Persons of the Year


As John McCain’s running mate in the election of 2008, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was the GOP sacrificial lamb. McCain never really had a chance of winning the White House. Bamboozeled by Barack Obama into accepting public money for his campaign, the Arizona senator was outspent seven to one by the Democrat, who had agreed to also take public funding, but in the first of what would become a series of broken promises, opted to raise money for his campaign the unfettered way. McCain was also distrusted by the conservatives of his party, a group which makes up the lion’s share of its base. The third strike against McCain came from the media which once loved him, but jilted the Republican for a younger, more dynamic and more attractive suitor - Barack Obama.

One of the leading examples of that Obamedia is TIME magazine, which announced its annual Person of the Year award today. To no one’s surprise, the trophy goes to President-elect Barack Obama, The One TIME and its ilk fell in love with and divorced Sen. H-Rod Clinton for. Among the four runners-up is the woman that same media has attacked relentlessly since being named by John McCain as his running mate, Sarah Palin. She shouldn’t feel bad about not being chosen for TIME’s top honors. In 1976, for example, the magazine chose  Jimmy Carter  to receive the honor, and we all know how well that turned out. On the Palin page of its POTY story, Nancy Gibbs writes:

She was not just a governor, but the most popular governor in the country; not just a mom but a mother of five, with a family made for reality TV. And she wasn’t just a running mate; she was a one-woman rescue team for the Republican ticket. Largely unknown but suddenly exalted, she was the perfect wide screen onto which people projected pride and prejudice in equal measure…

Gibbs writes about the tag team that pinned Sarah Palin. Katie Couric, who had trained for the event with Obama advisors, was the first of their number into the ring:

Couric managed a remarkable feat for a woman making $15 million a year: she made herself invisible. She was not the feminist’s avenging anchor or the snide dean of admissions or any of the archetypes she might have been tempted to embrace, given the stakes. She just asked her questions, then asked again, and can you give us just some example — and stayed far enough out of the way that Palin had the stage entirely to herself and proceeded to self-destruct.

Couric was hardly “invisible.” The only invisible actors in Couric’s piece of attack journalism pretending to be a fair interview were the behind-the-scenes video editors who who disassembled Palin’s responses and digitally glued together only the parts Couric required to savage the governor, leaving all context on the proverbial cutting-room floor. True, Sarah did not help her own case when, angered that the See-BS anchor had the gall to ask her what she liked to read (a question a more perky Couric didn’t stoop to ask of Obama, Joe Biden or even McCain in her interviews with them), responded with a flippant answer that, yes, people read all sorts of books and magazine up there in bassackwards Alaska.

Gibbs goes on to credit the rest of the tag team, Tina Fey and the McCain campaign itself. Then the Obamedia writer tosses out some numbers:

On Election Day, voters concluded in exit polls, 60% to 38%, that she was not qualified to be President.

That is a misleading statement. What the exit polls actually showed was that 60% of voters said that Sarah Palin was a factor in their decision of which presidential candidate to mark their ballots for. Of that 60%, people were more likely to vote McCain by a significant margin.

The TIME writer complains that a clear picture of Gov. Palin never emerged:

Everything about Palin seemed personal: an energy policy reduced to “Drill, baby, drill,” an economic policy embodied by Joe the Plumber. We knew too much about her clothes and her kids and her hunting habits and far too little about her priorities and principles.

And whose fault is that? The Obamedia ignored Sarah Palin when she spoke of her commitment to an “all-of-the-above” energy policy that includes not only oil, but clean-burning natural gas, nuclear and alternative sources from wind and solar to hydroelectric and geothermal. When did any drive-by interviewer ask Gov. Palin about how she cut taxes, produced budget surpluses and vetoed wasteful spending? These facts are not Alaska state secrets. The Wall Street Journal says that Gov. Palin’s Alaska is “one of the most financially sound states in the U.S.” Sarah Palin has a record as an able and effective government executive at both the municipal and state levels. If Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric cared one whit about Palin’s priorities and principles, why the devil didn’t they ask her about them when they had the chance? They were too focused on finding ways to portray her in the worst possible light. Gibbs concludes:

Palin may have lost, but she will now be the place where part of her party at least can park its ambitions for the next year or two. That’s not a bad return on a long-shot investment; in the bombed-out no-man’s-land of Republican rivalry, she starts out with a valuable piece of real estate that she was wise to consolidate. The most interesting thing about the evolution of Sarah Palin will be watching who she becomes, and whether she offers a philosophy that is bigger than her personality, a claim to leadership that rests on more than a wink and a promise.

