORN

Michael DeWeese Saturday, November 1st at 1:06PM EDT (link)

These ‘young’ and ‘newly’ registered voters are named Micjey Mouse and Donald Duck. They make it appear that there are more dems on the registry than really are. This innacuracy in registered dems is why democratic candidates always poll better in weighted polls that they perform in the election. Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck may be registered as dems, but they don’t vote. This is a psychological warfare method to demoralize republicans and suppress the republican vote.

Well put.

nogyro35 Saturday, November 1st at 1:16PM EDT (link)

Don’t forget Operation Chaos also added to the Democrats’ registration numbers and we all know those voters didn’t temporarily switch parties to vote for Obama.

 
 
 
 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.