Palin didn’t lose. John McCain, the real drag on the ticket, lost. It was an election he was doomed to lose. Outspent and out-maneuvered by his opponent, not trusted by his party’s base and cast aside by your own profession, he probably could have never won even if the financial meltdown had never happened. Sarah Palin already has a philosophy, Ms. Gibbs. It is one she shares with the late Ronald Reagan — fiscal restraint, a secure America, a smaller and less obtrusive federal government, and traditional values. Your colleagues should have asked her about it, but they were too fixated on the trivial and the art of character assassination. Her claim to leadership rests on a record of genuine accomplishment against overwhelming odds. They should have bothered to look it up.

- JP

Category: , , , , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

39 Comments Leave a comment

Given that all of us were named Persons of the Year

Mike gamecock DeVine Wednesday, December 17th at 1:42PM EST (link)

a few years ago, will this count as Obama’s second such honor?

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 

This is the opening salvo

Mark Malcolm Wednesday, December 17th at 2:02PM EST (link)

of the MSM trashing Sarah Palin ahed of the 2012. I contend they are worried to death she will become a viable candidate and enter the forefront of national politics for the 2012 nomination. I predict a marked rise in attack journalism aimed at marginalizing her before 2010, while the average american politically slumbers.

I may not agree with what you say but I’ll defend your right to say it to the very death.

 

Well freaking done, Josh

Jeff Emanuel Wednesday, December 17th at 2:22PM EST (link)

Outstanding post.

JE

 

With respect to Obama being POTY,

mbecker908 Wednesday, December 17th at 2:53PM EST (link)

surprise surprise. He appeared on 27% of Time’s covers this year. Add in having his name mentioned that jumps to 48%. Courtesy of the Weekly Standard Blog.

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

He did win

JakePrime Wednesday, December 17th at 3:03PM EST (link)

I don’t think anyone would dispute that he should be person of the year, whatever that may entail.

Good post Mr. Painter

He'd have been POTY if McCain had won the election.

mbecker908 Wednesday, December 17th at 3:10PM EST (link)

nt

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

You know, he might have

Neil Stevens Wednesday, December 17th at 7:18PM EST (link)

And that would have been telling.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

I’d rather everyone get along, but I’ll settle for everyone united in hating me for being a jerky moderator.

 
 

If it's awarded on the basis of achievement, then George Soros wins instead of Obama. n/t

janis Wednesday, December 17th at 3:13PM EST (link)

BAM!

E Pluribus Unum Wednesday, December 17th at 7:54PM EST (link)

It’s one thing to say you bought a country, like say Belize, or Slovakia, or even Argentina. But it is quite an accomplishment when you have bought the greatest nation the world has ever seen, and turned it into your dog’s chew toy.

Carthago delenda est
Do your conservative t-shirt Christmas shopping at EPU Gear. Save the conservative muse, save the world.

Breaking...General Mills in the Tank for POTY....

$peciallist Wednesday, December 17th at 8:00PM EST (link)
 
 
 
 

She remains enough of an issue for them

Achance Wednesday, December 17th at 2:53PM EST (link)

that there is a whole herd of Outside bloggers camped out on both the Juneau Empire and Anchorage Daily News’ sites taking advantage of any opportunity to trash her. The talking points are so consistent that it is clearly some sort of orchestrated effort. Theres an article in both papers today about a Commission’s recommendation to increase the Governor, Commissioners, and Legislator’s salaries. Normally it might get a couple dozen comments; it has a couple dozen pages of comments, most of them from people who don’t live here and all using it as a basis for criticizing Palin.

In Vino Veritas

Gov. Palin needs to remain aware of the Drive-by jackals...

RedWhite_and_Truth Thursday, December 18th at 10:32AM EST (link)

…which I am sure she is. She is very savvy, and now that she is unshackled from Loose-cannon McShame, she’ll be able to spar, thrust and parry without reservation. I pity the MSM moose that gets caught in her crosshairs.

I have to believe that B. Hussein has a “Bruce Almighty” filing cabinet-sized compartment in his brain filled with the threat of a Sarah Palin candidacy.

Coersion, after all, merely captures man. Freedom captivates him.
– Ronald Reagan

“Anyone that wants the presidency so much that he’ll spend two years organizing and campaigning for it is not to be trusted with the office.”
—David Broder

 
 

obiden press secretary may of played a part?

bobojake Wednesday, December 17th at 2:57PM EST (link)

just a simple question? I’ll take Sarah any day over the a ah a ah ah ah a give me my teleprompter.

 

Great post Josh...thanks for all the links..

Attack Mode Wednesday, December 17th at 3:01PM EST (link)

I am sure they will prove useful in the future.

“Land of the Free and Home of da Whopper” Peter Griffin…Family Guy

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

Steel-Belted Radial Right Winger

“I’ll create 5 million jobs from out of unicorn farts and pixie dust” Justatron paraphrasing Obamessiah…yes I love it that much.

 

It's a great post and I have

kowalski Wednesday, December 17th at 4:36PM EST (link)

I have a couple of sentences:

Nobody should have been fooled by Obama’s pledge not to finance his campaign the way he did. That was the biggest pile of steaming horse turd that I had heard in my life, particularly given the buzz he was creating in the early, early days of the campaign among private donors. I don’t know what was going through John McCain’s head when he decided he believed Obama would go the public-financing route, but just on the face of it, it was laughable.

Obama generated more buzz and more money from the buzz than any other candidate in the history of the world, and that was predictable. McCain should have realized what he was up against.

But the real problem is that McCain wasn’t bamboozled: he was a fizzle. Even if he had switched gears and privately financed his campaign, it wouldn’t have helped: he’s John McCain. In a contest with Barack Obama, and particularly given his weaknesses in the Republican Party, McCain had little choice BUT to hope Obama would take public financing, because McCain himself could never have raised the money privately.

I didn’t give a dime to the McCain campaign and I wouldn’t give John McCain a dime if he runs again: he’s not a Republican. He’s not a Conservative, and he’s certainly not a Republican Conservative. He’s a squish, and always was Playboy John McCain.

That’s why he had to take public financing: he knew that nobody would finance him privately.

Secondly, McCain was (sorry Adam C.) deranged if he ever believed that the media would treat him or his VP choice nicely after Barack got the nod. He found out the hard way that he’s one of those people who are invited to the media party as a kind of curiosity guest, not one of the players who gets to sit in the VIP room. He was treated well by the media for a while when they were flirting with him, like the ugly guest at the party that everyone tries to make nice with, until about 12:30 in the morning, when everyone is partnering up — and as far as the media was concerned, baby, this was Barack Obama’s party.

My takeaway from this election is this: Republicans cannot pitch squishes against charismatic supermen. And they should never be fooled again about how much money the Democrats have and are willing to spend. Finally, they should absolutely never rely on being “friendly” with the media as a barometer of whether or not they are viable candidates. They’re going to be treated as the enemy no matter what, particularly when the Donks are hungry.

Kowalski

kowalski Wednesday, December 17th at 4:44PM EST (link)

If this sounds like the Presidential election in this country should remind you of your time in High School, that’s deliberate:

It should. Presidential politics in this country at the level of the popular vote is something that can be understood by any 11th grader, very pointedly. It is like nothing but high school in the final analysis, and really anyone who wants to run a successful campaign should find some smart Juniors and Seniors and have them run the show for $8.50 an hour instead of the millions of dollars in consultant fees that were paid during this election cycle.

My teenage neighbor could have told everyone that McCain was lame and Barack was hot and what the outcome would be. It’s just that simple.

Fire the consultants, hire teenagers.

 

Will you walk into my parlour, said the spider

RetNAV Wednesday, December 17th at 5:27PM EST (link)

Secondly, McCain was (sorry Adam C.) deranged if he ever believed that the media would treat him or his VP choice nicely after Barack got the nod. He found out the hard way that he’s one of those people who are invited to the media party as a kind of curiosity guest, not one of the players who gets to sit in the VIP room.

Will you walk into my parlour?” said the Spider to the Fly,
‘Tis the prettiest little parlour that ever you did spy;
The way into my parlour is up a winding stair,
And I’ve a many curious things to shew when you are there.”
Oh no, no,” said the little Fly, “to ask me is in vain,
For who goes up your winding stair can ne’er come down again.”

Except John McCain took the trip up the winding stair.

I never want to hear again of bipartisanship. The only time I want a Republican “reaching across the aisle” is to smack a liberal.

5 - exactly

kowalski Wednesday, December 17th at 5:47PM EST (link)

Being led down the primrose path is no way to run a Presidential campaign, particularly against a stronger opponent. McCain got schmucked, basically.

Let’s not let it happen again: we lost this time, but we can do a lot better than this. The first rule is never to take Democrats at their word, because their own ethics don’t admit anything as important as integrity. You have to expect that they’re just going to lie through their teeth, and frankly Bob Shrum told people that about 3 years ago.

When the Democrats were really in the pits, I think it became the official strategy to just lie their way back to power. It’s very difficult to combat that, but the important thing is not to buy into it.

 
 

When it came to McCain, *WE* were bamboozled.

Martin Knight Thursday, December 18th at 10:04AM EST (link)

We listened to the talking heads tell us over and over again that the voting public valued “Bipartisanship” and that McCain was the best we had to offer because of his record of sabotaging his own party on cue “Bipartisanship”.

And we fell for it.

One thing everyone agrees with is that President Bush’s basement level approval ratings had a lot to do with McCain (and many other Republicans’) losses … but how many people ever note just how much McCain and his “moderate” groupies had to do with it?

Don’t get me wrong - George W. Bush’s myriad of failures as a communicator (and thus as a leader and rallying point for his party) is primarily responsible for our current predicament. He refused to defend his decisions, his people and own honor. He refused to market and defend his own policies.

But let’s not forget the key roles McCain and the “moderate” contingent he commands in Congress played in undermining the President over the past eight years.

Over and over again, McCain and his entourage happily provided “Bipartisan” cover to Democrats, lending strength and credibility to Democratic allegations and actions against the President just to get an invite to sit with Blitzer, Stephanopoulos, Russert, etc. on Sunday morning.

All I can say is; never again.

To Be Honest

baseketball Thursday, December 18th at 10:13AM EST (link)

I’m not convinced that anyone else in the Republican field would have done any better than McCain. It was TPS for the Democrats this year, I think Huckabee, Romney, Thompson, and especially Giuliani would have gotten creamed as well. Thompson would have let Conservatives go down with dignity in this election, but on the plus side, the fact that it was McCain who was running means that in this election liberalism didn’t win, and conservativism didn’t lose among the electorate.

Well, *I* am very convinced a non-Bipartisan could have done better than McCain.

Martin Knight Thursday, December 18th at 11:42AM EST (link)

I’m not saying they would have won, but a ticket comprised of Mitt Romney and Peter Pace (I advocated this in January by the way) would have made this a real nail-biter right down to the bitter end.

This here’s my argument for it. To put it more succintly, I seriously doubt they would have gotten “creamed.”

Anybody who would have stood up against the bailout

zuiko Thursday, December 18th at 12:17PM EST (link)

Would have probably done better than McCain. I doubt Romney would’ve gone that way, though. He seemed equally willing to adopt less-than-conservative positions as McCain was during the primaries (MI comes to mind).

When W and McCain came out and pushed hard for the $850bln, it was all over. That was the end of the campaign. McCain might as well have made his concession speech right there.

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman

The McCain Campaign ended the day he pulled the

Achance Thursday, December 18th at 12:31PM EST (link)

stupid stunt with suspending his campaign and then did nothing meaningful or even visible. A Republican victory was never likely but remained possible with the bump that he got from the Convention and Palin. But, he simply blew it all over the bailout. If he’d opposed it, even to the point of demogoguery, he might well have ridden that to the Presidency.

In Vino Veritas

 

Romney is not perfect (far from it), but he got a bad rap on the MI thing.

Martin Knight Thursday, December 18th at 12:42PM EST (link)

He specifically came out against a bailout of the auto-industry and actually advocated something much like what Bob Corker is doing right now … but of course, because it was Romney - the secret partial birth abortionist in a gay polygamous marriage - far too many people on our side (much to the delight of the editors of the Boston Globe) immediately shrieked “Flip-Flop!!!” and lost their heads.

As for McCain, well, he is not exactly known for going against the grain of Beltway conventional wisdom (which is decidedly liberal in orientation), so when all the talking heads were saying it was absolutely necessary, and that it would take “Bipartisanship” to get it through, McCain could not help but leap in and take a sledge hammer to his own chances.

 
 
 
 

I would disagree that WE were bamboozled....

JadedByPolitics Thursday, December 18th at 10:14AM EST (link)

WE knew who he was WE were disgusted that he was the R choice BUT WE were told to sit down and shut up and accept our fates as this what the people DECIDED….not mentioning the how of the decision. WE had Adam C and SteveLA and other McCain accolytes telling US how this man would WIN with I’s and all was well! They in turn got the full support of the Directors because this is a Republican/Conservative site and to continue to be part of this site WE had to succumb and save our disgust and anger with McCain for another site TMR.

I hope that WE have learned a lesson and are true to the ideals of the Republican/Conservative brand and NEVER again allow interlopers, RINO’s, SQUISHES to dictate to US how to be what we already are!

TO THINE OWNSELF BE TRUE!

Whoever has his enemy at his mercy &
does not destroy him is his own enemy

WE = Republican Primary voters.

Martin Knight Thursday, December 18th at 11:17AM EST (link)

‘Cause I know I wasn’t fooled.

I got you

E Pluribus Unum Thursday, December 18th at 11:21AM EST (link)

the collective “we” that in large part did not include RedState regulars (with a few notable exceptions).

Carthago delenda est
Do your conservative t-shirt Christmas shopping at EPU Gear. Save the conservative muse, save the world.

 
 
 

I'm with Jaded here

E Pluribus Unum Thursday, December 18th at 10:41AM EST (link)

I got myself in trouble here at RS, as did alot of other Fredheads, by being so stridently anti-McCain, long, LONG after he had the nomination sewn up. My opposition to him was EXACTLY along the lines you speak of now .

So I will accept no charge that I was anything but EXACTLY RIGHT ABOUT MCCAIN, from day 1, as were all the Fredhead bunch. Caleb (absentee), are you reading this? Told ya! About 100 times!

Carthago delenda est
Do your conservative t-shirt Christmas shopping at EPU Gear. Save the conservative muse, save the world.

 

What else would "We" have done?

Achance Thursday, December 18th at 11:09AM EST (link)

Assuming all of “us” weren’t going to vote for a Democrat under any circumstance, our choice was McCain or throw away our vote. I’ve always detested the arrogant, supercillious SOB, but I sure wasn’t going to vote for THEIR arrogant, supercillious SOB. At least our staying in the game forced him to abandon his “bipartisanship” in his choice of running mate.

Many here are much greater fans of Gov. Palin than I am, but she is at least an articulation of nominally conservative views with real prominence in the Republican Party. Left to his own devices, McCain would have chose a liberal Republican or even a Democrat as his running mate and there wouldn’t have been even the slightest representation of a conservative point of view.

In Vino Veritas

True ... [n/t]

Martin Knight Thursday, December 18th at 11:22AM EST (link)
 
 
 

And Palin deserves none of the blame

kowalski Wednesday, December 17th at 5:25PM EST (link)

Sarah Palin deserves none of the blame for the loss. In my reckoning she brought the ticket at least 5 more percentage points than they would have had if McCain had chosen anyone else.

The entire problem was that her nomination was a last-minute decision and really these things take six months to a year to prepare for adequately. Barack Obama has had at least four years of careful grooming, and Joe Biden — well, Joe Biden is Mr. Meet the Press. The McCain campaign’s last-minute decisionmaking, from Sarah Palin’s botched roll-out to Joe the Plumber, should tell people how desparate they really were internally, and that’s someplace we should never go again as a party.

I also think that McCain himself was delusional about his real chances among Conservatives in the Republican Party. My father could not stand McCain a year ago, two years ago, three years ago, four years ago, and he voted for him on election day under duress. When I told him McCain was going to be the Republican nominee he would flip me the bird. He’d do that over breakfast, while we were drinking coffee together, and the look on his face reminded me of the Joker — from the original Batman. I can’t think of any real Conservative who would have voted for him.

Add that to the problems Republicans had in this cycle and it was an easy outcome to predict.

Let’s rebuild from here, we have no place to go but up, folks.

I do think, however

kowalski Wednesday, December 17th at 5:51PM EST (link)

I do think that Palin really didn’t understand the cynicism of professional politics in America. I think she expected people to treat her fairly, but she’s battle-hardened now.

Unexpected

bc3 Wednesday, December 17th at 11:38PM EST (link)

I think the viciousness with with the media attacked Sarah Palin shocked most of us. I expected the media to be unfair … but not that unfair.

bc3

 

I dunno, I didn't hear any criticism of her

Achance Thursday, December 18th at 11:17AM EST (link)

from the national press that I hadn’t already heard here. Granted, the ADN and Juneau Empire wouldn’t run the blogger stories about Trig and the rumors about Bristol, but the national media criticisms and attacks on Palin were the same as the Lefties had been making against her here. ‘Course, then she fueled the fire with less than stellar performances in the two interviews and clearly there was no love between her and her staff and McCain’s staff, maybe even McCain himself.

In Vino Veritas

 
 
 

Just Cut State Budget

bc3 Wednesday, December 17th at 11:36PM EST (link)

In recent news, Gov, Palin’s budget includes a 7% budget cut as oil revenues are expected to drop. Only an “unqualified, redneck bimbo” would be dumb enough to cut spending in the face of an expected revenue decline.

Gov. Palin also is rejecting a $25k salary increase (from $125k to $150k) and has vowed that if she can’t refuse the increase, she will donate it to charity, where it can be used to help peopls.

She is the REAL DEAL.

bc3

We'll see what that budget looks like in May.

Achance Thursday, December 18th at 12:15PM EST (link)

Under our law, the Governor proposes a budget to the Legislature, which may or may not do what the Gov wants. Everything is about the revenue forcast and the revenue forcast is a black art based on oil price projections for the next year. The AK Dept. of Revenue has a whole economics unit and all their price stuff is online if you’re into that sort of thing. DOR makes a fall and spring projection and publishes a high, middle, and low case. Budgets are based on the middle case, but there’s a lot of wiggle room. The fall forcast is for average $71/bbl. oil, almost twice what the current price of ANS is. If oil doesn’t average $71/bbl. or if there should be a production interruption, there is potential for a significant deficit. Alaska has plenty of money in various reserves other than the Permanent Fund. Since the PF requires a vote of the People, it is considered untouchable. The problem with the major reserve, the Constitutional Budget Reserve, is that it requires a 3/4 vote of both bodies. Consequently, the majority has to “buy” votes from the minority to get into the CBR. Since Alaska was rolling in money last year, the seven percent cut is inconsequential.

In her two previous sessions, Gov. Palin has in many ways gotten along better with the Democrat minority than with the Republican majority in the House (The Senate was and remains a coalition). I don’t think there’s going to be much of that bipartisanship stuff this year; the Democrats aren’t going to help her do anything that might make her look good. A political rule I always tried to live by was that one didn’t go around peeing in wells that one might some day have to drink from. Well, there’s some pee’d in wells over on the Republican side of the aisle and Gov. Palin is going to have to drink.

I suspect that this budget will be the Legislature’s budget, not the Governor’s, that passing it will be the last thing they do before they go home, and that there will be blood on the floors of the Capitol. Gonna be an interesting Session!

In Vino Veritas

 
 

What this writer doesn't get:

baseketball Thursday, December 18th at 10:23AM EST (link)

“Everything about Palin seemed personal: an energy policy reduced to “Drill, baby, drill,” an economic policy embodied by Joe the Plumber. We knew too much about her clothes and her kids and her hunting habits and far too little about her priorities and principles.”

Look, Palin was supposed to be style over substance in this campaign. That’s the VP candidate’s job! They are supposed to win votes for the top of the ticket. You’d think the writer for TIME would understand that a VPs political stances, by necessity, take a backseat to the top of the ticket during a campaign.

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.